iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama Offshore Drilling Moratorium OVERTURNED By Judge

First Posted: 06/22/10 03:01 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 05:50 PM ET

Offshore Drilling Moratorium

NEW ORLEANS (AP) -- A federal judge struck down the Obama administration's six-month ban on deepwater oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico as rash and heavy-handed Tuesday, saying the government simply assumed that because one rig exploded, the others pose an immediate danger, too.

The White House promised an immediate appeal. The Interior Department had imposed the moratorium last month in the wake of the Deepwater Horizon disaster, halting approval of any new permits for deepwater projects and suspending drilling on 33 exploratory wells.

White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said President Barack Obama believes that until investigations can determine why the spill happened, continued deepwater drilling exposes workers and the environment to "a danger that the president does not believe we can afford."

Several companies that ferry people and supplies and provide other services to offshore rigs argued that the moratorium was arbitrarily imposed after the April 20 explosion that killed 11 workers and blew out the well 5,000 feet underwater. It has spewed anywhere from 67 million to 127 million gallons of oil.

U.S. District Judge Martin Feldman, who was appointed by President Ronald Reagan and has owned stock in a number of petroleum-related companies, sided with the plaintiffs.

"If some drilling equipment parts are flawed, is it rational to say all are?" he asked. "Are all airplanes a danger because one was? All oil tankers like Exxon Valdez? All trains? All mines? That sort of thinking seems heavy-handed, and rather overbearing."

He also warned that the shutdown would have an "immeasurable effect" on the industry, the local economy and the U.S. energy supply.

The ruling was welcomed by the oil and gas industry and decried by environmentalists.

Feldman's financial disclosure report for 2008, the most recent available, shows holdings in at least eight petroleum companies or funds that invest in them, including Transocean Ltd., which owned the Deepwater Horizon. The report shows that most of his holdings were valued at less than $15,000; it did not provide specific amounts.

It was not clear whether Feldman still has any of the energy industry stocks. Recent court filings indicate he may no longer have Transocean stock. The 2008 report showed that he did not own any individual shares in big companies such as BP, which leased the rig that exploded, or ExxonMobil.

Feldman did not immediately respond to a request for more information about his current holdings.

Josh Reichert, managing director of the Pew Environment Group, said the ruling should be rescinded if he still has investments in companies that could benefit from Tuesday's ruling.

"If Judge Feldman has any investments in oil and gas operators in the Gulf, it represents a flagrant conflict of interest," Reichert said.

Feldman's ruling prohibits federal officials from enforcing the moratorium until a trial is held. He did not set a date.

In his ruling, the judge called the spill "an unprecedented, sad, ugly and inhuman disaster," but said Interior Secretary Ken Salazar's rationale for the moratorium "does not seem to be fact-specific and refuses to take into measure the safety records of those others in the Gulf." Feldman said he was "unable to divine or fathom a relationship between the findings and the immense scope of the moratorium."

The judge said the blanket moratorium "seems to assume that because one rig failed and although no one yet fully knows why, all companies and rigs drilling new wells over 500 feet also universally present an imminent danger."

Feldman said there are about 3,600 structures in the Gulf that account for 31 percent of total domestic oil production and 11 percent of domestic natural gas production. More than 60 percent of active leases are in water over 1,000 feet deep. He also said an estimated 150,000 jobs are directly related to offshore operations.

The lawsuit was filed by Hornbeck Offshore Services of Covington, La. CEO Todd Hornbeck said after the ruling that he is looking forward to getting back to work. "It's the right thing for not only the industry but the country," he said.

Earlier in the day, executives at a major oil conference in London warned that the moratorium would cripple world energy supplies. Steven Newman, president and CEO of Transocean, called it unnecessary and an overreaction.

"There are things the administration could implement today that would allow the industry to go back to work tomorrow without an arbitrary six-month time limit," Newman said.

BP CEO Tony Hayward skipped the event after coming under fire for attending a yacht race in England on Saturday rather than dealing with the spill.

BP stock dropped 81 cents, or 2.7 percent, to $29.52, near a 14-year-old low for the company in U.S. trading. The stocks of other companies associated with the spill remained low despite Feldman's ruling.

The drilling moratorium was declared May 6 and originally was to last only through the month. Obama announced May 27 that he was extending it for six months.

Rep. Edward Markey, D-Mass., chairman of the Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming, slammed the ruling.

"This is another bad decision in a disaster riddled with bad decisions by the oil industry," said Markey, who was at the forefront of an effort to force BP to make underwater video of the spill public. "The only thing worse than one oil spill disaster in the Gulf of Mexico would be two oil spill disasters."

In Louisiana, Gov. Bobby Jindal and corporate leaders had complained that the moratorium would cost the region thousands of lucrative jobs, most paying more than $50,000 a year.

Feldman agreed, writing: "An invalid agency decision to suspend drilling of wells in depths over 500 feet simply cannot justify the immeasurable effect on the plaintiffs, the local economy, the Gulf region and the critical present-day aspect of the availability of domestic energy in this country."

Tim Kerner, mayor of the fishing town of Lafitte, La., cheered the ruling. "I love it. I think it's great for the jobs here and the people who depend on them," he said.

The American Petroleum Institute, one of the industry's main lobbying groups, welcomed the decision: "With this ruling, our industry and its people can get back to work to provide Americans with the energy they need, and do it safely and without harming the environment."

In its response to the lawsuit, the Interior Department had argued the moratorium was necessary while the effort to stop the leak and clean the Gulf continues and new safety standards are developed. "A second deepwater blowout could overwhelm the efforts to respond to the current disaster," the department said.

The government also challenged contentions that the moratorium would cause long-term economic harm. There are still 3,600 oil and natural gas production platforms in the Gulf.

As Feldman was issuing his ruling, the people in charge of a $20 billion fund to compensate those whose livelihoods have been ruined by the spill were on the coast Tuesday to talk with officials about the claims process.

Kenneth Feinberg, tapped by the White House to run the fund, has pledged to speed payments to fishermen, business owners and others. He was to meet with Alabama Gov. Bob Riley.

BP claims director Darryl Willis visited a claims center in a rundown strip mall in Bayou La Batre, Ala., and said the company has already cut 37,000 checks for $118 million. Claims totaling about $600 million have been filed so far.

"Anyone who feels like they have been damaged or hurt or harmed has every right to file a claim," Willis said. "These are complicated in some cases, and in some cases they're straightforward. But every person should file their claim, and they will be looked at fairly."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

NEW ORLEANS (AP) -- A federal judge struck down the Obama administration's six-month ban on deepwater oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico as rash and heavy-handed Tuesday, saying the government simply...
NEW ORLEANS (AP) -- A federal judge struck down the Obama administration's six-month ban on deepwater oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico as rash and heavy-handed Tuesday, saying the government simply...
Filed by Katherine Goldstein  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 9,301
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (161 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Coyote50
"Taxes are the price we pay for civilization."
02:25 PM on 06/27/2010
Here's a little more on the judge in the case.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/#37936669 Rachel Maddow
The judge also sold his stock in Exxon on the morning of the hearing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
emrogers
What could possibly go wrong?
02:40 PM on 06/24/2010
Wretched Carlson
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Veeve
Biochem/Psych/Hist/Econ/Techie
06:13 AM on 06/24/2010
How any semi fair minded judge can observe this fiasco and not understand that we don't have fail safe mechanisms for the worst case scenarios, and not become alarmed by that is ludicrous. Enough with these super pro industry judges! Do any conservatives out there actually understand what these judges do to American families? Are they too entranced by Sarah and drill baby drill? What gives?
photo
DrBlunt
Telling it like it is....
04:32 AM on 06/24/2010
Another DummmPhuckkk!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:38 PM on 06/23/2010
This judge should never have been allowed to be involved in this case. There was an evident conflict of interest. I know that we are all suffering because our economy is changing. Some of us will have to retrain into different fields and the oil business is one that may be dying. It's now or never. We have to turn to other fuels and create new industries. No more exploratory drilling. Strengthen and economize the wells we have left while we change over. It has to happen. The "Green Age" needs to move forward. Yes, it's easy to say due to my experience. The industry I was in for a long time evolved and shrunk leaving many friends out of work. But they all survived and did other things. Plan ahead and move on your own. Don't wait for the inevitable to happen. We'll be better off in the long run and so will our children.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Americulchie
Unapologetic Liberal
04:48 PM on 06/23/2010
One thing is abundantly clear deep water oil drilling is a risky operation.We need a rethink on allowing it to continue.It is obvious that this was an undertaking which was not well thought out.We cannot allow the drilling to continue as long as it is not known how to plug the damn leak.It is a shame that people will be put out of work but until we know if we can come to grips with this leak it would unwise to continue drilling period.
06:31 PM on 06/23/2010
Easy. Allow the oil companies to drill in shallow water. The tecchnology is there for oil spills in shallow water. Due to all of the enviromentalists, the oil companies have been forced to deep water and now we have a disaster we can't control~

tsk, tsk~
07:56 PM on 06/23/2010
1/2 the problem..tsk
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:22 PM on 06/23/2010
Bee Ess
07:15 PM on 06/23/2010
It's not risky . It's insanely dangerous. Apparently there are no safety gaps at all as has been proven by this ongoing , in our faces mega disaster on the Gulf.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dr Juan
We built America without BO
03:11 PM on 06/23/2010
If Obama wins the appeal it will be great for Oil companies becaue oil prices will climb again (and trigger the double dip in the economy.) To drill deep water or not to drill deep water...it is a win-win for big oil.

For Obama it is a lose lose because if he wins the appeal, and the moratorium stands, he will certainly be given full credit for causing the hikes in oil price and the resultant economic slump.
04:48 PM on 06/23/2010
so now it will be a race to complete and bring the wells online..........that should increase safety.......(sarcasm off for now)
07:58 PM on 06/23/2010
the admin can quash whenever they want...natl sec
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vegasyankee
Making Energy for a Strong America!
01:46 PM on 06/23/2010
morven 18 minutes ago (1:18 PM)
86 Fans
Become a fan
Unfan
Have you not listened to the men who work on this, and other rigs. they testified before Congress.

Many wells are dangerously unsafe, and shortcuts are being taken.

They are an accident waiting to happen, just like deepwater horizion.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

14 years in The Gulf and I will tell you this has always been and will always be a dangerous job. But the original poster was correct, drilling in the Gulf for over 60 years with 1 major spill is pretty darn good when you consider we've drilled 17,000 deep water wells and 35,000 shallow water wells.

And no, the majority of The Gulf rigs and platforms are NOT accidents waiting to happen. BP was careless and reckless but there a lot of oil and gas companies who operate out here everyday very safely. BP, Shell, Exxon and Chevron are NOT the only companies who work out here, there are lots of independent oil and gas companies who do things a whole lot different than the majors and who don't have walruses listed on their spill plans.

The 2nd worse thing to happen besides the accident itself is that now you have tons of offshore drilling wannna be experts who do not have a clue of what really happens out here.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
morven
02:29 PM on 06/23/2010
I have no doubt that the men and women who work on the rigs, work under dangerous conditions. Spills don't just happen in the ocean though, there are many that most never hear about. Rachel spoke about many of them.

I do however think the corps. they work for take dangerous risks with your lives, and our environment, for the almighty dollar. Maybe just the "majors" are that way, I don't know, and I would be willing to bet, neither do most Americans. I will remain a skeptic until I see sound back-up. I think more money should be put into R&D for this purpose. They should have to prove their fail-safe, not just say they have one. BP does things in our waters, (no fail-safe, disbursements, etc.), that they would never be allowed to do in the UK.

It is good to hear that there are some safe oil companies. I will always be skeptical about the "majors"
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:29 PM on 06/23/2010
Still posting your BS? Funny that you complain about wannabe experts while at the same time attempting to pass yourself off as one. You weren't one last night. Did you take a one hour online course today?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
morven
02:34 PM on 06/23/2010
Hmmmm, have I been played?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vegasyankee
Making Energy for a Strong America!
02:41 PM on 06/23/2010
Funny, you sit right right near the top of that list.

I have no doubt that after the space shuttle accident you were probably a NASA expert though.
01:23 PM on 06/23/2010
Probably not a good idea to be putting people out of work by closing down existing wells.

Instead we should be requiring every one of them to start drilling relief wells ASAP.

That would put more people to work and increase safety.

As for permits for new offshore wells, that should be shut down completely and permanently.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
johnnyfarout
01:20 PM on 06/23/2010
If some nightmarish life threatening disasters are bad does that mean we should ban them all...because some of them might be good. Isn't there a silver lining in every black noxious cloud of poisonous gas? If you are not quite dead yet, aren't you getting stronger? Doesn't god want you to go to work even on the day you die? Since BP's radioactive oil gusher that can't be stopped is flying along just fine...why can't we just see it as god's plan? First this, then the 3rd Temple, then arageddon...yippee! Am I going over the top with absurdities? Surely never!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chris1962
NYC
01:07 PM on 06/23/2010
Soros must be so proud. Obama is doing such a good job of destroying the Gulf states for him.

http://www.wdsu.com/news/23997498/detail.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
morven
01:19 PM on 06/23/2010
I think your beloved corporations are doing that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chris1962
NYC
03:05 PM on 06/23/2010
Like Petrobras, you mean? Oh, wait, that's Obama, Soros, and Al Gore.
photo
FairProgressive
Liberalism is totalitarianism with a
01:20 PM on 06/23/2010
obama took 2 billion dollars of taxpayer money, invested it in Brazilian oil drilling, of which Soros then profited handsomely, due have placed his bets prior to the public announcement.......oddly, i don't hear a single peep from the liberals or the progressives on the impropriety of this

where is the outrage from the unemployed and the granola crowd on this ?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
johnnyfarout
01:23 PM on 06/23/2010
hit yourself really hard again with that stupid hammer of yours
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chris1962
NYC
03:10 PM on 06/23/2010
>>>obama took 2 billion dollars of taxpayer money, invested it in Brazilian oil drilling, of which Soros then profited handsomely, due have placed his bets prior to the public announcement.......oddly, i don't hear a single peep from the liberals or the progressives on the impropriety of this>>>

Isn't it the strangest thing how you just don't hear a sound about that? Soros couldn't have been too happy about the judge and the moratorium thingie, but the $2B ought to appease him for awhile. And Obama's come up with a new scheme to cripple the Gulf some more: http://www.wdsu.com/news/23997498/detail.html That Obama: he just never runs out of ideas.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:51 PM on 06/23/2010
The current admin in the WH appointed someone to the MMS agency and they said drilling was ok. So the people of the gulf will now have to pay the price for that person giving a green light to that platform.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
morven
01:03 PM on 06/23/2010
That platform was approved and set up under the booosh admin.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chris1962
NYC
03:13 PM on 06/23/2010
>>>That platform was approved and set up under the booosh admin. >>>

And inspected by the Obama administration. Oh, wait...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dr Juan
We built America without BO
03:18 PM on 06/23/2010
It was approved under Obama admin in 2009.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
morven
01:04 PM on 06/23/2010
Didn't fox tell you that?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chris1962
NYC
05:32 PM on 06/23/2010
Let me guess: It's all Fox's fault.
I don't suppose you Kool-Aid drinkers have any idea how ridiculous you sound, trying to blame everyone other than Obama, who's been in office for a YEAR AND A HALF, duh.
12:49 PM on 06/23/2010
It looks like Future Pipe Industries in Gulfport has a fix for the leak. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UP8iN4ZX1JU&feature=channel I hope they can pull it off.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dr Juan
We built America without BO
03:25 PM on 06/23/2010
Not a bad idea - but it needs some disconnect system to save the drill ship in case of a well blow-out and fire.

Star Fiberglass could manufacture this in addition ot their line of corrosion resistant high pressure fiberglass petroleum piping used in sour gas wells.
04:00 PM on 06/23/2010
I guess you could hand the riser inside the silo, and if you had remote slips and power tongs atop the silo you could also hang the drill pipe with a stab-in valve. Disconnect without pulling the bit up into the riser.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chris1962
NYC
05:37 PM on 06/23/2010
The old leak or the leak? http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/06/23/oil-cap-removed-oil-spill_n_622663.html

When, by the way, are we going to stop calling this gusher a "leak"?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:46 PM on 06/23/2010
Thank goodness for the judicial branch of government. That is the only saving grace this country has to curb the power grab of the progressives.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
morven
01:06 PM on 06/23/2010
Power grab of the progressives? You have got to be kidding me. Well actually, fox does not tell you facts nor truth so I guess you would not know. That power grab was by the booosh/ch eney cabal.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jordan Anderson
02:15 PM on 06/23/2010
ACTIVIST JUDGES!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:09 PM on 06/23/2010
The WH is now trying to demonize the judge over the ruling. Who doesn't have oil in their stock portfolio? If the judge had 900million+ like Soros does, then we can say that he is biased. The WH needs to stop the attempt to socialize all our major industries and start providing jobs instead of unemployment checks.
12:14 PM on 06/23/2010
There are several MILLION Americans with no oil in their "portfolio".

"Socialism" is the cute Republican word of the week/month/year. It's almost as corny as a "Yo Mama" joke. Find something new.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:22 PM on 06/23/2010
So if you have oil in your portfolio you are bad? Soros wants the WH to nationalize all our major industries like Hugo did in Venezuela. Is it ok for the government to control(nationalize/socialize) and ban all the major industries in this country because they feel like it. Shouldn't they follow the laws like everyone else or are they the only ones that can make them up as they go along?
photo
FairProgressive
Liberalism is totalitarianism with a
01:23 PM on 06/23/2010
well, at least we ALL agree socialism as a practical way to govern is a joke...so, we do have some common ground after all
01:02 PM on 06/23/2010
Instead of focusing on this moratorium, we have a serious issue: millions of gallons of oil leaking into the Gulf of Mexico every day. Forget deep-water drilling in Brazil; it is raining oil in Louisiana.

http://www.newslook.com/videos/222982-raw-video-oil-rains-in-louisiana