More

Mark Kirk Cited By Department Of Defense For Campaigning While On Active Duty, Punishable By Jail And Discharge

Kirk

First Posted: 06/09/10 06:52 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 05:45 PM ET

In the latest twist in the ever-growing Mark Kirk military service fiasco, the Illinois Senate candidate appears to have violated military regulations by campaigning while on active duty.

If Kirk did indeed campaign while serving, as a newly released Department of Defense memo suggests, the offense would be punishable by up to two years of confinement and dishonorable discharge from the military.

The memo was released to the Nitpicker blog, which has played an instrumental role in investigating Mark Kirk's embellished military record. Kirk required the document, an "exception to policy" memo, in order to serve in the military while a member of Congress, which is illegal unless such an exception is issued.

Nitpicker reprints one portion of the memo, and highlights a particular phrase:

As a candidate for the vacant Senate seat in Illinois, Commander Kirk must complete the appropriate acknowledgment of limitations required for all candidates on active duty (DoDD 1344.10, paragraph 4.3.5.). Ordinarily this acknowledgment must be completed within 15 days of entering active duty. Because of the short period of active duty and concerns arising from his partisan political activities during his last two tours of active duty, Commander Kirk must complete this form prior to his entry on active duty.

Rich Miller of The Capitol Fax blog pointed last summer to tweets on the Kirk campaign's Twitter account, posted while Kirk was participating in a drill weekend at the National Military Command Center.

"Back on duty in the National Military Command Center - lets hope for a calm day for our troops," Kirk tweeted.

At first, the campaign claimed staffers were posting pre-approved tweets while Kirk was on duty; later, Kirk seemed to take responsibility for them, saying, "It's something that I will not do again."

But tweets from a drill weekend are one thing, as Miller writes today. The DoD memo points suggests that similar incidents took place during not one but two tours of active duty.

And Nitpicker points out just how severe a violation of the rules mentioned in the memo would be:

Those violations are, in fact, a prosecutable offense. As the regulation states, "Violations of paragraphs 4.1. through 4.5. ["concerns" about Kirk pertain to paragraph 4.3.5] of this Directive by persons subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice are punishable under Article 92, 'Failure to Obey Order or Regulation...'" A violation of Article 92 is punishable by up to two years of confinement and a dishonorable discharge. Mark Kirk broke the law at least twice according to this memo and seems to have escaped any punishment at all.

Nitpicker and The Capitol Fax have both contacted the Kirk campaign for a response to the memo, and neither has heard back thus far. HuffPost Chicago also got no reply from the Kirk campaign.

In recent weeks, Kirk has faced criticism over his repeated embellishments of his military service, including awards he never earned, enemy fire he never took, and places he never served.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CHICAGO

Filed by Will Guzzardi  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 933
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (24 total)
  1 of 4  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
TheRevV 09:27 AM on 06/10/2010
Kirk's words and actions are reprehensible, and now appear to be illegal. Yet, he's a Republican, and Repub candidates are not only "above the law" and contain a completely different set of rules than the rest of America that allows them to escape persecution, AND they enjoy the backing of a powerful spin machine (FAUX, Heritage Foundation, Citizen's United, Club For Growth, Karl Rove). This finding is  Read More...
12:46 PM on 06/11/2010
He's as hollow as Palin and her ilk. If there wasn't a military they wouldn't have a crutch to keep them upright. These types are users of the military for their own personal gain. Sad sacks for sure.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chitowncrown
09:57 AM on 06/11/2010
He uses his military record for everything. Some people make me sick and he is one of them.
09:25 AM on 06/11/2010
It's time for the voters of Illinois to DISHONORABLY DISCHARGE Mark Kirk!
03:33 AM on 06/11/2010
Wait, he lies about his military accomplishments, breaks military rules (and gets away with it?) and claims to be a moderate while voting 98% of the time straight republican (against healthcare, against DADT) - why is he still in office?
06:33 PM on 06/11/2010
HELLO,HELLO, ALEXI GIANNOULIAS ARE YOU AWAKE!! NOW IS THE TIME TO DEMAND KIRKS RESIGNATION & FULL PROSECUTION,HE'S UNFIT TO HOLD OFFICE & INELIGIBLE FOR THE SENATE,THEY WOULD DO THE SAME TO YOU.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/#37563940
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gitmo
11:08 PM on 06/10/2010
Kirk has no business holding public office anymore. He needs to resign.

Kirk has had to walk his military resume back three times already. It is virtually all he can claim as an accomplishment. The man is an untrustworthy weasel.

Kirk's military exaggerations go way beyond Blumenthal misstating "during" versus "in" once in 2008 - this is a pattern of exaggeration and overselling his qualifications from his first campaign ad for Congress to the present day. Kirk basically introduced himself to the wider Illinois electorate with a series of lies. He went hard right on issues from his prior positions in the GOP primary, and he's done his best to not say anything about the issues ever since. So now that his lies have been revealed, he quite literally has nothing to say to the general populace.
01:22 PM on 06/10/2010
Oh, a Govenor or a Senator can campaign for President while serving their term (and collect pay) but Kirk can't run while on active duty. Not fair. Actually, no one should be allowed run for anything while they are serving. If a Senator or Governor wants to run for another office, it should be mandatory that they quit and then run. Why should taxpayers pay salaries while a candidate is running for a different position?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
senatortruth
Fox keeps me "INFROMED"!
01:29 PM on 06/10/2010
Hey, talk to the military.

The law is what it is, so go ahead and get it changed.

Enron did, whenever they needed...

Good luck to you.
06:36 PM on 06/11/2010
WHAT?? JUST ADD THIS VIOLATION TO HIS LIES

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/#37563940
HE'S UNFIT TO SERVE PERIOD
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeftRight
TANSTAAFL
04:13 PM on 06/10/2010
I agree, if you're currently a Senator or a Governor or any other elected official running for another seat you should have to resign before the actual running. I would make an exception up to the point of a primary election, however, to allow for those who don't win the primary. So for example, once August rolled around, SENATOR Obama and SENATOR McCain should have both resigned.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Devilslakewoman
Flaming Liberal
04:18 AM on 06/12/2010
And Sen Kerry, Gov Dean, and a host of others. A rule like that would have led to unjust under-representation in Congress, and states without Governors.

The Military's rules are clear and precidented. Many high level Military recuse themselves for voting in state/national elections for all the right reasons, the Law being but one.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
senatortruth
Fox keeps me "INFROMED"!
01:13 PM on 06/10/2010
VillageMutt 18 minutes ago (12:33 PM)
4 Fans
Become a fan
Unfan
Sounds like your typical Illinois politician to me.

The electorate is in such an anti-incumbent mode
they just might elect someone in or going to jail.

Hell, he can't be worst than anyone he's replacing and
the chosen one hasn't lived up to his hype so don't be
too surprised at what happens her in da Midwest.
*********************************************************

The WORST are the TEXAS politicians.

LIARS and TRAITTORS against the USA.

If you want to get rid of the SKKKUUMMMM, Texas is the place...
12:33 PM on 06/10/2010
Sounds like your typical Illinois politician to me.

The electorate is in such an anti-incumbent mode
they just might elect someone in or going to jail.

Hell, he can't be worst than anyone he's replacing and
the chosen one hasn't lived up to his hype so don't be
too surprised at what happens her in da Midwest.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:02 PM on 06/10/2010
I would like to thank Senator Kirk for providing yet another example of GOP hypocrisy on this, my first day posting here. I am sure that you and your party will provide me with countless opportunities to exercise my snark.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GrumpyGrandpa
A '60's liberal who didn't sell out
11:56 AM on 06/10/2010
Mark Kirk is not the only one to engage in political activities while on active duty. If you look at the recent rebuttal of the President's State of the Union by the Governor of Virgina Bob McDonald, sitting behind and to the Governor's right is a uniformed military person. Now, either he is impersonating a member of the Armed Forces, a crime, or he is an active duty member of the Armed Forces engaging in political activity. That is also a crime as Mark Kirk is finding out to his great embarrassment and dismay. So if Mark Kirk is not allowed to do this, and I don't think that he should, then the person who was participating in the Republican rebuttal should not be allowed to either. He should be identified and prosecuted.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeftRight
TANSTAAFL
12:55 PM on 06/10/2010
We'd need to know a bit more about this member of the military. Perhaps it's the governor's child who is visiting. Maybe it's a leader of the VA National Guard. Maybe it's a visiting military member who simply happened to be in the audience. None of these would be illegal. It would BECOME illegal if the military member was the one giving the speech.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vegaspauli
04:31 PM on 06/11/2010
"The uniform" is not to be worn except in the course of one's duties (or to and from said duties). You are not supposed to wear a military uniform "out on the town...."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
madHenry
11:52 AM on 06/10/2010
Mark Kirk and CArly Fiorina--when their respective states get to know their records better, the less likely they are to win. Alexi is no "prize," but Kirk's close to toasty-toast here in Illinois. You know it's bad when you hear older more staid veterans say "welll...I don't know" about you on the evening news. a lot of ground between here and November, so there's still time for Kirk to bring in the BIG GUNS. WE WANT PALIN!!! y the same token, when all the HP doings start to weigh on her--the "among worst executives ever," the use of private investigators to shadow employees' doings phone calls (shades of Nixon), and such, I suspect the Golden State will put away its dreams of Carlyfornication.
photo
lesterbud
Facts ARE Liberty
11:50 AM on 06/10/2010
Oh My
What a dilemma for this little chicken hawk.
Either fess up that he avoided serving and suffer the wrath of his constituents,
or continue the building this facade and go to military prison.

What's a little lying coward to do??
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
D-V-H
I am a Damn Liberal
11:47 AM on 06/10/2010
Kirk's "embellishments" are akin to claiming you earned medals when you didn't, something civilians have been prosecuted for. As a soldier he should know the regulations better than most and as such be held to a higher standard.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blueken
Finger Picking blues man
11:39 AM on 06/10/2010
Guess who didn't serve under fire in the VIetname era. That would be Donald Rumsfeld, GW Bush, Dick Cheny and Karl Rove. Guess who was riding up and down the Mekong Delta in a plastic boat takeing enemy fire? Why that would be John Kerry. What do you call an old man who never served his country under enemy fire, but is all too willing to send others to war? A chicken hawk Republican.
photo
lesterbud
Facts ARE Liberty
11:48 AM on 06/10/2010
Thank You
Exactly!
11:38 AM on 06/10/2010
Here's an idea... don't vote for him if you live in IL or Blumenthal if you live in CT. Oh wait, what am I thinking. Both sides are going to disparage the other but exonerate their own. And people wonder why the US is in the situation it is in. It is the character of our leaders; most are bought by corporations and most will cheat, lie and steal to get elected. Not only that, people are too partisan to acknowledge that "their" party isn't perfect. Get rid of incumbents, vote Libertarian.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:05 PM on 06/10/2010
Because that party IS perfect? LMAO!