iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Scott Brown Vote For Financial Reform Bill Gets Democrats Closer To 60

Scott Brown

JIM KUHNHENN   07/12/10 09:43 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — Sens. Olympia Snowe and Scott Brown pushed sweeping financial legislation to the edge of final passage Monday, both announcing they intend to support the regulatory overhaul despite initial misgivings.

Snowe of Maine and Brown of Massachusetts join Susan Collins of Maine as three crucial Republican votes for the legislation.

"While not perfect, the legislation takes necessary steps to implement meaningful regulatory reforms, create strong consumer protections and restore confidence in the American financial system," Snowe said in a statement Monday evening.

In breaking with the rest of the Republican Party, the three lawmakers appeared to give Democratic leaders the 60 votes needed to overcome procedural hurdles facing the legislation.

Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada said the legislation would be wrapped up this week.

"We will finish our work on this bill this week to ensure that these critical protections and accountability for Wall Street are in place as soon as possible." Reid said in a statement.

He commended the three Republicans.

"Despite the difficult political climate, these Republicans have joined Democrats to support these common-sense protections for consumers, investors and financial institutions that will help prevent another financial crisis," Reid said.

Democratic Sen. Ben Nelson of Nebraska kept the vote count in limbo Monday, saying he remained undecided on the legislation. Nelson voted for an earlier Senate version of the bill.

"We've got some concerns that some of the banks in Nebraska have raised," Nelson said Monday. "We also have some banks in Nebraska saying vote for it. We're trying to balance out the concerns that have been raised. There's a certain amount of uncertainty. You don't have regulations written. You don't know who's going to be the head of the consumer protection bureau."

A fourth Republican who voted for the Senate version in May, Charles Grassley of Iowa, has indicated he has reservations as well.

The legislation attempts to rein in banks, police previously unregulated markets and provide a new array of consumer protections. It aims to avoid a recurrence of the 2008 financial crisis that helped drive the country into the worst recession since the Great Depression.

Without Nelson, Democrats would have to wait for West Virginia Gov. Joe Manchin, who is a Democrat, to fill the vacancy created by the death of Sen. Robert Byrd. Manchin said Monday that he would fill the vacancy as early as Friday and no later than Sunday.

Manchin's appointment would be expected to vote for the legislation.

Like Snowe, Brown won concessions in the bill and said Monday that the legislation "is a better bill than it was when this whole process started."

"While it isn't perfect, I expect to support the bill when it comes up for a vote," he said in a statement. "It includes safeguards to help prevent another financial meltdown, ensures that consumers are protected and it is paid for without new taxes."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — Sens. Olympia Snowe and Scott Brown pushed sweeping financial legislation to the edge of final passage Monday, both announcing they intend to support the regulatory overhaul despite...
WASHINGTON — Sens. Olympia Snowe and Scott Brown pushed sweeping financial legislation to the edge of final passage Monday, both announcing they intend to support the regulatory overhaul despite...
Filed by T.J. Ortenzi  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,033
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (29 total)
01:14 PM on 07/22/2010
Once again, apparently nobody ready this bill because it was written by the wolf guarding the hen house. There is NO provision for Fannie/Freddie, thanks to Barney Frank. A horrible bill that shows the stupidity of this entire congress. A room full of lawyers who can't write a decent law! THROW DA BUMS OUT!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kalidescopemind
My glass is 1/4 full '(
04:04 PM on 07/19/2010
Meantime, they block unemloyment benefits for those hurt by the Wall Street recession because they "don't want to increase the deficit". Nevermind the $Trillions they added during the Bush administration.
01:16 PM on 07/22/2010
They could use TARP money or use Newt's suggestions for unemployment. But NO, they rack up even MORE DEBT! Blame the socialists for this, not GOP. Not saying Bush did good, but Obama was supposed to make it BETTER, NOT WORSE!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kalidescopemind
My glass is 1/4 full '(
03:59 PM on 07/19/2010
Why is the GOP filibustering reforms design to prevent another $3/4 Trillion TARP bailout to Wall Street? Do they want it to happen again? How CORRUPT can a party be?
12:07 PM on 07/15/2010
Opacity reduces scrutiny and confers power on the few with the ability to pierce the veil. Although derivatives have indeed become extremely complex, in actuality, they are as old as the idea of finance itself. The credit derivatives market should borrow a thought from Leonardo: “Simplicity is the highest form of sophistication.”

For a clearer understanding of subprime mortgage-backed credit derivatives, visit:

http://donovanlawgroup.wordpress.com/2010/02/19/how-credit-derivatives-brought-the-u-s-economy-to-the-brink-of-a-second-great-depression/
04:39 PM on 07/14/2010
I am analyzing the financial effects of a total default by the US government as an alternative to austerity and/or monetary expansion. Comments and suggestions welcome at:

http://wjmc.blogspot.com/2010/07/what-about-default-option.html

Thank you in advance for you participation...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WriterGirl
02:12 PM on 07/14/2010
Moderate Republicans... what a concept! Here's hoping that more rational politicians survive the tea party hysteria.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter007
09:35 AM on 07/14/2010
The Republicans are happy that they have a republican seated in a democrat state. He has to run for re-election in 20 months. They will be happy if he can hold the seat.
02:48 AM on 07/14/2010
Still waiting for the evidence that the tea partiers are racist. Saying so doesn't make it so. Perhaps people should be condemning the NAACP for its blanket racist condemnation of the tea party.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter007
09:37 AM on 07/14/2010
The Democrats need a big turnout from the black voters this November. Elections are all about turnout.
Can you think of a better message to get people to turn out?
If there isn't any.....then its curtains for Dems.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kalidescopemind
My glass is 1/4 full '(
03:57 PM on 07/19/2010
I love how they like to call Dems "Obama-lovers" like we don't get the reference to n-lovers! If you can't see the racism, its is because you are not looking!
01:02 PM on 07/14/2010
You mean other than their signs, statements, and membership? I couldn't care less. It's the rest of what they think that's scary.. Racism is just the cherry on top.
05:52 PM on 07/13/2010
Given the lunatic level of obstructionist buffoonery the rest of the GOP in congress have exhibited; Scott Brown is starting to look positively left wing; come over to the bright side of the force....
05:05 PM on 07/13/2010
while the bill is neccesary to a point, someone should at least mention the fact that brown's vote apparently came at the cost of relaxing the volker rule to the tune of 3% (i think) of a bank's assets, thus paving the way for a systemic undermining of the financial reform bill before it has gotten off the ground. give a bank 3% and they'll take down your entire economy. as an NPR guest put it best, Brown may be less the senator from Mass. and more the Senator from State Street.

Though again, I do feel it good that he is willing to speak to the other side, despite his intentions, and it's not like Obama was forced at gunpoint to accept his vote.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PEACEAUTHOR
03:21 PM on 07/13/2010
Scott Brown is quickly becoming a major force in American politics. He shows that he is more concerned with the people he serves than with petty political antics. I think he will be a candidate for president at some point. At least he is showing us that men can stand up and be counted to get this country on track. If you check his history he happens to be an intellectual heavyweight despite being a guy who is a Kennedy type great looking hunk.
03:44 PM on 07/13/2010
The Mass voters will never re-elect him back to the senate.
04:57 PM on 07/13/2010
as a long-time mass. democratic voter, i beg to differ, especially given the lousy slew of democratic candidates
08:53 AM on 07/14/2010
I guess your not from Mass?
08:40 PM on 07/13/2010
Other than occasionally voting with the one or two Republicans who break ranks, what leadership has he shown? Has he proposed legislation? Written anything? Laid out policies? If he had landed in the Senate seat of someone else, the press would pay him no attention. Don't you think that a person who runs for President should have some overarching philosophy of governing that has been thought about for a while? I wonder if he really believed he could win? That stump speech intro of his, "I'm Scott Brown and I drive a truck," seems tongue-in-cheek. If it's not tongue-in-cheek, then he really is as superficial as his nude centerfold made him look.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:19 PM on 07/13/2010
Unemployment if 9.5% in Massachusetts. Would be nice if Brown would vote in favor of extended unemployment benefits... but he's not. Shame.
photo
Venus Louviere
Moving Forward
01:42 PM on 07/13/2010
He dose look good in that picture. lol
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thetheRedundant
Youth is wasted on the young.
01:31 PM on 07/13/2010
Yes! A moderate republican....we need more of you!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sals
12:58 PM on 07/13/2010
I am impressed with Scott Brown. He is in it for the long haul.