iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Leon Panetta: There May Be Fewer Than 50 Al Qaeda Fighters In Afghanistan

Afghanistan

AP/Huffington Post   First Posted: 06/27/10 12:01 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 05:55 PM ET

WASHINGTON -- CIA Director Leon Panetta said on Sunday there may be fewer than 50 al-Qaida fighters in Afghanistan, with "no question" that most of the terrorist network is operating from the western tribal region of Pakistan.

Panetta's remarks came as President Barack Obama builds up U.S. forces in Afghanistan to prop up the government and, in his words, "disrupt, dismantle, and defeat al Qaeda." About U.S. 98,000 troops will be in Afghanistan by fall.

Asked by ABC's Jake Tapper to estimate the number of al Qaeda terrorists in Afghanistan, Panetta said, "I think the estimate on the number of Al Qaeda is actually relatively small. At most, we're looking at 50 to 100, maybe less. It's in that vicinity."

Panetta told ABCs' "This Week" that the CIA is heavily focused on killing the al Qaida leadership in Pakistan, and he defended CIA drone strikes against "dead wrong" claims that they violate international law. He said Osama bin Laden is hiding amid the region's rough terrain with "tremendous security around him."

Asked to describe what an American victory would look like in Afghanistan, Panetta said: "Our purpose, our whole mission there, is to make sure that Al Qaeda never finds another safehaven from which to attack this country. That's the fundamental goal of why the United States is there. And the measure of success for us is: do you have an Afghanistan that is stable enough to make sure that never happens."

ABC News notes:

The CIA director said the U.S. is making progress in Afghanistan. "It's harder, it's slower than I think anyone anticipated. But at the same time, we are seeing increasing violence," he told host Jake Tapper.


"Is the strategy the right strategy? We think so," he said. "I think...the key to success or failure is whether the Afghans accept responsibility, are able to deploy an effective army and police force to maintain stability. If they can do that, then I think we're going to be able achieve the kind of progress and the kind of stability that the President is after," Panetta said.

A NATO spokesman also stressed Sunday that military operations to secure vast areas of Afghanistan would not be delayed by the ouster of the top commander in the war and mounting casualties.

NATO and U.S. forces are continuing their work as they await the arrival of new commander Gen. David Petraeus. He is taking over from Gen. Stanley McChrystal, who was ousted by President Barack Obama after he and his aides were quoted in Rolling Stone magazine making disparaging remarks about top Obama administration officials.

There has been concern that the leadership shake-up will further slow a push into the volatile south that has already been delayed by weeks in some areas and months in others. But NATO spokesman Brig. Josef Blotz told reporters in Kabul that the worries are unwarranted and the military is not pausing because of the changes.

"We will not miss a beat in our operations to expand security here in Afghanistan," Blotz said, repeating the assurances of many diplomats in recent days that the change in leadership does not mean a re-evaluation of strategy.

The top American military officer, Adm. Mike Mullen, flew to Afghanistan on Saturday to assure President Hamid Karzai that Petraeus would pursue the policies of his predecessor, including efforts to reduce civilian casualties.

Blotz said Petraeus was expected in Kabul in the next seven to 10 days.

Operations appear to be continuing apace, according to NATO statements. Two recent air strikes in the north, east and south killed at least nine militants, including two local Taliban commanders, NATO and Afghan officials said. No civilians were injured, NATO said.

Eight other militants were killed in a NATO-Afghan military operation in eastern Ghazni province, according to Gen. Khail Buz Sherzai, the provincial police chief.

NATO deaths also are climbing daily. A U.S. service member was killed in a bomb attack in the south and two others in a firefight in the east on Sunday, said Col. Wayne Shanks, a U.S. forces spokesman.

June has become the deadliest month of the war for NATO troops with at least 93 killed, 56 of them American. For U.S. troops, the deadliest month was October 2009, with a toll of 59 dead.

Blotz said the deaths do show that the fight is getting harder in Afghanistan, but said that does not affect NATO's resolve.

"We are in the arena. There is no way out now. We have to stay on. We have to fight this campaign," he said.

Blotz said about 130 middle- to senior-level Taliban insurgents have been killed or captured in the past four months.

But Taliban attacks against those allied with the government or NATO forces have also surged. In the latest such violence, the headmaster of a high school in eastern Ghazni was beheaded by militants on Saturday, the Education Ministry said. A high school in the same district - Qarabagh - was set on fire the same day.

In southern Zabul province Sunday, a roadside bomb attack on a private security company vehicle killed two of those inside and injured three, according to the provincial spokesman, Mohammad Jan Rasoolyar.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

WASHINGTON -- CIA Director Leon Panetta said on Sunday there may be fewer than 50 al-Qaida fighters in Afghanistan, with "no question" that most of the terrorist network is operating from the western ...
WASHINGTON -- CIA Director Leon Panetta said on Sunday there may be fewer than 50 al-Qaida fighters in Afghanistan, with "no question" that most of the terrorist network is operating from the western ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4,622
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (86 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tony wise
05:51 PM on 07/27/2010
and you guys blame bush? obama has to send in 30,000 more troops to capture obl and the last 50 al-quida ?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David VeLar
12:12 AM on 07/05/2010
Richard Greener asked: "Is there a rational person who can argue the necessity to have a military advantage on the ground of 100,000 to 50? Can someone tell me why we haven't brought our troops home in victory?"

Because someone in Pakistan and someone else in the GOP will get on a microphone and go "Ya missed me ya missed me, you didn't catch Bin Laaaaden" and trumpet that all around until the 2012 election comes home.
01:36 PM on 06/29/2010
I can't understand how people get worried about a timetable for withdrawal when there are only 50 terrorists left.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
1776 or 1984
IT'S AN EMPIRE, NOT A REPUBLIC!
07:09 AM on 06/29/2010
Again, does this story make any sense? The War on Terror is a lie.

Ali Mohamed, an ex-commando from the puppet state Egypt, is this Empire's Boba Fett.

Prior to 9-1-1, Ali Mohamed:

=served in the Pent@gon's Special Forces at Fort Bragg

=was also 0sama Bin_Laden's security chief -- DID YOU CATCH THIS? DEAL WITH IT. DON'T DISMISS IT, PROCESS IT, LEARN ABOUT IT

=was a C_I_A asset

=trained the 1993 World Trade Center b0mbing terr0r cell

=was an F_B_I "informant"

=escorted Al Qaeda's #2 in command, Al-Zawahiri, in the US on 'fund raising' trips,

=took the targeting photos for the b0mbed US African Embassies

=trained the Somalis on how to down Blackhawks

Come on, wake up. The Empire had this guy help create the War on Terr0r so they can get Iraq and trillions of our tax dollars.

Read between the lines in "Triple Cross" by Peter Lance (5 time Emmy Award Winning Investigative Reporter)
http://www.amazon.com/Triple-Cross-Ladens-Master-Penetrated/dp/0061189413/ref=tmm_pap_title_0

Smoking Gun.

This is still an open society, you still have the freedom to stick your head in the sand or not. Awake.

==================
Be a rebel, not a subject
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Guitar63
10:07 PM on 06/28/2010
Good thing McCrystal got those extra 40,000 troops eh?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
1776 or 1984
IT'S AN EMPIRE, NOT A REPUBLIC!
07:55 PM on 06/28/2010
These 2 wars are complete bullsh*t
07:28 PM on 06/28/2010
Agreed with the less than 50 Al Qaeda agents in Afghanistan. They mainly orchestrate missions and supply bomb makers for different factions of the Afghan mujahideen. This diverts attention from Pakistan where we should actually looking for Al Qaeda... Sadly, most of the munitions now used by the mujahideen were supplied by the US. During the Regan era we supplied 3-20B to help them fight to soviets.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
dsenbet
GOP: a party on the verge of extinction.
06:02 PM on 06/28/2010
Panetta said: "Our purpose, our whole mission there, is to make sure that Al Qaeda never finds another safehaven from which to attack this country. That's the fundamental goal of why the United States is there. And the measure of success for us is: do you have an Afghanistan that is stable enough to make sure that never happens."

Right now Al-qaeda's safe heaven is Pakistan. How one could justify a hundred thousand US troops in Afghanistan is beyond me.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
teknodum
03:50 PM on 06/28/2010
Any deluded human who may think we can actually transform the poor masses of religious relics ( who continue following and supporting Muslim Fundamentalist networks), should realize their egregious view
Bring these kids home NOW!
Read and Heed History . Focus on covert ballsy ways of targeting individual lunatics that threaten the USA. " Nation Build" here and clean up the Bush deregulations and War Machines that destroyed our economy and the lives of our children
photo
Littlewords
I think I am, therefore I am, I think?!?
05:03 PM on 06/28/2010
Afghanistan is deeper than a religi0us matter. It is a deeply entrenched tribal culture, which appears to trump the extremist religi0us zealots there. Undoing a way of life that permeates across the nation based on tribal norms is the deeper play. To even have a shot at this would be a 50 year adventure and the communities would require decades of education and fiscal vibrancy to even build up an alternative candidate to known customs that have survived their rough conditions.

Islam layers over the top of this as another tough factor of consideration, but the underlying foundation is even further entrenxh
photo
Littlewords
I think I am, therefore I am, I think?!?
05:06 PM on 06/28/2010
Sorry, post got truncated.

meant to finish with : ...further entrenched and even more solidified as an ingrained way of life in that region. Any neo-con greeted as 'liberators' thinking for that country is both equality laughable and danger0us....as we are finally and sadly coming to understand.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PCMinistry
Your Father
03:31 PM on 06/28/2010
AL-CIA-DUH
03:21 PM on 06/28/2010
And now Karzai is reportedly meeting with the Haqqani network, through the Pakistani Army and the ISI. Seems like he's forming a power base for after we leave. Can one blame him for it?

http://www.newslook.com/videos/223780-karzai-meets-leader-of-haqqani-network
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WHTrout
Religion is the Root of All Evil
02:31 PM on 06/28/2010
Our wars in Afghanistan and Iraq have been one huge wasteful game of wack-a-mole.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Guitar63
10:06 PM on 06/28/2010
Yeah, but to make light of them to such a degree is to ignore all the deaths, loss of money, loss of other potential uses of that work and money, and United States purpose, is a mistake. But if you are simply suggesting that it is a lost cause, you are right.
01:39 PM on 06/28/2010
AQ is a bunch of tough dudes if it takes 90,000 troops to remove them or it's just a big clusterfuckgoing on there.
photo
SolarArray
Republican = Trash America, Any Cost
01:37 PM on 06/28/2010
That is very believable but I think the true number is around 49.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Blackorpheus
the decisive blows are always struck left-handed
01:33 PM on 06/28/2010
And the US has 35,000 troops plus mercenaries to battle those estimated 50 al-Qaeda "terrorists."