Charlie Rangel CHARGED With Ethics Violations, Trial To Be Held

LARRY MARGASAK   07/22/10 10:47 PM ET   AP

Rangel

WASHINGTON — A House investigative committee on Thursday charged New York Rep. Charles Rangel with multiple ethics violations, dealing a serious blow to the former Ways and Means chairman and complicating Democrats' election-year outlook.

The House ethics committee won't reveal the specific charges until next Thursday in a public meeting. However, sources familiar with the allegations, who were not authorized to discuss them publicly, said the charges against the 40-year Democrat were related to:

_Rangel's use of official stationery to raise money for the Charles B. Rangel Center for Public Service at City College of New York.

_His use of four rent-subsidized apartment units in New York City. The city's rent stabilization program is supposed to apply to one's primary residence. One had been used as a campaign office, raising a separate question of whether the rent break was an improper gift.

_Rangel's failure to report income as required on his annual financial disclosure forms. The committee had investigated his failure to report income from the lawmaker's rental unit at the Punta Cana Yacht Club in the Dominican Republic. Rangel also belatedly disclosed hundreds of thousands of dollars in investment assets.

The charges by a four-member panel of the House ethics committee sends the case to a House trial. A separate panel of four Republicans and four Democrats will decide whether the violations can be proved by clear and convincing evidence.

Sanctions can range from a damaging committee report to censure by the House and even expulsion, a punishment reserved for only the most egregious violations.

The timing of the announcement ensures that a public airing of Rangel's ethical woes will stretch into the fall campaign, and Republicans are certain to make it an issue as they try to capture majority control of the House. Speaker Nancy Pelosi had once promised to "drain the swamp" of ethical misdeeds by lawmakers in arguing that Democrats should be in charge.

Rangel, who is tied for fourth in House seniority, told reporters that he believes the allegations have no substance and said, "I look forward to airing this thing."

"If you ask me how I feel about it, I feel extraordinarily good that my supporters over 40 years will be able to evaluate what they have come up with and I don't have any fear at all politically or personally what they come up with," he said.

In a written statement, Rangel said, "I am pleased that, at long last, sunshine will pierce the cloud of serious allegations that have been raised against me in the media."

Rangel was in negotiations to settle the case, said one person who was familiar with the talks but was not authorized to be quoted by name. The talks broke down when Rangel only agreed to accept some of the alleged violations, and that didn't satisfy the ethics committee, the person said.

His trial could begin around the time of his mid-September primary. While Rangel is a legend in New York's Harlem, elected 20 times, other Democrats are in close races and not looking forward to defending their party's ethical conduct.

Pelosi spokesman Brendan Daly said, "The action today would indicate that the independent, bipartisan ethics committee process is moving forward."

Republicans immediately seized on the case. House GOP leader John Boehner said the charges were "a sad reminder of Speaker Pelosi's most glaring broken promise: to drain the swamp in Washington."

Rangel led the tax-writing Ways and Means panel until he stepped aside last March after the ethics committee criticized him in a separate case – finding that he should have known corporate money was paying for his trips to two Caribbean conferences.

Rangel had hoped to regain his chairmanship, but the allegations make that virtually impossible this year.

He recently announced a bid for a 21st term, days before his 80th birthday. One of his Sept. 14 primary opponents is Adam Clayton Powell IV, son of the congressman whom Rangel defeated in 1970.

While the case will generate unfavorable headlines for Rangel, it may have little effect in his congressional district, where he has been a Harlem political leader for decades and is known by older constituents as a Korean War hero.

"He keeps ethics on Page 1 and Democrats, going into a tough election cycle, aren't eager to carry any liabilities beyond what they have," said Lee Miringoff, director of the Marist College poll.

"But I think it has less to do – barring any major undoing of his legislative career – with his seat," Miringoff said.

___

Associated Press writers Michael Gormley in Albany, N.Y. and Gerry Bodlander in Washington contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST NEW YORK

WASHINGTON — A House investigative committee on Thursday charged New York Rep. Charles Rangel with multiple ethics violations, dealing a serious blow to the former Ways and Means chairman and co...
WASHINGTON — A House investigative committee on Thursday charged New York Rep. Charles Rangel with multiple ethics violations, dealing a serious blow to the former Ways and Means chairman and co...
Filed by David Weiner  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4,230
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (79 total)
  1 of 14  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
chuck prebys 07:48 PM on 07/22/2010
Good.
Charlie has run his limit on the perceived goodwill of his constituents.
The word was out on him years ago.
Even his own constituents don't like him (enough of them anyway).
And as they say, he "already robbed everything and there's nothing left to rob.

I hope it's fair.
And I hope he'sgone.

Don't cry for Charlie.
He'll be comfortable on a  Read More...
08:44 PM on 07/24/2010
I'm all for cutting a deal with Rangel, with the deal being the same for him as it would be for you or me. Rat out and testify against other miscreants in Congress. The more you rat out, the better your deal. We'll give you partial credit for Congresspersons of the past.
trish333
Tea will be served in 2012. Lemon or sugar?
04:40 PM on 07/24/2010
OMG! Just read that this corrupt weasel will be using campaign funds to defend himself:

http://jammiewearingfool.blogspot.com/2010/07/ethics-schmetics-rangel-using-campaign.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thepheonix
thepheonix..is that better Dems?
04:29 PM on 07/24/2010
Now that you have been charged with ethics violations.

Your party will collectively dump you.

They will have no choice or they will be seen as hypocrites
02:31 PM on 07/24/2010
Most ethical Congress evah
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:13 AM on 07/24/2010
Does anybody out there feel that politicians start to loose ethics after a period of time because of being re-elected over the years they get a feeling of immunity. Can we get congress to try set term limits? Again?!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Teresa Eckerman-Pfeil
05:21 PM on 07/23/2010
It's always the system. We are mortals so the rules must be strict and strictly enforced. Here's a visual comment:
http://therightissowrong.blogspot.com/2010/07/drain-swamp.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
johndpieper
I dance the skies on laughter-silvered wings
03:39 PM on 07/23/2010
To the conservatives calling us "liberal apologists": Please be patient with us. We do not have NEAR the experience with this sort of thing that you do with republicans. If this were happening AGAIN to a republican we would be demanding an investigation and trial. So we need to hold our democratic leaders to the same standard to which we always hold your republican leaders. I know we would because we have had to. Over and over and over and over again. Being in the hotseat is relatively new for us. We will hold Rangel to a higher standard and if he's found guilty, we would expect a punishment of some sort. The man is 80 years old and might just be sloppy in record keeping, and he might also be cunning and trying to hide income. I eagerly await the trial. The conclusion of which we will have to accept as finished business. That goes for you too, should Rangel win acquittal.
09:49 AM on 07/26/2010
Democrats don't have experience with corruption?

LOL - oh, my, that was nice... thanks for the Monday morning laugh. I needed that.

Perhaps you meant that Democrats don't have experience with actually having to hold other Democrats accountable for their corruption? THAT would be more in line with the truth.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
johndpieper
I dance the skies on laughter-silvered wings
04:08 PM on 07/26/2010
No, NO. Make not mistake. I meant exactly what I said. I've lost count of issues from the republicans. I think we are at 3 for democrats. I meant exactly what I said. Thanks for trying though.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Matt Nappo
02:53 PM on 07/23/2010
"sources familiar with the allegations, who were not authorized to discuss them publicly,"... but did.

In other words...unethical people leaked the details of his alleged unethical behavior. Politics, makes you need a shower just reading about these people.
02:29 PM on 07/23/2010
This should prove interesting !!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
jimme
They're Right, but never correct.
01:40 PM on 07/23/2010
Dme or repub,it doesn't matter. If he's guilty then he should be tossed-out,put in jail, and barred from ever having anything involving public office.
This is one of the reasons that money should be taken out of politics. No buying votes or getting rich from the public trough. I guess you wouldn't see to many rich pols then though.
And that's not a good thing ?
photo
OLJW00
right is right
01:33 PM on 07/23/2010
By all means liberal apologists - please keep attempting to deflect and blame Conservatives for everything...or at least attempting to excuse bad behavior by pointing at "the other guy" to excuse bad actors in your own ranks.

With November just around the corner it has quite the opposite effect as is intended...but I'm not complaining.

Keep up the good work!!!!!
12:32 PM on 07/23/2010
This man's finagling and corruption has been an open secret for a long time. What sort of idiot would keep electing him?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:16 PM on 07/23/2010
I'm tyring to understand why, at his age, he is willing to keep this issue in the public eye. I'm not saying he's guilty, but I doubt he's as pure as the driven snow. 40 years is a good run.... I don't see this ending in a flattering manner. I'm guessing there are dems who would like to see him retire.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Zapbranagan
11:28 AM on 07/23/2010
Charlie Rangel is the poster child for term limits
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Zapbranagan
11:27 AM on 07/23/2010
As we all know democratic representatives have shown recently that theyl hard time being honest about their tax liablilities.
All representatives regardless of party need to audited upon election and each year they serve it would be money well spent.
photo
Ed C Atlanta
Justice for all,,It's an Entitlement
12:06 PM on 07/23/2010
and you believe the repubs have been honest about theirs?... please.. all of these people with money do not pay their fair share of taxes, that's why they all have creative accountants....