NYR More

Christopher Hitchens On 'Hitch-22': Memoir Was 'Fantastically Difficult' To Write

HILLEL ITALIE   06/14/10 12:06 PM ET   AP

Christopher Hitchens

WASHINGTON — The coffee is strong, the wine a dry red poured from a tall, swanlike beaker. On a sunny afternoon at his apartment near Dupont Circle, Christopher Hitchens holds up a Marlboro Light between cigar-shaped fingers and discusses the hitch of writing his memoir, "Hitch-22."

"I found it fantastically difficult," he says. "Normally, when I'm writing, I'm making an argument, making a case. Also, when I'm writing, I'm trying to see how much I can pack into 5,000 words about a subject. But here's a subject I know too much about."

The equally polished and varnished British author, essayist and columnist enjoyed surprising commercial success three years ago with "God Is Not Great," a direct attack on religion that countered a recent trend of spiritual works. After more than a dozen previous books, it was a sign that readers engaged by Hitchens' opinions about others might want to learn his views of himself.

Urged by his then-publisher, Jonathan Karp of Twelve, Hitchens submitted some sample chapters, was asked to continue and turned in a manuscript twice as long as requested and as eventually released. The finished book is a "highly selective" and dry-eyed 400-page account that includes reflections on sex (he's for it), class, his "purse-lipped and silent" military father Eric, and tragically romantic mother, Yvonne, who killed herself during an extramarital rendezvous in Greece.

"It was painful to write about my mother, but not very because long ago I internally managed all that," he says. "I even went back to Greece and I went to the graveyard while I was writing the book and decided not to write about it. I thought that would be sentimental."

The 61-year-old Hitchens is seated at a small, wooden table in the dining area, his gray-sandy colored hair brushed back and semi-combed, blue shirt unbuttoned just enough for comfort, his voice a handsome baritone which has been likened to Richard Burton's. Renovations are planned, so much of the furniture around the apartment has been put away, except for the books, as indispensable as running water, arranged on built-in-shelves and stacked in towers like CDs. A visitor might note a full set of P.G. Wodehouse, and a row of titles by a special Hitchens hero, George Orwell. Evidence of a free-ranging mind: A copy of Isadora Duncan's memoir stands just one shelf below the "Saddam Hussein Reader."

The "Fighting Words" columnist for Slate Magazine and a contributing editor to Vanity Fair, Hitchens is a proud trespasser of boundaries between left and right. He was an opponent of the Vietnam War and backer of the Iraq war, a supporter of Palestinian rights and intervention in Iran, an admirer of George Orwell who voted for George W. Bush, and perhaps the only man with respectful words for both Karl Marx and Karl Rove.

"One of the things about Christopher is that you can have things out with him, and all of us who love Christopher have disagreed with him," says Salman Rushdie, a longtime friend. "He's one of the funniest people you can meet. It's difficult not to hit it off with him, unless he chooses to attack you, in which case it's impossible to hit it off with him."

In Hitchens' memoir, conflict awaits even in the blurbs. Beneath friendly words from Ian McEwan, Christopher Buckley and others is a compliment from Gore Vidal: "I have been asked whether I wish to nominate a successor, an inheritor, a dauphin or delfino. I have decided to name Christopher Hitchens."

But Hitchens and Vidal are now estranged, in part over Vidal's assertion that the Bush administration was likely complicit in the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. So the "dauphin" quote, which dates back several years, is crossed out, with a scrawl on the side that reads, "No, CH."

"The devil made me do it," Hitchens said with a laugh.

Vidal, in an interview from his home in Los Angeles, said their feud was "all his doing, not mine." He denied ever deeming Hitchens his literary heir and called him an "opportunist who'll grab anything to get his name on Page Six of the New York Post.

"He couldn't get in without me," Vidal said.

As written in "Hitch-22," Christopher Eric Hitchens drew his "first squalling breath" in Portsmouth, England, in 1949. He learned early the power and the muscle of words; he deflated a schoolyard attacker by calling him a "a liar, a bully, a coward and a thief." He loved books so much he brought them to church and read them during the sermons. Seemingly born to differ, he recalled "no particular sense of loss" at the assassination of President Kennedy, whom Hitchens regarded as a "high-risk narcissist."

Fate withheld the gift for writing novels (the omen, says Hitchens: no musical talent). But he has long been part of the club of British letters, close to authors McEwan, Martin Amis and James Fenton. Their bond, Hitchens says, is "a similar sense of humor, finding the same things funny, also finding the same things revolting or depressing, things like superstition, and racism."

A picture in "Hitch-22" shows Hitchens, Rushdie and others gathered during the time Rushdie was in hiding after the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in 1989 called for Rushdie's death because of the alleged blasphemy of "The Satanic Verses." For Hitchens, the fatwa embodied everything he hated ("fanaticism, blood lust, certainty, fierce hatred of sex, hatred of literature") and what he loved ("cultural pluralism, sexual liberation, separation of church and state, irony").

"I think that it (the fatwa) was very important to Christopher in his thinking and in his politics," Rushdie says. "And so he became very exorcised and therefore very available to me during that time. It certainly brought us much closer together."

"It was also a very important date for him, 1989, because of the collapse of the Soviet Union," Amis says. "It was tremendously liberating for him. It freed him of ideology."

To nods and applause from the left, Hitchens has called Henry Kissinger a war criminal and advocated for his prosecution. He despises Mother Teresa ("a fanatic, a fundamentalist, and a fraud") and such Christian right leaders as Pat Robertson and the late Jerry Falwell, calling them "tethered gas-balloons of greed and cynicism." Upon the death of Alexander Haig, the former Nixon aide and secretary of state under President Reagan, Hitchens characterized him as a "neurotic narcissist" with "a manically authoritarian personality."

But Hitchens never answered to one crowd. As he writes in "Hitch-22," he was in trouble with the left as far back as 1968, when as a young radical on a visit to Cuba he confronted a filmmaker about the limits of artistic expression under the Castro regime and was branded a "counter-revolutionary."

"You do not forget, even if you come from a free and humorous society the first time that you are with unsmiling seriousness called a `counter-revolutionary' to your face," Hitchens writes in his memoir.

He has doubts about abortion rights ("I believe the concept `unborn child' is a `real concept,'" he once said) and wrote a piece in Vanity Fair titled, no joke, "Why Women Aren't Funny." Once on good enough terms with the Clintons to help arrange a White House visit for Rushdie, he came to believe that Bill Clinton was a "habitual and professional liar," supported the president's impeachment over his affair with Monica Lewinsky and wrote the anti-Clinton book "No One Left To Lie To." Although independent politically, he registered as a Democrat in 2008 just so he could vote against Hillary Clinton in the presidential primaries.

"I used to find him delightful; nobody was more fun to sit with and have a few drinks and listen to," says Joe Conason, a liberal author, columnist and Clinton supporter. "But he's such a fanatic about Clinton. I would go on television and say what I had to say, that scandal mongering about Clinton was out of control and mostly false and Christopher would come on and defend and amplify every rumor and innuendo and often in a vicious and personal way. I came to find him repugnant and wrong."

Hitchens real turn began with the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. He initially feared an overreaction among conservatives, "an orgiastic flag-waving unanimity," and instead came to despise the response of the left, the suggestion that Americans deserved the attacks because of sins committed abroad, or the theories – urged by Vidal among others – that the Bush administration itself was behind them.

The camel's back broke at the Telluride Film Festival in the fall of 2002. Michael Moore, set to release his antigun documentary "Bowling for Columbine," was interviewed on stage by Hitchens in front of a seemingly like-minded audience. Few minds, however, are like Hitchens'. They discussed the war in Afghanistan, opposed by Moore, supported by Hitchens. When Moore expressed doubts that Osama bin Laden was behind the attacks, Hitchens asked Moore if he considered bin Laden's guilt an "open question."

Moore answered: "Until anyone is convicted of any crime, no matter how horrific the crime, they are innocent until proven guilty."

"And the whole audience roared into applause," recalls Hitchens, who soon quit his longtime position as a columnist for the liberal weekly The Nation. "That was the moment I thought, `I'm out of here. I'm not part of this crowd.'"

His politics could be called neo-Wilsonion, the advocating of liberal humanism and the willingness to go to war for it, in Iraq and elsewhere. His creed, if any, is atheism. In his memoir, Hitchens accepts the honor of being associated with such prominent nonbelievers as Richard Dawkins and Daniel Dennett, warriors against "the literally lethal challenge" from those of "absolute certainty" and prodders of those "hesitating to defend the society that makes their existence possible."

"The defense of science and reason is the great imperative of our time," he writes. "To be an unbeliever is not merely to be `open-minded.' It is, rather, a decisive admission of uncertainty that is dialectically connected to the repudiation of the totalitarian principle, in the mind as well in politics.

"But that's my `Hitch-22.'"

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BOOKS

Filed by Jessie Kunhardt  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 25
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
08:18 PM on 07/14/2010
I think those who are declaring publicly that they are "praying for Christopher Hitchens" are craven opportunists, using the occasion of his very serious illness to promote their own cause. We can assume that Hitchens does not seek their prayers, and it seems that their prayers are not being said with much love for the one being prayed for. And if he recovers, which I sincerely hope he does because I think he is terrific in all his "terribleness" and I am fan, will they then try to credit prayer for that recovery? If so, isn't all of that just a bit mean-spirited, kind of rubbing salt in the wounds of a sick person?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
julbar
04:03 PM on 06/24/2010
I see I am very late with this post. I am trying to decide whether to run over to Union Square (SF) this evening to meet Hitchens at his book signing and so, I am catching up on a few pieces about him and the book though I have followed some of his press tour.

Cannot decide whether I like or dislike this man, have hated him at times. After reading some of the HP pieces again, I think it's okay to disagree with the guy and not dislike him- and I do not entirely disagree with what he says in every instance like some of the others who have posted here.

What I have found I decidedly dislike about him is his snarkiness, I have seen him literally looks down upon and sneers at audiences that do not agree with him- or maybe he wasn't sober at the time.

Interesting about his feud with Vidal, they are so similar in "type"though the 9/11 craziness from the Left quoted here was, imo, not typical really, and certainly not the sentiments of the many dozens of people I knew anywhere then, including myself and others who were in the thick of it in NYC at the time.
12:46 AM on 06/30/2010
"Cannot decide whether I like or dislike this man, have hated him at times"......

"julbar" I'd venture to say...that the vast majority of Hitchens enamoratii....would readily....even eagarly...admit the same.

Surely, those of us who enjoy and understand our "mother tongue".....can set this or that detail aside when confronted with one as literate as Hitchens.

Like you,.......this innocuous view was never more sorely tested than when "Hitch" seemed (utterly improbably) just another cheerleader for the debacle in Iraq.........(I'm sure I hated him during that period)

Interesting you mention Vidal........

I like to think that Vidal (with deference to some remarkable educators).......more than any other,....taught me to appreciate our language....not to mention irony, wit, and even ...on some level... American History...............I had several chances to "meet him" (Vidal)...(which means be in his presence at some public event)....and didn't. I remain sorry to this day.

I think absolutely that Vidal and Hitchens are part of the same grand continum.....to wit

Those that remind us that our language is still important (and fun)

For me ....the two co-chair the very pinnacle of that list......

I too am late to the post............I hope you made it to the square...........

RSVP....if time permits
TM
09:11 PM on 06/20/2010
"To be an unbeliever is not merely to be `open-minded.' It is, rather, a decisive admission of uncertainty that is dialectically connected to the repudiation of the totalitarian principle, in the mind as well in politics."

Brilliant.

Too bad he's kind of a universally self-aggrandizing misogynist... but I guess everybody has their quirks.
10:35 AM on 06/16/2010
One more thing about Hitchens. Sometime in the early 90's he was debating Charleton Heston on Nightline. Something to do with us going to war in the Middle East, it might have had to do with the Desert Storm. Anyway, Heston was pontificating, making good use of that great voice of his, but he was clearly out of his debth discussing geo political particulars. Hitchens asked Heston where a certain country that they were talking about was located. What countries surrounded it also? Heston couldn't answer. He had zero knowledge of the region he was acting like he was an expert on. Hitchens called him "Pundit of the Apes" . Heston got angry and Hitchens said something like "Don't get so upset Moses, your hairpiece will fall off". I almost had a heart attack I laughed so loud. Heston was broken in half by Hitchens. It was a beautiful thing to witness.
10:42 AM on 06/16/2010
I think Hitchens said, "Relax. Keep your hair on." It was beautiful.
01:07 AM on 06/30/2010
"Loophole" I think you are correct

Please see an exchange with "James Riddle" (just next-door)

All the best
TM
01:03 AM on 06/30/2010
I saw it also...but...like you....the devastating (hair-related) rejoinder left me thoroghly ravished...

Huffposter "loophole" seems to have it about right (see below).....Doesn't it sound Hitchens-esque?

In any event......Re: Heston??......Our bad boy Chris was....yet again....in a "battle of wits" with an un-armed man.
Regards
TM
10:02 AM on 06/16/2010
I have always liked Hitchens and admired his contrarian nature. I'm a basic lberal myself, but with a deep mistrust of unthinking leftists who think Castro is great or believe 911 was some sort of right wing conspircy. Life and politics are not that cut and dry. I understand this because George Orwell is also my hero. Why Hitchens voted for G. Bush I'll never understand though. But who says I have to understand everything someone does to appreciate them in an overall sense? For his public stand on atheisn alone Hitchens has my eternal gratitude.
04:30 PM on 06/15/2010
You have to admire someone in this day and age whose intellect is not limited by their ideology. It's almost impossible to find anymore. Hitchens is one of the few people commenting that you actually have to read first before you know what he thinks. And Bin Laden confessed Michael Moore fans.It shows you what a fat pantload he really is.
02:50 PM on 06/15/2010
I think, therefore I am. I don't have to agree with everyone out there but I love the free flow of thought. One thing Hitchens states on his book tour is that he wouldn't allow the "circumcision" of his name Chistopher as he talked with CHRIS Matthews. I liked that...LOL
10:20 AM on 06/15/2010
I would imagine this guy staying sober for 4 hours straight would also be "fantastically difficult".
photo
JohnFromCensornati
The End is near
09:13 AM on 06/16/2010
I see you have not read his memoir.
10:43 AM on 06/16/2010
...and the Church Lady faction is heard from.
08:55 AM on 06/15/2010
He's one of the few writers that can cause self-polarization (at least for me).

One opinion seems well thought out, even sublime, and the next totally ridiculous.
07:02 AM on 06/15/2010
In the latest pictures of him it looks like his alcoholism is wearing him down.
10:21 AM on 06/15/2010
He's looked like that for 10 years now.
12:36 AM on 06/15/2010
The book was Christopher Hitchens on Christopher Hitchens. So the story is Christopher Hitchens talking about his book, which is really Christopher Hitchens talking about Christopher Hitchen's book on.... himself. oh ok!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:11 PM on 06/14/2010
I never have never particularly liked Hitchens and seldom have agreed with him. If, however, as the article notes he actually "came to believe that Bill Clinton was a 'habitual and professional liar" .. [a]lthough independent politically, he registered as a Democrat in 2008 just so he could vote against Hillary Clinton in the presidential primaries," then he can't be all bad.
04:53 PM on 06/14/2010
I enjoy Hitchens and agree with a lot of what he says. I just wish he weren't so incredibly sexist.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
theriveryeti
Blue in Red-land
04:32 PM on 06/14/2010
I seldom agree with him, but he's always interesting.
04:32 PM on 06/14/2010
I just finished reading this book, and I have to say: it is actually quite absorbing. But, what I find annoying about Hitchens is that he thinks everything he's doing is so brave and courageous and iconoclastic.

His repudiation of religion, for example. Does he really think that it was brave of him to write that book? Seriously - atheism has had a long and established presence within the literary establishment (and outside of it). It is not unusual at all for someone like Hitchens to be an atheist. But, to hear him talk about it, one would think that he practically invented the idea.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Witkacy
11:10 AM on 06/28/2010
I agree - Hitch has only done his best to cast atheism as a rival dogma--which, for my money, is a betrayal of atheism, for which no defense ought to be mounted. *Any* defense of atheism and reason, it seems, only evokes a neat Manichean bout, a picture of a conflict promising possible victory of some sort for the god-fearing side. Hitch's own faith in the international war contra Islamofacism or whatever it is has served *him* well--but atheism isn't a cause to be prosecuted, it's not at service to political policy/ideology, and it's not tied at all to Hitch's smug careerism and moral certitude.