More

White House's Lobbyist Liaisons Blasted By Watchdogs (VIDEO)

First Posted: 06/28/10 12:38 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 05:55 PM ET

Lobbyists

Watchdog groups are blasting the Obama administration for dodging records rules and cutting corners on its self-imposed disclosure requirements for White House visitors.

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington called for an investigation by a congressional oversight committee of potential violations of the Presidential Records Act and Federal Records Act. And the Sunlight Foundation on Friday set up shop outside a nearby coffeehouse to catch any administration staffers secretly meeting with K Streeters.

"It shouldn't matter whether or not a meeting between White House officials and lobbyists happens at the White House or at Caribou Coffee," wrote Sunlight's Nicole Aro in a blog post.

Despite its pledge to be transparent about special interest access, and its anti-lobbyist rules and rhetoric, the Obama administration is apparently more in touch with lobbyists than it would like people to know. The New York Times reported on Thursday that White House staffers use personal email accounts and nearby coffeeshops to avoid a paper trail and to keep lobbyists' names from appearing in the much-ballyhooed visitors log too frequently.

Also, two lobbyists told the Times that "the White House had suggested that a job candidate be 'deregistered' as a lobbyist in Senate records to avoid violating the administration's hiring restrictions."

Though 2009 was the most profitable year ever for the influence industry, more than a thousand lobbyists deregistered, a trend many attribute to Obama's harsh rhetoric and rules barring lobbyists from serving in the administration or on federal advisory boards.

"There's no doubt that many lobbyists have revisited their status in order to achieve a number of goals, including jobs in the administration, and to avoid the 'Scarlet L,'" said Mike Fulton, a lobbyist with Golin Harris and a board member with the American League of Lobbyists, a group that promotes best practices on K Street.

Indeed, two lobbyists heard Obama's rhetoric and decided it would be better to ditch the Scarlet L and start a new "non-lobbying entity" called K Street Research.

"This is what all the administration's anti-lobbyist rhetoric gets you -- less transparency," said CREW director Melanie Sloan in a statement. "Rather than being open and clear about who is influencing White House policy, the White House is trying to hide who it's really talking to. Even worse, the public is being suckered with lofty rhetoric about the evils of the same lobbyists White House officials are meeting with."

Republicans seized on the Times story as well: "Just because the latte-drinking liberals in the Obama White House prefer coffee houses to the traditional smoke-filled backrooms of Washington in order to cut their special interest deals, doesn't make it any less insulting to the American public," said Ken Spain, a spokesman for National Republican Congressional Committee.

The Sunlight Foundation had some trouble tracking down any lobbyists when it staked out Caribou Coffee on Friday, noting in a video that "lobbyists look like everyone else." A similar problem occurred when the White House first released its visitor logs. "A lot of people visit the White House, up to 100,000 each month, with many of those folks coming to tour the buildings," wrote White House ethics lawyer Norm Eisen. "Given this large amount of data, the records we are publishing today include a few 'false positives' -- names that make you think of a well-known person, but are actually someone else."

Michael Jordan, William Ayers, Michael Moore, Jeremiah Wright, and R. Kelly did not actually visit the White House, Eisen wrote -- just their non-famous namesakes. But maybe they stopped by Caribou.

WATCH Sunlight's video:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Watchdog groups are blasting the Obama administration for dodging records rules and cutting corners on its self-imposed disclosure requirements for White House visitors. Citizens for Responsibility a...
Watchdog groups are blasting the Obama administration for dodging records rules and cutting corners on its self-imposed disclosure requirements for White House visitors. Citizens for Responsibility a...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 113
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LucieLee
Stand up and be counted...
01:50 PM on 07/02/2010
Republicans need to be careful with their rhetoric on this......they would NOT want to labeled hypocrites now would they???
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Altario
Among nerds, I'm cool.
12:14 AM on 06/29/2010
Transparency, as brought to you by Obam--, er.... watchdogs. Yes, watchdogs. Hired by Obama to show you the truth.
chrisincalif
End privately funded elections
11:52 PM on 06/28/2010
The only thing that will eliminate the web of corruption in D.C. is a loud, nonstop, outraged demand from the public to end privately financed elections in this country. No campaign contributions, no perks or gifts to elected officials, no jobs in private industries that related to a Congressional job for 5 years.

A change like that would help every issue anyone cares about from war to health to education to environment, etc.

If only all our progressive organizations would craft an election alternative together, then use combined resources to sell it to the public....
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Chris1962
NYC
11:08 PM on 06/28/2010
>>>Despite its pledge to be transparent about special interest access, and its anti-lobbyist rules and rhetoric, the Obama administration is apparently more in touch with lobbyists than it would like people to know.>>>

Always have been. Why do you think there's no public option? Top insurance lobbyist Karen Ignagni wouldn't permit it. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/obamasdeal/view/?utm_campaign=viewpage&utm_medium=grid&utm_source=grid
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marianne TB
10:56 PM on 06/28/2010
so much for transparency, obama.

what a joke.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
worker beenumbed
09:31 PM on 06/28/2010
The coffee shop is a public place .I wonder if it has been cleared of listening devices.All meetings should be listed I guess.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bude
My Brain Hurts!
09:01 PM on 06/28/2010
More "change" I see.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:59 PM on 06/28/2010
Well at last we have the "Change" we were promised. Just not quite what we expected. How does that saying go again, fool me once ......... gullible me. I feel like I bought the bridge to no where.
09:16 PM on 06/28/2010
I think they meant hope and pocket change
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
rtgmath
There has got to be a better way!
08:49 PM on 06/28/2010
Obama pledged to be more open and transparent, but then hired for his inner circle high-end corporate and economic connections. He pledged to trust the experts to guide him in policy decisions where he did not have the expertise, and got the wrong experts.

Which is why the Obama administration has so often been at odds with its own policy initiatives. Financial reform has been gutted with the help of opposition to the key points reform needs. Health care reform was weakened catering to the insurance industry in key areas. Obama had justly criticized the war in Iraq, only to have the Generals control him. So he wound up supporting the Bush administration's strategy of a protracted, long-term war. I think Obama genuinely wants to end "Don't Ask, Don't Tell", but is cowed by military advisors warning of rebellion in the ranks. So we continue to get delay and delay.

The lack of recordkeeping is to hide from the public the extent to which Obama has been weakened by his advisors' connections to big business and finance.

I believe Obama himself is a fine person, but with a great weakness for approval and is easily befuddled by so-called experts pushing an agenda. A pity. I had such great hopes.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
demsrsilly
Proud to be non union
07:49 PM on 06/28/2010
yeah, not many libs will respond to this thread. TRANSPARENCY! Too funny, yet another lie by this administration .
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:09 PM on 06/28/2010
He has kept at least 70% of Bush’s policies and furthered them. Will bet if he was a Wasp Republican, you would be cheering.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
rtgmath
There has got to be a better way!
09:19 PM on 06/28/2010
I'm a lib.

Question, which administration has been more transparent: the Bush administration or the Obama administration?

While I admit Obama hasn't been the improvement I hoped for, still, he's better than his predecessor.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DragonflyChase
07:17 PM on 06/28/2010
Gotta hide those backroom deals, gotta preserve that Chicago Style Politics, it's the Rahm way.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
t-boy42
09:31 PM on 06/28/2010
I keep hearing about the "backroom deals" from fox news so I guess it's a repubican talking point now. Can you give me an example of any of these famed "back room deals"?
09:50 PM on 06/28/2010
Health care....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DragonflyChase
02:07 PM on 06/30/2010
yes, just take what happened with healthcare and apply that to all bills going through congress. The game is to look like they are reforming, while not reforming at all.

Obama pats them on the back and the whole country groans.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dzadzey
Afflicting the comfortable
06:40 PM on 06/28/2010
So much for the transparency in government we were promised. One more promise broken.
06:29 PM on 06/28/2010
Dictators don't have the same rules as Presidents.

Socialist governments don't have to perform by the same standards as Republics.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pjwrites
05:07 PM on 06/28/2010
Shocked, I tell you, shoc . . . yawnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
criticallydampedroots
04:48 PM on 06/28/2010
Obama and the Democrats promised no lobbyists, HIPOCRITES!!