iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

2 Norwegian Journalists Arrested For Snapping Photos Of Chelsea Clinton's Likely Wedding Site

07/22/10 07:59 PM ET  AP

RHINEBECK, N.Y. — Two Norwegian journalists face trespassing charges after they were arrested snapping photos of the New York estate where Chelsea Clinton is expected to get married.

Thomas Bjorn Nilsson, 43, of New York, and Kjerste Sortland, 41, of Snorova, Norway, were charged with a violation after they were stopped around 2 p.m. Wednesday on the Astor Estate in this picturesque town along the Hudson River 90 miles north of New York City, according to Maj. Michael A. Kopy of the New York State Police.

Media reports indicate Chelsea Clinton, the daughter of former President Bill Clinton and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, will marry investment banker Marc Mezvinsky on Saturday, July 31, at the estate.

Reached in Oslo, Helje Solberg, managing editor for the newspaper Verdens Gang, said police went overboard when Nilsson and Sortland tried to take pictures of the gate. She said they were not on the property.

"We did not realize it was forbidden to take the picture of the gate of the house where the Clinton wedding is to be," she said.

Solberg said the paper will pay the fine – in New York, trespassing is a violation punishable by up to 15 days in jail and/or a fine up to $250 – even though "we see this as an overreaction."

"The Clinton wedding has a public interest," Solberg said.

Kopy said police have gotten more calls than usual related to the estate, designed by renowned architect Stanford White for John Jacob Astor IV, the early 20th-century millionaire who died when the Titanic went down. It was recently on the market for $12 million, real estate agents said.

Rhinebeck, a town of about 8,000, is just 75 miles from the home in Chappaqua, N.Y., that the former president and first lady bought before Hillary Clinton's successful run for the U.S. Senate in 2000. The Clintons have passed through the town a number of times.

Kopy said Nilsson and Sortland identified themselves as journalists and were taking pictures. He did not know if the images were confiscated and was not aware whether they mentioned the Clinton wedding. He said state police are working with the Secret Service ahead of the wedding and will be diligent about keeping the Astor Estate secure.

"We're aware of the visit by the former president of the United States and are working with the U.S. Secret Service as we do with all visits by protectees of the Secret Service," Kopy said.

"We're responding to calls (around the estate)," he said. "Anybody who is located on the grounds of the estate will be arrested and prosecuted."

An e-mail to a spokesman for Bill Clinton was not immediately returned.

Ed Donovan, a spokesman for the Secret Service, said the agency would have no comment on the matter.

Nilsson and Sortland are due in court on Aug. 12.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST STYLE

Filed by Jeff Muskus  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 179
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Okieborn
Equal Rights For All !
10:53 AM on 07/26/2010
One might say, just to much about nothing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Slash14
Liberalism makes me laugh!
09:56 AM on 07/26/2010
who cares???? get married and get it over with so everyone can stop listening to this stupid story. and I can stop seeing HP putting up bad pictures of you
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom Sutpen
A for-real Socialist
08:37 PM on 07/27/2010
The telephoto lens is not her friend.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
goodmarina
Most People use Religion to justify their bias!
03:06 AM on 07/25/2010
i imagine that there's protocol and security measures followed by the establishment & police under the instruction of the secret service b/c Chelsea Clinton's father is the ex president and her mom is the current Secretary of State -- both high profile, high security-detail-requiring folks.

i always get a kick when these reporters (who are snapping up photographs for monetary reasons) claim "public interest". i promise you, as a member of the general public - they are not acting in my best interest.
08:19 PM on 07/24/2010
She looks like a young Queen Victoria.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dylansfan
06:52 AM on 07/26/2010
hmmmmmmmmm .... :)
03:12 PM on 07/26/2010
Except Queen Vic didn't have cosmetic surgery. Might have had a relative who practiced "medicine" in Whitechapel, though.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom Sutpen
A for-real Socialist
08:38 PM on 07/27/2010
Hey, that's never been proven! :)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:34 AM on 07/24/2010
next time don't trespass.
07:59 AM on 07/25/2010
The article is contradictory. The cops said they were on the Astor estate, the Norwegian editors said they were not even on the property. None of us knows the definitive answer, but it seems likely to me that they were very near the property, used a zoom lens, and the cops were overzealous. We don''t know for a certainty they did trespass. There are many cases of cops strong-arming others to curry favor with the "powerful". I've lived too long to be willing to accept the cops' version in toto when others contradict it.
09:43 AM on 07/24/2010
Chelsea Clinton is not a public figure. Her parents are, but not she.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:35 AM on 07/24/2010
that is incorrect. She is a public figure. When you are the first daughter, you are considered a public figure.
08:01 AM on 07/25/2010
She put herself out there when she was campaigning for her mother. Therefore she's a public figure. You can't have it both ways. Had she not done that, I would say she wasn't a public figure. But she did, and is.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dylansfan
06:53 AM on 07/26/2010
You are exactly right. She just can't have it both ways.

Congrats Chelsea!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BillyClub
07:13 AM on 07/24/2010
The cops overreacted! They should have checked the credentials of the photographers
and if they spanned out, then told them to back off. No need to arrest anyone. This isn't
the West Bank and Gaza. Yet! Tourists take tours in LA of the rich and famous to show
you where they live. No one gets arrested for snapping pics of their mansions. In fact,
the Gipper ended his days in a $40 million estate in Beverly Hills that didn't have
any sidewalks. To paraphrase Ted Agnew, if you've seen one mansion, you've
seen them all. What's the big deal here? Photographers have to make a living, too.
08:03 AM on 07/25/2010
I agree.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
patriciacaldwell
Yes, this keeps me awake at night.
11:37 PM on 07/25/2010
You're speaking up for the paparazzi? Neighbors in the area of the estate have reported trespassers on their property on multiple occasions all week. These people are stalkers trying to make a quick buck.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom Sutpen
A for-real Socialist
08:44 PM on 07/27/2010
They're photo-journalists practicing their trade; and they make their money more honestly by far than just about anybody showing up for this bacchanal.
photo
An Independent Woman
Honni soit que mal y pense
10:10 AM on 07/28/2010
I feel badly for the girl (with no political connections) who's getting married in Rhinebeck on the same day as CC. Streets are closed down, whole parts of the town are going to "off limits" in the words of the major. She was expecting 250 guests at her wedding. But because of all the restrictions, more than 1/2 of her guests have called with their regrets (after having responded that they would be coming, before the announcement that CC was getting hitched there too). Who has the right to make parts of the town "off limits" to citizens???? Umm the Secret Service does... tragic.
12:08 AM on 07/24/2010
Could we at least TRY to be accurate in our reporting? They were not arrested for "taking pictures". They were arrested for trespassing. Two very different things.
08:06 AM on 07/25/2010
Could we at least TRY to be accurate in our comments? The cops said they were on the Astor estate but the Norwegian editors said they were not trespassing. They may have been on a public easement, and using a zoom lens. Two different, contradictory things. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think either one of us were there at the time. I know I wasn't. I don't think you were, either. So, until they go to court, I'm not going to fully accept the police version. Just because they were arrested for trespassing, doesn't mean they actually were.
12:57 PM on 07/25/2010
You, my friend, need to READ comments before you reply to them!

Where did I say in my comment that I believe they were trespassing? Go back and read my comment. All I said was, "They were not arrested for "taking pictures". They were arrested for trespassing. Two very different things."

So, as you can read, I'm just describing what happened with the police. It is a FACT that the police arrested them for trespassing. Whether or not the charge has merit will be determined in court, and I don't think I passed judgement on this at all.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GrownupStewie
07:57 PM on 07/23/2010
....I seriously doubt they just "took a picture of the front gate" I would bet they were on the grounds and that is private property...i could go right now and take a picture of the gate....trust me, they were on the grounds...
01:55 AM on 07/24/2010
Said the guy who wasn't there and really has no idea.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:07 PM on 07/24/2010
lead dots are priceless idiocy
08:10 AM on 07/25/2010
Wiliiamina, I love lead dots. Priceless idiocy? Not to me... :)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
happycat
No bio needed. My cuteness speaks for itself.
07:35 PM on 07/23/2010
That is ridiculous. Unbelievable.
07:34 PM on 07/23/2010
Well, at least they've learned ONE important lesson from the BP disaster .... If you don't want coverage of something, just arrest the journalists.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
happycat
No bio needed. My cuteness speaks for itself.
07:44 PM on 07/23/2010
Exactly!
08:07 AM on 07/25/2010
Fanned and faved. Great point.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
terry63
treasure hunter.
05:14 PM on 07/23/2010
So , they ex- presidents daughter and her husband to be is strolling around in public and somebody snaps a picture, Go figure.
04:48 PM on 07/23/2010
The safety of Bill, Hillary, and quite likely the first family depends on secrecy in this case. There's no national interest that is served by us knowing where and when Chelsea's wedding is going to be held.
07:40 PM on 07/23/2010
No national interesting and, in my case, no personal interest.
08:11 AM on 07/25/2010
Likewise.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Pagoas
Imagine no religion... it's easy if you try.
04:41 PM on 07/23/2010
jesus, chelsea. get married already. you straight people drag out stuff until its not even fun anymore.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GrownupStewie
08:00 PM on 07/23/2010
hahaha....no kidding....a gay couple could put together a fabulous wedding for themselves in 2 weeks, while being half asleep, with both hands tied behind their back (oh that sounds fun...uh nvm), and with a shoe string budget and some glitter....

chelsea needs to get this show on the road, its getting ridiculous.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alicam
03:47 PM on 07/23/2010
Where is Rhinebeck? Iran? Saudia Arabia? Since when can you not take a picture of an estate in the U.S. if you want to? These rich people think they own the world and can dictate like a king. Get over yourselves.
08:26 PM on 07/24/2010
sadly, the rich do and can