iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

New Cap On Gulf Oil Leak: BP 'Pleased' But No Promises

First Posted: 07/11/10 10:08 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 06:00 PM ET

Gulf Oil Spill New Cap Bp
In this image taken from video provided by BP PLC, the arm of a remotely operated vehicle works at the Deepwater Horizon oil spill site in the Gulf of Mexico, Saturday, July 10, 2010. Undersea robots manipulated by engineers a mile above were expected to begin work Saturday removing the containment cap over the gushing well head in the Gulf of Mexico to replace it with a tighter-fitting cap that could funnel all the oil to tankers at the surface. If all goes according to plan, the tandem of the

NEW ORLEANS (Associated Press) - Underpromising with hopes of overdelivering, BP said Sunday that it is making progress on what could prove its most effective effort yet to contain the Gulf oil leak, but cautioned that the verdict could be several days away.

A new cap being placed atop the gusher is intended to provide a tight seal and might eventually allow the oil giant to capture all the crude leaking from the well for the first time since an April 20 oil rig explosion set off the environmental crisis. But several prior failed attempts to stop the leak have made BP PLC careful to keep expectations grounded.

"We're pleased with our progress," said BP senior vice president Kent Wells, who then hastened to add the operation was still expected to last up to six more days.

Asked during a conference call if the new cap and collection efforts would end the spilling of oil into the Gulf, Wells said only that BP will capture all the oil "at some point."

Wells said BP may have to bring another vessel back online and add additional collection capacity in order to stop the oil flow altogether.

Officials won't be satisfied the cap is working until they've run tests on whether it can withstand the tremendous pressure of oil pushing up from below the seafloor, Wells said.

"We've tried to work out as many of the bugs as we can. The challenge will come with something unexpected," he said.

The well has been gushing largely unchecked since an old, leaky cap was removed from the wellhead Saturday to make way for the new one. Between 88 million and 174 million gallons have already spilled into the Gulf, according to federal estimates.

Wary Gulf residents reserved judgment about BP's latest effort and said the damage already done to the environment, fishing and tourism will haunt the region for a long time either way.

"At this point, there have been so many ups and downs, disappointments, that everybody down here is like, 'We'll believe it when we see it,'" said Keith Kennedy, a charter boat captain in Venice, La.

Robotic submarines finished removing a busted piece of pipe that was bolted around the leak around 3 a.m. Sunday. That paved the way for the installation of a pipe-like connector called a flange spool that will sit on top of the spewing well bore. The new cap would be mounted on top of that connector and have flexible pipes leading up to surface ships.

The work was being closely monitored at the White House, where President Barack Obama is being briefed multiple times a day, adviser David Axelrod said on ABC's "This Week."

"We have every reason to believe that this will work," he said.

The new cap will be aided in containing the leak by the arrival of the Helix Producer, a vessel that will be able to take in about 1 million gallons of crude per day by Tuesday after gradually ramping up. The Helix connected to flexible pipes from the well Friday, and crews have been running tests since then.

Like another vessel already operating, the Q4000, the Helix will take in oil through connections beneath the new seal. Once the new cap is affixed, two other vessels are to connect to it for their oil collection.

Ultimately, the four vessels collecting oil from the leak would have a rough capacity of about 2.5 million to 3.4 million gallons a day -- enough to capture all the oil leaking, if federal estimates are right. Getting all the vessels on the task will take about two to three weeks.

The hurricane season that lasts through November could interfere. There are no storms forecast now, but if one blows through, the ships collecting the oil may have to leave and crude would spew again for days into the water.

If the new cap is a complete success in stopping the leak, that will be a first.

In May, BP tried to drop a four-story, 100-ton steel-and-concrete box on the leak, but abandoned it when it was encased by ice-like crystals. That was followed by a mile-long siphon tube designed to suck up oil escaping the leak. That, in turn, was scrapped after it managed to suck up only about 900,000 gallons after roughly a week of operation.

The most anticipated effort was the so-called "top kill," in which mud and cement were pumped down from above the leak. After about three days of the strategy, BP announced on May 29 it had failed.

Then came the cap that was removed Saturday. That device didn't form a perfect seal on the jagged pipe that was cut to make room for it, and the inexact fit meant that it was able to collect only 1 million gallons or so of oil a day.

The new, tighter cap is not intended to be the permanent fix to the problem.

Relief wells are being dug for the permanent fix, a "bottom kill" in which heavy drilling mud and cement are pumped in from below the broken wellhead.

The effort to drill relief wells was moving ahead of schedule, Wells said Sunday. BP and government officials have said the wells are expected to be completed sometime around mid-August.

The new cap, or "Top Hat 10," weighs some 150,000 pounds. It is designed to fully seal the leak and provide connections for new vessels on the surface to collect oil. The cap has valves that can restrict the flow of oil and shut it in, if it can withstand the enormous pressure.

Former Sen. Bob Graham of Florida, co-chair of the national oil spill commission, said capping the spill would be a relief.

"But the problem is still going to be there to deal with the enormous amount of petroleum put in the Gulf of Mexico," he said during a stop at a local emergency operations center in the Florida Panhandle town of Southport.

Crews are working to skim oil from the Gulf's surface and remove it from the coast, but the job is enormous. People on shore who depend on the Gulf for their livelihood are paying attention to the latest effort but wonder if the damage already done by the spill is too much.

Trey Riviere, 42, who owns a fishing lodge in Myrtle Grove, La., said that even if BP is successful, he fears the aftermath could last for years. He said crude was already in his waters in the marshes west of the Mississippi River.

"How are they going to get all that out of there?" he asked.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

NEW ORLEANS (Associated Press) - Underpromising with hopes of overdelivering, BP said Sunday that it is making progress on what could prove its most effective effort yet to contain the Gulf oil leak, ...
NEW ORLEANS (Associated Press) - Underpromising with hopes of overdelivering, BP said Sunday that it is making progress on what could prove its most effective effort yet to contain the Gulf oil leak, ...
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 251
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
M Miles
05:19 PM on 07/14/2010
They are testing it to see if they can shut the well down. If there is a problem with shutting it down connect riser back up from the drill ship to the new put in place three ram unit. Now let the oil flow through the riser to the ship vessels rather than into the ocean! Today would be a good day for that!
01:01 AM on 07/13/2010
Those crumb bums are STILL only entertaining ideas that let them keep the well...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
barnybilt
09:26 PM on 07/12/2010
Gee! BP has been pleased with itself from the start. According to them they are like a knight on a white horse swooping in to clean up the oil, and pay everybody for their slightest damage from it.

The funny thing is that only the Government agree's with BP on that.

Ask anyone hurt by this, and they will tell You BP is a dime short and many days late.

The oil speaks for itself, and contrary to BP's spin on the clean up the pictures speak for themselves.

They could have fixed this problem days after the spill started, and the fact they are about to do it now confirms that.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:23 PM on 07/12/2010
Just a question, why wasn't this well, as well as the other offshore wells drilled onshore using the horizontal drilling method?
US Department of Energy, 1993, drilling sideways, a review of horizontal well technology and it's domestic application. At http:/Tonto.era.doe.gov/ftproot/petroleum/ tr0565.PDF
Would have been a darn sight easier to cap.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:25 PM on 07/12/2010
Sorry miss type: http:/tondo.era.doe.gov/ftproot/petroleum/tr0565.pdf
11:38 PM on 07/12/2010
Because drilling a 200km hole is impossible with current technology
03:53 PM on 07/12/2010
Coastal Sheriffs have the right to issue arrest warrants for British Petroleum officials and should do so ! Why the coastal Sheriffs have not done so thus far is anyone's guess.
12:26 PM on 07/12/2010
And yet Gindal, Palin and the rest of the GOP are fighting a moratorium on deep sea drilling until this can be stopped and proven that any future explosions could be immediately contained! Amazingly stupid, short-sighted and greedy -- but that pretty much sums up the Republican/Teaparty philosophy. Since they are all so anti-Federal government, we should have let them pony up to pay for all the recovery relief -- afterall, it only affected the gulf states (tongue in cheek).
01:43 PM on 07/12/2010
1.) you all know that Roberts is going to rule against the ban. expect a 5/4 decision.

2.) the ban won't protect anyone, here's why:
http://sweetness-light.com/archive/cuba-to-drill-for-oil-off-of-key-west-fl

3.) boycott bp.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:03 PM on 07/12/2010
Interesting - when reading the posts there appears to be some who actually understand what is going on from a technical point. And there are questions about the solutions and suggestions that imply some of us are becoming more educated on what is going on below the surface.

Bashing is okay - don't get me wrong, I do it a lot. But it's good to see knowledge is being expressed and exchanged, and points of view are "discussed" and given valid thought.

back to work now.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
den1953
The National Inquire of Politics the GOP!
01:02 PM on 07/12/2010
Technically speaking it took BP engineers 80 + days to come to this conclusion, why not the first week?
whitebeach
Hey, buddy, can you spare a micro-bio?
01:15 PM on 07/12/2010
Almost certainly at least some of the engineers on this project were working on this solution from very early on. But other approaches were faster and seemed plausible. The first cap didn't work, for unexpected reasons. The second worked at about 50 or 60 percent. At that point, with the knowledge gained from the first two attempts, it was decided to try this third method, which undoubtedly had been under design, development, construction, and testing for weeks. Weather intervened for something like ten days, and now here we are. This really shouldn't be all that difficult a sequence to understand, and it doesn't imply either incompetence or some ulterior motive. It's the way many things get done in unusual situations in the real world. Your question is sort of like looking back at the early failures of the space program and asking why they didn't just build the Saturn moon rocket in the first place.
11:21 AM on 07/12/2010
wake up and smell the corexit.
11:18 AM on 07/12/2010
I just checked the live feed and it appears they are still pumping dispersant into the flow. Can't someone make them stop?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
OlHippie
Career smart arse.
11:12 AM on 07/12/2010
The day after the first video of the oil gushing appeared, many of us said, "Hey that is a flange; all they have to do is unbolt it and install a new flange with four open valves, and then close the valves after the flange is attached." Many of us e-mailed BP, FEMA, and congress daily with this suggestion. We told that was a dumb idea, and we just didn't understand the problem.

After they cut the pipe, we said, "If you can turn a saw blade, you can turn a wrench, and if you can turn a wrench, you can unbolt the flange and install new valves to stop the flow dead." Again, we were told we just didn't understand the problem.

Over the weekend, we watched with fascination as they unbolted the flange, and replaced it with a new "transition spool." Now, that transition spool could have jut as easily been flanged on to a four valve shutoff (one valve could fail) system, and we'd be done with it....TODAY.

More infuriating is the fact that they could have done all of this two month ago, but they CHOSE to let the leak continue until the figured out how to save the well. Since day one, BP has been more concerned with saving the oil than they have with saving the Gulf Coast.

Do you ever wonder how this would have played out if the shore being devastated was in the Hamptons?
11:42 AM on 07/12/2010
That's false. BP isn't trying to save the well. The relief well will seal off the wellbore permanently. All 3 wellbores will be cemented and abandoned never to be used again. BP would have to start from scratch with a new wellbore if they want to tap the oil reservoir again.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
OlHippie
Career smart arse.
12:06 PM on 07/12/2010
Says who? BP" The government? How about if one relief well seals the current leak, and the other two tap in below it, and bring the oil to the surface?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:55 AM on 07/12/2010
I believe at the time removing the flange was a concern because it would fully open the well - resulting in total flow - at the time that was considered a bad idea - being that less was better than more, with the expectation that each idea they had would be "it".

Looking back - yes remove the flange is the best idea - but at the times prior it didn't seem to be. HIndsight is best - but in this case it all a guessing game, since it's all unknown.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
OlHippie
Career smart arse.
12:04 PM on 07/12/2010
It is not unknown; it is just unknown by the layman. I have been an engineer for 40 years; I've designed piping systems for chemical and petrochemical applications at tremendous pressures. It ain't rocket science; you just have to have an open mind and believe that someone else might think of something you haven't.

I don't understand why anyone believes a word BP says.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Merle Savage
10:57 AM on 07/12/2010
In 1989 Exxon told the cleanup workers the same story, that the crude oil is not toxic. Some of us are living proof of the toxic exposure, and many others have died. Please view the YouTube video, and help get the message to Gulf residents, BP crude oil cleanup workers, and President Obama. Respirators need to be supplied to oil cleanup crews.
Thank you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5M1J7U2GYA0

July 7, 2010 – Amy Goodman, Democracy Now Interview
http://www.democracynow.org/2010/7/7/bp_oil_spill_cleanup_workers_getting
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
teddy salad
10:43 AM on 07/12/2010
Yes, BP has done some stupid and improper things, but the real reason this article was written, is that the writer and the elitists in general hate Christianity (which BP represents, though not as well as it should).
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:05 AM on 07/12/2010
Sounds awfully like the post you wrote on the apple thread. One trick pony.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
teddy salad
11:16 AM on 07/12/2010
Actually, I have two tricks (as I appear to pull a half-dollar from behind your ear).
11:16 AM on 07/12/2010
What in the name of God are you talking about? You need an intervention.
whitebeach
Hey, buddy, can you spare a micro-bio?
11:31 AM on 07/12/2010
What? You mean you don't automatically think of Christianity when you look at a vast international corporation making obscene profits while killing its own workers and befouling one of the most beautiful and fertile natural environments on earth? What's wrong with you?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blueken
Finger Picking blues man
10:19 AM on 07/12/2010
I pray the new cap works, but there is a lesson here. Drilling for oil at those kinds of depths is dangerous. Technology can't always come riding over the ridge and save the day, therefore we need to proceed with all due caution. Sonic blow out valves and relief wells should be mandatory before a rig goes into production. Many countries already have those regulations in place. After this event, I assume many more will adopt these regulations. I hope the United States is one of them. I for one, am willing to pay .10 a gallon more at the pumps to protect our oceans.
11:31 AM on 07/12/2010
How would a sonic BOP stopped this leak? Remember the current BOP had leaking hydraulic lines and the ROVs could not close the device with a manual override. A mandatory relief well does not make sense of any kind. The economics behind would make most new drilling worthless. It may work for the BPs, Exxons, Shells, and Chevrons of the world but the smaller mom and pop shops would not be able to afford that operation. With your logic, wouldn't we want to require a relief well for the relief well if it doesn't work?? What countries actually use those regulations?? Can you provide evidence to your claims?
12:20 PM on 07/12/2010
If a company can't afford to drill a relief well to begin with, then they shouldn't be allowed to drill - period - because they couldn't afford to pay for the clean-up either in the event of another blow out! Somethings are just off limits for mom and pop type operations and oil drilling is one of them.
06:15 PM on 07/12/2010
No country requires relief wells to be drilled in advance of a blowout. The sonic trigger is a good thing, but would have made no difference in this case.
10:05 AM on 07/12/2010
the ground is fractured. nice try.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ljilja
http://graciouslivingdaybyday.com/
09:52 AM on 07/12/2010
NO, never any promises!

Why not? Why not promise (and keep the promise) that they will fix this horrible mistake and take care it never happens again?

http://graciouslivingdaybyday.com/
whitebeach
Hey, buddy, can you spare a micro-bio?
09:56 AM on 07/12/2010
Could it possibly be because this is a unique, first-time-ever situation in which no one can be sure that any given solution will work until it is in place and tested?
11:10 AM on 07/12/2010
then why did the administration assure us that 90% of the oil would be contained by the end of june? just another sign of incompetence. because now it's mid july, months after this disaster started, and we're all just hoping BP gets it right this time. where is the leadership on this?

nothing but broken promises from this president:

* unemployment wouldn't reach 9% if the stimulus passed: wrong
* gitmo would be closed down: wrong
* those making less than $250,000/yr wouldn't pay 'a penny' more in takes: wrong
* promised to be a leader in gay rights: wrong
* promised to change the tone and games in washington: WAY wrong

i could go on and on, but does anyone see a pattern...?