iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

UN: Afghan Insurgent Violence Soaring Over Last Year's Levels

ROBERT H. REID   06/19/10 09:01 PM ET   AP

KABUL, Afghanistan — The United Nations reported Saturday that insurgent violence has risen sharply in Afghanistan over the last three months, with roadside bombings, complex suicide attacks and assassinations soaring over last year's levels.

The three-month report by U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon to the U.N. Security Council appeared at odds with Pentagon assertions of slow but steady progress in Afghanistan – an assessment that was challenged by U.S. lawmakers during recent hearings on Capitol Hill.

In the report, Ban said the overall security situation in Afghanistan has not improved since his last report in March and instead the number of violent incidents had "increased significantly compared to previous years and contrary to seasonal trends."

The most "alarming trend" was a sharp rise in the number of roadside bombings, which soared 94 percent in the first four months of this year compared with the same period in 2009, Ban said.

Moreover, assassinations of Afghan government officials jumped 45 percent, mostly in the ethnic Pashtun south, he said. NATO has launched a major operation to secure the biggest southern city, Kandahar, the Taliban's spiritual birthplace.

At the same time, suicide attacks are occurring at the rate of about three per week, Ban said, half of them in the south. Complex attacks employing suicide bombers, rocket-propelled grenades and small arms fire were running about two a month, double the number in 2009, he added.

During testimony Tuesday before the Senate Armed Services Committee, senior Pentagon official Michele Flournoy said the percentage of complex attacks had fallen steadily since a peak in February and were averaging below last year's levels. She gave no figures.

"The shift to more complex suicide attacks demonstrates a growing capability of the local terrorist networks linked to al-Qaida," Ban said.

He attributed the rise in violence to increased NATO and Afghan military activity in the south during the first quarter of the year, including the U.S.-led attack on the Taliban stronghold of Marjah. He also cited "significant anti-government element activities" in the east and southeast of the country.

"The majority of incidents continue to involve armed clashes and improvised explosive devices, each accounting for one third of the reported incidents," Ban said, referring to the military term for roadside bombs.

The U.N. report found some encouraging signs, including the government's plan to reach out to insurgents and offer economic incentives to leave the battlefield. It also said the U.N. was working with Afghan officials to prepare for parliamentary elections in September.

Polio vaccinations began in February to reach 7.7 million children this year, 200,000 more than last year, the report said.

Nevertheless, the overall U.N. assessment contrasted with the tone set last Wednesday by Defense Secretary Robert Gates, who told a Senate panel that the U.S.-led force was making progress in Afghanistan. Gates complained about negative perceptions about the war taking root in Washington.

"I think that we are regaining the initiative," Gates told the panel. "I think that we are making headway."

Key congressional Democrats responded skeptically to Gates' remarks, raising questions about rising U.S. casualties and the slow pace of progress in an increasingly unpopular war.

At least 53 international troops, including 34 Americans, have died so far this month, a rate that could make June among the deadliest for U.S. and other international forces in the nearly 9-year war. The deadliest month for U.S. troops was October 2009, when 59 Americans died. The deadliest for the entire international force was July 2009 when 75 troops, including 44 Americans, were killed.

The U.N. also reported 395 war-related civilian casualties between April and June, a decrease of 1 percent from the same period last year. The report blamed "anti-government elements" for about 70 percent of the civilian casualties, up 3 percent from the last U.N. study in March.

Insurgent attacks on schools have increased steadily across the country, the report said, with militants using threats, intimidation and violence to frighten parents and staff. The report also said the U.N. was having trouble recruiting international staff because of threats of violence and a lack of secure living facilities.

Despite the negative assessment, NATO spokesman Brig. Gen. Josef Blotz told reporters Saturday that the international force was making steady strides, even though "tough fighting is expected to continue."

Insurgent commanders were being apprehended by coalition forces, which over time will disrupt the ability to organize suicide and roadside bomb attacks, he said.

"It has to be tougher perhaps before it goes easier," Blotz said.

Using figures different from the U.N., Blotz said the number of civilians killed or wounded in operations involving the international force dropped by 44.4 percent in the past 12 weeks compared with the same period in 2009.

"In the same period of time, the number of civilian casualties caused by the insurgency increased by 36 percent," Blotz said.

Afghan authorities reported civilian casualties in what NATO said was an attack late Friday against the Haqqani network, an al-Qaida-linked wing of the Taliban, along the border between Khost and Paktia provinces in southern Afghanistan. NATO said the attack included precision missile strikes against "a large number of armed insurgents" although the alliance was aware of reports of civilian deaths.

Shafiq Mujahid, head of the Khost provincial council, said at least six civilians, including five children and one woman, were killed in the airstrike and 13 other civilians were wounded.

NATO said it would accept full responsibility if civilians were "unintentionally harmed."

Also Saturday, police said gunmen assassinated a relative of a powerbroker in Kandahar the night before. The victim, Hamayun Khan, was a relative of Gul Alai, one of the Pashtun warlords who drove the Taliban from Kandahar in 2001, police said.

Two Afghan civilians were killed Friday when their vehicle hit a roadside bomb in the Marjah district of Helmand province, the Afghan Interior Ministry reported Saturday.

Three Afghan soldiers were killed and two others wounded by a roadside bomb Friday in Paktia province in southeastern Afghanistan, according to the deputy provincial police chief, Ghulam Dastagir.

___

Associated Press writers Deb Riechmann and Rahim Faiez in Kabul and Mirwais Khan in Kandahar contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

KABUL, Afghanistan — The United Nations reported Saturday that insurgent violence has risen sharply in Afghanistan over the last three months, with roadside bombings, complex suicide attacks and...
KABUL, Afghanistan — The United Nations reported Saturday that insurgent violence has risen sharply in Afghanistan over the last three months, with roadside bombings, complex suicide attacks and...
Filed by Hunter Stuart  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 36
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:46 AM on 06/21/2010
Duh phase 2 of the Islamic -Maoist style insurgency. Read the Viet Cong play book to follow along.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
omobob
left coast, usa
08:29 PM on 06/20/2010
The Afghan Insurgency is emboldened. They have struck in Kabul at the CIA, The two Air fields and in Kandahar. With todays news that Afghanistan and Pakistan are talking about how to make peace with insurgents fighting U.S. troops in Afghanistan focused on what they fear could be a abrupt withdrawal of U.S. It is little wonder the insurgents are striking more often. The inept handling of the war by Military Command has only compounded the problems (posting us combat teams in isolated positions egging the insurgents into battle). The war is being prosecuted in Pakistan by Predators only widening the fighting and assuring Pakistan as a lightening rod for insurgents and a haven for Afghans.
09:53 AM on 06/20/2010
Of all the excuses baby bush stated for invading Iraq, only “protecting Israel” was not proven wrong. AfPac has the same root, just a little more indirectly.
I think any US citizen that would support war against the Muslim states for no other reason than to support Israel should have their foreheads in their campaign posters stamped SFFFS for Squandered Fortune For Foreign Squatters. Biting the hand that feeds us oil for the benefit of foreign squatters to the disbenifit of US citizens is a form of treason. Clearly they care more about foreign squatters than US citizen soldiers. It’s not just freedom of speech, it’s what any LOYAL US Citizen would do for their neighbor.
09:01 AM on 06/20/2010
I guess this proves Bush wrong. War isn't the best way to revitalize an economy. This is a culmination of epic fails on theories of the war wizards.

The war will pay for itself- FAIL
Iraq has WMD- FAIL
We will be greeted as liberators- FAIL
The war will be over in months- FAIL
researcher
researcher
03:09 AM on 06/20/2010
please was there anyone in america that believed our gov on these timelines?

believe nothing they tell you when it comes to these wars for profits.

this is vietnam all over agains only this time we have two vietnams.

twice as much money for the military complex and corp america.

the sad part as long as there is no draft americans could care less.

as the state go bankrupt raise taxes less social benefits and americans have not yet figured out they spend their money on these wars for profits and a mega size industrial military and intelligence gathering complex.

ike warned us in 1961 few if any americans listened to his final speech.

the bully in the world is going bankrupt.

we learned little if anything from history.

rome all over again and all we can do is blame those folks south of the border that we want for their cheap labor. look into a mirror americans we are imperialists to the core.

note how few even posted on here.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
viko
Aim high, allow for the wind, land on target.
03:08 AM on 06/20/2010
Our work in Vietnam has produced good sales in Coka Cola. 55,000 Marines dead
After a forty year cold war.no one ever put a price on SDI.
We Invade Iraq twenty for Hours Shock and ough. 6,000 Marines dead
My Question Where were the Al Qaeda Militant Muslim Terrorist for forty years.
Were they invented because the Communism went down to finance a war machine.
No accountability and a culture of greed is dissolving us all from within.
The Japanese get the Minerals in Afghanistan and the Chinese get the oil in Iraq. We get a leak in the Gulf. The Vietnamese got the Coka Cola.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
viko
Aim high, allow for the wind, land on target.
02:55 AM on 06/20/2010
BP got the slack to drill, because Iran was cutting the oil supply in the Gulf..
We sent troops to Afghanistan to get Bin laden..
Then we reversed and went to Iraq which was the plan prior 911.
Obama sent more troops to Afghanistan an is trying to wind down in Iraq.
The only thing we see now is Mineral grab. DADT. and Generals collapsing .
The lesson of the Nam was don't invade a country that does not have a stable Government intact.
No exit strategy is one thing but Hanoi was simultaneously attacked in 59 bases an onslaught the US army could not handle. Karsai has proven to be a turn coat If he had a relationship with the Talliban he would have won the election. . A preemptive strike is one thing but a preemptive exit might be in the offing.This "over there" containment policy might have to be revived.The
US might have to adopt a policy. " If you want me come and get me" It seems to work for Bin Laden. he is sucking us in and blowing us away.
Jack Kennedy was temped to send troops in Nam and was accused of not being tough on Communism and now Obama is hit by the same reverse psychology commitment pride decision . You are not tough on terror?. Make a new Nam and play into the hands of War and Terror and The Republican,SELF DESTRUCTION ECONOMICALLY AND POLITICALLY.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
davidpkronmiller
02:49 AM on 06/20/2010
Ah iPhone commenting - meant die in Iraq
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
davidpkronmiller
02:15 AM on 06/20/2010
For years we ignored Taliban in Afghanistan/Pakistan and al queda under bush and we're surprised that when we put pressure on them they react? They're not stronger suddenly - we're just finally really in that fight. Bush was a weak military commander on chief who let 4000 soldiers due in Iraq while he allowed the people who did attack walk free. Maybe his families ties to Saudi oil kept him from doing his real job.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ArmyTanker
01:51 AM on 06/20/2010
Another U.N. Secretary-General talking to much truth. Looks like the US will be pushing to have him replaced. People are getting sick of these wars. The US is spinning the crap out of its war effort. Just look at the news about the mineral find they just found, that in reality they've known about for a very long time. There's always a price to pay for war mongering. We'll be paying for decades to come. The deaths and injury of innocent civilians. The death and injury to our own young soldiers. Not to mention the long term physiological effects war has on everyone. How about the loss of public services and the neglect of our own infrastructure just to keep money pumping into wars that have no end in sight. It's not looking good for the human race as a whole.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realitytrumpsbull
Two 'alves of coconut!
01:32 AM on 06/20/2010
Well, isn't the UN part of the reason that our troops have been in Afghanistan for so long, rather than an inability on the part of our military to do what they've been asked to do, whatever that is, exactly?

I think war is war, and if you're sending an army to occupy a foreign country, you kind of do it 'all in, or all out', and you build high-capacity prisons and so forth, disarm the public, and establish an unapologetic occupation government. Then, some time down the road, when it seems like the local people are civil and organized and peaceful enough, you let them take it over.

But, what's really the purpose of occupying Afghanistan, to begin with? Is it because of the Taliban, is it because of Al Queda and dialysis man, or is it because of mineral holdings that foreign countries want to access and control? What's the real story, here? And, moreover, how many more billions is the United States going to waste on fighting half a war? Frankly, the UN seems to be better at starting problems and making them worse than it is anything else, and has to be rescued time and again by the US and other countries. Obama promised to bring the troops home, and I support that.
12:12 AM on 06/20/2010
UN: US Occupation VioIence Soaring Over Last Year's Levels.
11:01 PM on 06/19/2010
Why on earth are we still sacrificing our troops and countless others in a region where US presence serves only to inflame hostility? Leave these nations, Israel included, to their own devices with no assistance whatsoever from this country. We've grossly overspent for decades in lives and dollars. US corporate interests do NOT trump our real national interests, and that has been the case for at least sixty years.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fred Hood
United we win divided we lose
10:33 PM on 06/19/2010
we are pushing more to their side with our actions.....backwater ki//ing innocent families...while getting or stealing more of our wealth
gdeer
liberal for 76 years
10:18 PM on 06/19/2010
Oh the futility and hopelessness of this war! The U.S. will "win" only if we are able to kill enough Afganis to convince them to turn their country over to us. Not going to happen!

What is wrong with Pres. Obama that he can not understand what so many of us see as so obvious. Is he listening to the wrong people? Does the Military Industrial Complex have his ear? Is he giving himself over to generals? Well, the generals have made lots of mistakes in this war and continue to do so.
photo
CarolinaDem
they DID take the last train for the coast!
10:56 PM on 06/19/2010
They're all incapable of grasping the uselessness of their power. I think (hope) Obama meant it when he effectively called their bluff, giving them 18 months to win the thing and challenged them to admit they could not do it. They blinked, agreed and now...it will soon be apparent to them as to him that they can't produce. Then he can pull 'em out, but he has to confront them with the chance of their humiliation if they get medieval on him.