iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

'Racism' Video That Led To Firing USDA Official Shirley Sherrod Lacked Critical Context

BEN EVANS and MARY CLARE JALONICK   07/20/10 09:42 PM ET   AP

Shirley Sherrod Usda Naacp
Shirley Sherrod Resigns From USDA Post After Racism Controversy

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration is standing by its quick decision to oust a black Agriculture Department employee over racially tinged remarks at an NAACP banquet in Georgia, despite evidence that her remarks were misconstrued and growing calls for USDA to reconsider.

Shirley Sherrod, who until Tuesday was the Agriculture Department's director of rural development in Georgia, says the administration caved to political pressure by pushing her to resign for saying that she didn't give a white farmer as much help as she could have 24 years ago when she worked for a nonprofit group.

Sherrod says her remarks, delivered in March at a local NAACP banquet in Georgia, were part of a story about racial reconciliation, not racism. The white farming family that was the subject of the story stood by Sherrod and said she should keep her job.

"We probably wouldn't have (our farm) today if it hadn't been for her leading us in the right direction," said Eloise Spooner, the wife of farmer Roger Spooner of Iron City, Ga. "I wish she could get her job back because she was good to us, I tell you."

The NAACP, which initially condemned Sherrod's remarks and supported Sherrod's ouster, joined the calls for her to keep her job. The civil rights group said it and millions of others were duped by the conservative website that posted partial video of her speech on Monday.

"We have come to the conclusion we were snookered ... into believing she had harmed white farmers because of racial bias," said the statement from NAACP President Benjamin Todd Jealous.

A White House official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said President Barack Obama was briefed on the matter after Sherrod's resignation and stands by the Agriculture Department's handling of it.

The website, biggovernment.com, gained fame last year after airing video of workers at the community group ACORN counseling actors posing as a prostitute and her boyfriend. It posted the Sherrod video as evidence that the NAACP, which recently passed a resolution condemning what it calls racist elements of the Tea Party, condones racism of its own.

Sherrod said she was on the road Monday when USDA deputy undersecretary Cheryl Cook called her and told her the White House wanted her to resign because her comments were generating a cable news controversy.

"They called me twice," she told The Associated Press in an interview. "The last time they asked me to pull over to the side of the road and submit my resignation on my Blackberry, and that's what I did."

Sherrod said administration officials weren't interested in hearing her explanation. "It hurts me that they didn't even try to attempt to see what is happening here, they didn't care," she said. "I'm not a racist ... Anyone who knows me knows that I'm for fairness."

The administration gave a different version of events.

Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack – not the White House – made the decision to ask Sherrod to resign, said USDA spokeswoman Chris Mather. She said Sherrod willingly resigned when asked.

In a statement, Vilsack said the controversy surrounding Sherrod's comments could, rightly or wrongly, cause people to question her decisions as a federal employee and lead to lingering doubts about civil rights at the agency, which has a troubled history of discrimination.

"There is zero tolerance for discrimination at USDA," Vilsack said. "We have a duty to ensure that when we provide services to the American people we do so in an equitable manner."

USDA is sensitive to the issue because the agency has for decades faced charges of discrimination against black farmers who said they could not get aid that routinely went to whites. The department agreed to a final $1.25 billion settlement earlier this year in a class-action suit that has been pending for more than a decade. The payout of that settlement is pending in Congress, and Vilsack has made fixing past wrongs over civil rights a top priority.

The current controversy began Monday when biggovernment.com posted a two-minute, 38-second video clip in which Sherrod describes the first time a white farmer came to her for help. It was 1986, and she worked for a nonprofit rural farm aid group. She said the farmer came in acting "superior" to her and that she debated how much help to give him.

"I was struggling with the fact that so many black people had lost their farmland, and here I was faced with helping a white person save their land," Sherrod said.

Initially, she said, "I didn't give him the full force of what I could do" and only gave him enough help to keep his case progressing. Eventually, she said, his situation "opened my eyes" that whites were struggling just like blacks, and helping farmers wasn't so much about race but was "about the poor versus those who have."

Sherrod said Tuesday the incomplete video appears to intentionally twist her message. She says she became close friends with the farmer and helped him for two years.

In the full 43-minute video of her speech released by the NAACP Tuesday evening, Sherrod tells the story of her father's death in 1965, saying he was killed by white men who were never charged. She says she made a commitment to stay in the South the night of her father's death, despite the dreams she had always had of leaving her rural town.

"When I made that commitment I was making that commitment to black people and to black people only," she said. "But you know God will show you things and he'll put things in your path so that you realize that the struggle is really about poor people."

Sherrod said in the speech that working with Spooner, who she does not name, changed her entire outlook.

"She's always been nice and polite and considerate. She was just a good person," Eloise Spooner said. "She did everything she could trying to help."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Filed by Elyse Siegel  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 14,212
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (206 total)
photo
rak6748
Love-Respect-Integrity
05:27 AM on 08/06/2010
The Other Side of Shirley Sherrod
http://www.counterpunch.org/wilkins08022010.html
12:15 AM on 07/25/2010
Breitbart is a scandal monger,and loves to stir anger,
but he isnt the one her on her cell phone
and tell her to resign-over the phone immediately.
photo
poeticjustice4all
Past = Prologue
05:31 PM on 07/22/2010
Let's get Glen Beck to do a story opposing Afghanistan. Obama will end the war over night.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
ShanniC
For truth, justice, and the 'merican way!
04:29 PM on 07/22/2010
This doesn't look good for the administration when they kowtow to Fox News. They cannot allow news organizations, or any other organizations to dictate to them. Stop getting your cues from the news Vilsack et al!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:09 AM on 07/22/2010
This incident says more about the deceptive tactics of www.biggovernment.org and Fox News. They are clearly eager to slander people and destroy lives based on race.

This was the same unholy team that damaged a great community organization, ACORN, using exactly the same tactics.

Should a "news" outlet like Fox continue to be part of the White House Press Corp? I suggest not.
06:12 PM on 07/22/2010
Fox News never mentioned the story until after Sherrod was fired.
06:26 AM on 07/23/2010
The post you responded to didn't say anything about 'when' Fox mentioned the story. They said Fox played yet another edited, out of context video, like they did with the ACORN tapes. Fox makes a habit out of showing misleading video to their gullible audience.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/05/fox-news-assailed-for-vid_n_196719.html

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/07/acorn-sting-tape-edited-r_n_528556.html

Hannity video switch-up is only the tip of Fox News' video-doctoring iceberg
http://mediamatters.org/research/200911110019

REPORT: Time and again, Fox News doctors video to smear progressives
http://mediamatters.org/reports/200905050003
10:38 AM on 07/22/2010
I did watch the video. It's not the full video on the NAACP site. It's cut at 20:59. She still says in the present tense that "... it is about black and white." Look, epiphany moment, road to Damascus moment, whatever moment you want to call it, there are better people than her for the job, otherwise, this would not be an incident to begin with. Say goodbye, Sherrod.
09:42 PM on 07/21/2010
well Ms Sherrod may be a wonderful employee and she seems real sweet; however she did discriminate by not offering a white person the same treatment that she said she would have provided to someone who wasnt white. In the current political correct affirmative action work environment a white person had said what Ms Sherrod said, he or she would have been fired on the spot and not offered any apology. I believe the equal opportunity means equal opportunity for anyone of any race, religion, sexual orientation or national origin. Equal opportunity should not mean lets handicap any white male just because they are not women or they are white.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Eldienne
Moderate Dem
10:24 PM on 07/21/2010
truthisneeded all right. The video that Shirley Sherrod appeared in was doctored by Andrew Breitbart, and appeared on his Biggovernment website. So have you seen the news lately? Probably not.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frankg3400
11:30 PM on 07/21/2010
Ms Sherrod treated the white family perfectly fine, in fact, the family came out and supported her. The video was edited to appear she was a racist, but was explaining a life learning experience. Her parents had been murdered by whites, and at the time white farmers were getting an extraordinary amount of help from the government whereas the black farmers were not. They only showed the very first part of her speech. Here is a video to bring you up to speed on the issue.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/07/21/shepard-smith-unloads-on_n_655013.html
photo
jan1760
The Constitution is not an instrument for the gove
07:15 PM on 07/21/2010
Is really sad that after going what she just went through she still chooses to play the race card, some things will never change. Breibart was absolutely wrong in editing this tape, I do not know if all they had was the edited version or the full version but the intent was obviously not good. As far as the accusation against FOX ,let’s be honest this did not air till late Monday night and they presented the fats as they had them, just like the White House acted on the facts as they had them. The NAACP had the whole video and they did not released it did Tuesday after their condemnation. All sides were wrong, some for rushing to judgment and Breibart for manipulation content, but for Ms. Sherod to take this bias stand when she should be the first standing for a color free and bias free reporting is sad and disconcerting. If we continue to play the race card at every turn we will destroy this country, and we have come too far in the area of race relations to let this happen for the benefit of a few politicians. If I do not like the policies, is not about race is simply not liking the policies.
08:15 PM on 07/21/2010
Are you kidding or what?

Ms. Sherrod has handled this with grace, dignity, humility, and honesty.
She did NOT play the "ra ce card" as you accuse her of.
Au contraire!
photo
jan1760
The Constitution is not an instrument for the gove
10:17 PM on 07/21/2010
Please read the whole interview in MediaMatters:
"But the clear damage to Sherrod comes from Breitbart, who posted the tape without context, and Fox, which ran with the story and did not seek to confirm it. '

""Not before they reported it," she said of Fox's negligence. "They have called me today and initially I had said yes (to an interview), but I thought about it and I did not think they intended to be fair in their reporting. They are going to say what they want to say regardless of what I say."

"I think they should but they won't. They intended exactly what they did. They were looking for the result they got yesterday," she said of Fox. "I am just a pawn. I was just here. They are after a bigger thing, they would love to take us back to where we were many years ago. Back to where black people were looking down, not looking white folks in the face, not being able to compete for a job out there and not be a whole person." http://mediamatters.org/strupp/201007210037
A wrong has been done but to use to cause further division is sad. Once again why didn't the NAACP look at their own video before condemning her? Be honest and be fair.
photo
jan1760
The Constitution is not an instrument for the gove
10:19 PM on 07/21/2010
Oh oui, elle ne , read the interview
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lalita Amos
My hovercraft is full of eels
09:28 PM on 07/21/2010
What are you talking about? Mrs. Sherrod shared a story about transformation to caution the gather that even those who have been negatively impacted by discrimination are not immune to hardened hearts.

Hardened.

Like yours.
photo
jan1760
The Constitution is not an instrument for the gove
10:25 PM on 07/21/2010
Careful ,Lalita I am a minority and have been in the receiving end many times, I believe the difference is I did not grow up in this country. Were I grew up we are a little bit of everything and even though to say racism does not exist there is far fetched. It will never be as bad as here. I did not learn to watch my words till I came here, I never saw any differences till I came here. I was brought up by a strong black woman and a strong white woman, they formed my soul, my perspective and my will. I see no difference in people of any race, there are good and bad in both. Thankfully I have brought up my children the way I was , they do not see race, actually my son expressed it just right; "why should I care some people have more melanin in the skin than me"
06:23 PM on 07/21/2010
This is all a typical Rovian accusation reversal. In 2004 we had a choice between a coward who malingered stateside and shoved cocaine up his nose while wearing an officer's uniform, or an actual warrior and hero who came to oppose the war.

Now we have a movement (properly named, as the concept of the baggers came out of Armey's backside one morning after a strong cup of coffee and a prune danish) that is rotten with rac ists.

So the rovians accuse those committed to confronting and combating rac ism with being raci sts, in order to deflect the perfectly valid charge against the baggers.
06:23 PM on 07/21/2010
This is all a typical Rovian accusation reversal. In 2004 we had a choice between a coward who malingered stateside and shoved cocaine up his nose while wearing an officer's uniform, or an actual warrior and hero who came to oppose the war.

Now we have a movement (properly named, as the concept of the baggers came out of Armey's backside one morning after a strong cup of coffee and a prune danish) that is rotten with racists.

So the rovians accuse those committed to confronting and combating rac ism with being raci sts, in order to deflect the perfectly valid charge against the baggers.
06:22 PM on 07/21/2010
This is all a typical Rovian accusation reversal. In 2004 we had a choice between a coward who malingered stateside and shoved cocaine up his nose while wearing an officer's uniform, or an actual warrior and hero who came to oppose the war.

Now we have a movement (properly named, as the concept of the baggers came out of Armey's arse one morning after a strong cup of coffee and a prune danish) that is rotten with racists.

So the rovians accuse those committed to confronting and combating rac ism with being raci sts, in order to deflect the perfectly valid charge against the baggers.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Yurdelite51
05:16 PM on 07/21/2010
They already bought the lie once about ACORN from O'Keefe and Breitbart.

Fool them twice shame on them...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ediva75
"Free Your Mind & The Rest Will Follow!" -Envogue
06:29 AM on 07/22/2010
THANK U!!!
photo
poeticjustice4all
Past = Prologue
05:32 PM on 07/22/2010
EXACTLY
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Magick1
Dark fire shall not avail you. You shall not pass
05:14 PM on 07/21/2010
Good ole Brietbart, wanted to capitalize on the race issue tension between the Tea Party and the NAACP, so he gets a hold of a very old tape and proceeds to take apart a woman who works for the federal government, but not at the time of the taping. But, wait, he left out the important part of her helping the farm couple. The NAACP jumps on it, her boss jumps on it, likely the WH jumps on it, Fox, MSNBC, CNN, and viola, she's out of a job. Maybe the apologies will pay her mortgage, if she has one. I'd sue for termination without cause and discrimination and not go back to work there.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ediva75
"Free Your Mind & The Rest Will Follow!" -Envogue
06:31 AM on 07/22/2010
I am truly truly hoping she sues the **** out of Andrew Breitbart. What I want to have done to him ain't legal WHATSOEVER and would be the best way to take care of the "situation" but at least with a lawsuit it makes him wish he didn't do what he did cause he got hit with the mean green!!!
Harpo1129
You can't spell Progressive without Progress
08:05 AM on 07/22/2010
And she should also sue Fox for defamation of character too. The other news organizations made the mistake of taking a story that Fox promoted first and ran with it KNOWING that Fox broadcasts nothing but lies. Shame on them AND the administration for believing ANYTHING that Fox says. If Fox said that it was day at noon time, I'd look out the window first before I believed them
06:30 AM on 07/23/2010
The tape is from March 2010 -- not very old at all.

It was sent in it's edited version to Breitbart in April.

Breitbart did not edit the tape.

He didn't run it until the NAACP charged the Tea Party movement with racism, to illustrate racism in the NAACP.

The complete tape, which was in the NAACP's possession the whole time, was posted by the NAACP AFTER they had condemned Sherrod.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Magick1
Dark fire shall not avail you. You shall not pass
04:55 PM on 07/23/2010
I likely should have said not a current tape, but for me that issue is that there is a lot of blame to go around here. I think that the administration, the dept of Agriculture, the NAACP, Breitbart, Fox, MSNBC all played a part in the pain of this lady, who was simply telling a story of a life event. Olberman took time off from his vacation for a special statement on this. He was right on the mark as far as I'm concerned.
04:21 PM on 07/21/2010
It is unfortunate that her story of growth was edited and mischaracterized. These are the stories that change hearts and minds and somebody or somebodies at one of her speeches probably took something away from it. What this type of journalism does is make people afraid to tell their own story out of fear of a sound bite. This reinforces something I already understood but probably do not practice all the time. Wait till the dust settles to get the truth. That being said if this were a white woman she would still be considered a racist for her past views and could not get a job with the government.

Of course unless that white woman was a democratic senator from Virginia.
03:49 PM on 07/21/2010
Dear Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack: Have you never heard of SNOPES? You really should check things for validity before shooting yourself in the foot. Did you even watch her whole speech? Pay Attention! Can we really afford to fire career "public servants" without thoroughly checking into the charges against them? Are you so media driven you can't even think for yourself? Sad. Pathetic. Just Wrong.
photo
poeticjustice4all
Past = Prologue
05:34 PM on 07/22/2010
How about GOOGLE? Look into it.