More

Gulf Oil Spill: BP's Failures Amplified By Numerous Gaffes

HARRY R. WEBER and ERIN McCLAM   06/11/10 09:30 PM ET   AP

Bp Gaffes

HOUSTON — BP is already fighting an oil gusher it can't contain and watching its mighty market value wither away. Its own bumbling public-relations efforts are making a big mess worse.

Not only has it made a series of gaffes – none greater than the CEO's complaint that "I'd like my life back" – the company hasn't even followed its own internal guidelines for damage control after a spill.

Executives have quibbled about the existence of undersea plumes of oil, downplayed the potential damage early in the crisis and made far-too-optimistic predictions for when the spill could be stopped. BP's steadiest public presence has been the ever-present live TV shot of the untamed gusher.

What BP has lacked, crisis management experts say, has been much of a show of human compassion.

"All crises are personal," said Richard Levick, who runs a public relations firm, Levick Strategic Communications, that advises companies. "Action and sacrifice is absolutely critical."

The best move for BP's image, of course, would be to stop the leak. That has proved difficult enough, with one fix after another failing and estimates of the severity of the spill growing by the week.

Failing a solution, Daniel Keeney, president of a Dallas-based PR firm, suggested putting CEO Tony Hayward in a hard hat and life vest, helping crews contain and clean up the spill.

"You want to get him right in the thick of things, even if he looks somewhat uncomfortable doing it," Keeney said.

Levick suggested BP could have cut gas prices at its stations along the Gulf Coast – a show of financial solidarity.

BP has taken a stab at soothing angry Americans, airing a slick, multimillion-dollar national TV spot this week in which Hayward pledges: "We will make this right." Hayward also promised BP would clean up every drop of oil and "restore the shoreline to its original state." President Barack Obama said the money spent on the ads should have gone to cleanup and compensating devastated fisherman and small business owners.

And even those efforts violate the company's own prescription for damage control. Its own spill plan, filed last year with the federal government, says of public relations: "No statement shall be made containing any of the following: promises that property, ecology or anything else will be restored to normal."

On top of everything else, BP can't figure out what to say about its dividend. Lawmakers in the U.S. insist the company must look after the devastated people of the Gulf before paying its shareholders. But in Britain, legions of retirees count on the steady payouts.

And earlier this week when Wall Street freaked out over the prospect of billions of dollars in BP liabilities and sent its stock to its lowest point since the mid-1990s, the company response was positively tone-deaf.

"The company is not aware of any reason which justifies this share price movement," the company said early Thursday, after its stock was hammered on New York and European exchanges.

Almost from the beginning, BP has been as unable to control its public message as it has the spill itself.

Hayward was ridiculed for telling reporters "I'd like my life back" earlier in the crisis, remarks the families of some of the 11 men killed in the explosion of the Deepwater Horizon rig felt were insensitive. He also suggested that the environmental impact of the spill would be "very, very modest."

Former Shell chairman John Hofmeister said it might have been more appropriate for senior U.S. executives of the company to take the heat. Hayward is an Englishman, and BP is based in Britain.

"I think it was a mistake for Tony Hayward to come and put his physical presence in the U.S.," Hofmeister said. "The U.S. has its own culture and traditions. Foreign companies can come and do business there, but they are not necessarily welcomed."

BP's chief operating officer, Doug Suttles, an American, was rolled out for interviews, but his aides grumbled Hayward was stealing the spotlight. Hayward's decision to present a video explaining BP's "top kill" attempt took the company's Louisiana command by surprise.

As for Suttles himself, he insisted this week that there were no massive underwater oil plumes in "large concentrations" from the spill. To NBC, he offered that it "may be down to how you define what a plume is here."

The government had said three tests confirmed oil as far as three-fifths of a mile below the surface of the Gulf, at least 40 miles away from the site of the gushing well.

Suttles also predicted the spill would be reduced to a "relative trickle" by early next week. BP later sought to walk the comments back, saying the company was optimistic but that getting the spill to a trickle would take more time.

By late this week, the government had reported that the spill was spewing the equivalent of the Exxon Valdez disaster into the Gulf every two weeks or less, with the catastrophe nearing the end of its second month.

Since the April 20 explosion, BP has parachuted its own staff, plus staff from at least two independent public-relations firms, to deal with the deluge of round-the-clock media inquiries.

Early on in the crisis, BP and government officials held daily in-person briefings with media, allowing questions. In recent days and weeks, officials have increasingly resorted to teleconferences with reporters and have limited the ability to ask questions and the number of questions that could be asked.

In Houston, where BP has set up a U.S. command center, company PR officials have grown weary of reporters going directly to engineers and other higher-ups for information, at times trying to insist media go through them first.

Spokesman Robert Wine said in an e-mail to The Associated Press that media visits to the Houston center are "very carefully controlled and sparingly arranged" by design.

"The rooms that are shown are full of the teams who WILL make a difference on the result of this crisis," Wine wrote. "Every second they are not helping with media visits is time they are not doing the `day job.'"

In the meantime, BP has been buying up spill-related search terms on Google and Yahoo, so that links to its own oil-response sites pop up first. BP says the idea is to help people on the Gulf find the right forms and people quickly and effectively.

Others suggest it's a move to steer searchers away from bad press for BP.

"It is clearly trying to protect its brand image," said Matthew Whiteway, director of campaign management at London consulting firm Greenlight, which says 95 percent of BP's search listings are rated very negative.

Crisis management experts say the only reliable way to repair BP's badly tarnished image is the obvious one – to plug the hole.

"Crisis management is about fixing the problem. It's not about looking good," said Tony Jaques, a crisis management consultant in Melbourne, Australia. "BP has done some things that have not been smart, but really, what would they have done to look good in this kind of situation anyway?"

___

McClam reported from New York. Associated Press writers Michael Liedtke in San Francisco, Tamara Lush in New Orleans and Jane Wardell in London contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

HOUSTON — BP is already fighting an oil gusher it can't contain and watching its mighty market value wither away. Its own bumbling public-relations efforts are making a big mess worse. Not only...
HOUSTON — BP is already fighting an oil gusher it can't contain and watching its mighty market value wither away. Its own bumbling public-relations efforts are making a big mess worse. Not only...
Filed by Jeff Muskus  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 78
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
darkstar528
01:29 PM on 06/14/2010
When did telling the truth become a "gaffe"?...Why do we let them get away with saying "I misspoke" or "what I meant was....."...People usually speak the truth the first time, it's not a gaffe, that's a way off of the hook...Now Biden Gaffes!!!!!!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vippy
Carpe Diem!
09:46 AM on 06/14/2010
Inexcuseable! All these gaffes and errors and someone still thinks that CEOs deserve their big paycheck.
photo
joebaggadonuts
Civilization: Evolutionary pathway of choice.
09:43 AM on 06/14/2010
I see the BP board is going to let him stay on to speak before Congress. They must be as idiotic as he appears to be.
07:01 PM on 06/13/2010
Why speculate on any of this? Big oil owns the world, their leaders and all the governments.
Nothing will change, just like the Exxon Valdez.
06:02 PM on 06/13/2010
That extra safeguard that would have cost $500,000 to install but, was negated by big dick and his "police yourself policies" for big oil now reveals the ugly truth that according to these money lovin', sinful decision makers, the Gulf of Mexico and the surrounding ecosystems weren't worth a measly half a million dollars. Vengeance is the Lord's and I have a feeling these modern day pharisees are gonna have all the oil they grave after their judgement day. It will be used to stoke the fires they will burn in for eternity. In the meantime, they should be tried for crimes (murder) against nature and humanity. I WANT MY ENVIRONMENT BACK!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pjfbncyl
Avatar Dude Starship
04:58 PM on 06/13/2010
Human Race To Undergo Mastectomy?
From The BBC :
If the oil flows east, it will encounter the seagrass beds that form a key habitat for manatees , among other species. "If you've got seagrass beds badly contaminated, clearly the manatees could be seriously affected," says Carl-Gustaf Lundin, head of the Marine Programme at the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN).

From Wikipedia :
Manatees (family Trichechidae, genus Trichechus) are large, fully aquatic, mostly herbivorous marine mammals sometimes known as sea cows. They are noted for their friendly nature, up to 4 meter size, and paddle-like flippers. The name manatí comes from the Taíno, a pre-Columbian people of the Caribbean, meaning "breast".

We lose the manatee we lose a breast. It will not regrow. Extinction is forever!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pjfbncyl
Avatar Dude Starship
04:51 PM on 06/13/2010
Please everybody just calm down. Everybody is just getting hysterical and that serves no purpose. We cannot fire somebody just like that. Think about it, like me. Calm down. Lets just pour oil on these troubled .....ooops
11:06 AM on 06/13/2010
The corporate system produces psychopathic destructive behaviour by design.
11:03 AM on 06/13/2010
If owners of corporations (the stockholders) were held personally liable for the destructive actions of the businesses they are responsible for funding, they might think twice about buying stock in a company that pollutes and ruins the property of others.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vippy
Carpe Diem!
09:48 AM on 06/14/2010
I think that applied to all of Wall Street. What is Wall Street good for. Wanting more and more productivity, pressured every company to make more and then forced them to go global so they could make more money. The same people that bash big oil probably are invested in oil in some form or another like retirement. Well, you know what I am saying.
11:00 AM on 06/13/2010
Why should the owners of a publicly-traded corporation be shielded from personal liability for the actions of the company they own. If we were truly going to be fair about the situation, British pensioners should be sued for their personal possessions for the damage that has been wrought by the company that has in the past enriched them with their polluting poisonous product. Unfortunately the owners of corporations have set up a legal system that shields them from true responsibility.
outnow
Ban the bomb
10:35 AM on 06/13/2010
You can't have a pristine Gulf with unlimited oil drilling. Human error will eventually cause another massive failure. Foreign vs. domestic oil; shallow water vs. deepwater; BP vs. Exxon-Mobil - it's all the same in the final analysis.

In Chernobyl you saw provincial party hacks who were responsible. Those hacks got a better summer house and a few more bimbos. So BP CEO got a bigger bonus, a few regulators were entertained with drugs and bimbos. Capitalism vs. communism. Again, humans will screw up and massive environmental disasters are bound to occur.

Mankind is playing with fire but lacks wisdom necessary to control the outcome. It is arrogant to assume that the human error could be eliminated, not to mention the technological risks.

No matter what the system, people are only human. Personal gain causes people to lose sight of the risks. The free market does not in any way assure our safety. No drilling is the only rational answer. Being 99% "safe" doesn't cut it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pjfbncyl
Avatar Dude Starship
05:00 PM on 06/13/2010
Human Race To Undergo Mastectomy? (Google That Please) Dont worry itsOnlyGod
photo
AbeMartin
The best person fer a job is never a candidate
07:15 AM on 06/13/2010
BP is polluting more than just the Gulf of Mexico!

Lake Michigan is one of the most vital resources in the US.
In 2007, Indiana’s Republican Governor Mitch Daniels “exempted BP from adhering to Indiana’s environmental laws. BP needed permits for a $3.8 billion expansion of its Whiting, Indiana heavy oil refinery.” Daniels’ justification for the waiver of the expansion was for 80 jobs. He handed BP a pass to dump toxic waste hundreds of feet offshore in a “mixing zone,” increasing pollution in the lake that provides water to millions in Chicago.

Under BP’s Indiana permit it can release 54% more ammonia and 35% more sludge into lake Michigan every day”. EPA reported in 2007 numerous violations at BP’s refinery in Indiana.

“Immediately taking office, Daniels redefined the mission of Indiana’s Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) to attract business to Indiana and 'create jobs.' He instituted a business friendly “streamlined” permit approval process, fired IDEM staffers he thought wouldn’t support the new mission.” Instead he appointed a Peabody lawyer, coal lobbyist, David Joest to carry forward his pro-BP agenda.

Joest will be Daniels nominee for Secretary of Interior if Daniels is elected President in 2012. How much is BP’s contributions to Daniels presidential ambitions going to cost the United States?

sources: http://wwwdownstreamtoday.com/news/article.aspx?a_id=4856
http://wwwsignonsandiego.com/newsbusiness/2007//30-1519-bpwhiting-violations.html
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/keyword/efinery/recent/2
http://indiana.sierraclub.org/idem/w0037.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RitaS
11:07 PM on 06/12/2010
How much more does the US people have to endure by this callous Company?? BP's past is an open book in their callous disregard to people & the environment...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vippy
Carpe Diem!
10:37 PM on 06/12/2010
BP will declare Chapter 11 and we will have to nuke this place in the Gulf, I understand there is a bigger leak right next to this one. I understand there is a lake of oil 100 miles long and 4500 ft deep already. This is simple one of those disasters that cannot be fixed. Remember, the Russians already had to nuke their oil spill. Just unthinkable.
outnow
Ban the bomb
10:37 AM on 06/13/2010
Soviets nuked natural gas leaks but the same principle of implosion may be necessary to seal off the formation. The point is that nobody really knows for sure - or they aren't saying.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nickfromla
09:14 PM on 06/12/2010
Check this out, media get declined at BP cleanup site: http://www.frequency.com/video/bp-security/107379