iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

FDA Says Antibiotics In Meat A 'Serious Public Health Threat'

MARY CLARE JALONICK   06/28/10 05:47 PM ET   AP

Fda Antibiotics Meat Bacteria Limit

WASHINGTON — The Food and Drug Administration is urging meat producers to limit the amount of antibiotics they give animals in response to public health concerns about the drugs.

The FDA said antibiotics in meat pose a "serious public health threat" because the drugs create antibiotic-resistant bacteria that can infect humans who eat it. The agency is recommending that producers use the drugs judiciously, limiting their use unless they are medically necessary and only using them with the oversight of a veterinarian.

"Developing strategies for reducing (antibiotic) resistance is critically important for protecting both public and animal health," the agency said in draft guidelines printed in the Federal Register on Monday.

The agency said misuse and overuse of the drugs has led to the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Antibiotics have been given to animals to kill pathogens for more than 50 years, and the FDA acknowledged that practice has had "tremendous benefits" to animal and human health.

Of greater concern, the agency said, is when producers use antibiotics on healthy animals to speed growth and reduce feed costs. The agency is also concerned about antibiotics that are given continuously through feed or water to entire herds or flocks of animals.

The agency said it is expecting to issue more specific guidelines soon, but FDA Principal Deputy Commissioner of Food and Drugs Joshua Sharfstein would not say whether the agency eventually plans to issue stricter regulations. He said the guidelines are just a first step and the agency will be watching industry response and also patterns of antibiotic resistance.

Advocates on both sides of the issue criticized the decision.

Sam Carney, a pork producer from Adair, Iowa, and president of the National Pork Producers Council, said reducing the amount of antibiotics given to animals could harm their health.

"As we know, healthy animals produce safe food, and we need every available tool to protect animal health," he said.

But Steven Roach, a public health advocate with the group Keep Antibiotics Working, a coalition dedicated to eliminating the overuse of antibiotics, said the guidelines don't go far enough.

"It shows the FDA still has no plan to take the necessary steps to protect public health by stopping the non-therapeutic use of antibiotics in animal agriculture," he said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST FOOD

Filed by Colin Sterling  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 705
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (21 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:11 PM on 07/07/2010
"Developing strategies for reducing (antibiotic) resistance is critically important for protecting both public and animal health," the agency said

Um how about feed them GRASS?! No need to "develop" anything. Feed them what they are designed to EAT.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:13 AM on 07/07/2010
Yeah, big news. This is supposed to be surprising?.
Solution?
If you eat meat, buy only grass fed/free ranged/certified organic.
And you'll be supporting small farmers with your dollars.

What I'd like to see is the geniuses at the FDA ask the geniuses at the USDA why companies like ConAgra, ADM, & Tyson are allowed to do business the way they do, so that they have every market advantage in the world over the little guys?

No way...
regulators protecting health & safety? Perish the thought.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lifencompass
12:18 PM on 07/02/2010
Oh.. NOW it's a threat. GEESH! Hello, it was a threat way back when. At least the FDA is catching up.

Reason #402 I get up to the virtual podium about cheap, mass produced, "meat". It should be called what it is: drugged, abused, cattle (or insert animal), that can hurt you if you eat it. This is REAL people, not good for you.
06:44 PM on 07/01/2010
The NY Times published a far scarier article about the link between MRSA infection and antibiotic overuse in pork production:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/12/opinion/12kristof.html?_r=2

My three-year old nephew almost died of MRSA, which is literally a nightmare infection. Thanks pig farmers and FDA, for nothing.
photo
khountrygirl
Believe nothing merely b/c you have been told it.
02:07 AM on 07/02/2010
Thank you for sharing the news article.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GAYF
Would love to interact more; I do not have time.
04:02 PM on 07/01/2010
The FDA, all government protection agencies for the people are co-opted by corporate. Dr. Theron Randolph, a pioneer in this area taught his patients this--and wrote many scientific articles 30-40 years ago. Most journals would not publish his research. Governmental agencies let themselves get co-opted very quickly. We the people do not trust ourselves. We are the real government, if we realized it. We, the voters allow the corruption. We have few to warn and help us. Organic Consumers Association is one of the few that does. The mainstream press is handmaiden to the power structure.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Leslie Robinson Goldberg
Writer
02:15 AM on 07/01/2010
I'm so glad the FDA is at least talking about it! According to the Union of Concerned Scientists 70 percent of the antibiotics used in the the U.S. are fed to farm animals and 80 percent of those drugs are given to them not to cure illness but make them grow faster. It's insane.
12:35 AM on 07/01/2010
Wow, ya think? This is old news, but the powers that be (i.e. the beef packers and ranchers associations) own and control the USDA. The FDA has no power and little incentive to do anything about this. Yet one more great reason to go veg, or at least purchase one's meat responsibly.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Grada3784
Dogmatic Dictators, believers or not, not welcome
11:01 PM on 06/30/2010
Glad to see they finally woke up. A lot of years too late though.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ddanimal
06:46 PM on 06/30/2010
And of course the corrupt FDA wont do anything about it. I'm surprised they even said anything about this issue, which has been ongoing for 20 years or more.

The FDA is too busy going after kombucha manufacturers because it has a couple percent alcohol or whatever. There must be something very good about kombucha, since the FDA is attacking it. The FDA expands the power and influence of its evil drug industry clients when more people are sick.
05:30 PM on 06/30/2010
If they did that, it would mean they would have to treat the animals well, house and care for them appropriatley. Like that's going to happen. Where would the profit be there? Go vegan.
05:35 PM on 06/30/2010
Or, buy local free range organically raised meat. Cause there is no way I would ever go vegan.
06:07 PM on 06/30/2010
Or, raise your own. "Farm City" is where it's at!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Leslie Robinson Goldberg
Writer
02:04 AM on 07/01/2010
Free range is good, but why not vegan?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mark Montgomery
The forces of fear do not scare me
04:57 PM on 06/30/2010
And yet nothing will change.
04:53 PM on 06/30/2010
When our corporate owned government and FDA warns about something like this, it has to be critically serious.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ddanimal
06:46 PM on 06/30/2010
Or a distraction.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Animal Compassion
04:12 PM on 06/30/2010
I am sure that MeatHead blogger would have a solution for the FDA. Wake people and Go Vegan!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Poorsarah
02:29 PM on 06/30/2010
My brother's wife is from Spain...she is horrified how our food is produced in the USA. In Spain, the meat is safe to eat and also the veggies, etc. What always astounds me is folks in the USA who tell us that if we don't like it here then move...seeing how many countries care how their food is processed, I might just do that.
02:00 PM on 06/30/2010
Seems to me the only way to change a corporate monster that lets cows stand and feed in their own feces, burns chickens' beaks off, and snips pigs' tails is to threaten its source of profit. Whether it's by going vegetarian, buying only grass-fed meat from organic producers, or buying meat directly from a local farmer you know and trust, getting enough people to refuse to eat filth and stop buying the stuff means less money for them and more for the food producers who are trying to do right by the animals, by the planet, and by their communities. It's not an easy change to make in terms of money, time, convenience, and so forth, but why is it that we are willing to pay for new TVs, cars, cell phones, designer clothes and shoes, and on and on, but we won't pay for what actually enters our bodies, every day? Food is one of the great joys in life, but not if it's garbage.