iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

As Lending To Small Businesses Plummets, Bernanke Implores Banks To Do More


First Posted: 07/12/10 09:00 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 06:00 PM ET

After more than 40 summits held across the country to figure out why the nation's small businesses aren't getting the loans they need and qualify for, America's central banker was no closer to a solution Monday than he was a year ago, when the Federal Reserve first identified a crippling small-business credit crunch.

With that in mind, Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke implored banks to free up credit, telling a conference in Washington that "lenders should do all they can to meet the needs of creditworthy borrowers."

The bankers aren't listening.

Bank loans to small businesses are down about $30 billion, or 4 percent, since last year, according to the latest figures from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

New loans guaranteed by the federal Small Business Administration fell off a cliff in June, dropping 66 percent to their lowest level in at least two years, according to agency data. The value of new loans in June -- $647 million -- is less than the total in February 2009, the month before the Obama administration's stimulus plan eliminated some fees on the taxpayer-backed loans and increased the federal guarantee on some of them to 90 percent, an incentive which has since expired. June's total loan figure was also less than half the total lent in September 2008, the flashpoint of the financial crisis.

The lack of credit is stifling the nation's ability to emerge from that crisis.

"Making credit accessible to sound small businesses is crucial to our economic recovery and so should be front and center among our current policy challenges," Bernanke said in prepared remarks. "Small businesses are central to creating jobs in our economy; they employ roughly one-half of all Americans and account for about 60 percent of gross job creation. Newer small businesses, those less than two years old, are especially important: Over the past 20 years, these start-up enterprises accounted for roughly one-quarter of gross job creation even though they employed less than 10 percent of the workforce."

But nearly a year after the Fed's main policy-making body, the Federal Open Market Committee, first identified the difficulties small businesses face in securing financing, the Fed appears no closer to solving the problem than they did during that two-day meeting in August of last year.

In Monday's speech, Bernanke addressed the lack of available credit, the lower demand for it, lenders' tighter underwriting standards and the frustration banks are feeling when dealing with regulators who are keen to tighten the reins after years of loose supervision.

"The insights we obtained from small business owners, lenders and others in this series of meetings have given us a more nuanced understanding of the problem and will help us identify areas where we might be able to do more," Bernanke said of the summits that began in February.

Bernanke has delivered at least seven speeches since November in which he referenced the lack of available credit, including one in each month since April.

The subject's importance cannot be overstated. Small businesses can't grow without credit, and because small businesses are the nation's primary job creators it's critically important for them to secure the financing they need, experts say. "The formation and growth of small businesses depends critically on access to credit," Bernanke said.

It's hard to understand, though, what new information the Fed has learned over the past few months that hadn't been known by experts for some time. Industry consultant Bob Coleman of Coleman Publishing said there hasn't been much in the way of new information on the credit crunch.

But Coleman said he hoped the summits have helped attract attention to the issue, and could prod Congress to pass a much-needed small business lending bill.

"We need to get this done. Businesses are dying on the vine," he said.

Some banks, sensing opportunity, have taken advantage of others' retrenchment.

Nara Bank, a $3-billion community bank founded in 1989 to serve Korean-Americans in Southern California, has increased its lending to small businesses by $250 million, or 37 percent, since last year, FDIC figures show.

"It's been a focal point for us," said Paul Choi, a bank spokesman. "A lot of the mindset here was to switch towards a more marketing-oriented mindset as opposed to a more conservative approach," Choi said. "We really wanted to push our lending volume up," he said, so the lender's district managers focused on finding good loan prospects.

More than 99 percent of the bank's loans go to businesses, according to a May investor presentation. Supermarkets are the bank's biggest borrowers of commercial and industrial loans. Hotels, motels and gas stations are among its biggest borrowers of commercial real estate loans.

"It's always been a philosophy to grow," said Choi, and the SBA's stimulus-funded efforts to increase lending provided new incentives to push in that direction. Given those incentives, the bank "made a conscious effort to really improve" its small business lending, Choi said. "We are actively and aggressively seeking qualified candidates."

Nara hopes to reduce its commercial real estate lending this year and instead focus on increasing its commercial and industrial loans.

But the nation's biggest banks continue to reduce their lending to small businesses. Coleman blames the economy for the lack of available loans, pointing to near-double-digit unemployment and the lack of demand for goods that's causing businesses and banks to hold back. Coleman also said uncertainty over new regulations -- like those businesses will face as part of the recently-enacted health care law -- has made some think twice about borrowing.

"A lot of people are saying, 'Hey, I don't know what's going on here.' I want to know how much health care is going to cost me,' for example," Coleman said.

The National Federation of Independent Business, an advocacy group, reports that its members say financing continues to be difficult to acquire, yet it's far from their biggest concern. About 92 percent of small business owners reported that "all their credit needs [were] met, or they did not want to borrow," according to the group's most recent monthly report.

What, then, caused the most angst?

Poor sales, taxes, and government red tape.

*************************

Shahien Nasiripour is the business reporter for the Huffington Post. You can send him an e-mail; bookmark his page; subscribe to his RSS feed; follow him on Twitter; friend him on Facebook; become a fan; and/or get e-mail alerts when he reports the latest news.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
After more than 40 summits held across the country to figure out why the nation's small businesses aren't getting the loans they need and qualify for, America's central banker was no closer to a solut...
After more than 40 summits held across the country to figure out why the nation's small businesses aren't getting the loans they need and qualify for, America's central banker was no closer to a solut...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 822
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (23 total)
08:16 PM on 07/15/2010
Why would the banks do that?

They have already won.

The Bankers Now Own the world.

The banksters stole all the money out of the system.

The banksters robbed us.

Swaps are a fraud.

Swaps are a Ponzi scheme.

Swaps now dominate the world financial economy.

The people lost, the republic lost.

prepare for the pain.

prepare for millions going homeless, and dying on the streets.

The Banksters have won.

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/04/what_would_fdr_do.html

But it's too late.

And the SEC fined them a couple of percent of their stolen Booty.

We needed FDR again, but this time the Bankers won.
10:14 PM on 07/14/2010
Hi all, I am doing research on the potential financial economic impact of a total US default on the national debt in terms of dollars, including stakeholders. You will find my opening discussion points at:

http://wjmc.blogspot.com/2010/07/what-about-default-option.html

All public comments are welcome through the link above, and thank you in advance for helping me out with this potentially devisive issue for public policy...
09:11 PM on 07/14/2010
Ben Bernake sits on the IMF and is demanding the US do away with social security. Its all political he is not doing what is best for us and does not even care for that matter. The US holds the majority of votes in the IMF and guess who governs.... Bernake. He gets his 100k a year pension but wants all of americans to do without. They could force the banks to lend money if they really wanted to but why would they do that? They paid off (bailed out) the bankers so why would they force them to spend that money now? If they had spent the 2 trillion on JOBS real jobs like the CCC or the TVA and told the bankers you made your bed now lay in it, we would have been out of this mess by May of last year.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeLoup
Res ipsa loquitur, ergo tace!
08:19 PM on 07/14/2010
Ben,

Don't implore; force them by making it unprofitable to trade their clients' money instead of lending.

Come on Ben! You can do better than that.
photo
Aldyth
Advocating for those who cannot defend themselves.
04:44 PM on 07/14/2010
Banks always do the right thing, as long as you ask politely.
04:41 PM on 07/14/2010
"In Monday's speech, Bernanke addressed the lack of available credit, the lower demand for it, lenders' tighter underwriting standards and the frustration banks are feeling when dealing with regulators who are keen to tighten the reins after years of loose supervision."

F the billionaire paupers who can't stand people keeping an eye on their USORY!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eaglett1111
12:02 PM on 07/14/2010
Government red tape. I think not. Small businesses and the American homeowner on main street are apparently expendable.

Give me a break. Bernanke is "imploring" the banks to lend more to small businesses? Just like you encouraged them to modify home loans and enticed them with a whole "$1,000" per successful mod? The people at the Fed have their heads in the ground. Deep. They freely gave these banks our tax money, with NO STRINGS ATTACHED that I know of, and now they are "imploring" them to step up to the plate? What kind of leaders are these?

This is a farce. Speaking to groups is not going to change anything. The only way you are going to get the banks to actually step up to the plate for small businesses or for the thousands suffering in loan modification hell is to get some cahones and prosecute. If the American Homeowner knows this, why doesn't the Fed? Read what is going on at www.beingmiddleclass.org and the many other websites where consumers are educating ourselves and fighting back.

But we shouldn't have to do this. We pay taxes. The fed gifted our tax money to the banks. then the banks turn around and steal our homes or keep credit from small businesses and THE FED DOES NOTHING BUT WHINE. Well get out and let the real leaders fix this. Before it is too late.
12:25 PM on 07/14/2010
There's a quick way for Bernake to solve this, otherwise you're right the FED is useless and Bernake needs to step down as admission of his ineffectiveness. Simply make bureaucratic excuses as to why large banks with poor records of loaning to small business can't get access to the free money the FED keeps printing and lending to banks at essentially no cost to the banks.

Sure let them take the FED to court, but by the time the legal wrangling gets resolved banks will get the message that it would be cheaper just to start lending a bit more to small businesses again. It can always be argued that the FED is right to more carefully and painstakingly scrutinize its dispensing of free money at the discount window.

If there are any rules to capitalism it is that the one way to get the greedy to do things differently is to withhold money from them.
11:40 AM on 07/14/2010
Why would banks loan money to small business and take a risk when they can manipulate the stock markets and make a much better profit, tax free.
photo
Aikaterina
A Greek-American living in California
11:12 AM on 07/14/2010
When the government appropriated the $700-billion bail-out, without precondition or scrutiny, coupled with a guarantee against future losses, it assured that banks would never resume prudent lending.

The TARP was billed as a means to restore liquidity, remove toxic assets, and provide financial institutions the capabilities to resume lending to credit-worthy businesses and individuals.

However, with no precondition or scrutiny, our bail-out funds were used for posh junkets, obscene bonuses, and lobbying. With up to $3-trillion in guarantees against future losses, the financial institutions have no incentive to lend (at fixed rates), but to divert deposits towards speculative investments, which has the potential for massive profits without the consequence of failures-losses.

Businesses rely on short-long term loans for inventory, expansion, research-development, etc. Without loans, the economic recovery in the private sector will remain stalled, and unemployment will remain high, if not get worse.

With tax cuts, subsidies (corporate welfare), bail-outs, and lacking accountability, the financial institutions have us (taxpayers, victims of their malfeasance) subsidizing and enabling our own demize, continued recession, exacerbated unemployment, while we're set up for another, more devastating (sooner or later) collapse of our economy.
photo
Aldyth
Advocating for those who cannot defend themselves.
04:46 PM on 07/14/2010
We rewarded business as usual with our hard earned tax dollars.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:43 AM on 07/14/2010
FDR, PULLED US OUT OF THE GREAT DEPRESSION

I have heard only too often that WW II industries pulled us out of the 1929 Depression.

This is totally rewriting history, and as a 16 year old when WW II started, I will share some startling experiences in NYC prior to the Japanese attacking Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941:

Up until that "Infamous Day" the USA was a staunch Isolationist nation; in the USA we were celebrating the Italian holidays with week long festivals, playing the Italian National Anthem, "Giovanetsa"; I still remember the melody.

At the same time German American Bund organizations were congregating in our US forests and carrying on military Boot Training Camps in open public.

America not only was Isolationist up until December 7, 1941, but was Pro Italy and Germany. American census in 1939: 25% German, 16% Irish, 11 % Italian.

War industries never began until after the Pearl Harbor Attack on December 7,1941. My older brother bought one of the last commercial autos built, a 1940 Oldsmobile, before American industries converted to war time vehicles and war time industries.

OBAMA! The recovery of the 1929-35 depression was the result of FDR's Government funded infrastructure work programs. By 1937 the country was in full recovery with almost zero unemployment thanks the NRA, the WPA, and the CCC.

So next time someone says the Great Depression was solved by WW II industries, give them a WW II history book for Christmas.

FDR, A LEGENDARY LEADER
09:29 AM on 07/14/2010
Hello all -- I am looking for public feedback regarding the default option separate from austerity measures or monetary expansion -- the link below outlines the concepts:

http://wjmc.blogspot.com/2010/07/what-about-default-option.html

All comments and feedback most welcome under at the link above, thank you in advance...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:10 AM on 07/14/2010
FDR, PULLED US OUT OF THE GREAT DEPRESSION

I have heard only too often that WW II industries pulled us out of the 1929 Depression.

This is totally rewriting history, and as a 16 year old when WW II started with Hitler invading Poland in 1939, I will share some startling experiences in NYC prior to the Japanese attacking Pearl Harbor:

Before December 7, 1941, the USA was a staunch Isolationist nation; in the USA we were celebrating the Italian holidays with week long festivals, playing the Italian National Anthem, "Giovanetsa"; I still remember the melody.

At the same time German American Bund organizations were congregating in our forests and carrying on military Boot Training Camps in open public.

America not only was Isolationist up until December 7, 1941, but overwhelmingly Pro Axis Italy and Germany. American Census in 1939: 25% German, 18% Irish, 12 % Italian.

War industries never began until after the Pearl Harbor Attack on December 7,1941. My older brother bought one of the last commercial autos built, a 1940 Oldsmobile before American industries converted to war time vehicles and war time industries.

The recovery of the 1929-35 depression was the result of FDR's Government funded infrastructure work programs. By 1937 the country was in full recovery with almost zero unemployment thanks the NRA, the WPA, and the CCC.

So next time someone says the Great Depression was solved by WW II industries, give him a history book for Christmas.

FDR, A LEGENDARY LEADER
photo
castlerider
"A man's home is his castle"
11:50 PM on 07/13/2010
It's very unfortunate; tragic, really that this administration is not even at terms with the fact that every economic turnaround this nation's ever had has centered around the home industry...

Why? Because it's so smack dab in the middle of the economy... Bringing jobs in every direction from the vendors (hundreds) to the suppliers (thousands), then everything people spend money on... Food, clothes, tires, restaurants, child care, etc.. on & on.

Yeah, there's a home glut, but not everywhere, and besides, the energy efficiency in newer homes alone make them better choices that government should at least endorse & recommend.

But here's the real problem, right now.. Money's not as accessible to hard working Americans... Loans? impossible to get, practically. Banks aren't lending because they don't have to, since trading & derivatives.
Regulation drawn in place has over-reached in a HUGE way... Why? Because it was drawn up by the BANKS, not the government... And Obama's administration has completely overlooked their opportunity to act on it. ( I can just see those greedy bankers... "OK, you want regulation, I'LL GIVE YOU REGULATION !)
This excuse banks don't have money is pure BS. All the money that was out there in our economy is still there, it's just in the hands of fewer people.

Please write your congressman, this is about JOBS too. Conservatives should be behind this, but of course they'll never flex on banks because they're totally BOUGHT
10:23 PM on 07/13/2010
Simple. If the banks won't lend, open up the fed window for small business to borrow from. What's good for the big banks is good for small business
07:06 PM on 07/13/2010
Dr Bernanke should admit that he has failed the unemployed and small businesses, and then resign for the good of the nation...