iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Apple Censors--Then Approves--Gay Kiss In Oscar Wilde Comic (PICTURES)

Huffington Post    
First Posted: 06/14/10 05:23 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 05:45 PM ET

Apple's censors are raising eyebrows again.

As The Big Money reports, Apple censored a gay kiss in Tom Bouden's graphic novel version of Oscar Wilde's The Importance of Being Earnest.

Several animated frames of the comic featured two naked men locked in an embrace. Although there was no frontal nudity, the app was rejected--then later approved, but only after the frames were partially covered by black blocks.



Image credit: The Big Money/Prism Comics

The App Store reversed its decision Monday and allowed the app's developers to resubmit the original comic--minus the black boxes, TechCrunch reports. Apple called the comic's reject a "mistake."

Similarly, a graphic novel called Ulysses Seen, based on James Joyces's Ulysses, was censored last week because of nudity; however, TechCrunch writes, Apple also reversed this ban Monday and invited the creator to resubmit the app.

As Prism Comics reports, some smaller publishers complain that Apple has been more tolerant of explicit content when it comes from larger publishers, like Marvel. App developers voiced a similar complaint earlier this year: Apple's App Store, without warning, removed some 5,000 "explicit" apps showing women in lingerie and bikinis, while Playboy and Sports Illustrated's swimsuit apps were not included in the purge.

This is hardly the first time Apple's censorship policy has raised eyebrows. The company has previously banned R-rated content--as well as apps that criticize public figures--only to later reverse their decision after review.

In response to criticism over its no-porn policy, Steve Jobs has reportedly said that Apple had a "moral responsibility" to keep racy materials off the iPhone, promising consumers "freedom from porn." "Folks who want porn can buy and Android phone [sic]," he emailed one upset customer.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

Apple's censors are raising eyebrows again. As The Big Money reports, Apple censored a gay kiss in ...
Apple's censors are raising eyebrows again. As The Big Money reports, Apple censored a gay kiss in ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 372
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
08:36 AM on 06/17/2010
Gay kiss or porn, period? Those images aren't appropriate.
02:59 AM on 06/17/2010
I bet ya they wouldn't have censored it if it was a straight couple.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gwj2000
10:41 PM on 06/16/2010
And to think, people are more concerned about Google becoming the moral compass and big brother of the new world order...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Curtis inSF
Gay Progressive Agnostic Graphic Designer
07:51 PM on 06/16/2010
I feel like I'm just on play and repeat. Apple screws openness and free exchange of information again! Isn't that what the great benefit of the tech revolution was supposed to be about? Not some grizzled old billionaire telling us what's morally or politically correct. He's become the Big Bother of his own ads watching over our content, telling us what we can see. It just makes me sick. His own filthy mind is ruining the tech revolution. That iPad sure is pretty, but at what price?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mjredder
04:06 PM on 06/16/2010
Everybody knows about Apple's initial suppression of political cartoonist Fiore's work---until it, and the fact that he had won a Pulitzer for cartooning. Then Apple beat an abashed retreat.

But the fact is that Apple's suppression policies do continue--suppression of what its functionaries and Steve Jobs consider "porn" and "defamatory" material.

Yet these are people who, I'd bet, have no significant artistic, humanistic, literary, or political background or education. I know from a personal telephone call from Steve Jobs that he has not read much George Bernard Shaw, for example. These censors and suppressors would certainly have suppressed Thomas Nast's cartoons attacking the Tammany Hall leadership in the 19th century, for example, since this was the NYC Democratic Party.

Yet such is the province of a totalitarian society---activities that we usually condemn when we see them occurring In Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, Egypt, etc. But the shortsighted Apple fan base, like so many in those countries, seem willing to overlook this attack on their freedom to read what they wish.
10:45 AM on 06/16/2010
I am so happy that Apple is making the decisions of what is right and decent to view cause thinking is hard.
06:27 AM on 06/16/2010
THIS is what happens when you start to censor stuff. You'd think those smart folks at Apple would've thought of that BEFORE the started this policy, wouldn't you?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cantal
07:36 PM on 06/15/2010
Apple has the ability to censor apps in their appstore, music in their itunes store. They certainly have the right to do this, but honestly how sad is it that a company that was built by young, liberal consumers is now censoring stuff like this.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AnotherTry
Tell me again why we can't be equal?
03:22 AM on 06/16/2010
Just because one has the right to censor, doesn't make censorship right.
06:30 AM on 06/16/2010
Because the folks running the show AREN'T young or liberal any longer. Seen Brother Jobs lately? Eesh.
09:26 AM on 06/16/2010
Steve Jobs never was liberal. He is the ultimate new-right libertarian in the mold of Hayek or Milton Friedman.

The irony for me is that he is a hustling venture capitalist, yet somehow the fanboys imbue him with almost messianic qualities. Contrast that with how Bill Gates is percieved, yet Gates actually wrote the original MS software and gave $20 billion to charity.
JWoode
yes.. my micro bio is meaningless
04:48 PM on 06/15/2010
It's not the cartoon drawing of a naked butt...

It's the idea that those.. funny.. people.. might kiss.
This is censorship of thought.
04:57 PM on 06/15/2010
but.... think of all the children. Who's caring for the children? If apple won't do my job for me as a parent then I might have to engage in my child's life rather than just giving them a $300 phone in lie of a pacifier.
photo
AlamoSexual
Don't fan me because I'm beautiful.
08:21 AM on 06/17/2010
Don't fret - your kids are too buzy looking at titz on an Apple approved pole-dancer app.
photo
AlamoSexual
Don't fan me because I'm beautiful.
08:23 AM on 06/17/2010
"Appole Girlz"
03:55 PM on 06/15/2010
I am going online and buy that comic!
01:34 PM on 06/15/2010
Kudos to Prism Comics for raising awareness of Apple's inconsistent standards!
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
shrimpdip
01:12 PM on 06/15/2010
Indeed Apple has issues it needs to work on. The HuffPo writer and editors are clearly clueless about the GLAAD Media Guide and journalism standards, or they'd know not to use the word "homosexual" in a headline or at all. Unless, of course, HuffPo's point is simply to sensationalize this story, a la Fox News.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AnotherTry
Tell me again why we can't be equal?
03:23 AM on 06/16/2010
Wrong. It has been shown that people respond negatively to the word homosexual, maybe because the word 'sex' is embedded. That's why conservatives ONLY use the word homosexual and never LGBT, gay or lesbian.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PaticaDeGato
Hissing and scratching with gusto.
12:46 PM on 06/15/2010
Some degree of censorship is always necessary. Free speech is just a mirage after all.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pucifer
Fight Back Against Oppression!
02:01 PM on 06/15/2010
"Always necessary"? Er, no.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PaticaDeGato
Hissing and scratching with gusto.
04:02 PM on 06/15/2010
Always necessary. I mean, ask your average HuffPo moderator.
03:25 PM on 06/15/2010
True, nensorship may sometimes be necessary?
Are you implying that consenting gay males engaging in sexual relations is equivalent to child pornography, snuff films, or animal torture?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PaticaDeGato
Hissing and scratching with gusto.
03:59 PM on 06/15/2010
1. "The importance of being earnest" is not supposed to contain gay sex (although Wilde, witty as ever, did sneak a humorous subtle reference to it in the original tes\xt; try and find it). So, if a child finds a cartoon (A CARTOON!) with the same title and approximate plot to Wilde's piece that happens to feature gay sex, a parent might be justifiably upset.

And...
12:42 PM on 06/15/2010
I thought this was about the new Archie Comics character.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PaticaDeGato
Hissing and scratching with gusto.
07:30 AM on 06/16/2010
So did I.