More

GOP Hits Obama On Arizona Lawsuit While Other Democrats Lay Low

CHARLES BABINGTON   07/ 6/10 06:53 PM ET   AP

Arizona Lawsuit Gop Obama

WASHINGTON — Republicans denounced the Obama administration's challenge of Arizona's new immigration law Tuesday, a fresh sign they may try to paint Democrats this fall as soft on illegal border crossings.

While Democrats stayed largely quiet, a host of Republicans said the federal government has no business challenging Arizona's new law. Slated to be implemented July 29, it would require state and local police to question and possibly arrest illegal immigrants during the enforcement of other laws such as traffic stops.

"If the president wants to make real progress on this issue, he can do so by taking amnesty off the table and focus his efforts on border and interior security," said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.

But some Democratic strategists say the GOP is playing a dangerous game. Past GOP bids to crack down on illegal immigration have driven Latino voters into Democrats' arms, as was seen most dramatically in California in the 1990s. And Americans who are most passionate about illegal immigration tend to be reliable Republican voters anyway, and not up for grabs, these strategists say.

"There's no evidence that Republicans have been able to turn this issue into a winning issue in a general election," said Simon Rosenberg, who follows immigration matters as head of the liberal-leaning group NDN. If top Republicans keep pounding the issue, he said, it could increase Democratic turnout in Texas, Arizona, Nevada, California and possibly other states.

The politics of immigration has a complex past and unclear future.

Republican President George W. Bush failed to persuade a GOP-controlled Congress to enact comprehensive changes that would have included pathways to legal status for millions of illegal immigrants. Democrats prospered in the next two elections, in 2006 and 2008, when immigration was a back-burner issue. In 2008, Republicans chose as their presidential nominee Sen. John McCain of Arizona, once a champion of Bush's immigration efforts.

But McCain, like many other Republicans and some Democrats, has shifted to the right on the issue. Facing a tough GOP primary, McCain has run a campaign ad saying "complete the danged fence." Three years ago, he had dismissed the effectiveness of building a fence on the U.S.-Mexico border.

He joined numerous well-known GOP officials in criticizing President Barack Obama's decision Tuesday.

They included Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele and House GOP leader John Boehner of Ohio. Boehner said the federal government should not sue Arizona but should help that state and others "stop the crime and lawlessness along the border."

Top Democratic elected officials had little to say, leaving the defense of Obama's move to liberal allies such as the ACLU. One exception was Sen. Bob Menendez, D-N.J., who heads his party's Senate campaign committee. He said the Arizona law "sets a dangerous precedent that puts even citizens and lawful residents at risk of racial profiling."

Matt Bennett, vice president of the Democratic-leaning group Third Way, said Republicans might get some short-term gain from criticizing Obama's decision, "but in the end, they are taking a simplistic approach to a complex issue."

Polls reflect the issue's complexity, Bennett said. They show strong support for controlling immigration, including support for Arizona's new law. But they also find significant support for an "earned path to citizenship" for illegal immigrants already here.

Americans who are most likely to make immigration a top voting priority, Bennett said, tend to live or work in places "profoundly affected by immigration."

That includes states on the Mexican border, which also are home to many Latino U.S. citizens who are sensitive to crackdowns on Hispanics.

Immigration politics also are complex within the Democratic Party. Obama performed well among Latino voters, but many of them feel he has moved too slowly to push for comprehensive immigration reform. At least one Republican, Senate nominee Dan Coats of Indiana, said the president's move Tuesday was "based purely on politics, not sound constitutional principles."

The Democratic-dominated Congressional Hispanic Caucus praised Obama's actions Tuesday, but left little doubt it wants more.

"Immigration reform must provide a system that ends illegal immigration, secures our borders and provides rules that everyone can follow," the group said in a statement.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — Republicans denounced the Obama administration's challenge of Arizona's new immigration law Tuesday, a fresh sign they may try to paint Democrats this fall as soft on illegal border...
WASHINGTON — Republicans denounced the Obama administration's challenge of Arizona's new immigration law Tuesday, a fresh sign they may try to paint Democrats this fall as soft on illegal border...
Filed by Jeff Muskus  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,008
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (13 total)
  1 of 7  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS

photo
realitytrumpsbull 01:23 AM on 07/07/2010
Right now, our two countries have a little bit of a problem, 19th century meets 21st, gets in bar fight. The world has grown, gotten more crowded, more expensive, more complex, signing "X" doesn't cut the mustard anymore. And, into the middle of this are thrust the citizens of two countries, with all the hue and cry and sturm and drang and vociferous exclamation and and and, attendant to the border debate.  Read More...
12:24 AM on 07/15/2010
IF YOU CROSS THE NORTH KOREAN BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU GET 12 YEARS HARD LABOR.

IF YOU CROSS THE IRANIAN BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU ARE DETAINED INDEFINITELY.

IF YOU CROSS THE AFGHAN BORDER ILLEGALLY, YOU GET SHOT.

IF YOU CROSS THE SAUDI ARABIAN BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU WILL BE JAILED.

IF YOU CROSS THE CHINESE BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU MAY NEVER BE HEARD FROM AGAIN.

IF YOU CROSS THE VENEZUELAN BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU WILL BE BRANDED A SPY AND YOUR FATE WILL BE SEALED.

IF YOU CROSS THE CUBAN BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU WILL BE THROWN INTO POLITICAL PRISON TO ROT.

IF YOU CROSS THE U.S.. BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU GET:

1 - A JOB,
2 - A DRIVERS LICENSE,
3 - SOCIAL SECURITY CARD,
4 - WELFARE,
5 - ACCESS CARD,
6 - CREDIT CARDS
7 - SUBSIDIZED RENT OR A LOAN TO BUY A HOUSE,
8 - FREE EDUCATION,
9 - FREE HEALTH CARE,
10 - A LOBBYIST IN WASHINGTON
11 - BILLIONS OF DOLLARS WORTH OF PUBLIC DOCUMENTS PRINTED IN YOUR LANGUAGE
12 - AND THE RIGHT TO CARRY YOUR COUNTRY'S FLAG WHILE YOU PROTEST THAT YOU DON'T GET ENOUGH RESPECT
In Europe you are detained and deported.
10:44 AM on 07/14/2010
Do you want your wars of choice or border protection? We don't have enough military for both. So choose which is more important, protection of foreign oil wells OR security of our borders...
photo
GregHooper
what is this
11:12 AM on 07/12/2010
The amazing thing here is how the Dems don't see the fact that if they throw the racist orginization LaRaza under the bus they can have anything they want

Instead of backing the American public and making immigration reform about securing the border and getting illegals off our jobs they chase some fiction about how they are securing the latino vote

So all Latinos are in favor of illegals right??

Not the legal ones I know

Wake up and you can own Washington

Try amnesty first and you have a fight on your hands

American citizens are unemployed angry and our country is broke

Every past amnesty has been the easy way out and has not ever solved the problem it set out to fix It merely made it bigger and then legitimtized the idea that if you can make it to the US you can have an American Passport

To even consider granting citizenship to millions of border jumpers who have no way of proving who they are is absurd

The undocumented The illiterate uneducated low skilled poor of the world are not a benefit and will not solve the primary problem which is they need to fix their dillemma at home
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
charles847
12:28 AM on 07/08/2010
Obama has done more to secure the border in the past year and a half, than Bush and the republicans did in the past 8 years. These republicans are a bunch of lying hypocrites and people should wake up and see them for the liars they are.
11:44 AM on 07/08/2010
And what has he done? What are the Republicans lying about? Is it that you have no facts to point to so you fall back on name calling?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
spytheweb
04:30 PM on 07/08/2010
I'am a democrat and this may be true, i just want the wall finished.
12:26 AM on 07/08/2010
Why do "Other Democrats Lay Low?" Could it be that they are smart enough to realize that this is a toxic issue? Could it be that they are smart enough to realize that most Americans support Arizona?
10:11 AM on 07/08/2010
More Americans support comprehensive immigration reform on the Federal level than they support the Arizona law, a law which in my opinion is just legalized racism. If you want to stop illegal immigration you need to go after the businesses that are putting out the help wanted signs at the border. People wouldn't come here if there weren't any jobs. I think the Republicans are the ones that will have the backlash on this one, not the Democrats.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
IllTakeTheRedEye
Do you know what a nonemployer business is?
12:09 PM on 07/08/2010
You wrote, "If you want to stop illegal immigration you need to go after the businesses that are putting out the help wanted signs at the border. People wouldn't come here if there weren't any jobs. I think the Republicans are the ones that will have the backlash on this one, not the Democrats."

Why is it the Democrats in Illinois are the only state in the USA that have legislatively stopped employers from using E-verify?
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Which states require use of E-Verify for immigration enforcement?

13 states do
http://www.ncsl.org/default.aspx?tabid=13127

Which is the only state preventing employers from using E-verify to determine if they are about to hire an illegal alien?

"Illinois. Illinois enacted HB 1744, which bars Illinois companies from enrolling in any Employment Eligibility Verification System until accuracy and timeliness issues are resolved. Illinois also enacted HB 1743, which creates privacy and antidiscrimination protections for workers if employers participating in E-Verify don’t follow the program’s procedures. On August 24, 2009, Illinois enacted S1133 amending the Right to Privacy in the Workplace Act and urges employers, before enrolling in E-Verify, to consult the State Department of Labor's website for current information on the accuracy of E-Verify and to review and understand an employer's legal responsibilities relating to the use of the voluntary program. It prohibits the state or localities from requiring employers to use an employment eligibility verification system."
http://www.ncsl.org/default.aspx?tabid=13127
photo
rbchilds
Independent with Open Eyes
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
terry63
12:21 AM on 07/08/2010
Most Latino's already vote Democrat, and all illegal latino's vote Democrat. The Gop will loose some votes but not as much as Dems will loose by taking on, What is it 20 states now? In order to overturn this bill, they will have to overturn Federal law or show just cause that Federal law should not be inforced by the states. I think that number of states will only increase in number by this fall, If Washington wants to take on any and all comers I say be my guest. Good luck. And good luck Passing youre Amnesty Bill.
11:47 AM on 07/08/2010
Seems to me that illegals should not be allowed to vote....

If 1070 is knocked down and the government continues doing an inadequate job of protecting the borders, what next? The citizens are only going to make louder their demands to fix the problem.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
IllTakeTheRedEye
Do you know what a nonemployer business is?
12:44 PM on 07/08/2010
You wrote, "What is it 20 states now?"

Perhaps this will help?

If below is what you meant by "20 states now?"...it is actually more than 20
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thursday, June 24, 2010

"In the first three months of this year, legislators in 45 states introduced 1,180 bills or resolutions dealing with immigrants, an unprecedented number, according to the NCSL. By the end of March, 107 laws and 87 resolutions had been adopted by 34 states, with 38 bills pending"
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/23/AR2010062305335.html


April 29, 2010
"In just the first three months of 2010, more than 1,180 bills and resolutions relating to immigrants and refugees were introduced in state legislatures across the country. And of those bills, 71 laws were enacted and 87 resolutions adopted in 25 states"

"State laws related to immigration have increased dramatically in recent years:
"In 2006, 570 bills were introduced, 84 laws were enacted and 12 resolutions adopted."
"In 2007, 1,562 bills were introduced, 240 laws were enacted and 50 resolutions adopted.""
"In 2008, 1,305 bills were introduced, 206 laws were enacted and 64 resolutions adopted."
"In 2009, more than 1,500 bills were introduced, 222 laws were enacted and 131 resolutions adopted"
http://www.ncsl.org/default.aspx?tabid=20239
-------------------------------------------------------------------

StatesCountiesCitiesTownsVillages have enacted legislation fighting the presence of employers enabling illegal foreign nationals in the USA, other legislation is "sanctuary city" stuff.

DOJ ignores SanctuaryCity/States interference of "Secure Communities"
Double standard? Corrupt?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
LDF
That's me in the red coat
11:16 PM on 07/07/2010
Does Mitch have a wattle?
10:13 AM on 07/08/2010
I always want to know what happened to his chin?
11:12 PM on 07/07/2010
McConnell looks like a surprised weasel!
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
criticallydampedroots
10:57 PM on 07/07/2010
GOOD QUESTION: “If, as President Obama and Attorney General Holder claim, there is a federal preemption issue, why hasn’t the administration sued Rhode Island already? After all, Rhode Island is actually enforcing these procedures, while the Arizona law hasn’t even gone into effect yet.” Answer pure politics.
08:44 PM on 07/07/2010
OMG - what a mug on that guy! If there ever was a "poster child" of the GOP I think he would be on the poster front and center.
08:54 PM on 07/07/2010
You beat me to it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AngryHarpy
I dwell in possibility.
07:16 PM on 07/07/2010
I see atleast one turtle made it out of the Gulf alive.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Zen0469
An empty micro-bio is a happy micro-bio.
07:47 PM on 07/07/2010
It's a great photograph or R. Attus Norvegicus following a vigorous oinkage session. Polluting the environment won't be a problem now.
08:54 PM on 07/07/2010
LOL
10:17 PM on 07/07/2010
Gov. Jan Brewer will win the Repub. Primary in August by a lanslide (approx 61%-15%).
She is the Heroine of both Dems, R's and Independents of all ages and backgrounds.

Our Immigration Law mirrors the Fed. law and is Constitutional.

In the Gulf everyone is asked for ID, but AZ. is being sued. A major inconsistency here.
photo
JoeBlough
The Horror. . .The Horror. . .
06:38 PM on 07/07/2010
I love that picture of McConnell. It looks like the foreskin around his neck is becoming enflamed.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aaron Tessoni
06:12 PM on 07/07/2010
Why is this such a hot topic at the moment? Aren't there bigger things to deal with? How come this issue blows up in the middle of all the crap President Obama is dealing with, and not such a hot issue when Bush was in office? I kind of feel like "what is the next issue they are gonna inflate" to add on to Obama's plate?
photo
JoeBlough
The Horror. . .The Horror. . .
06:40 PM on 07/07/2010
The Repubs are throwing everything, including the kitchen sink, at Obama as part of their program to make Obama fail. They think if they throw enough flack, people will come running back to their Bush/Cheney lovin' arms.
12:03 PM on 07/08/2010
Obama does not need any help from the Republicans to fail. He is doing it quite nicely himself, in spite of the fact that the Democrats had a super-majority in Congress.
11:59 AM on 07/08/2010
At least one reason it is a hot topic is because of the economic crisis at the state and federal level: We were in bad shape before Obama took office. After Obama took office, the deficit is heading toward quadruple what it was previously. Many states are looking to get out of the red ink. They do not have to look too hard to see the negative impact illegal immigration has on their infrastructure. The feds have not dealt with this in any sense of an affective manner (includes multiple administrations both Democrats and Republicans). The states are looking for options. AZ 1070 is a response to the situation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
claudiam
Proud Arizona Democrat
05:54 PM on 07/07/2010
Finding a clear path for undocumented workers to gain citizenship is not an American Constitutional principal? I am so sick and tired of the Rethugs and their posturing on this issue. To Jr. Bush's credit he wanted to do something about the immigrants and the gops sat on their hands. McCain wimped out after working with Kennedy for reform. They are a hypocritical bunch aren't they? I say to9 them - go back and ready your history books! claudiatucsonaz
PC Contrarian
Political Correctnes­s is the opiate of the left.
06:08 PM on 07/07/2010
"Finding a clear path for undocumented workers to gain citizenship is not an American Constitutional principal? "
No it's not.
It's called rewarding illegal behavior.
We should reward behavior we want more of, and punish behavior we want less of.
Do you want more illegal behavior in general; or just more illegal aliens?
photo
JoeBlough
The Horror. . .The Horror. . .
06:42 PM on 07/07/2010
"It's called rewarding illegal behavior" - geez, we have been doing that for the last nine years. And the GOBP got away with it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NativeSonKY
Always hopeful, yet discontent...
06:37 AM on 07/08/2010
to PC Contrarian - any non-Native Americans are trespassers on this land, so you need to quit acting as if you are entitled to be here...you are as much an "illegal" in my eyes as you see these people as being.
04:52 PM on 07/07/2010
Every time I see this man I wonder if his parents are cousins?

After all, he is from Kentucky . . .

Just sayin'

./
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
claudiam
Proud Arizona Democrat
05:54 PM on 07/07/2010
Ha! claudiatucsonaz