More

Gulf Oil Spill: Democrats Try To Seize Initiative

Gulf Oil Spill Democrats

H. JOSEF HEBERT   06/ 9/10 06:51 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — The latest announcement on how much oil is being captured from the gushing BP oil well raised additional doubts Wednesday about the validity of government estimates on how much crude actually has been spewing into Gulf waters.

Coast Guard Adm. Thad Allen, who is in charge of the spill response effort, said that BP was now capturing 630,000 gallons a day and that the amount could nearly double by next week to roughly 1.17 million gallons. But the government's estimate of the total oil leaking has been 500,000 to 1 million gallons every day.

Allen said he expects a fresh analysis of the flow rate to produce more accurate estimates on how much oil is being released.

The inability to pin down how much oil is gushing from the BP well a mile beneath the water's surface has stymied government officials almost from the day of the accident April 20.

"I'm not going to declare victory on anything until I have absolute numbers," said Allen on Wednesday.

At a Senate hearing, meanwhile, Interior Department officials – like Allen – expressed confidence that more precise numbers on the flow rate will be available from a special task force of scientists, which is nearing completion of a review of earlier flow data and has been provided new high-resolution video.

"We expect to have a much better estimate (of oil flow) very soon," Deputy Interior Secretary David Hayes told senators at a hearing by the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee.

The task force earlier estimated that 500,000 to 1 million gallons a day are flowing from the broken wellhead, but Hayes said those numbers assume "a lot of uncertainty." Some independent scientists long have said the flow is almost certain to be higher.

Meanwhile, Allen acknowledged that the amount of oil now being captured is close to exceeding the capacity of the processing ship that is on site. But he said a second vessel, where oil can be both stored and flared, is expected to be available soon. And an even larger vessel from the North Sea also is heading to the oil spill site.

With oil expecting to gush for another two months, Allen said he wants a long-term containment strategy from BP "with built in redundancies" that would taken into account new risks posed by the upcoming hurricane season.

He said a 1,000-foot-long vessel being brought in from the North Sea is similar to a production platform that can "lock into position" of the water surface and provide greater stability as it processes oil flowing from the damaged wellhead.

Allen also noted that he and other officials are meeting with BP later Wednesday to discuss problems with the handling of damage claims related to the April 20 accident.

He said claims brought by individuals for loss of business as a result of oil contamination "sometimes (is) hard to get a handle on" but that he will discuss the issue with BP officials to try to speed up the process.

President Barack Obama, who has been to Louisiana three times since the oil rig explosion, planned a two-day trip to the region early next week. Obama spokesman Robert Gibbs said the president is expected to make stops in Gulfport, Miss.; Theodore and Orange Beach, Ala.; and Pensacola, Fla.

Some senators, meanwhile, expressed concern over the impact the response to the spill will have on oil development, particularly the six-month moratorium the Obama administration has imposed on deep-water drilling.

Testifying before the Senate energy panel, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, when pressed by Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La., promised to ask BP to compensate energy companies for losses if they have to lay off workers or suffer economically because of the moratorium.

"BP is responsible for all the damages that flow from the oil spill," said Salazar, adding that the job losses and economic harm from the pause on deep-water drilling "are some of the consequences from the oil spill."

Salazar, however, stood firm on the six-month drilling moratorium, along with new requirements for shallow-water oil drilling. The moratorium affects 33 deep-water drilling rigs, but it does not halt oil production from existing production wells.

Landrieu said a halt in these drilling activities for six months will "wreak economic havoc on the region." She said as many as 330,000 jobs could be affected in Louisiana alone and cited complaints she has received from a number of companies that support the drilling on shore and on the rigs themselves.

Salazar said the administration wants to make sure that drilling can be done in a way "that is protective of the people and the Gulf region." He said the drilling pause will be in place "until we can have a sense of safety, until we have a sense that this (kind of spill) can never happen again."

At another hearing, the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee took testimony on legislation that would raise the federal oil spill liability cap from $75 million to $10 billion.

Kenneth Murchison, a law professor at Louisiana State University, told the lawmakers there are "economic and more arguments" for raising the cap. Holding back his emotions, Murchison, born in Louisiana with deep roots in the state, said he is "dismayed by the horrific damages" done by the oil spill.

Opponents of the cap increase argued that the federal limit does not affect unlimited liability under state law, but raising it to $10 billion would unfairly impact smaller oil companies.

At a separate House hearing, Robert Hartwig, president of the Insurance Information Institute, said oil companies wouldn't be able to get insurance to cover $10 billion in potential liability.

But Michael Greenstone, a Massachusetts Institute of Technology economics professor, said the current $75 million cap encourages oil companies to take shortcuts at the risk of safety.

"Firms and people behave differently when they are protected from the consequences of their action," said Greenstone.

___

Associated Press writer Joan Lowy contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

WASHINGTON — The latest announcement on how much oil is being captured from the gushing BP oil well raised additional doubts Wednesday about the validity of government estimates on how much crud...
WASHINGTON — The latest announcement on how much oil is being captured from the gushing BP oil well raised additional doubts Wednesday about the validity of government estimates on how much crud...
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 44
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:26 AM on 06/10/2010
Dems have a tiger by the tail...now what?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Legs2
11:43 PM on 06/09/2010
One of the biggest concerns across America even before this happened was the creation of jobs and unemployment. This 6 month moratorium will do nothing but exacerbate that reality. 100,000's of jobs are on the line. I just read an article by John Engler who is the CEO of the National Association of Manufactures entitled "Economy must be a priority even in times of environmental disaster". Google that.
I worked in conservation for 12 years and raised millions for The Nature Cionservancy", but I am a realist. What will happen in the ensuing months is deepwater rigs will move from the Gulf for Brazil and China. These countries are begging for companies to explore their oil reserves. I have already read that one company has plans to pull 3 rigs out of the Gulf. I looked up one company. They have 13 rigs affected by the moratorium. They stand to lose $1, 166 billion if this moratorium stands for 180 days. The average contract on a rig for deep water is 5 years. Once these rig companies leave the Gulf they won't even think about returning until at least 2016 if ever. There won't be any replacement rigs because it takes several years for these large rigs. Again, jobs will be shipped out of America. Hello, $4 gasoline.
08:38 AM on 06/10/2010
I couldn't have said it better myself. To take this disaster and make it into an even bigger disaster by eliminating 300,000 (per Senator Landrieu) jobs based on the idiot Salazar's desire to keep his boot on somebody's throat would be utterly stupendous.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
doubleB
09:27 AM on 06/10/2010
300,000 jobs... I have a hard time believing that figure. How many jobs (not to mention lives) have been lost / will be lost because of the spill? And how many more rigs are set up like this one, with haphazard safety devices? I'd rather have a clean environment and leave our fishing / tourism industries in tact, than continue to contribute to climate change and ocean pollution so that we can leave Big Oil intact. Not to mention that a large percentage of the profits goes overseas to a foreign country.
12:04 PM on 06/10/2010
The rig did not have hap hazard safety decives, it had a BOP that had the hydrolic hoses hooked up wrong, it had a bad cement job and a clueless company man- all human errors not faulty equipment. 33 rigs with and average of 200 employees + 6600 direct jobs lost- when you throw in the multiplier effect of the companies that provide mud, bits, pipe, hleocoptors, boast, groceries- the impact is enourmous, the 300,000 number come from Senator landrieu. The panel of experts that made safety change recommendations did not recommend a moritorium- that is all Salazar and Obama.
photo
SirSlappy
My micro-bio is still empty.
09:52 PM on 06/09/2010
Rather late at this point to try that Dems. Noone believes you, and the person we believe least of all is "a55-kicking" Obama.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
acmeaviator
H@ll is other people.
03:12 PM on 06/09/2010
Looks like its mission accomplished by BP - keep buying time with bs until you can get the equipment in to make the well work. If the reserve this well tapped into is as big as some of the estimates say it is - BP can afford a few billion $$ to bring it in. Over its production like they will reap exponentially more money out of it than it will cost them.
09:45 AM on 06/10/2010
No way, this disaster will possibly bankrupt BP- this a good thing for them.
photo
NorCalSurfer
Sometimes, truth hurts.
02:03 PM on 06/09/2010
Can anything that BP says be taken as truthful and factual? first we had leakage of minimal amounts, according to BP, they are now forced into stating more along the lines with the truth since they will without doubt tell us they are capturing more oil than they had said was even leaking.

When and if, this main leak is capped with success, is BP going to head to the horizon without making sure 100% that there is no more leakage due to this man-made disaster?
04:42 PM on 06/14/2010
The relief wells will settle it for sure. As for the flow rate guesses, all that will come out in the wash. When they do a material balacne using proven engineering methods they will be able to estimate what the reservoir has produced by considering the reservoir pressure before the well blewout, the remaining pressure and the days it blew based on the size of the container.,
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
legalgirl
Just a legal girl on a mission for the truth
01:12 PM on 06/09/2010
"Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La., told Salazar the drilling moratorium threatens HUNDREDS of oil industry jobs and could result in "economic havoc" and be "devastating to our state and to the Gulf Coast." [Emphasis added.)

That's HUNDREDS of jobs, folks. Even a complete idiot can see that the loss of hundreds of jobs does not come close to equating to the damage being done, and potentially being done, by illegal or lax oil-well operation plans. The federal government can HIRE hundreds of laid-off oil workers to help with the process of inspecting oil-well operations, subjecting them to the most rigorous possible inspections, and cleaning up the mess.

Sen. Landrieu lacks imagination.
photo
Geegs
Question everything!
01:59 PM on 06/09/2010
I agree with your thoughts, however, the numbers of lost jobs will be in the THOUSANDS, not just HUNDREDS. In our little area alone, we are already into the hundreds of job losses. My husband and I were just talking about the economic impact and suspect that within 12 months, our community will likely look like a ghost town. Today's noon news report showed photos of our beaches, and they are nearly empty. With this being early June, our beaches are normally crowded to excess at this time of year. Those crowds usually continue until the start of school in the late summer and early fall.

I do not feel that any leaders at any level of government have yet to realize the long-term devastation to the gulf coast region that is likely to occur. If they really have a grasp of it, they certainly haven't been articulating and disseminating that information to the public.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
legalgirl
Just a legal girl on a mission for the truth
02:45 PM on 06/09/2010
I completely agree with you. I just read one of the Rolling Stone articles, and as with everything else, the "100s" figure is way too low. I live in L.A. (the other one) and this has been going on for close to a year for me, and somewhat longer for my boyfriend. I'm still waiting for the helicopter that was supposed to rain money. Instead, lawmakers stall on passing extended unemployment benefits, a system never designed to cope with extended, widespread unemployment. "These are the bad times" (from "Goodfellas'").
08:38 AM on 06/10/2010
That is hundreds of thousands...
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Coinyer101
King of Doobiestan
01:07 PM on 06/09/2010
*Testifying before the Senate energy panel, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar sought to reassure lawmakers that the Obama administration has pressed a "pause button, not the stop button," on all offshore oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico and elsewhere.

Salazar described the recent moratorium that President Barack Obama put in place for offshore deepwater drilling, along with new requirements for shallow water oil drilling. The moratorium affects 33 deep-water drilling rigs, but does not halt oil production from existing production wells*


'Yes we can, drill baby drill'...,?



Palin / Obama 2012
photo
Lorianne
ama vitam
05:50 PM on 06/09/2010
If we stop drilling on our shores all that does is push more drilling on other shores.
We'll still buy and consume oil from other places

Pushing offshore drilling to some other location on the globe isn't really solving the problem nor mitigating the environmental risks of drilling
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stopthemadness69
Real Americans care more about people than profits
11:50 AM on 06/09/2010
I would be willing to bet that there are more jobs in fishing, hotels and tourism in the gulf being affected due to the spill than there are new drilling jobs affected by the pause on drilling. The idea that oil jobs are some how more important and more worthy of protection than the fishing and tourism jobs is just plain lunacy. If the fishing and tourism industry in the gulf was donating the kind of money to politicians that the oil and gas industry is donating then we would see those politicians on the side of the fishing and tourism industry rather than on the side of the oil industry.
08:42 AM on 06/10/2010
That is possible but eliminating 300,000 jobs in the oil industry and supporting the oil industry makes no sense- it will result in even more job loss in the fishing, hotel and tourism business. We have a huge fire and Salazar and Obama's propose to make it worse by throwing gasoline on it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realpolitic
GOP is full of sound and fury, signifying nothing!
11:11 AM on 06/09/2010
Democrats just do not do spin as well as Republicans. Republicans are the party of drill, baby, drill and should be on the defensive after the worst spill in history. But, of course, per the usual script, the Democrats remain on the defensive.
11:05 AM on 06/09/2010
the smugness of the democrats is palpable... their incompetence is beginning to rival that of the republicans.
09:32 AM on 06/09/2010
This is the problem with politicians--worrying about "seizing the initiative" rather than focusing solely on plugging the leak.
maxfax
Taa - dah!
10:32 AM on 06/09/2010
That's BP's job, but it should be the job of the politicians assuring the safety of our country from criminality by these corporations.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
mrJJ
10:43 AM on 06/09/2010
They know the source of the problem... & they need to fix it yesterday

http://www.politicalcartoons.com/cartoon/d4448832-b373-44d0-abd9-dc0585bacb7f.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rougebaisers
08:11 AM on 06/09/2010
You just keep on looking out for your careers while the Gulf dies. Pitiful losers.
09:08 AM on 06/09/2010
Whose careers were the voters of LA lookinbg out for?
07:55 AM on 06/09/2010
'Senate Democrats on Tuesday proposed a fivefold increase in the tax that oil companies pay into a spill liability fund. The legislation would raise the tax on oil produced offshore from 8 cents a barrel to 41 cents a barrel – 7 cents higher than legislation that passed the House last month.'

This just means the consumer will pay more. How about end the pointless wars and use the money to clean up the gulf.
09:39 AM on 06/09/2010
I'm all for ending the wars but use the money for the whole country. Let BP and the Gulf take care of their problem.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stopthemadness69
Real Americans care more about people than profits
12:06 PM on 06/09/2010
The argument that we can't or shouldn't heavily regulate big industry or change the way we regulate big industry because they will just pass the cost on to the consumer, is really getting old and tired. It sounds like you are in favor of "we the people" paying to clean-up the gulf? The point is to make the oil company pay to clean up the oil that they spilled. If we end the wars (which I would love to see) and use that money to do the clean-up, aren't we just bailing out BP and sending the message that nothing has changed, go ahead and spill your oil because the american people will pay for the clean-up? They need to be held financially accountable and existing rules must actually be enforced and tougher rules added and if that means we all pay moreat the pump, then so be it, maybe it will make us all more willing and ready to find another way to power our country.
photo
Lorianne
ama vitam
05:51 PM on 06/09/2010
The end user always pays.
Always.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vegasyankee
Making Energy for a Strong America!
07:44 AM on 06/09/2010
The Washington D.C. Oath -

Never let a good crisis or tragedy go to waste.

Disgusting.
maxfax
Taa - dah!
10:35 AM on 06/09/2010
The only reason this is not on the radar of Republicans, is because Republicans and their anti-regulation and corporate "let 'em have it" promise, got us here
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vegasyankee
Making Energy for a Strong America!
10:40 AM on 06/09/2010
I don't care what flavor they claim to be.....

They're all thieves getting rich at our expense.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stopthemadness69
Real Americans care more about people than profits
12:10 PM on 06/09/2010
Are you saying that in the middle of a huge oil spill, the worst disaster we have ever seen, we should not be doing energy legislation? We should what? Wait until it is no longer in the news and then try to do an energy bill? We need to do this now while the disaster is still fresh in the minds of not only the politicians but the people.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dragonmaster
07:40 AM on 06/09/2010
Obama simply has a hard time exposing the GOP and its lying surrogates.

He is too cool and detached- and that is causing him to blow opportunities to expose the many vulnerabilities the republicans have-

The BP mess would have been readily more exploited by a more 'emotional. chief executive who was moire politically astute.

Obama seems content with excepting the problem and reacting as he may needs to do- which seems like he really could care less.