iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

BP Well Cap: BP, Feds Clash Over Reopening Capped Gulf Oil Well

Bp Well Cap

First Posted: 07/18/10 11:08 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 06:05 PM ET

NEW ORLEANS (Associated Press) - BP and the Obama administration offered significantly differing views Sunday on whether the capped Gulf of Mexico oil well will have to be reopened, a contradiction that may be an effort by the oil giant to avoid blame if crude starts spewing again.

Pilloried for nearly three months as it tried repeatedly to stop the leak, BP PLC capped the nearly mile-deep well Thursday and wants to keep it that way. The government's plan, however, is to eventually pipe oil to the surface, which would ease pressure on the fragile well but would require up to three more days of oil spilling into the Gulf.

"No one associated with this whole activity ... wants to see any more oil flow into the Gulf of Mexico," Doug Suttles, BP's chief operating officer, said Sunday. "Right now we don't have a target to return the well to flow."

An administration official familiar with the spill oversight, however, told The Associated Press that a seep and possible methane were found near the busted oil well. The official spoke on condition of anonymity Sunday because an announcement about the next steps had not been made yet.

The concern all along -- since pressure readings on the cap weren't as high as expected -- was a leak elsewhere in the wellbore, meaning the cap may have to be reopened to prevent the environmental disaster from becoming even worse and harder to fix.

The official, who would not clarify what is seeping near the well, also said BP is not complying with the government's demand for more monitoring.

Retired Coast Guard Adm. Thad Allen, the Obama administration's spill response chief, demanded BP provide results of further testing of the seabed by 9 p.m. EDT Sunday night.

"When seeps are detected, you are directed to marshal resources, quickly investigate, and report findings to the government in no more than four hours. I direct you to provide me a written procedure for opening the choke valve as quickly as possible without damaging the well should hydrocarbon seepage near the well head be confirmed," Allen said in a letter to BP Managing Director Bob Dudley.

When asked about the situation earlier Sunday before the letter was released, BP spokesman Mark Salt would only say that "we continue to work very closely with all government scientists on this."

Allen insisted Sunday that "nothing has changed" since Saturday, when he said oil would eventually be piped to surface ships. The government is overseeing BP's work to stop the leak, which ultimately is to be plugged using a relief well.

Allen decided to extend testing of the cap that had been scheduled to end Sunday, the official who spoke on condition of anonymity said. That means the oil will stay in the well for now as scientists continue run tests and monitor pressure readings. The official didn't say how long that would take.

Officials at the Department of Homeland Security referred questions to a statement issued by Allen; neither he nor BP officials could explain the apparent contradiction in plans.

Suttles' comments carved out an important piece of turf for BP: If Allen sticks with the containment plan and oil again pours forth into the Gulf, even briefly, it will be the government's doing, not BP's.

The company very much wants to avoid a repeat of the live underwater video that showed millions of gallons of oil spewing from the blown well for weeks.

"I can see why they're pushing for keeping the cap on and shut in until the relief well is in place," said Daniel Keeney, president of a Dallas-based public relations firm.

The government wants to eliminate any chance of making matters worse, while BP is loath to lose the momentum it gained the moment it finally halted the leak, Keeney said.

"They want to project being on the same team, but they have different end results that benefit each," he said.

Oil would have to be released under Allen's plan, which would ease concerns that the capped reservoir might force its way out through another route. Those concerns stem from pressure readings in the cap that have been lower than expected.

Scientists still aren't sure whether the pressure readings mean a leak elsewhere in the well bore, possibly deep down in bedrock, which could make the seabed unstable. Oil would be have to be released into the water to relieve pressure and allow crews to hook up the ships, BP and Allen have said.

So far, there have been no signs of a leak.

"We're not seeing any problems at this point with the shut-in," Suttles said at a Sunday morning briefing.

Allen said later Sunday that scientists and engineers would continue to evaluate and monitor the cap through acoustic, sonar and seismic readings.

They're looking to determine whether low pressure readings mean that more oil than expected poured into the Gulf of Mexico since the BP-leased Deepwater Horizon rig exploded April 20, killing 11 people and touching off one of America's worst environment crises.

"While we are pleased that no oil is currently being released into the Gulf of Mexico and want to take all appropriate action to keep it that way, it is important that all decisions are driven by the science," Allen said in a news release.

"Ultimately, we must ensure no irreversible damage is done which could cause uncontrolled leakage from numerous points on the sea floor."

Both Allen and BP have said they don't know how long the trial run will continue. It was set to end Sunday afternoon, but the deadline -- an extension from the original Saturday cutoff -- came and went with no word on what's next.

After little activity Sunday, robots near the well cap came to life around the time of the cutoff. It wasn't clear what they were doing, but bubbles started swirling around as their robotic arms poked at the mechanical cap.

To plug the busted well, BP is drilling two relief wells, one of them as a backup. The company said work on the first one was far enough along that officials expect to reach the broken well's casing, or pipes, deep underground by late this month. The subsequent job of jamming the well with mud and cement could take days or a few weeks.

It will take months, or possibly years for the Gulf to recover, though cleanup efforts continued and improvements in the water could be seen in the days since the oil stopped flowing. Somewhere between 94 million and 184 million gallons have spilled into the Gulf, according to government estimates.

The spill has prevented many commercial fishermen from their jobs, though some are at work with the cleanup. Some boat captains were surprised and angry to learn that the money they make from cleanup work will be deducted from the funds they would otherwise receive from a $20 billion compensation fund set up by BP.

The fund's administrator, Kenneth Feinberg, told The Associated Press on Sunday that if BP pays fishermen wages to help skim oil and perform other cleanup work, those wages will be subtracted from the amount they get from the fund.

Longtime charter boat captain Mike Salley said he didn't realize BP planned to deduct those earnings, and he doubted many other captains knew, either.

"I'll keep running my boat," he said Sunday on a dock in Orange Beach, Ala., before heading back into the Gulf to resupply other boats with boom to corral the oil. "What else can I do?"

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

NEW ORLEANS (Associated Press) - BP and the Obama administration offered significantly differing views Sunday on whether the capped Gulf of Mexico oil well will have to be reopened, a contradiction th...
NEW ORLEANS (Associated Press) - BP and the Obama administration offered significantly differing views Sunday on whether the capped Gulf of Mexico oil well will have to be reopened, a contradiction th...
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,726
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (35 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
michael429
10:41 PM on 07/19/2010
as i am writing this i am watching Kenneth Feinberg on CSPAN...what a self important and pompous hack for corporate America....who will protect the interests of the fishing industry and other victims of the BP crime....certainly not him...Nobdody...a travesty and a joke.....
03:39 PM on 07/19/2010
Sir, Madam
Closing oil well Mexico gulf.
This comment I send is very important, please publish quick as you can

1- This closing of the well is very dangerous action, they are watching for oil leek while the (7 inch diameter) well delivery pipe is full of methane gas, seems no one recognize that at mint of closing 3 valves at cap gas goes up and liquid goes dawn (deferent density).
And now if that cup explodes, the golf will be full of methane gas
2- They are telling of pressure difference of (2-10) # while those pressure gauges can not reed (+-)less than 100# and that is if the pointer is sensitive and not staking, usuly those high scale pressure gages are with some sticky range.
I think the best is to joint the 3 valve outlets on the cap to surface oil tanker up to closing the well by 2 bent well, although I never recommend closing 80000 B/D or even more oil production.
3- In gathering spill oil by those small fish ships are also wrong the sick they use is sucking water more I send comment in using another stick with sucking more oil and less water.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
areachanging
01:57 PM on 07/19/2010
Re: tralbry's comments about President Obama and the oil spill.

Socratic method vs. I'm the decider, shoot from the hip, sociopath method.
I'll take Socrates.

You clearly don't like President Obama.
I knew I wouldn't agree with every decision he made, when I voted for him.
He's not perfect but he is way above average in many respects.

The main thing about President Obama, to me is, he is a sincere man… a good man.
Before I voted for him, I watched old C-SPAN videos. He was on the correct side of discussions (in my view) way before most people knew who he was.

He has compassion for others but is very capable of making the hard calls… without hesitation. Although, he does take the time to think, before acting.

tralbry, it seems that you want another poorly equipped decider, in the White House.
What we have is an extremely well equipped, intelligent, think before deciding, President.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gschear
Max Baucus: What's in your wallet?
10:08 AM on 07/19/2010
They need to produce with the well until they plug it. They have to open the thing anyway to relieve pressure when the relief well intersects with this well and the cap has to be open when the apply the concrete. If they keep it capped and it is leaking, I should say pressurizing, the sea bed then there is the awful possibility of blowing out the seabed and creating a spewing gash of unknown proportions. Game Over.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vegasyankee
Making Energy for a Strong America!
09:13 AM on 07/19/2010
no exit

Right. Tell me how you feel about the fact that BP pays not ONE CENT in taxes yet continues to be subsidized by the U.S. government (read: TAXPAYER) to the tune of MILLIONS of dollars every year to drill for oil that we don't even USE? Apparently that's okay?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Completely false -

Fact: Oil and gas production are major contributors of tax and royalty payments to all levels of government. Fortunately, for those interested in facts, the federal government publishes a lot of them, and they tell a stubborn truth. The oil and gas production business pays about $140 billion annually in royalties and corporate income taxes to the US government. In comparison, far from being a beneficiary of government subsidies, oil and gas producers receive little–about $2.2 billion in 2008. The major recipients of government energy largesse are wind, solar, refined coal, and ethanol with more than 60% of federal energy subsidies. And this money buys us just about 4% of domestic energy production. Oil and gas, on the other hand, receive about 12% of all federal energy funding, but account for almost half of this country’s energy production.

The $2.2 billion that that the government spends annually on oil and gas is dwarfed by the $23 billion in royalties received by the federal government for production on government lands in 2008. Beyond the royalties are corporate income taxes of more than $130 billion annually just for the major producers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Samalabear
08:55 AM on 07/19/2010
One paragraph from the article I just posted on methane bubbles and what they mean:

"1. Why was BP allowed to drill in this location? Both the MMS and BP geologists cautioned against drilling in the location of the Deepwater Horizon due to evidence of a highly volatile methane bubble beneath the seabed. They warned that if this bubble was disturbed and exploded, it could cause a 200 foot tsunami that would virtually wipe out six Gulf states! In spite of all this, MMS waived environmental impact studies for the rig and well."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Samalabear
08:51 AM on 07/19/2010
Pandora's Box in the Gulf:

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/07/18

There are many other articles on what a methane explosion means, but it is in one of the bullet points of this article in a more encapsulated version for those who haven't read about it.
08:37 AM on 07/19/2010
This is so discouraging! I was so hoping the cap would work until the relief wells could be finished.
08:36 AM on 07/19/2010
As with everything, politics is the main concern here. BP doesn't want to open the well for fear they will be blamed for the resulting avalanche of oil into the Gulf. Obama's people are afraid if it's not open, THEY will be blamed for the oil seepage on and possible damage to the sea floor. Typical. http://www.gulfoilcam.info
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thepheonix
thepheonix..is that better Dems?
08:29 AM on 07/19/2010
Well...

The clowns better make a decision soon.

You could have a bigger disaster on your hands if it blows
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vindictive
Some days I'm crazier than others.
08:43 AM on 07/19/2010
This whole situation blows. Thanks BP... You're my hero!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:20 AM on 07/19/2010
what happened to "the relief well is 20 hours from completion" three weeks ago?
08:11 AM on 07/19/2010
BP doesn't want the people of America know how many gallons of oil each housr really spew out of the well. That's the real reason.
08:14 AM on 07/19/2010
And all those "abandoned wells" too...with so called temporary-seals
You know that some are leaking out there....but BP has never had to be put under a
microscope.
I wouldn't trust them to measure a cup of flour.
08:58 AM on 07/19/2010
BP would have considerable records showing the oil production from this well while it was operating. This could be used to determine the amount of oil coming from the pipe after the break.
Or has BP been keeping two sets of books? To avoid royalty payments? Or taxes?
Also, a well casing should have been used originally to withstand higher pressure and rupture would not be an issue. Could they have been cutting corners there too?
08:11 AM on 07/19/2010
Can someone tell me....if there is a methane seep
does that mean oil is leaking somewhere
do we know this for sure?
08:48 AM on 07/19/2010
Not by default, but it means there is probably a rupture somewhere which may or may not lead to oil leaking. If it's a fissure, we won't be able to stop whatever comes out. The methane in itself is potentially catastrophic, as it leads to oxygen depletion in the ocean. The actual well itself was leaking somewhere between 40-70% methane last I read.
08:09 AM on 07/19/2010
I don't understand why the captains of the boats thought they would get paid by BP, then also get the full amount of money they lose from shrimping or whatever they operate their boat for.

I feel very sick for them and what has happened in the gulf, their way of life may be gone for many years to come and BP is responsible, how-ever if you are working and being paid for that work, then you should only be paid the difference between the two amounts (what you would have earned and what you are earning).
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:24 AM on 07/19/2010
Right. Tell me how you feel about the fact that BP pays not ONE CENT in taxes yet continues to be subsidized by the U.S. government (read: TAXPAYER) to the tune of MILLIONS of dollars every year to drill for oil that we don't even USE? Apparently that's okay?

http://blogs.alternet.org/grantlawrence/2010/05/25/bp-gulf-oil-gusher-disaster-subsidized-by-corporate-welfare/

These fishermen have earned whatever pay they are getting from BP in addition to compensatory relief which I dearly hope will be in the millions per fisherman.
photo
Neets101
politely asking for mod squad approval
08:58 AM on 07/19/2010
It will be a long time before the fishing comes back, and the cleanup work will end long before that happens.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/10307105
FTA:

"In the fishing town of Champoton, in the state of Campeche, many people will tell you that the Ixtoc spill marked a turning point in the economy of the area.

"The amount of fish to catch was never the same as before the spill," says Pablo Bonastre, a veteran fisherman who still remembers the days after the accident when they would catch fish whose eyes were red and almost popping out.

And he vividly recalls the local government giving them "a pair of boots, a spade and plastic bags" to help collect the oil from the sea's surface.

In the following months, many fishermen had to find unskilled work on land; others left town and never returned.

The fishermen believe that depleted fish stocks are not just the result of the Ixtoc spill but of pollution caused by the area's burgeoning oil industry, which has helped make Mexico one of the world's top 10 oil producers."

"But another study, carried out by Swedish researchers in 1981, appears to contradict that view.

"The oil from the Ixtoc I blow-out acutely affected the species and ecosystems in the Campeche Bay area through its chemical toxicity (in the vicinity of the well) and through its physical properties (stickiness) in a larger area offshore and along the coast," that study says."
07:37 AM on 07/19/2010
Look at it this way... BP still has quite a bit of money they owe to us, and I don't think opening the Oil Well would be a good idea because BP still has money owed to us, and when opening the Oil Well again, it is going to crash and burn their finances. As they will need *more* money to keep THAT Oil Well running.