More

BP CEO Tony Hayward Goes To Capitol Hill, Gets Pilloried By Congress: 'Shame On You' (VIDEO)

First Posted: 06/17/10 08:33 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 05:50 PM ET

Bp Ceo

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Channeling the nation's anger, lawmakers pilloried BP's boss in a withering day of judgment Thursday for the oil company at the center of the Gulf calamity. Unflinching, BP chief executive Tony Hayward said he was out of the loop on decisions at the well and coolly asserted, "I'm not stonewalling."

That infuriated members of Congress even more, Democrats and Republicans alike.

Testifying as oil still surged into the Gulf of Mexico and coated ever more coastal land and marshes, Hayward declared "I am so devastated with this accident," "deeply sorry" and "so distraught."

Yet the oil man disclaimed knowledge of any of the myriad problems on and under the Deepwater Horizon rig before the deadly explosion, telling a congressional hearing he had only heard about the well earlier in April, the month of the accident, when the BP drilling team told him it had found oil.

"With respect, sir, we drill hundreds of wells a year around the world," Hayward told Republican Rep. Michael Burgess of Texas.

"Yes, I know," Burgess shot back. "That's what scaring me right now."

Phil Gingrey, R-Ga., told the CEO: "I think you're copping out. You're the captain of the ship." Democrats were similarly, if more predictably, livid.

"BP blew it," said Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., chairman of the House investigations panel that held the hearing. "You cut corners to save money and time."

The verbal onslaught had been anticipated for days and unfolded at a nearly relentless pace.

But in a jarring departure that caught fellow Republicans by surprise, Rep. Joe Barton, top GOP member of the panel, used his opening statement to apologize – twice – for the pressure put on the company by President Barack Obama to contribute to a compensation fund for people in the afflicted Gulf of Mexico states.

Barton said the U.S. has "a due process system" to assess such damages, and he decried the $20 billion fund that BP agreed to Wednesday at the White House as a "shakedown" and "slush fund." He told Hayward, "I'm not speaking for anybody else. But I apologize."

He later retracted his apologies to BP, then apologized anew – this time for calling the fund a "shakedown." "BP should bear the full financial responsibility for the accident," he said, and "fully compensate those families and businesses that have been hurt by this accident."

Barton's earlier remarks were clearly an embarrassment for the party. House Republican leaders John Boehner, Eric Cantor and Mike Pence issued a statement asserting: "Congressman Barton's statements this morning were wrong. BP itself has acknowledged that responsibility for the economic damages lies with them and has offered an initial pledge of $20 billion dollars for that purpose."

Since 1990, oil and gas industry political action committees and employees have given more than $1.4 million to Barton's campaigns, the most of any House member during that period, according to the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics.

With multiple investigations continuing and primary efforts in the Gulf focused on stopping the leak, there was little chance the nation would learn much from Hayward's appearance about what caused the disaster. Yet even modest expectations were not met as the CEO told lawmakers at every turn that he was not tuned in to operations at the well.

He said his underlings made the decisions and federal regulators were responsible for vetting them.

Hayward spoke slowly and calmly in his clipped British accent as he sought to deflect accusations – based on internal BP documents obtained by congressional investigators – that BP chose a particular well design that was riskier but cheaper by at least $7 million.

"I wasn't involved in any of that decision-making," he said.

Were bad decisions made about the cement?

"I wasn't part of the decision-making process," he said. "I'm not a cement engineer, I'm afraid."

Also, "I am not a drilling engineer" and "I'm not an oceanographic scientist."

What about those reports that BP had been experiencing a variety of problems and delays at the well?

"I had no prior knowledge."

At one point a frustrated California Rep. Henry Waxman, Democratic chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, interrupted the CEO. "You're kicking the can down the road and acting as if you had nothing to do with this company and nothing to do with the decisions. I find that irresponsible."

Hayward quietly insisted: "I'm not stonewalling. I simply was not involved in the decision-making process."

Rep. Eliot Engel, D-N.Y., voiced the committee's frustrations as the afternoon wore on. "You're really insulting our intelligence," he said. "I am thoroughly disgusted."

Waxman told the BP executive that in his committee's review of 30,000 items, there was "not a single e-mail or document that you paid even the slightest attention to the dangers at this well."

Burgess slammed both the CEO and the government regulators for a risky drilling plan that he said never should have been brought forward.

"Shame on you, Mr. Hayward, for submitting it," he said, "but shame on us for accepting it, which is simply a rubber stamp."

As Hayward began to testify, a protester disrupted the hearing and was forcibly removed from the room by Capitol police. The woman was identified as Diane Wilson, 61, a shrimper from Seadrift, Texas, near the Gulf Coast. Her hands stained black, she shouted to Hayward from the back of the room: "You need to be charged with a crime."

Stupak, the subcommittee chairman and a former Michigan state trooper, noted that over the past five years, 26 people have died and 700 have been injured in BP accidents – including the Gulf spill, a pipeline spill in Alaska and a refinery explosion in Texas.

Hayward argued that safety had always been his top priority and "that is why I am so devastated with this accident." When he became CEO in 2007, Hayward said he would focus "like a laser" on safety, a phrase he repeated on Thursday.

Rep. John Sullivan, R-Okla., questioned BP's commitment to safety.

BP had 760 safety violations in the past five years and paid $373 million in fines, Sullivan said. By contrast, Sunoco and ConocoPhillips each had eight safety violations and ExxonMobil just one, Sullivan said.

"How in the heck do you explain that?" he asked Hayward. Hayward said most of those violations predated his tenure as CEO. "We have made major changes in the company over the last three to four years," he said.

As of Thursday morning, the BP well had sent 66 million to 120 million gallons of oil into the Gulf of Mexico, based on government daily spill rate figures.

WATCH The Testimony:

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy



Read Hayward's prepared testimony:


Tony Hayward's testimony before Congress on BP oil spill (6/17/10)

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Channeling the nation's anger, lawmakers pilloried BP's boss in a withering day of judgment Thursday for the oil company at the center of the Gulf calamity. Unflinching, BP chief ex...
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Channeling the nation's anger, lawmakers pilloried BP's boss in a withering day of judgment Thursday for the oil company at the center of the Gulf calamity. Unflinching, BP chief ex...
Filed by T.J. Ortenzi  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4,866
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (99 total)
  1 of 20  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS

photo
murphthesurf3 10:16 AM on 06/17/2010
WHEN WILL THE CONGRESSIONAL HEARINGS
ABOUT CONGRESSES MALFEASANCE AND CORRUPTION BEGIN?

Let's remember that the BP "spill" did not take place in a vacuum.

BP, and the other Super PetroCorps, operated in the context of a corporation oriented regulations; lax oversight (or outright corruption) by MMS, huge tax breaks in recognition of fake safety and crisis programs, the  Read More...
07:06 PM on 06/18/2010
Hayward has been taken off the Oil Spill ops. That's good - he was clearly incompetent.

Now we need Obama to be taken off the Gulf Spill ops for the same reason.
10:54 AM on 06/18/2010
PEOPLE OF THE GULF STATES:

If we have learned anything from the Exxon Valdez oil spill it is that we must DEMAND that the President:

Place BP in RECEIVERSHIP NOW.

Provide TRANSPARENCY and ACCESS to the media, the American people, local authorities and all volunteers.

STOP THE DUMPING OF TOXIC DISPERSANTS.

GET the details of the 20 billion ESCROW ACCOUNT and verify it is NOT a FINAL PAYMENT.

DEMAND that BP's TRIAL is NOT in Houston and NOT their choice of OIL-tainted Judges as was reported last night on CNN.
10:37 AM on 06/18/2010
No! This is a mistake. Congress didn't grill Tony Hayward. He grills the Congress. By his answers he wants to say: Don’t worry I shall answer nothing I intend to pay nothing even if I will see you in oil to the neck you will receive from me nothing. And that will be.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
darkstar528
09:20 AM on 06/18/2010
In the first place, how stupid was Congress for not telling him to bring everyone and anyone that he would need to answer specific questions, this was like asking Obama how MMS operated on a daily basis, he's responsible but would have no clue...

2ndly, every time he said "I wasn't part of that decision", they should have asked "who was and how long will it take them to get here, we'll wait?"...We ended up with soundbites and no answers...

If you agree with that, you have to wonder why they didn't...Didn't they want answers?...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zx880
09:09 AM on 06/18/2010
Tony Hayward may take the award from Alberto Gonzales for most the most obfuscation per hour in Congressional testimony.
08:18 AM on 06/18/2010
Stonewalling it? BP has no choice.
There is no way any official of BP can provide a definite answer to any question asked of them.
Beside the obvious immediate political and economic ramifications, there awaits BP the countless
civil suits that will be brought against them in the near future. Anything they say now will potentially cost the company even more millions, if not billions, of dollars in restitution.
Therefore it makes sense that no one from BP is going to say anything that will commit them
one way or the other as far as responsibility and accountability go. They're taking a hit now so
that later on they won't have to economically.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JapanDan
07:44 AM on 06/18/2010
These congressional hearings are getting absurd! These egotistical blowhards, except for the occasional one, are there for one purpose, to score political points and hopefully make a sound-bite. Isn't that what it seems to you? Right , BP should be flogged, so..let's make their appearance before congress more satisfying and consequently involve rotten fruits and vegetables! Make them sit the and listen to these congressmen bloviate while getting pelted in the back of the head with rotten apples. EVERYBODY'S HAPPY!!
06:59 AM on 06/18/2010
The secrecy and lies, the restriction being applied to publicly documenting the disaster might be pointing to something much larger than what it looks like. Crude oil is pretty toxic stuff, the dispersant being used are pretty toxic as well, rotting carcases and vegetation are also really pretty toxic, combine them all in a humid sub-tropical climate and there is a real fear of compulsory evacuation fro all people in the affected region. A oil based Chernobyl giving cancer to a whole generation. Not your one week evacuation but one lasting years, the reality is children in the affected region are likely at extreme risk of suffering long term medical harm and should be evacuated ASAP and that is what that are trying to hide.
06:20 AM on 06/18/2010
Now that Tony Hayward has the pesky inconvenience of testifying before a congressional committee behind him, BP can get back to work on the important task of preventing the media from covering this disaster. www.eightfits.blogspot.com
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
j main
Reality is just a collective hunch, anyways.
05:34 AM on 06/18/2010
This just in. Members of Congress and Tony Hayward all went to the local strip club together after the hearings. Hayward paid for all the lap dances.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zombywulf
Pirate Captain Church of Saint Jerry
02:37 AM on 06/18/2010
Congress grills BP, only they forgot to light the BBQ.
02:22 AM on 06/18/2010
I watched this Congressional dog and pony show today and I have one question.
Why didn't the committee subpoena the FORMER CEO of BP? Most of the questions were directed at decisions that were outside of Tony Hayward's tenure.
01:41 AM on 06/18/2010
Why weren't these questions asked?

Is the well casing ruptured?
Is the earth beneath the blow-off preventer being eroded by the 11,000 pounds per square inch pressure?
Are there fractures and fissures along eight or so miles of sea floor surrounding this "accident"?
Is oil and toxic gas spewing from other related areas other than the cut pipe?
Working through a "relief well" will you be able to stop this eruption if the well casing is compromised and multiple oil exit points are simultaneously occurring?

I have pretty much lost hope.

Corporate capitalist rule coupled with an impotent and bought off government has done this.

Greed is ugly
12:47 AM on 06/18/2010
What Hayward should have said at the outset is that no one will know for sure what happened that day until the well is capped and the blowout preventer is brought to the surface. Congress and the American people are understandably impatient to know what happened but no one knows what happened to cause this blowout. There will undoubtedly be numerous mechanical and operational decisions that individually wouldn't have been a problem but in combination were.
Hayward should have said: "With respect, sirs, it is premature for me to draw conclusions about what caused this blowout and it is premature for you to be holding these hearings.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Buhler
12:33 AM on 06/18/2010
They should grill him literally...in oil! And yes, all the other slack As@#$%els who were involved...The trouble is, people just CANNOT do the "right thing"..so boil em in oil..