iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Bernanke Warns Congress Not To Cut Spending, Cautions About 'Fragile' Recovery

First Posted: 06/09/10 03:17 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 05:45 PM ET

Bernanke

While the conventional wisdom in Washington appears to focus largely on the need to lower the federal government's budget deficit, rather than on reducing the nation's nearly 10 percent unemployment rate, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke sent a message Wednesday to lawmakers: Now's not the time.

"Right now I don't think is the time -- this very moment is not the time -- to radically reduce our spending or raise our taxes because the economy is still in recovery mode and needs that support," Bernanke testified before the House Budget Committee.

Bernanke referred to the nascent economic recovery as "still pretty fragile" and cautioned that the economy "may need more assistance."

Though the nation's output is growing, jobs are still scarce; nearly eight million jobs have been lost as a result of the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression. Since January the private sector has created about 480,000 jobs, Labor Department data show. At that rate, the economy won't return to its pre-recession employment level of about 115.6 million jobs until about 2016.

The lack of jobs accompanying the ascent out of the "Great Recession" has led economists and commentators such as regional Federal Reserve Bank presidents to term this a "jobless recovery." Others, while not making that claim outright, worry that's what the recovery will end up being unless current stimulative measures -- such as the Fed's policy of a near-zero main interest rate -- continue.

The Fed is "doing its part," Bernanke said of the central bank's "supportive monetary policy." The main interest rate stood at 0.20 percent in May, Fed data show.

The nation's central banker added that government's fiscal policy, like the nearly $800 billion stimulus bill passed last year, "is helping" and that it's "needed."

Congressional Republicans have focused on reducing the federal government's budget deficit rather than on taxpayer-financed job creation efforts; Democrats have begun to follow.

Bernanke, however, pushed back against House Republicans' claims that the stimulus, pushed by the Obama administration, didn't bolster the economy. He said it "did increase growth" and "add to job creation."

But the economy's slow recovery has been a "disappointment," Bernanke said. He added that there wouldn't be a "V-shaped recovery," a term to describe a rapid economic expansion following a downturn.

Despite the slow recovery and potential need for additional stimulus, though, Bernanke warned Congress to develop a credible plan to deal with the government's budget deficits.

Obama's 2011 budget forecasts a $1.6 trillion hole, or about 10.6 percent of the nation's total output, a post-World War II high.

Bernanke said ongoing deficits of that size aren't sustainable, and called on Congress to create a plan in the "medium term" to bring deficits to a more manageable level. Economists say deficits of about 3 percent of total GDP are sustainable.

The plan, he said, needs to have the confidence of the markets. If it has that, "I think we'll be okay," Bernanke said. But if investors in U.S. debt don't find the plan "plausible," the nation faces a risk of a "potential loss of confidence" by investors.

A loss of confidence could entail investors demanding higher rates of return in order to buy Treasuries, which would drive up the government's borrowing costs. Funds for government programs would instead be diverted to bondholders.

Investors are demanding about 3.3 percent interest from the U.S. government in order to buy 10-year Treasury bonds, a level near historic lows. Ten years ago, investors demanded double that rate.

But it's important to note that Bernanke didn't say Congress needs to cut spending now; he simply said Congress needs to begin developing a plan in the "medium term" to bring down the government's budget deficit. In response to a question about whether Congress should focus on job creation (which would entail more spending) or reducing the deficit, Bernanke said it needs to do both.

Congress needs to "show" that it's "serious" about the deficit, he said.

Meanwhile, the muscular jobs bill that progressive groups, unions, and labor economists clamor for has yet to materialize.

The private sector created 20,000 jobs last month. Nearly 15 million unemployed workers continue to look for work.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
While the conventional wisdom in Washington appears to focus largely on the need to lower the federal government's budget deficit, rather than on reducing the nation's nearly 10 percent unemployment r...
While the conventional wisdom in Washington appears to focus largely on the need to lower the federal government's budget deficit, rather than on reducing the nation's nearly 10 percent unemployment r...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,847
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (57 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chabuka
02:12 PM on 06/14/2010
What a crock...! The Banks are the only ones "recovering" nicely...thanks to Bernanke, Geithner, Dodd, etc.(They will all get positions with the private sector as Corporate lobbyists and that pays much better than "public service" positions do, any way!)...main street is sliding into deeper recession....and Congress is to stupid (and greedy) to figure out main street is where their taxpayer-paid "budget" comes from, (or they prefer to ignore the fact.. big money is so shiny and new looking)...the big international companies that the FED, the Treasury (and most of Congress) DEEP bow too ..hide their money, profits and business deals..dodging taxes and laughing all the way...who will pay for the bankers and Corporations free ride on the gravy train...if they continue to kill off and starve the middle class (the workers and their union representation).......
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:23 AM on 06/13/2010
Keep the stimulus going only by having the wealthiest pay for it with increase in their rates and closing their loopholes, and for goodness sake, have the IRS enforce existing law with the hedge fund managers and ther 2B+ incomes- if you do it full time, it's ALL earned!
Immediately repeal both of Bush's tax cuts, and immediately reinstate the estate tax, and INDEX IT
10:17 AM on 06/12/2010
Hello Politicos -- ARE YOU LISTENING? Instead of giving stimulus to the Corporations and Banks, give it to the businesses and people who need it in AMERICA for AMERICA (UI and Cobra extensions, keeping good jobs here, tax breaks for SMALL BUSINESS to create new jobs, etc. etc.)
12:32 AM on 06/12/2010
Print money and spending money on ridiculous programs will not help. An industrial strategy that will create well paying jobs is critical. Without it, we are doomed. Bernancke continues to promote speculation and is just kicking the can down the road.
madame48
NO..it's a gop Cookbook !Tempus edax,homo edacior
12:10 PM on 06/11/2010
he makes the "don't cut now" because he is an expert on the depression and knows that when FDR listened to the GOP and made cuts...Americans paid the price with a slow down of progress out of the depression. and as for the trolls who said FDR didn't help the depression, my 94 year old uncle had a few choice words, " I was there and I remember..willful ignorance is dangerous"
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Y3rMawm
veni, vidi, bibi.
04:37 PM on 06/11/2010
Your uncle is an expert just because he was there. Many people in the present day, and still don't have a clue about what is going on right in front of them...even the so-called-experts.

..and no...FDR did not end the depression. Destruction of Europe and Asia did. We destroyed the competition, while our industrial capacity remained intact. Does not bode well, does it?
07:57 PM on 06/11/2010
Anyone who speaks against FDR is a troll? That's interesting. Regarding your uncle,l I must say it is always impressive when someone lives till 94, especially an economist from the depression era.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Mikeeee
Did you forgive god today?
10:22 AM on 06/11/2010
Shouldn't he be taking that message to the banks?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:24 AM on 06/13/2010
he carries water for the bankers
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
defaultstrategy
09:42 AM on 06/11/2010
Why are we still listening to this man?
"A popular struggle will begin. And when it does, we'll at least have a fighting chance to recapture our democratic souls."
The Patriot's Guide to Strategic Default
www.mystrategichomedefault.com
People have gotten wise to the corporate control of America. Jobs outsourced abroad: check. Home prices artificially inflated due to deregulation: check. Bailout of huge, menacing banks: check. Failure of Obama plan to bring any real incentives for the banks to modify loans: check. Strategic Defaulters know they won't qualify for FHA loans for years anyway...they're saving up for things that make sense to buy. Like food, education, small business investments...not some crappy payments to a bank.
07:39 AM on 06/11/2010
-If I owe you some dollars, and if I have a printing press that can make as many dollar notes as I please,

-If I wish, I can just print more dollar notes and give them to you.

-I will have repaid you in full,

-But I will have given you worthless paper.

Hence the concept of 'default by stealth'.

I'm alarmed because I believe that each time the Fed prints paper, they devalue the Dollar more and more.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Mikeeee
Did you forgive god today?
10:24 AM on 06/11/2010
You're just now coming to that understanding? Amazing.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:31 AM on 06/13/2010
we don't have a gold standard, which is a good thing, as that has been the method of tyrants from long before the Roman Empire. Therefore we have a fiat currency-which is a good thing, both the Roman and British Empires were built on fiat currency. We have handed over the issuance of money tied to debt to private bankers, who also get to control it's supply, set interest rates, and fractional lending policies, these are bad things to give over, as they have all the power now. Who controls your money supply, it's interest rate and the amount in circulation has the power to paralyze commerce and beggar the people, which they have done rather handily.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Y3rMawm
veni, vidi, bibi.
04:39 PM on 06/11/2010
It's not quite that simple, but you are on the right track.

"Whenever destroyers appear among men, they start by destroying money."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:26 AM on 06/13/2010
got the dvd from secretofoz.com?
07:33 AM on 06/11/2010
It's an ironic and perverse thing isn't it, that they say they want us to keep spending on the basis that if we don't keep spending... we'll run out of money.
06:41 PM on 06/10/2010
if the bank produces their ownership of your house,

walk away from your mortgage, with everything you can take with you.
06:40 PM on 06/10/2010
hire the worst shark in town, and

take the bankers to the court and demand proof that they own your house.

you got nothing to lose and everything to gain!
01:24 PM on 06/10/2010
I'd definitely say the economy is fragile when the government inflates job figures.

Elizabeth Hasselhoff is on my ditzy list 99.9% of the time, but yesterday she made sense when she railed against the government saying there was job creation when a person was hired for two weeks, fired and then hired again. I mean, in who's book is that in anyway considered two jobs? Personally, I think the job has to last at least one year before it is considered a job.
madame48
NO..it's a gop Cookbook !Tempus edax,homo edacior
12:12 PM on 06/11/2010
job numbers have been fuzzy numbers for 30 years
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:32 AM on 06/13/2010
Reagan started that, and Bush admin detached them from all reasonable benchmarks
photo
jrutle
War is not working.
11:11 PM on 06/26/2010
Bureau of Labor Statistics measurement of unemployment and the consumer price index have been a political football since Reagan's time. They understate both unemployment and inflation.
01:23 PM on 06/10/2010
Can anyone tell me where Bernanke and Treasury Secretary find money so that the unemployed also find money? The unemployed want jobs and the Gulf coast people who recently lost jobs and businesses for long time to come, want jobs too.Probably the gulf coast people can take a few hits with hurricanes rather than the mess created by BP.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:33 AM on 06/13/2010
The secretofoz.com has a wonderful idea for that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
T4
Entreprenuer and financial consultant
10:33 AM on 06/10/2010
Bernake is an Obama appointed criminal who has stolen the future of your children and their children by creating this monster of over $2 trillion in bank giveaways that has collapsed the economy. Along Tim G they are Obama's posse in the concerted effort to wipe out the gains of middle clss int his country by creating greater poverty and increasing the wealth of the rich in fewer hands.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jcaunter
Profile: schizoid, INTJ
10:59 AM on 06/10/2010
Actually just to be clear, Obama and Bernanke together have gifted the Wall Street banks with over 14 trillion dollars.

http://www.franconomics.com/fourteen-trillion-dollar-value-drain-II.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
getsit
good morning, I'm here
01:15 PM on 06/10/2010
That may be true, but he's also right about spending. If the jobs are not in the private sector it is better to put people to work with government money than for them to be unemployed. This money WILL come back eventually and more quickly if we spend it appropriately. When there are downs there will always be an up. The more we spend on jobs and stimulus now the sooner the economy will improve and money will be repaid in taxes. Remember, the unemployed do not pay taxes and spend little so the local economies are hurt which in turn hurt the state and government economies. Every person who is not working or is laid off hurts the economy a little bit more. We need to put people to work.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Mikeeee
Did you forgive god today?
10:27 AM on 06/11/2010
IF you truly believe the words in your comment are true and accurate, then your name is wrong, because you don't.
photo
Erdgeist
per omnia extrema
10:24 AM on 06/10/2010
Take a few deep breaths and think about this. What if we didn't have the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts for the wealthy giving them effectively 1.4 trillion bucks? And what if the bipartisan Medicare prescription drug program didn't exist (boy that little baby cost some dough). And what if the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan ended. We wouldn't be in this pickle.

But we can't dream anymore (well, Congress can). We have to wake up to a new reality. We can't tax the rich. We can't cutback on the Medicare prescription drug plan which is a giveaway to big Pharma. As for the wars, WE NEED THEM. Our troops would feel unmanned without war -- how would they define their manhood?

The only course of action left to us is to do something totally irrational. And I trust that we will. Heck we did it during the Hoover Administration which oversaw a level of prosperity unequaled in U.S. history, then blew it, ushering in the Great Depression.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
getsit
good morning, I'm here
01:09 PM on 06/10/2010
The Medicare prescription drug program didn't have to be a financial givaway to insurance companies. We did not have to deal with insurance companies at all and that includes the Advantage programs. Just add the precription program to Medicare and negotiate with the drug companies. The subsidies to insurance are what cost so much. And the donut hole really hurt the lower middle class seniors. But this was a "compromise" with the Republicans who owned the Congress. So the insurance corporations got what they wanted.

But I agree about the tax cuts. It was insane to cut taxes for the rich when we were at war. It's the 2 wars we have been fighting for nearly 10 years that is costing us and putting us in this hole. We bail out the rich, we bail out the banks, we continue the wars but we can't bailout the poor and middleclass? But who said life was fair?

Bernanke is right. If the jobs are not in the private sector then the governments need to provide money for jobs, unemployment, and "welfare". People have to remember that this money goes right back into the local economies as a stimulus. Then taxes are paid (income, sales, and other taxes) and the money comes back full circle. It is NOT A WASTE. When people are working the rich get richer so I don't know why the right objects.
07:36 AM on 06/11/2010
I tend to agree and:

History repeats. First there was the "Great War", But later we called it the "First World War", because it happened again. Now we know these two wars as World War 1 and 2.

First came the "Great Depression"

Pretty soon we will be calling the Great Depression "World Depression 1"

That's because we are on the cusp of "World Depression 2"

"World Depression 2".