More

Unlike Rangel, Other Democrats Not 'Looking Forward' To Ethics-Charge Fight

BETH FOUHY   07/24/10 05:27 PM ET   AP

Rangel Ethics

NEW YORK — Friends and political allies of embattled Rep. Charlie Rangel are noticeably quiet after the disclosure that the 40-year House veteran and dean of the New York congressional delegation may face serious charges from a House ethics panel.

Rangel, 80, told reporters Friday that he looked forward to a public airing of the charges next week and fully intended to fight to clear his name. But national Democrats, already nervous about the party's prospects in the November election, had little to say publicly about Rangel's plight.

It's a particularly vexing situation for New York Democrats, who know Rangel well and have benefited for years from his campaign contributions and his advocacy for the state – particularly on the powerful Ways and Means Committee, which he chaired before stepping down from the post last March.

To criticize Rangel would look politically expedient for these Democrats and could risk the ire of the Congressional Black Caucus and the many influential black activists in New York. But staying silent leaves them vulnerable to Republican charges that the party is not sufficiently tough on the ethical lapses of its members.

Another issue for many of New York's top officeholders: a scheduled Aug. 11 campaign fundraiser for Rangel at the Plaza Hotel in Manhattan, hosted by outgoing Gov. David Paterson and chaired by most of the state's Democratic party elite, including Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, the Democratic candidate for governor, and Sens. Chuck Schumer and Kirsten Gillibrand. New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, a Republican-turned-independent, was listed as a co-host as well.

Asked at a Buffalo event Friday about Rangel, Gillibrand said she still backed him and planned to attend the fundraiser.

"I support the chairman. He's done a great deal of good for this country," Gillibrand said, which drew a blast from Republican David Malpass, who is seeking the GOP nomination to challenge Gillibrand.

"By affirming her support for the ethically challenged congressman, Sen. Gillibrand has once again chosen insider Washington politics over the interests of New Yorkers," Malpass said.

Few others were willing to weigh in on Rangel's behalf.

In an e-mail message, Bloomberg spokesman Jason Post said the mayor's position had not changed and he would reserve judgment until evidence was presented by the ethics panel. A spokesperson said Schumer was still planning to attend the Rangel fundraiser, while a Cuomo spokesman said the campaign schedule had not been mapped out far enough yet to know whether Cuomo would be able to attend.

Also at issue for some New York Democrats: contributions Rangel has made to their campaign committees, which Republicans say are tainted.

Rangel made the vast majority of his contributions in the 2008 campaign cycle, before the ethics committee concluded he had broken House rules by accepting corporate donations for travel to the Caribbean earlier this year. After that, many Democrats gave Rangel's money to charity.

Two New York House Democrats, Dan Maffei and Michael McMahon, have said they will keep the money they've received from Rangel.

"I talked to him last night, and his position hasn't changed. We're not going to give up money that came from the past," Maffei spokeswoman Abigail Gardner said.

McMahon's spokeswoman, Jennifer Nelson, said McMahon had contributed the $1,000 he'd received from Rangel to the Wounded Warriors charity but that he would keep the rest.

"As Congressman McMahon has said before, he is not going to take other people's money to replace funds already spent to satisfy those seeking political gain," Nelson said.

For his part, Rangel has said he fully intends to run for another term. He faces four poorly funded challengers in the Sept. 14 Democratic primary, including Adam Clayton Powell IV, the son of the famed Harlem congressman Rangel first defeated in 1970.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
NEW YORK — Friends and political allies of embattled Rep. Charlie Rangel are noticeably quiet after the disclosure that the 40-year House veteran and dean of the New York congressional delegatio...
NEW YORK — Friends and political allies of embattled Rep. Charlie Rangel are noticeably quiet after the disclosure that the 40-year House veteran and dean of the New York congressional delegatio...
Filed by Jeff Muskus  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 60
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DogTown
Your micro-bio is empty
02:38 PM on 07/28/2010
Good man whom did wrong things....time for him to go! Too bad!
DUSAA-1775
never moon a werewolf
07:33 AM on 07/26/2010
While stories are still up on the politics page from 7/21.... this article about Rangel is dropped off by the HP... gee I wonder why?
03:44 AM on 07/25/2010
Hit the road Charlie.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Skeptical Patriot
10:57 PM on 07/24/2010
What's wrong with a party that can't dispose of a senior member that is so clearly criminally guilty. The Reps are no better but I'd hoped for better behavior from the "Drain the swamp" party. Instead, we have politics as usual as the very law maker that uses Justice as his call card engages in criminal and financial larceny.

THROW all the the Bums out!
photo
VotingPresent
Read in all57states
06:25 PM on 07/24/2010
Just as the Blago trial is coming to an end, it's time to see another Dem go on trial. You guys are the gift that keeps on giving.
12:42 PM on 07/24/2010
If Mr. Rangel is guilty then he should be tossed out of the congress. Then both democrats and republicans should as well be investigated at once and lets see all the crooks who have been taking "Bribes" for so long on both sides and they to should be tossed out the door and face criminal charges. And yes there are more conservative crooks sitting in this congress. When members of congress are working against the american people "They should be facing charges of Treason".
12:14 PM on 07/24/2010
Pack it in, Chuckie boy. It's all over.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Dangerous Dan
Because I can!
11:42 AM on 07/24/2010
4 rent controlled properties.
That goes beyond unethical, that isjust plain criminal.
There is a rent commission that should have denied 3 of these.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
blingbling65943
11:34 AM on 07/24/2010
a Real shame, I'm not sure if some of the things Rangel is accused of doing Should be illegal, but they are

It should also be noted that these things WERE legal when the GOP was in power, nancy pelosi made the rules stricter when the Dem's took power in 2006.

Non the less, Rangel DID break the rules, he needs to step down.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:33 AM on 07/24/2010
Charlie, Charlie, Charlie.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
niceguysneverfinish
11:20 AM on 07/24/2010
He looks like a cross between Al Sharpton and Don King... is he their love baby?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TruEngineHearing
Happiness needs new pursuers...
11:05 AM on 07/24/2010
Stop it, Charlie. Don't put yourself over your constituents and your party. You will bring down the party in November if you try to twist your way out of this. Anyone can see that your resistance is futile. It's already looking quite tawdry, and you should know what happens next.
11:21 AM on 07/24/2010
All politicians are in it for personal gain and not the love of the party
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
popman
Not a puppet
11:24 AM on 07/24/2010
.....or country
10:56 AM on 07/24/2010
Impose serious ethicical regulation on Congress and D.C. will be empty within a month.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:53 AM on 07/24/2010
While corruption knows no party affiliation (a recent Pew poll cites both parties as equally corrupt), the hypocrisy over corruption is damning.

Tea baggers demand the 1) resignation 2) impeachment 3) arrest 4) all of the above, regarding Rep. Rangel while ignoring the fact that Sen. Ensign (R-NV) is currently under criminal investigation by the FBI.

And it doesn't bother conservative christians that Sen. Vitter (R-LA) paid prostitutes for sex. They forgave Vitter because if he resigned, the governor - a democrat - would replace him with a democrat. Having a politician as a criminal is OK as long as he keeps his seat.

I've said before that it's time for Rangel to go. But when it comes to corrupt or criminal politicians, conservatives want only Democrats held responsible.

Cowards and hypocrites.
11:07 AM on 07/24/2010
There is a big difference in being charged, indicted, or convicted for a crime vs being investigated. An investigation means nothing. Rangel is actually being charged with and will likely be convicted.

Also, when you have a politician like Rangel that goes around demainding others pay higher taxes while he avoids taxes you have not only crimes being committed but rank hypocrisy on top of it.
10:38 AM on 07/24/2010
Someone needs to write to the DNC and tell them to try one of these amazing tactics when asked about Rangel to avoid either being vulnerable or supporting him outright:

"I have great faith in our justice system and I'm sure it will reach the appropriate conclusion."

"I'm not privy to all the facts in the case, but I expect that a just conclusion will come about in the end."

"Do I believe Charlie Rangel did it? I don't know, I'm not on involved with the investigation. It's a matter best left to the courts, which will return a just verdict I'm sure".

Notice what they all have in common. Honestly, the GOP has done this dance for years. Support the process, not the person or the charge. Do the Democrats not read the paper?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Moti
Guns 'n Moses
10:50 AM on 07/24/2010
Conversely, Dems are famous for their "... the seriousness of the allegations..." snippet that they love to insert when demanding that someone from the other side of the aisle step down pending any legal conclusion to whatever the situation.