iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Financial Reform Coalition Endorses Elizabeth Warren To Head New Consumer Agency


First Posted: 07/19/10 01:13 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 06:05 PM ET

On Monday, a coalition of groups fighting to reform the nation's financial system formally endorsed Harvard Law professor and bailout watchdog Elizabeth Warren to head the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Americans for Financial Reform, an alliance of more than 250 organizations that has spent the past year advocating for financial reform legislation, said that Warren is the "most experienced, effective and independent person" to serve as the critical first chief of the new agency.

The endorsement comes on the heels of Thursday's Huffington Post report that Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner opposes Warren's nomination, and Friday's statements by a senior White House adviser and top Geithner lieutenants at Treasury that Warren was "well qualified" for the position, yet nonetheless was only one of three top candidates.

AFR includes top labor groups and progressive advocacy organizations with deep ties to the Obama administration, including AFL-CIO and the Service Employees International Union.

"[Elizabeth] Warren has shown a steadfast and tireless commitment to protecting consumers throughout her distinguished career and is without question the best candidate to run the new CFPB," Heather Booth, AFR's director, said in a statement.

"We join many others in encouraging the White House to quickly move to nominate Elizabeth Warren to head the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau," Booth added.

Some Democratic groups, like the Progressive Change Campaign Committee, announced their support for Warren on Friday. The PCCC even launched an online petition urging President Barack Obama to pick Warren as the chief of the new agency designed to protect consumers from predatory lenders. More than 100,000 people have signed it so far.

"There was some urgency to move forward" on the endorsement, an AFR spokesman said. The group drafted its statement over the weekend, intending to get it out before Monday.

The move may put increased pressure on the White House to select Warren to head the new entity. Consumer advocates and financial lobbyists agree that the first director will have a tremendous impact on the agency that will likely last beyond the director's term. A strong consumer protector will ensure tough consumer protections for years, as the agency's staff and the director's successors will take their cue from precedent; a weak chief nearly guarantees an ineffectual agency that will fall short of the promises advocated by the soon-to-be enacted financial reform legislation.

Sources say Geithner supports one of his top deputies, Michael Barr, for the position. Barr, a former law professor and Treasury Department official during the Clinton administration, has drawn raves from consumer groups for his role in ensuring the survival of the new agency as the financial reform bill made its way through Congress. Though reformers have clashed with Barr on other aspects of the bill, he's widely praised for his efforts on consumer protection.

But the agency is largely Warren's idea. A noted defender of the middle class, she's widely embraced by progressives and Democrats in Congress.

"Elizabeth Warren is a great, great champion for consumers and middle-class families across the country," White House senior adviser David Axelrod told reporters on a Friday conference call. "She has helped inform this effort greatly and what has been done here in many ways reflects something she's been advocating for years and years and years."

Warren introduced the idea for a consumer agency in a 2007 journal article. She's done extensive research on the debt-strapped middle class, bankruptcy and the working poor.

Geithner's spokesman, Andrew Williams, called Warren a "driving force" behind the new agency's creation.

Warren currently serves as chair of the Congressional Oversight Panel, a watchdog created to keep tabs on the federal bailout. Barr serves as Treasury's assistant secretary for financial institutions.

The third candidate, Eugene Kimmelman, is a former top official at consumer advocacy groups Consumers Union, the Consumer Federation of America, Public Citizen. He now works in the Justice Department's antitrust division.

Kimmelman's former employers are part of AFR.


*************************

Shahien Nasiripour is the business reporter for the Huffington Post. You can send him an e-mail; bookmark his page; subscribe to his RSS feed; follow him on Twitter; friend him on Facebook; become a fan; and/or get e-mail alerts when he reports the latest news.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
On Monday, a coalition of groups fighting to reform the nation's financial system formally endorsed Harvard Law professor and bailout watchdog Elizabeth Warren to head the new Consumer Financial Prote...
On Monday, a coalition of groups fighting to reform the nation's financial system formally endorsed Harvard Law professor and bailout watchdog Elizabeth Warren to head the new Consumer Financial Prote...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,646
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (38 total)
07:42 PM on 07/21/2010
Would she serve at the pleasure of the Treasurer of the US? My Goodness, wouldn't that make Timmy's nose grow?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Siebenstein
> there is no endless growth
06:55 AM on 07/21/2010
She should have been integrated when the darn thing was written.
But, as most of you probably know, Volckert was undermined as well.

Let Chris Dodd oversee that agency and stand for the cr@p he scripted.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Siebenstein
> there is no endless growth
06:52 AM on 07/21/2010
Why would Warren do that to herself?

The administration came up with yet another half-hearted reform.
She would have to work with these implementations. She disagrees with many of the rules which do not go far enough at all.
It would be a job of fighting windmills, and would make her look as incompetent, because she will not be capable of changing what was put into place.
05:55 PM on 07/20/2010
You may E mail and call the white house just do it please. Get involved now. The comment phone number is 202 456 6111 you may have to wait and a live representative will answer the phone. Please I urge all of you E-mail or call it does make a difference.
12:39 PM on 07/20/2010
I'll be brief: "Tim Tim, appoint Warren and we'll let you live another day."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
txgrandpa6
Progressive Democrat living in Texas!
09:40 AM on 07/20/2010
As far as I am concerned, this is where the rubber meets the road. President Obama has promised we Progressives much and delivered little. If he fails to nominate Elizabeth Warren to head the new CFPB then he will lose the support of the Progressives and moderate Democrats that voted him in office. That will sent shock waves against his campaign for a second term. If he fails to nominate Warren for this important post I, for one, will work against him for a second term. That does NOT mean I will support a Republican, God forbid, it merely means that my financial and emotional support will start looking seriously as 3rd Party candidates. I am sure that I am not the only Progressive who feels this way, we are many and varied throughout the nation. If the President fails the Progressives, yet again, he will seriously impede his drive for a second term. I have begun writing the White House and the Senate to endorse Elizabeth Warren, let us hope that our voices are not once again wasted on this President.
04:25 AM on 07/20/2010
As a registered Democrat and POTUS supporter, I am getting sick and tired of the those Democrats that continously act so pessimistically about anything and everything . If you don't believe you will be able to get this or that done, maybe, just maybe you shouldn't be the one's leading us. Start challenging these Republicans already and have some guts to do the job you were elected by us for!! What it appears like to everyone is that you are afraid of Ms Warren and the "honesty" she will bring to this office. Remember, Nov and 2012 are approaching very soon!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
txgrandpa6
Progressive Democrat living in Texas!
09:45 AM on 07/20/2010
Fanned and Faved! Great post, it says exactly how I and many other Progressive feel toward this important appointment. It is time for the Democratic Party remember how they got elected in 2008, and just who their base is. They have abandoned the base too many times since the election and this would be the final cut. They would lose a vital voting bloc and seriously risk reelection in 2012.
07:52 PM on 07/21/2010
Fanned and faved. Well said Sir.
03:46 AM on 07/20/2010
I am afraid that the true heroes working for the good of people not banks are being undermined by those who received so much in the way of donations from bankers.

Look at Dodd's donation lists then try to imagine he would ever really go against them.

Ironically I believe Obama is independent of donors. They may have access, but he speaks his mind. He cannot be bought.

What frightens me most is the banking interests aligned with the media which try to sway public opinion.
03:42 AM on 07/20/2010
Elizabeth Warren needs to be given some real power to get things done and change the status quo and we need to all be extremely verbal about supporting her!
Thank you HuffPost for all the great coverage on this!
There is nothing like trust to help get our country back on track!
03:30 AM on 07/20/2010
F Chris Dodd.

F doesn't mean FORGIVE, either...

One of the MOST duplicitous Senators in history.

And you wonder HOW he became Chairman of the Senate BANKING committee.

This quote looks VERY BAD on Obama. This quote isn't made without Obama pushing the agenda. Sorry, folks, that's the way I see it. This is Obama's quote because perhaps he doesn't want Warren after all.

After all, Obama could FORCE A VOTE, FORCE THE CONVERSATION and BE A WINNER WITH THE PEOPLE EITHER WAY.

If he doesn't nominate her, it's time to ask the very serious, most sensitive question yet. You all know what it is, so save your flaming for someone else....

"Dodd, the chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, said he sensed rumblings among colleagues that Warren, the chairwoman of the panel overseeing the 2008 Wall Street bailout program, might not get the 60 votes necessary to win confirmation."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
txgrandpa6
Progressive Democrat living in Texas!
09:48 AM on 07/20/2010
No flaming here, just agreement.
photo
FZliveson
Beating the Conundrum
02:51 AM on 07/20/2010
Christopher Dodd couldn't confirm a bowel movement if he did not have 12 lobbyists lined up telling him it was ok.
04:49 AM on 07/20/2010
hahahahaha.

I love that!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ItWasntMeReally
Ann to Mitt: Does our policy cover Landslides?
02:35 AM on 07/20/2010
Let's issue a warren for his arrest.
photo
FZliveson
Beating the Conundrum
02:52 AM on 07/20/2010
Seconded
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
William Young
Repubs you lost GET OVER IT!
04:19 AM on 07/20/2010
Nice play on words LOL! Good one!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mad tn dem
Surrounded by Republicans But Won't Be Silent
02:21 AM on 07/20/2010
President Obama...this isn't even a question..the very fact there's "rumbles" tells us she is perfect for the position. Perhaps her honesty and integrity will prove contagious..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alleykat444
02:14 AM on 07/20/2010
Not enough votes to confirm? Ha!!!! That woman is qualified to be President of the United States. And, maybe should be from where I stand.
photo
FZliveson
Beating the Conundrum
02:52 AM on 07/20/2010
Warren/Kucinich 2012
photo
pewty
Psych RN, & wisenheimer
04:12 AM on 07/20/2010
Greyson/Warren 2016
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pat2 718
FOSS emergency management software developer
01:42 AM on 07/20/2010
Barr or Kimmelman might be ok if they were not up against Warren. Warren has already been in the hot seat and we know she doesn't wilt. We also know she'd do the right thing *and* would know what that right thing is.

Barr would, unfortunately, be beholden to Geithner, and would have a hard time not being influenced by him. And since Geithner is pushing Barr, and Barr works for Geithner, we can deduce that Barr agrees with Geithner on policy -- not something we want here, IMO.

Kimmelman has a good background in consumer groups, but do we know how effective he'd be in a harsher political situation?

Here's the pro-Warren petition...
http://act.boldprogressives.org/cms/sign/petition_warren