More

White House Projects Record Budget Deficit Of $1.47 Trillion, Slightly Lower Unemployment For 2011

ANDREW TAYLOR   07/23/10 06:28 PM ET   AP

Record Deficit

WASHINGTON — New estimates from the White House on Friday predict the budget deficit will reach a record $1.47 trillion this year. The government is borrowing 41 cents of every dollar it spends.

That's actually a little better than the administration predicted in February.

The new estimates paint a grim unemployment picture as the economy experiences a relatively jobless recovery. The unemployment rate, presently averaging 9.5 percent, would average 9 percent next year under the new estimates.

The Office of Management and Budget report has ominous news for President Barack Obama should he seek re-election in 2012 – a still-high unemployment rate of 8.1 percent. That would be well above normal, which is closer to a rate of 5.5 percent to 6 percent. Private economists don't think the unemployment rate will drop to those levels until well into this decade.

"The U.S. economy still faces strong headwinds," the OMB report said. They include tight credit markets, a high inventory of unsold housing and retrenchment by state governments bound by balanced budget mandates. The European debt crisis has also had an impact.

"Despite these headwinds, the administration expects economic growth and job creation to continue for the rest of 2010 and to rise in 2011 and beyond," the report said.

The gaping deficits are of increasing concern to voters. But Obama and Democrats controlling Congress are mostly taking a pass on deficit reduction this year as they await possible recommendations from Obama's deficit commission.

While there's a slight improvement in the deficit for the current year compared to the administration's February forecast, next year's predicted $1.42 trillion worth , next year's predicted $1.42 trillion worth of red ink – that's 37 cents of borrowing for every dollar spent – is looking worse. It's about $150 billion more than previously predicted, because of still-slumping tax revenues.

The current record holder is the $1.41 trillion deficit for 2009.

Economists agree that the most important measure of the deficit is against the size of the economy. Opinions vary, but many economists say a deficit of 3 percent of gross domestic product is sustainable since it would stabilize the overall debt when measured relative to the economy.

The report put the deficit at 10 percent of GDP this year and 9.2 percent of GDP next year. It would never reach the 3 percent figure under Obama's predictions – which underestimate war costs and depend on assumptions of tax hikes that may not materialize.

OMB Director Peter Orszag said the numbers represent a "fiscal situation that requires attention."

Obama "has done little to confront this domestic enemy," said Rep. Mike Pence, R-Ind. "Washington desperately needs real leadership. We cannot continue to postpone the hard choices and sacrifices that are necessary to stop this fiscal train wreck."

Deficits have skyrocketed since the recession took hold in 2008 and Congress responded with a massive bailout of the financial system and last year's $862 billion stimulus measure.

"What we should be doing now is putting in place deficit reduction policies that will kick in after the economy has more fully recovered," said Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad of North Dakota. "It is an unsustainable long-term course."

___

Associated Press writer Jeannine Aversa contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
WASHINGTON — New estimates from the White House on Friday predict the budget deficit will reach a record $1.47 trillion this year. The government is borrowing 41 cents of every dollar it spends.
WASHINGTON — New estimates from the White House on Friday predict the budget deficit will reach a record $1.47 trillion this year. The government is borrowing 41 cents of every dollar it spends.
Filed by Jeff Muskus  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 152
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
chocolateandcheese
Imagine if we could get 99% voter turnout
03:04 AM on 08/01/2010
Let the Bush tax cuts expire. Close tax loopholes for more than a few multinational corporations. Watch the revenue pour in, and spend it on infrastructure and some sort of direct, effective job stimulus.

The rich haven't created one single job with their tax cuts...why would they now?
iconoclast1
give truth a chance
10:31 PM on 07/31/2010
The obvious thing to do at this juncture is to link shorter-term stimulus to longer-term reductions in deficits. The other obvious things to do are to reduce military spending over the long haul from its present level of 59% of federal discretionary spending, and put entitlement programs on a sustainable course. If you do the math on Medicare, for instance, you find that the typical person probably contributes less that $50,000 into Medicare in their lifetime (at the 2.9% combined contribution rate), hardly enough to cover a hip replacement, certainly not enough to cover medical care from 65 forward. People need to learn to live within their means, and that applies to governments as well. You can't have everything, so you have to prioritize.
photo
chocolateandcheese
Imagine if we could get 99% voter turnout
03:07 AM on 08/01/2010
Maybe we should stop calling things like Medicare --government's necessary attention to human decency-- negatively perceived terms like "entitlement programs" and start giving more powerfully negative labels to CEO greed and corporate welfare.
03:21 AM on 07/27/2010
Lawmakers from Ohio, Indiana, Massachusetts and Virginia are pushing the House Defense Appropriations Committee to spend another $485million on an alternate engine for the F-35 fighter jet - which neither Defense Secretary Gates nor the White House even WANT (today's NYT). The engine will cost $10billion. The ability of state congressmen and senators to override the Defense Secretary and to force weapons systems nobody wants down his throat is how America spends its money. God save us from the politicians. 30% of America's annual $3.5trillion spending is waste. It is not investing in America's future. It is just spent on (inappropriate term). America has no jobs and housing is going lower because Washington is busy flushing our money down the toilet.
01:02 PM on 07/27/2010
@better better: "...30% of America's annual $3.5trillion spending is waste. It is not investing in America's future..."

Seems to be a pretty arbitrary statement care to provide a reference or details of how you arrived at this number.

lff
03:12 AM on 07/27/2010
lawmakers from Ohio, Indiana, Massachusetts and Virginia are pushing the House Defense Appropriations Committee to spend another $485million on an alternate engine for the F-35 fighter jet - which, wait for it, neither Defense Secretary Gates nor the White House even want (today's NYT). The ability of state congressmen and senators to override the Defense Secretary and to force weapons systems nobody wants down his throat is how America spends its money. God save us from the politicians. 30% of America's annual $3.5trillion is waste.
02:46 AM on 07/27/2010
Time for the next round of military base closures. We have 865 bases in 40 countries costing us $250BILLION every single year. Whoever decided this was the best way to spend America's money was on crack. Close 90% of them now. The rest of the world can pay for its own defense. Spend our taxpayer money to create jobs HERE!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cbates
10:02 PM on 07/26/2010
If the government has to borrow more money doesn't it say we either are not charging enough for our services (war efforts in the DMZ, Iran watching, Japan, protection, Israel, Pakistan, Afghanistan and etc), or we need to find more money. Which one is it?
04:49 PM on 07/26/2010
Blame it on Bush.
01:05 PM on 07/27/2010
No blame it on the "Reagan Revolution" and the GOP administrations that have tried to implement it:

See: http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/2010062415/reagan-revolution-home-roost-charts

This mess has been 30 years in the making. Even GW couldn't do this much damage in 8 years.

lff
03:46 PM on 07/25/2010
Happy days are here again!!
03:39 PM on 07/25/2010
I've got a great idea, BP should put Dick Cheney in charge of BP!!! If anyone knows how to spill blood and oil it's Dick! We need more Dick! Can you imagine all the wonderful headlines we'd see over the next few years? Headlines like "WMD's hidden in Gulf States, Oil Spill Deters War!" Or, "Cheney Shoots Sea Turtle in the Head with Shotgun!" Or maybe this "Dick takes over Dicked Company as Head Dick Head." What do you think of that?

~~Fan Me People! I want to be popular!!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RMorr2002
06:32 PM on 07/25/2010
I used to wonder..."Are the Libs REALLY that stupid?".....You have just convinced me that it is not an act....they really are that stupid!
photo
guveqzero
Inventor and Innovator
11:00 AM on 07/25/2010
It's not the deficit that is important to the health of the nation, it's the rate of unemployment. When the economic clowns all start to move together on this, our country will be hurting.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OSCPJ
Want it? Work 4 it. No 1 has ever drown in sweat.
04:47 PM on 07/25/2010
So what amount of money was spent wisely? What happens when it runs out?
07:04 PM on 07/24/2010
Our debt is currently at unsustainable rates right now. The most accurate way analyze national debt is to put it relative to percent GDP. Here is analysis from Barack Obama's own website: Bush started his presidency with national debt at 57% of GDP and left the White House with it at 64%. Obama started it at 64% and took it to 94.3% in just a year and a half and it is predicted to surpass 103% by 2015. Here is Barack Obama's own analysis of total debt (a less accurate way but still says a lot about Obama's policies): Bush started with the debt at 5.8 trillion dollars and left it at 8.9 trillion dollars. Obama's own website predicts our national debt will reach 19.6 trillion dollars by 2015. Remember folks, these numbers come from whitehouse.gov, not some random website. This is what bugs me the most: It costs taxpayers over 1 trillion dollars a year just to service our debt with interest rates and fees. Spending more? I think it is the most detrimental thing we can do right now... Here is my source:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2011/assets/hist07z1.xls
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
contrariandy
Progressive Capitalism created the Middle Class.
09:47 PM on 07/24/2010
But, Obama hasn't really increased spending by much, and you realize that it's the tax shortfall that's the problem, right?. So you're blaming Reagan and Bush for creating so much unnecessary national debt that's costing us so much to service, right? We can't blame Bush (TARP) /Obama (Recovery Act) for money spent fighting off the Second Great Conservative Depression but we should blame the "conservatives" who brought us to this point where tax cuts for the rich created our National Conservative Debt and for the fact that Great Conservative Recession tax revenues are inadequate to service the Conservative National Debt they needlessly created. Up to now they've been "borrowing" the Social Security surplus to supplement the "conservative" income tax shortfall, but the Great Conservative Recession has put SS into deficit this year for the first time as well. And how do they want to pay for past conservative sins, not by letting the Bush tax cuts for the rich expire, but by sacrificing the SS and Medicare programs that the Middle Class has sacrificed to pay for all their lives. Voting Republican is Middle Class Suicide.
04:14 PM on 07/25/2010
Fanned,
09:52 PM on 07/26/2010
Your liberal talking points aside let's look at some actual numbers. Look at this chart and tell me Obama has not increased spending. Also, look at the Bush years, execpt for the two years after 9-11 revenues increased.regularly. Particularly when the graduated tax cuts (like capital gains) went in to effect in 06-08. The problem is spending went up every year also. So my point is that tax uts are not a budget item that have to be paid for because in truth they increase revenues. They not only increase revenues when accurately delivered, but they actual increase the number of tax payers because the small business owners have more money to hire workers reather than laying them off when taxes are increased as we are seeing and will see more of in 2011. Spending is the problem and both parties have been terribe spenders. But to say Obama has not increased spending that much is disingenious at best.
photo
seeksthetruth
Why is my tax rate higher than Romney's?
02:26 AM on 07/26/2010
Check this chart out:

http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3036
03:25 PM on 07/24/2010
Is the deficit being under-reported, or is there outright theft?

There is evidence that the federal budget numbers are being falsified, and the yearly deficit is significantly greater than officially stated.

What evidence?
The government is borrowing MORE on a monthly and yearly basis than the reported deficit.

How much more?
About $50 billion per month more for the past 6 months.
About $1.5 Trillion more in the past 48 months.

What could the excess borrowing be used for?
Off-budget war costs?
Covert bank bailouts at home and abroad?


http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article21285.html
04:20 PM on 07/25/2010
To "Off-budget war costs? Covert bank bailouts at home and abroad?" you can add the unknown amounts of money disappearing into the massive uncontrolled and secret security complex.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OSCPJ
Want it? Work 4 it. No 1 has ever drown in sweat.
04:48 PM on 07/25/2010
Intra governmental transfers and off budget. Clear and Transparent. Yeah....
iridium53
Semper Fi
12:37 PM on 07/24/2010
Team Obama and the Democrats have increased spending on Afghanistan.

Instead of making an effective effort to reduce unemployment, they have spent their time explaining how it was Bush's fault and lowering expectations - that they set when they got their stimulus package.

No effective efforts to actually take action that would actually improve the economy.

But, they sure did give a trillions to banksters - who won't give loans to small business.

Obama priorities are very clear. His words are worthless.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
contrariandy
Progressive Capitalism created the Middle Class.
09:55 PM on 07/24/2010
Historically speaking (for grownups), the TARP money for the banks was under Bush and his Treasury Secretary, former Goldman CEO, Hank Paulson. And, while TARP wasn't perfect it did prevent a worldwide Depression. The Recovery Act (stimulus) while too small and too short, has also been successful in saving/creating millions of jobs and preventing even worse unemployment and recovery numbers. Stop being a partisan and start being a patriot.
12:02 PM on 07/24/2010
Amazing. Not too many Libs posting on this story.

Why?

This should be Lib Utopia. They have the House, Senate, White House, a majority of governor's mansions and state assemblies. They have taken over car companies, the student loans, health care deform, nationalized the banks, and yet they are still miserable.

They should be thrilled yet the economy is still melting down. Their ideas have failed and yet they are angry and cannot admit that they are failures.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
contrariandy
Progressive Capitalism created the Middle Class.
10:04 PM on 07/24/2010
Conservatives put us in Debt and into Recession. TARP and Recovery have prevented Depression and brought us out of Recession. The mess is very deep, recovery will be slow and difficult, but it was the Conservatives of both parties who failed and the Liberals and Progressives who are once again fixing the mess despite the ongoing Conservative sabotage. By the way, none of the things you mis-mentioned are socialism, they were done to save and strengthen American capitalism.
04:25 PM on 07/25/2010
Fan you again, if I could.

But, Andy, there is no use providing the socks with facts. They're only purpose in being here is to spread lies, distract and divide - facts don't serve their agenda.
photo
guveqzero
Inventor and Innovator
11:51 AM on 07/24/2010
Where does the 3% come from? It comes from the same economists that thought a jobless recovery couldn't happen. When idiots in power make decisions, you get what we have today. The impossible coming true.