iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Proposed Federal Rules Target For-Profit Colleges

ERIC GORSKI   07/22/10 11:59 PM ET   AP

For Profit College Rules

The Education Department will propose much-anticipated regulations Friday that would cut off federal aid to for-profit college programs if too many of their students default on loans or don't earn enough after graduation to repay them.

"Some proprietary schools have profited and prospered but their students haven't, and this is a disservice to students and to taxpayers," Education Secretary Arne Duncan said Thursday in a briefing with reporters. "And it undermines the valuable work, the extraordinarily important work, being done by the for-profit industry as a whole."

To qualify for federal student aid programs, career college programs must prepare students for "gainful employment."

The Obama administration, amid intense lobbying from both for-profit college officials and consumer and student advocates, is proposing a complicated formula that would weigh both the debt-to-income ratio of recent graduates and whether all enrolled students repay their loans on time, regardless of whether they finish their studies.

Although the rules would provide schools more roads to compliance than an earlier proposal, a senator and for-profit colleges' chief lobbying group warned that it would make college less accessible.

Republican Sen. Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, a former Education secretary, ridiculed it as "a surprisingly wacky proposal from one of the president's best cabinet members." The government could in effect "institute price controls on certificate and degree programs at thousands of institutions of higher education," Alexander said in a statement.

Underscoring the partisan divide on the issue, Sen. Tom Harkin of Iowa, a Democrat who is holding oversight hearings on for-profit colleges, praised the proposed regulations as "plain common sense."

For-profit colleges have faced increased scrutiny in recent months for some questionable recruiting tactics, high loan default rates, and low graduation and job placement rates. The government is taking notice because for-profit colleges are bringing in record amounts of federal aid money – $26.5 billion last year, up from $4.6 billion in 2000.

Under the Obama administration proposal, vocational programs would fall into one of three categories:

_ Programs fully eligible for aid will either have at least 45 percent of their former students paying down the principal on their federal loans – or their graduates will have a debt-to-earnings ratio of less than 20 percent of discretionary income or 8 percent of total income.

_ Ineligible programs will have less than 35 percent of their former students paying down the principal on their federal loans – and their graduates will have a debt-to-earnings ratio above 30 percent of discretionary income and 12 percent of total income.

_ Those programs that don't fit either definition would be restricted – meaning they would be subject to limits on enrollment growth and schools would be required, among other things, to warn of their high debt levels.

Duncan said the department estimates that if schools make no changes, 5 percent of for-profit college programs would be ineligible for aid in 2012 – affecting 8 percent of all students in the fast-growing sector.

If the rules went into effect now, 55 percent of for-profit schools would be required to disclose unflattering loan data in their promotional materials, making for a strong consumer protection tool, the agency said.

To give schools time to improve and to target "the bottom of the barrel," Duncan said the administration would cap the number of programs it would strip of aid eligibility at 5 percent in fall 2012, when that penalty would first be available.

The Career College Association, the for-profit college sector's main lobbying group, said establishing a ratio between student debt and anticipated graduate earnings is unwise, unnecessary and unproven.

"Amounts borrowed today do not indicate what you will be able to repay in five years, ten years or over a working lifetime," the association's president, Harris Miller, said Thursday in a statement.

Others who were hoping for tougher rules were disappointed, as well.

Pauline Abernathy, vice president of the Institute for College Access & Success, said while the proposal is significant and has teeth, programs could continue to profit from federal aid when more than half their students can't afford to pay down the principal on their loans.

"It is not as strong as it should be to protect students and taxpayers from getting ripped off by career education programs that over-promise and under-deliver," she said.

The proposed rules will be published Friday in the Federal Register and a 45-day public comment period will follow. The final rules are scheduled to be announced in November and would take effect next year, although enforcement action that would strip schools of aid eligibility would not begin until the 2012-2013 school year.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST COLLEGE

The Education Department will propose much-anticipated regulations Friday that would cut off federal aid to for-profit college programs if too many of their students default on loans or don't earn eno...
The Education Department will propose much-anticipated regulations Friday that would cut off federal aid to for-profit college programs if too many of their students default on loans or don't earn eno...
Filed by Leah Finnegan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 11
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Murphdogg
This micro-bio is literally a nano-bio on steroids
04:27 PM on 07/23/2010
It's about damn time. This isn't about education, it is about eradicating leaches from education. Let's spend the same tax dollars on education, but spend them more wisely.
04:00 PM on 07/23/2010
Another one of Arne's genius ideas. He stays up late at night smoking stuff and thinking this stuff up.
03:53 PM on 07/23/2010
Those planning to get a degree and teach, would do best to reconsider. This administration reminds me of the 50's 60's 70's era. Fire all experience teachers and hire as many first year teachers as possible. Much cheaper. Just heard Michelle Rhee, Chancellor for D.C.schools. She and Arnie Duncan sound exactly alike.Students do poorly fire the teacher. Excellent politician response but I would suggest that if the school is doing poorly start at the top and fire the Chancellor, Superintendent, United States Secretary of Education. Problem is generally not the teacher but rather the class room structure. How does this work: typical class room; several at risk students, three students from broken homes, four students whose parents are being evicted from foreclosed homes, three kids whose primary language is not English, 1 or 2 students who are intellectually challenged, all packed into a class of 35 or 40 young adults going through puberty. Michelle Rhee wants to hire several hundred new teacher to replace the teachers that have poorly scoring students. What a genius. Arne Duncan's credential are again? And what are Michelle Rhee's creds. please?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
booksnmoreforyou
Progressive educator, activist for good government
01:58 PM on 07/23/2010
I have a better idea. Mandate that all education be done not-for-profit. Period.
01:19 PM on 07/23/2010
It's about time....I worked for almost 10 years in the for profit education industry and I can tell you that the ONLY priority is profits...screw the students and their futures....there is virtually NO academic integrity AT ALL....they just want that Title IV loan money...not to mention, the tuition is insanely high...there's simply no reason to charge $2,000 for ONE course....ONE...that doesn't even include books!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ssfahrer
10:16 AM on 07/23/2010
But since "Liberal Arts" does NOT 'prepare students for "gainful employment"', what about regulating colleges that teach Liberal Arts? (LOL!!!) Hopefully, you realize that this was a JOKE-- as is any such regulation as being proposed...

Better that the government GET OUT OF THE EDUCATION BUSINESS, give that function to the religious institutions as it should be (separation of Church and State and all that). We can start on the road to true educational FREEDOM by eliminating government funding of schools; then banning government mandated curricula, etc.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thomas McNeill
03:56 PM on 07/23/2010
you propose education be handled by the church and cite separation of church and state...? lol. you keep your church "sponsored" education, I'll keep the department of education.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:50 AM on 07/23/2010
about time...my sis was a recruiter And she recruited at bus shelters and homeless centers..these are just cash cows no incentives to help individuals find jobs
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:23 AM on 07/23/2010
This crackdown is long overdue. Many of the for-profit companies get as much as 85% of their revenue from student loans (the figure is much lower for not-for-profit colleges). Moreover, none of them bear the cost of supporting academic research for faculty or their students. Some do provide a service for those who need online courses and programs, but that can also be provided by traditional colleges, provided that the funding resources are available.

To see what's really happening, go take a look at the annual reports of some of these corporations. What you'll find is a lot of discussion about how they are increasing enrollment, opening/acquiring new centers, offering more courses. In addition, they are concerned about maintaining their regional accreditation (required for receiving federal loan money) and about these changes in federal regulations. They openly discuss threats, mostly financial and regulatory, to their future as well as how they plan to manage them.

In sum, IT'S ALL ABOUT THE BOTTOM LINE FOR THESE COMPANIES. There is hardly a word about educational quality, except insofar as questions about that might affect their accreditation. And the accreditation agencies are so weak that there's not much of a threat there either.

I know that times are tough for governments at all levels (thanks, in part, to the refusal by Congress to approve much-needed aid for states), but having companies skim profits is not how to fund education.
REDSTATEREFUGEE
Texan by birth ; Californian by choice
09:43 AM on 07/23/2010
X2 Agreed......At the for profit where I have taught, the school retains phantom students on my official rolls for as long as possible, collecting federal and California state monies for non-attending students. I am not allowed to drop them myself and the students do not voluntarily withdraw for they profit from being considered "students," obtaining a couple of hundred dollars for my course from the state of California. Is it any wonder why Cali is in a financial crisis? Why someone in state government has not examined this scam is beyond me....

Too, IMHO, marginal students attend these colleges. Most of my students tried to attend the local community college, but found the demands too daunting, so they drifted over to the FP across town, where their lack of commitment to education is rewarded. Those who do attend regularly do not read course material, submit work late, if at all, and generally do not understand how to behave in college.

Folks, your federal and state tax dollars, for which you have worked so hard, are being squandered on these pseudo-colleges. Please support any effort by your legislators, both national and state, to restrict the cynical, self-serving FP games....
01:25 PM on 07/23/2010
I have taught at for profit as well and while I have had some excellent students (who should have went to community college) most of my students were like yours...marginal, at best. some didn't have high school diplomas, so all they were required to do was pass some exam to prove their ability to succeed in the program. well, of course they're going to succeed in a program that has no academic rigor, whatsoever. I too was not allowed to drop the students and if I failed them (which they rightly EARNED), I was told that I had to accept all their missing work and subsequently give them a passing grade so the school could boast a high program completion rate....