iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

iPhone 'Jailbreaking' Legal Under New Government Rules

JOELLE TESSLER   07/26/10 03:44 PM ET   AP

Iphone Jailbreaking

WASHINGTON — Owners of the iPhone will be able to legally unlock their devices so they can run software applications that haven't been approved by Apple Inc., according to new government rules announced Monday.

The decision to allow the practice commonly known as "jailbreaking" is one of a handful of new exemptions from a 1998 federal law that prohibits people from bypassing technical measures that companies put on their products to prevent unauthorized use of copyright-protected material. The Library of Congress, which oversees the Copyright Office, reviews and authorizes exemptions every three years to ensure that the law does not prevent certain non-infringing uses of copyright-protected works.

For iPhone jailbreakers, the new rules effectively legitimize a practice that has been operating in a legal gray area by exempting it from liability. Apple claims that jailbreaking is an unauthorized modification of its software.

Mario Ciabarra, founder of Rock Your Phone, which calls itself an "independent iPhone application store," said the rules mark the first step toward opening the iPhone app market to competition and removing the "handcuffs" that Apple imposes on developers that want to reach users of the wildly popular device.

Unless users unlock their handsets, they can only download apps from Apple's iTunes store. Software developers must get such apps pre-approved by Apple, which sometimes demands changes or rejects programs for what developers say are vague reasons.

Ciabarra noted that Google Inc. has taken a different approach with its Android operating system, which is emerging as the biggest competitor to the iPhone. Google allows users of Android phones to download applications from outside the Android Market.

Although Apple has never prosecuted anyone for jailbreaking, it does use software upgrades to disable jailbroken phones, and the new government rules won't put a stop to that. That means owners of such phones might not be able to take advantage of software improvements, and they still run the risk of voiding their warranty.

Apple spokesman Natalie Kerris said Monday that the company is concerned about jailbreaking because the practice can make an iPhone unstable and unreliable.

"Apple's goal has always been to ensure that our customers have a great experience with their iPhone, and we know that jailbreaking can severely degrade the experience," she said.

In addition to jailbreaking, other exemptions announced Monday would:

_ allow owners of used cell phones to break access controls on their phones in order to switch wireless carriers.

_ allow people to break technical protections on video games to investigate or correct security flaws.

_ allow college professors, film students, documentary filmmakers and producers of noncommercial videos to break copy-protection measures on DVDs so they can embed clips for educational purposes, criticism or commentary.

_ allow computer owners to bypass the need for external security devices called dongles if the dongle no longer works and cannot be replaced.

_ allow blind people to break locks on electronic books so that they can use them with read-aloud software and similar aides.

Although the jailbreaking exemption is new, all the others are similar to the last set of exemptions, which were announced in November 2006. The new rules take effect Tuesday and are expected to last a few years.

The exceptions are a big victory for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which had urged the Library of Congress to legalize several of them, including the two regarding cell phones.

Jennifer Stisa Granick, EFF's civil liberties director, said the rules are based on an important principle: Consumers should be allowed to use and modify the devices that they purchase the way they want. "If you bought it, you own it," she said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

Filed by Bianca Bosker  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 692
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (14 total)
09:27 PM on 07/28/2010
The last few months have been one giant headache for cell phone manufacturers and service providers and one giant victory for consumers. On June 15, San Francisco passed a city ordinance requiring all cell phone retailers to display in the store the rate (SAR) at which their phones’ radiation is absorbed into the body. A month later, the Federal Communications Commission and the Wireless Assocation, a coalitition of service providers, began a blog war over the FCC’s May “bill shock” research. Finally, Monday marked an equally unpleasant rule making decision by the Library of Congress, which enables cell phone users to “unlock” their phones for use on other networks.

While it is unclear exactly how the situation in San Francisco will resolve it itself in the future, whether the bill shock issue will be readdressed by the CTIA, or the future scope of the Copyright Office’s final rule, one thing is clear. Consumers are ending up on the winning side of these decisions, and judging from industry press releases, it is not happy about it.

Read More: http://bit.ly/cxAsnW
07:34 AM on 07/28/2010
So, in other words, things regarding the iPhone will now be exactly the same as they have been.

Far more important are some of the other exemptions made. This is as close as we've gotten to a DMCA repeal, so why the iPhone focus?
photo
runtwelds
Father, Educator, & Artist
12:15 AM on 07/28/2010
don't want apple apps, don't want apple operating system, don't want at&t, why bother with an iPhone at all? seriously why go throught the trouble of unlocking and jailbreaking when a system upgrade is going to brick it? will you still get the subsidized price? who would brick a $700 phone?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JohnSawyer
arglebargy
05:36 PM on 07/30/2010
The line in the article about iOS updates bricking jailbroken and/or unlocked iOS devices is wrong, and still hasn't been corrected. All an iOS update will do, is to remove the jailbreak/unlock code, and return the device to its standard condition (only runs all Apple-approved software), since iOS updates overwrite all the previous iOS code (modified or not) with standard iOS code. Apple isn't likely to carefully extract the jailbreak/unlock code prior to installing an update, then re-inject that code into the standard iOS code after the update. After each iOS update is released, all anyone usually needs to do, to update and re-jailbreak/unlock their iOS device, is to wait on updating their iOS device until the people who write jailbreak/unlock software, update their utilities to work around whatever new roadblocks the new iOS introduces. This is an inconvenience, but that's about it for most people who use jailbroken/unlocked iOS devices. Some people sometimes use less-capable or older jailbreak/unlock software to re-jailbreak/unlock after an iOS update, or they do a straight iOS update strictly using iTunes instead of waiting for an updated jailbreak/unlock utility to act as the intermediary, which sometimes has the unfortunate side effect of making it difficult or seemingly impossible to jailbreak/unlock that iOS device again, but sometimes even in these instances someone eventually figures out how to fix this.
10:36 PM on 07/27/2010
It's kinda sad when you have to go to the government in order to be allowed to use something you bought and own as you wish. That just goes to show you how companies, under our current corporatist culture, feel they can overreach on anything now.
08:20 AM on 07/28/2010
It's thanks to the government that you're not allowed to in the first place. Of course you'd have to go to them. "Fair Use" as we used to know it is quite dead.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JohnSawyer
arglebargy
05:38 PM on 07/30/2010
To paraphrase Monty Python: "It might be slowly getting better..."
10:17 PM on 07/27/2010
closed product ecosystem .... russia? china? cuba? north korea?....apple, bad bad boy.
10:36 PM on 07/27/2010
Kim-il Jobs?
photo
JasonMcl
Hey a countdown clock. MannNnn that is trouble...
10:14 PM on 07/27/2010
This is a great victory for the EFF. Congratulations to them on taking this important step towards securing our computing future from corporate clutches. This ultimately won't change anything at apple but the declared legalization of jailbreaking may have the adverse effect of informing users that they can actually reach beyond the walled garden.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hollandjwm
Insert foot here_____
06:08 PM on 07/27/2010
The part of the story that's missing is that once you jailbreak it, you can never do another software update again. Apple uses these to render the phones "bricks" if they have been altered in any way. Jobs will maintain his iron-fisted monopoly, no matter what he has to do.
photo
JasonMcl
Hey a countdown clock. MannNnn that is trouble...
10:27 PM on 07/27/2010
That isn't totally true anymore on the update bricking at least. Though it was indeed so at one point.

The biggest problem would be a hardware malfunction that prevents you from connecting to iTunes and wiping the break before sending it in.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MyResponsibility
Action over hope
11:21 PM on 07/27/2010
Definitely not true. If you do end up accidentally accepting a software upgrade, the iPhone will be unjailbroken until the dev team can find a new vulnerability.
04:05 PM on 07/27/2010
In the UK the iPhone is now offered on a variety of networks. This is a VERY good thing as it prevents annoying abuses, like the extra tethering fee.

AT&T's international offerings are truly horrific too.
03:55 PM on 07/27/2010
does this mean I'm aloud to unlock my Xbox 360 to play unauthorized games and connect to a "carrier" other than Xbox live?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Bell
04:03 PM on 07/27/2010
No it doesn't...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MyResponsibility
Action over hope
06:05 PM on 07/27/2010
It certainly should, but then again, I never cared about what Apple claimed was illegal, but was unsettled in the law. There's an XBOX 360 jailbreak available, but don't know if there's an alternative "carrier" to which to connect.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joseph Bethea
musician
03:01 PM on 07/27/2010
i can hear and see Jobs cursing and growing horns of his head right now the control freak has finally lost some of his control. Amen
02:01 PM on 07/27/2010
Apple has to now open that evil empire and free the people. The bigger they get the more evil they become. History is always repeated. www.digitalundivide.com
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Brandon1990
01:56 PM on 07/27/2010
OMG Apple No Longer has Control Over all Apple Users....Yikes
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
studmoose
This Micro-Bio Intentionally Left Blank
01:00 PM on 07/27/2010
Where's the credit to the EFF for doing this?

Without The Electronic Frontier Foundation, this would have never happened.

http://www.boingboing.net/2010/07/26/eff-wins-enormous-vi.html

www.eff.org
photo
hypnotoad72
Freedom = real democracy = living wages
05:27 PM on 07/27/2010
Thanks for the links!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
studmoose
This Micro-Bio Intentionally Left Blank
05:44 PM on 07/27/2010
Sure thing.

The EFF has a nice Teaching Copyright tutorial, aimed at teenagers, so they won't get in any legal messes. It's a nice thing to review on top of actually reading their full-fledged Copyright guides.
11:56 AM on 07/27/2010
Phones should never have been locked in the first place. As things stand now, there is no free market in telecom services. One travels to Europe with a locked ATT phone, and you get a data charge of hundreds of dollars in only a few days. ATT blames this on foreign carriers. The reality is that if one had an unlocked phone, they could purchase an inexpensive SIM card in their travel destination and save loads of money. Why the FCC allows this type of consumer abuse is beyond me.

The newest thing is that IN THE UNITED STATES if you wish to use your phone as a modem for your laptop you must pay ATT extra per month EVEN WHEN YOU ARE ALREADY PAYING FOR DATA SERVICE. Of course this b.s. rule exists only in the US and is another example of the abusive practices of telecom vendors, and ATT is not the only one doing this. In other countries, there are laws that prevent this type of abuse.
03:03 PM on 07/27/2010
You should have downloaded that little app some 15 year old kid made - it looked like a harmless flashlight but had hidden thethering functionality.
10:01 PM on 07/27/2010
These kinds of business practices by the telecoms are a result in a way by their lobbying-influence on many of the federal commissions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Abdi S
11:00 AM on 07/27/2010
At&t is horrible service, and many of my friends left the service for t-mobile or verizon.
11:57 AM on 07/27/2010
All of the US telecom services are bad, but for slightly different reasons.
photo
hypnotoad72
Freedom = real democracy = living wages
05:29 PM on 07/27/2010
Agreed. I left Verizon as they disabled various phones' ability to have custom ringers and wallpaper because they wanted people to buy their vcast service instead. Maybe that's changed since 2006... I hope the same law is applied, and there's no real reason or justification for an exception.