iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Right-To-Die Billboard Raises Concerns

First Posted: 07/17/10 11:53 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 06:05 PM ET

Right To Die
Robert J. Levine of Princeton, N.J., who volunteers for the New Jersey chapter of The Final Exit Network, in front of the group's billboard in Hillside, N.J., which has been condemned by the Catholic Church.

By Steve Strunsky
Religion News Service

HILLSIDE, N.J. (RNS) The huge black billboard is hard to miss, looming over a stretch of Route 22 like a harbinger of death, or at least the right to die:

"My Life, My Death, My Choice, FinalExitNetwork.org"

The 15-by-49-foot billboard went up June 28, paid for by Final Exit Network, a nationwide group that provides guidance to adults seeking to end a life of constant pain from incurable illness.

The billboard, along with one in San Francisco and another planned for Florida, anchors a national campaign by the network to raise awareness of itself and its mission. Members say the locations were chosen for their reputations as being socially progressive and, in Florida's case, for its elderly population.

"What we're trying to do is let people know that Final Exit Network exists, and that we're here, and if they spend a little time trying to find out what we do, they might actually support us," said Bob Levine, 88, of Princeton, who founded the group's New Jersey chapter after his first wife died of cancer.

Levine said reaction on the organization's website has been mixed: "From, 'God bless you, we finally have somebody who understands us,' to 'You are a bunch of atheists and you ought to be put in jail."'

Criticism has also come from two other corners: suicide prevention counselors and the Catholic Church.

Jim Goodness, a spokesman for the Archdiocese of Newark, said the message "cannot be condoned."

"The Catholic Church teaches, and has always taught, that all human life has dignity and all human life is precious," he said.

Therapists called the billboard "irresponsible," arguing it could serve as a "tipping point" for troubled teens or others at risk of suicide.

"The idea of any of these upset, impressionable kids seeing a billboard like that absolutely horrifies me," said Judith Springer, a Morristown psychologist and board member of the Society for the Prevention of Teen Suicide. "You can't filter who sees a publicly displayed sign."

At least one motorist driving by the billboard had a similar opinion. Minji Ryu, 30, of South Amboy said the billboard's message was vague and could "give a totally different message to teenagers," who might take it as condoning suicide under any circumstance.

James Pride, 54, of Newark, a plumber who was filling up at a gas station near the billboard, said he hadn't noticed the sign, but once the issue was explained said, "I can understand it in certain situations."

The network takes its name from the 1991 best seller "Final Exit: The Practicalities of Self-Deliverance and Assisted Suicide for the Dying" by Derek Humphry. Humphry, an advisor to the network, said this is the first right-to-die public awareness campaign in the U.S. to use billboards.

"Nobody in the movement has had the idea before," the 80-year-old author said. "It's the freedom of information, the right to express yourself, which is holy in America. People are entitled to look at it or not. I think it's a good idea to get people thinking."

The network does not advocate physician-assisted suicide, a practice associated with Jack Kevorkian, who served eight years in prison on a second-degree murder charge in Michigan in 1999, after he gave a lethal injection to a man with Lou Gehrig's disease. Instead, it recommends suffocation by donning an air-tight hood and inhaling helium pumped in through a tube.

"We offer guidance and the most current information known for self-deliverance when the person is ready to choose," according to the network's website. "Safeguards are in place to ensure that the person's decision is voluntary and repeatedly stated."

Levine, a retired engineer, said safeguards include an interview with end-of-life "guides," who also require medical records of an illness.

"I think it is outrageous for somebody to tell me how I can end my life," he said. "Who appointed them in charge of my life? I think it's kind of sad that people make this assumption that there's not really much they can do about it. If somebody wants to end their life, there's too many cases where, rather than doing it in a way that we advise, they shoot themselves or jump off a building."

Levine said Final Exit has 3,000 members nationwide. The network has guided dozens of suicides, he said, including "at least one" in New Jersey, which Levine refused to identify.

Thomas E. Goodwin, a physician who founded the network in Florida in 2004, is facing criminal charges of violating Georgia's law against assisted suicide in the 2008 death of a 58-year-old man at his home near Atlanta. Network members face similar charges in Arizona. New Jersey also prohibits assisted suicide.

Hillside Mayor Joe Menza said he did not condone the message, and that his own father clung to life despite cancer that killed him at age 65. He said he hadn't received any complaints about the billboard and the group had a right to deliver its message.

"They do have freedom of speech," he said.

(Steve Strunsky writes for The Star-Ledger. Rohan Mascarenhas contributed to this story.)

FOLLOW HUFFPOST RELIGION

By Steve Strunsky Religion News Service HILLSIDE, N.J. (RNS) The huge black billboard is hard to miss, looming over a stretch of Route 22 like a harbinger of death, or at least the right to die: "My...
By Steve Strunsky Religion News Service HILLSIDE, N.J. (RNS) The huge black billboard is hard to miss, looming over a stretch of Route 22 like a harbinger of death, or at least the right to die: "My...
Filed by Clay Chiles  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 644
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (12 total)
07:00 PM on 07/24/2010
To people of all religions: Worry about your own choices. Forcing your belief system on others is a very transparent attempt to squash your own doubts about your beliefs. All religions rationalize their busy-bodied behaviors by calling it "gods work" ( or whoever you worship). I don't need the threat of hell or the reward of heaven to distinguish right from wrong. What is worrisome is that the majority of u do need this distinction. If you don't think you have the right to die the solution is simple: DON'T DO IT.
12:54 AM on 07/23/2010
Death with dignity will be the next wave of change brought to America by the baby boomers. The generation that burned their bras and draft cards and brought about civil rights, equal opportunity for women, birth control, rainbow coalitions, gay rights, wheels for everything, sensible shoes, free flowing hair, activism, and technology on a personal level will not be filling up nursing homes, hooked up to tubes, or live beyond reason. Dr. Kevorkian was about 20 years ahead of his time (and too focused on contraptions). But we knew we will not let anyone else control our lives or our deaths.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StephenJK
All your consciousness are belong to us
09:28 PM on 07/22/2010
What would someone think if you knowingly let your pet suffer through his last days, weeks, months or years? You know the animal won't get better and you know it is suffering greatly. It would be a painful experience for all parties involved. People would think you are cruel for letting your pet suffer. Why is it different for humans in this situation? People should have a choice but, a PhD should be a large part in factoring if the choice is suited for the individual, I guess. At the very least, it should be available for the terminally ill.
been2there
Facts have a liberal bias.
02:11 AM on 07/22/2010
I think that the experience of Oregon is significant here. Plenty of people voted for the assisted suicide law, but very few ask for the prescription, and only about half of those use it. This indicates to me that it is the knowledge that they can end it, rather than the actual end, that most people want.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
elijah24
Ubuntu
12:15 PM on 07/20/2010
I have lost 6 friends by their own hands. Most were young, with the oldest being in his 50's. None of them were terminally ill.
The impact of their deaths have left a crater in my soul, that I can't imagine will ever be filled. Like anyone else who has been left behind when a friend committed suicide, I regularly feel anger, sorrow, loneliness, and confusion. It is the single greatest pain I have ever experienced, and I have felt many times that it is the cruelest act anyone can commit.
But in my moments of clarity, I understand. Because none of my friends wanted to hurt me. They just couldn't stand the pain anymore. And while it was my duty as their friend to help them as much as I could in any way that I could; it would have been cruel of me, to force them to continue to suffer. The religious community will make the case that suicide is a sin, and who knows? They might be right. But I feel it is a greater sin, to impose suffering upon a person, when relief is available.
In our culture, we have learned to fear death. But sometimes, death is not the ultimate failure. We all die eventually, after all. Sometimes, death is mercy. And if we love our friends, and we can't save them, what is mercy, but an act of love?
08:42 PM on 07/24/2010
Your take on this issue, in my opinion, is the perfect example of how one's mind evolves and grows with experience. Its sad that many people can never see past the selfishness in this me, me, me world. I have never heard of a case of suicide that was willfully done with the sole purpose of hurting someone else. Death is by far not the worst thing that can happen to you. I am sorry for your losses and the fact that you can see past your own pain is an amazing quality to have.
06:08 AM on 07/20/2010
Read about a company engaged in "assisted suicide."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dignitas_(euthanasia_group)
A-Superstitionist
Keep thy superstitions to thyself and out of laws
10:51 PM on 07/19/2010
Every person should have the right to die with dignity and this is none of the government's or any organized superstition's (i.e.; religion's) business.

However, what is the government's business is to ensure that those who might financially benefit from someone's death do not interfere with that person's right to die or right not to die yet.

Several European countries have addressed this by defining a clear process for euthanasia. For example a person might indicate to his family practice doctor that he/she wants to end his/her life at some point in the not so distant future because of certain illness or age and is seeking the doctor's assistance in it. The doctor has to confirm that this is a terminally ill patient and/or that the quality of life is severely impacted. Some time later, a second doctor needs to independently go through this analysis again. Both doctors must ensure that this patient is capable of making an independent informed and conscious decision and is not under any pressure from relatives (who might want to get their inheritance earlier, ...). Different countries have established different criteria.

(see part 2 below)
A-Superstitionist
Keep thy superstitions to thyself and out of laws
11:05 PM on 07/19/2010
(part 2)

The reality is that for most terminally ill patients (especially cancer patients) the ABILITY to determine when they die makes their last days more comfortable. If at any time painkillers cannot manage the pain sufficiently, they COULD trigger the euthanasia procedure. However, they rarely do because pain management has advanced quite a bit.

The key thing is to keep all superstitions out of this. What gives any religion the right to determine what anyone does to themselves? Isn't it sad that religions seem to care more for the not-yet-born and the nearly-dead but then go put pressure on congress to stop universal healthcare for the living? No it is not just sad. It is immoral.
07:39 PM on 07/19/2010
About TIME!!! The ultimate CHOICE. How much pain can I tolerate? Or, do I WANT to tolerate? What's the point of longevity if there's no quality of life?

It's never an easy decision. But who's should it be? Why shouldn't it be ME?
05:07 PM on 07/19/2010
I recognize that this is a sticky issue - there is an obvious slippery slope issue here. At what point does it move from people having the RIGHT to die because they are suffering, or feel like they are a becoming a burden to others, etc., to the OBLIGATION to die because of this? It seems obvious to me that if someone in a competent state of mind wishes to die, they should be able to - and it shouldn't be a crime to assist. If, however, a disabled man decides that it's too hard on his wife to care for him, so he decides to die - will other disabled people feel as though they really SHOULD do the same thing? Out of respect for their loved ones?

I don't know - no matter how you look at it, it's a grey area that seems to have no right answer. I guess the only thing to do is to determine it on a case-by-case basis. I do not think that sweeping comments on either side are particularly helpful - this ignores and disrespects the suffering of poeple who have decided that their time on this earth should come to an end.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:32 AM on 07/20/2010
Let's enact a law first before we start worrying about a slope. There are plenty of ways that medicine "interferes" with life, shocking hearts back to pumping. artificial insemination, etc. I want the right to determine the end of my life if I have a terminal illness or alzhiemer's disease or any number of other things. There is no way that I want to end up in some home, drooling in a wheelchair putting myself or my loved ones through hell.
03:39 PM on 07/19/2010
I will be dead in 2 years. Knowing what is coming makes me very aware of how cruelly and without any remorse our society, government and doctors treat the terminally ill.

Death row inmates facing execution receive more compassion and concern than the terminally ill. They are given a chance to say good-bye to loved ones, are offered comfort and every effort is made to make sure their death is quick and painless.

Yet the suffering of the terminally ill & our families is ignored. It is not compassionate to force a terminally ill person to live when an acceptable quality of life no longer exists. It is unfair to impoverish our families and leave them with insurmountable debts caused by our prolonged dying. It is cruel to make us die alone because our extended death has destroyed the emotional bonds we once shared.

If we choose to end our life, we must do it while we still have an acceptable quality of life, before the decision is taken from us & we must act alone. To keep our family & friends safe from accusations of complicity, we can't say goodbye, express our love & appreciation nor have the simple comfort of holding a loved one's hand.

We can provide a safe & caring environment for we that are ready to die and for those who care for us. Why insist my death must be prolonged, expensive & lonely?
05:10 PM on 07/19/2010
What a powerful post - you have really humanized the issue - and maybe that's the only way we can really get clarity about it. I really feel your struggle - it is profoundly unfair to have to go through this alone to avoid your loved ones being complicit in assisted suicide.

On the other hand, is mounting debts because of illness a reason to die? I mean, if otherwise you wished to live? My mom is dying of cancer, and I would pay my last dollar for an extra few months with her.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lore Splitt
03:27 PM on 07/19/2010
I've seen family members dying slow, agonizing deaths, I can understand those who would put an end to it, I'm pretty sure if it were me I'd want to choose my own terms if my life was nothing but agony with no hope of reprieve.

However, I've also known people who went through something traumatic and became suicidal- people who became bi-polar, and didn't realize it... or a number of other mental disorders who just needed help- and were fine... that ad may make it harder to get them the help they need, especially since you can't just drag a person to a mental health facility without being able to prove, without a doubt, they want to harm themselves, and- the majority of people who really want to kill themselves, are very good at hiding it. Which is part of why family members and friends of successful suicides very rarely see it coming.

It's such a hard balance, because there may be family members of people who want to just die with dignity, who really don't understand it's not that uncommon a wish, I understand why they'd want to post the board, I think it just needs to be phrased differently.
been2there
Facts have a liberal bias.
02:13 AM on 07/22/2010
As a person who struggles endlessly with depression, I can tell you that mental anguish is just as bad as physical anguish.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lore Splitt
12:50 PM on 07/22/2010
Didn't say it wasn't, trust me- I know it is... however, there are ways to help with that- if the person is able to get the help they need. Sometimes part of whatever is hurting a person mentally prevents them from reaching out for that help though.

I have family members who are bi-polar, and I personally suffered from extreme depression in High School. I know full well it can be just as bad. I've also woken up when I wasn't supposed to during a surgery, so temporarily, I know how physical agony can be as well-

But with the mental agony- help is more available. It takes time for meds to work, if appropriate for the situation, and definitely time for something like cognitive behavior therapy to work (Not enough therapists offer this though)- but they can work. I personally have more faith in the later, than the former.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Forester
Overeducated woods worker.
01:39 PM on 07/19/2010
This issue is similar to same s ex marriage.

Until you actually have a personal experience that informs your opinion, you really have no idea how outraged you can feel when the government and strangers intrude on your own personal choices.
02:15 AM on 07/20/2010
Brilliant! thank you! I agree
photo
Euterpe360
I'm just a little bi-partisan
11:33 AM on 07/20/2010
Fanned for this and previous comments you've made.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StealGeorgia
I am not boycotting the walrus
12:17 PM on 07/19/2010
So 'Big Butter Jesus' melted away, and now we have this?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:10 PM on 07/19/2010
The sad part is that there has to be a billboard to espouse the most fundamental and private aspects of our lives. If its not OUR life, whose is it? The Pope's? Sean Hannity's? Pat Robertson's? George Bush's? The Catholic church claims it has dignity for life? For whose life, the Pope's only? Certainly no dignity for child victims of clergy sex abuse, they are told to shut-up, that the Pride of the Church is far more important that the loss of dignity from being molested. Institutional Pride trumps human dignity in the Catholic Church, so what other moral authority claims to have the high road on this issue, the high road of making people suffer horrific pain instead of being allowed to end terminal agony? What about Small Government, government not telling us what we can put or take out of our bodies?

The governments and churchs of the world have little problem with the tens of millions who die in wars, young people with their whole lives ahead of them, but a person in absolute hellish agony at the end of their life, make him or her suffer some more, its What Jesus Would Do. We peasants are so unimportant that our pain is irrelevant to the Holy Ones, besides, how can you keep tithing from your cancer ward if you are dead?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
minerva117
The dog ate my micro bio.
12:39 PM on 07/19/2010
Not to mention the MONEY that is made during an end-of-life illness. When my husband died last summer, the bill for his 15 days of hospitalization came to a quarter of a million dollars. Thats not counting the week he spent on the local hospital, who discharged him as all better 17 days before he died. Prolonging a person's suffering=big bucks.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lore Splitt
03:37 PM on 07/19/2010
My Uncle was in the hospital from Feburary 2001 to June 2001, declining the entire time, his medical bills were astronomical and even with a very good insurance plan, his costs bled over as well.

The highest costs? The end of life care hands down. Hospitals drag everything out, their goal isn't quality of life, it's quantity of it- and if they can have a person hooked up to a respirator trying to scream because they can't give them anymore pain meds, that's just what they'll do.

At least hospices just focus on making a person as comfortable as possible, which isn't even an option for everyone- however it's still not the same as letting a person go who's ready, and willing to go.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lore Splitt
03:39 PM on 07/19/2010
And I'm so sorry for your loss, nobody should have to go through that, especially with the premature release, I've had family members pass because of that as well.
photo
newtom
eschew obfuscation
02:15 PM on 07/19/2010
Once again, as in the case of abortion, the catholic church will have its opinion which should NOT interfere with the laws of the US and the rights of people to choose for themselves. If you think it is wrong to end your life in any situation, then don't do it. If you choose -- out of a lack of other choices and without the hope of recovery or real relief from pain -- to end your life, it should be legally and mediacally available.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mishal Zeera
11:06 AM on 07/19/2010
Theres something so undignified about all this "spelling it out in big letters on the highway" business. Right to die, absolutely.. but it reminds me of religious anti abortion ads I saw in upstate NY that were so crude.

I guess they felt the need to put that up there considering all the religious messages being pushed by the "other side"?