Consumer Confidence Falls As Corporate Profits Rise

Consumer Confidence Corporate Profits

ANNE D'INNOCENZIO   07/27/10 08:47 PM ET   AP

NEW YORK — The disconnect between Wall Street and Main Street is growing.

Americans' confidence in the economy faded further in July, according to a monthly survey released Tuesday, amid job worries and skimpy wage growth. That's at odds with Wall Street's recent rally fueled by upbeat earnings reports from big businesses such as chemical maker DuPont Co. and equipment maker Caterpillar Inc. That's because the pumped-up profits are being fueled by cost cuts like layoffs and overseas sales. In fact, big companies have shown few signs they're ready to hire.

The Consumer Confidence Index came in at 50.4 in July, a steeper-than-expected decline from the revised 54.3 in June, according to a survey the Conference Board. The decline follows last month's decline of nearly 10 points, from 62.7 in May, and is the lowest point since February. It takes a reading of 90 to indicate a healthy economy – a level not seen since the recession began in December 2007.

"Consumers have a much different view of the economy than the stock market does, and their views matter more to the economy," said Mark Vitner, an economist at Wells Fargo. The index "tells me the economy is heading for slower growth in the second half. We have low expectations for back-to-school."

Joel Naroff, president of Naroff Economic Advisors, agreed, noting that the fatter profits have shown that companies have been able to squeeze out higher productivity from workers, but that also means that "households are not benefiting."

The profit picture is "good news for Wall Street, but not good for workers," he added.

The survey was taken July 1-21, beginning just before the Standard & Poor's 500 index hit a nine-month low of 1,022.58 on July 2. It had risen 4.5 percent by July 21 and has since climbed an additional 4 percent as upbeat earnings reports from key manufacturers have made investors more convinced that the economic recovery isn't stalling as much as they had originally thought.

The Dow Jones industrial average rose 12 points Tuesday, although broader stock measures slipped, after three days of big gains, as investors digested the confidence data as well as a slowdown in regional manufacturing reported by the Richmond Federal Reserve. Stocks rose moderately at the open because of strong earnings from chemical maker DuPont Co. and European banks UBS and Deutsche Bank.

DuPont, which has announced thousands of job cuts over the past year, reported that second-quarter income nearly tripled, as revenue surged in most of its businesses. The results were led by revenue gains in the Asia Pacific region. DuPont didn't announce any hiring plans.

A rapid, sustainable recovery can't happen without the American consumer. And the second straight month of declining confidence following three months of increases is worrisome, economists say.

Economists watch confidence closely because consumer spending accounts for about 70 percent of U.S. economic activity and is critical to a strong rebound.

Both components of the index declined. They measure how people feel about the economy now, and their expectations for the next six months.

The index – which measures how Americans feel about business conditions, the job market and the next six months – had been recovering fitfully since hitting an all-time low of 25.3 in February 2009. The index typically falls before the economy slows down, and on the way out of a recession, the expectations component, which accounts for 60 percent of index, rises sharply, said Lynn Franco, director of The Conference Board Consumer Research Center.

"It's all about jobs. That's still the primary source of income," Franco said. "Until we see the pace of job growth pick up and consumers are confident that this is sustainable, we are not likely to see a significant pickup in confidence."

The Conference Board survey, based on a random survey mailed to 5,000 households, showed that consumers' assessment of the job market was more negative than the month before. Those claiming that jobs are "hard to get" increased to 45.8 from 43.5 percent, while those saying jobs are "plentiful" remained unchanged at 4.3 percent.

Michelle Banks, 38, a teacher from Bloomfield, N.J., said she's more worried about job security than she was last year because of rampant state budget cuts. So she started saving money for back-to-school items for her 5-year-old son in January. She plans to spend $200, evenly divided between school supplies and clothing.

"I'm buying clothes that will last, not fall apart," she said.

Economists say the index's expectations component tends to track stock market movements, but Vitner noted that the market's big plunge in May has made such an imprint on consumers that the recent rebound hasn't registered.

Retailers had a surprisingly solid start to the year, but business has been slowing since April. With unemployment stuck near 10 percent, Americans are expected to remain skittish through the back-to-school and Christmas season.

Concerns are also rising about the housing market. While the S&P/Case-Shiller 20-city home price index released Tuesday showed a 1.3 percent rise in May from April, the home buyer's tax credit, which expired April 30, helped pull more buyers into the market. In fact, the report warned that the recent gains in home prices are not likely to last.

___

AP Business Writer Stephen Bernard and AP Real Estate Writer J.W. Elphinstone contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
Filed by Jeff Muskus  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 7,039
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (101 total)
  1 of 42  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
slinkymom 08:11 AM on 07/28/2010
From the 1940's until around the 1980's the top tax rate was extremely high and yet, corporations created the most jobs during that time period than anytime since.

How is it that we had the greatest manufacturing growth during that time period? There were plenty of wealthy people and an incredibly strong and happy middle class.

Now we have a shrinking middle class and an ever  Read More...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tim1478
10:04 PM on 08/11/2010
If this article is attempting to expand of U.S. companies hiring overseas, its a little late. I've read little about the good news that the jobs bill is paid for by closing tax loopholes for hiring overseas because little is being written about it.
10:51 AM on 07/30/2010
What the author here fails to note is that one of the main reasons we are seeing this artificial rise in corporate profits is because all these big corporations are forcing as much income onto fiscal 2010 in anticipation of the the tax increases coming on Jan. 1, 2011. The numbers reported are in many cases artificially high as the companies restructure their fiscal year reporting to get as much onto 2010 as possible. So this year profits will look really good but next year profits will be abnormally low, and when those numbers start coming in for fiscal 2011 your going to see the bottom drop out of the market. They are going to suck as many of people into this market as they can as we watch the DOW continue to increase, but just wait, the big one is coming in 2011 as we hit the second dip of this recession. Some friendly advice: you better pull everything out before 2011!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tim1478
09:56 PM on 08/11/2010
In other words they haven't changed their habits?
04:28 AM on 07/30/2010
Plutonomy

An economy that is driven by or that disproportionately benefits wealthy people, or one where the creation of wealth is the principal goal.
[Blend of pluto- (wealth) and economy.]

In a report called "The Plutonomy Symposium Rising Tides Lifting Yachts," Ajay Kapur, Citigroup's global strategist, says the balance sheets of the rich are "in great shape, and will get much better," which is why he recommends going out and buying stocks of companies that cater to that very select market.

Spending by the uber-rich overwhelms that of the average consumer and helps explain why the U.S. economy has continued to do well and the U.S. dollar hasn't collapsed even in the face of the current federal budget deficit, a negative savings rate, global imbalances and high energy prices, he says. The United States is one of the plutonomy countries countries whose economies are powered by a relatively small number of rich people.

- Angela Barnes, "Want wealth? Invest in the uber-rich," The Globe and Mail, October 2, 2006

They dont need U.S. anymore...get used to it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ResearchtheFacts
01:15 PM on 07/29/2010
It took them this long to figure this out.."Consumers have a much different view of the economy than the stock market does, and their views matter more to the economy,"

I haven't been in a store to buy anything except food, lately. Really I have no incentive to purchase, not as long as I am being fee'd to death and the legislation being produced leaves me to be further victimized. Nothing from nothing leaves nothing.

Like they tell us, you have to spend money to make money. And, first rule of business there is no free lunch, Obama.

Don't expect the vote or me to feed the economy if you are not putting something of value in the pot.
04:22 AM on 07/30/2010
Gee and guess what...wallstreet and the "economy" doesnt need US consumers....they have moved on.
12:45 PM on 07/29/2010
We don't need another poll and a slew of numbers to tell us that we don't have enough money to go shopping for useless garbage. I'm spending my money on canning supplies, thrift store clothes, minutes for my cell phone and on my small business.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scott Zwartz
09:17 AM on 07/29/2010
These figures show that the public know that Obama is a fraud and we will never side with main Street. No sane consumer can have confidence in the economic health of the country while Geithner is Secretary of Treasury and Obama did not even try to re-instate Glass-Steagall.

Dump Obama in 2012, but Vote Democrat is 2010!

When the Independents see that mainstream Dems are dumping Obama due to his right wing practices, then they can have some confidence in the future. If the Dems continue to pretend that Obama has been anything less than a back stabbing fraud, they will have no credibility and consumer confidence will remain low.

This is no different than the early 1990's -- "it's the economy, stupid." Obama has diverted trillions of dollars to the pockets of Wall Street crooks while starving Main Street. This was not a mistake like running a red light. Obama's economic policies are as right wing and as corrupt as the Bush Administration, which is why Geithner is Secretary of Treasury.

Dump Obama in 2012, but Vote Dem in 2010!
04:11 AM on 07/29/2010
Soon we'll look back on these days with nostalgia ...
02:42 AM on 07/30/2010
Oh great, that's a nice thought to go to sleep on.. as if it can get much worse :)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ZeraLee
A Citizen's View from Main Street
04:55 PM on 07/28/2010
It is not surprising that the drop in consumer confidence correlates with the stonewalling of extending unemployment insurance. Nor is it surprising to see the republican finger-pointing. It would be rude if it were not so tragic.

It is like watching someone die of starvation. The muscles atrophy while the fat cells complain about redistribution of health.

"The operation was a success, but the patient died."

Conservatives and corporations are having their successes, but the real economy is still dying.
02:15 PM on 07/28/2010
wow, just wow

one of my comments were removed....why? I didn't say anything inflammatory or insulting to anything or anyone...in fact I even sympathize with a lot of the thoughts around here ..........its ok to bash the successful, republicans, Christianity, free markets and so on....but don't you dare step outside the box and criticize anything we say.

how often does this happen?........wheres the "enlightenment"...the "open-mindedness" the "tolerance"?

you can't make any "PROGRESS" (get it? progress, progressives? ohh nevermind)if you are not willing to at least accept the possibility that there may be some flaws in what you want

I mean if you keep running into a brick wall in your "progress" then does it hurt to re-analyze some things....that maybe you are doing "something" wrong?.....you can't plug your fingers into your ears yelling "la la la I can't hear you" and then proceed to run right back into that wall
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:49 PM on 07/28/2010
The next couple of years will be interesting in organized labor. If you have Chinese workers striking and demanding a fair wage then americans should follow their example. Strikes, boycotts or some good old molotov cocktails could be the ticket.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dnalpahs
02:05 PM on 07/28/2010
"Workers Unite!"

Wow, you liberals really are stuck in the 1920s.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:08 PM on 07/28/2010
" Workers Crawl ! "

Wow, you corporate bootlickers are stuck......period.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ohioan4truth
I'm just an average, ordinary guy.
02:12 PM on 07/28/2010
Unions created the middle class. Unions saved workers from dying on the job. Unions are for the worker.......companies are fo owners

Different ends of the spectrum.
02:44 AM on 07/30/2010
Ah yeah that will work to keep manufacturing jobs in the country huh? What do you think Unions will be striking for? they will have run off all businesses because they can't compete with the ridiculous labor costs brought about by unions... Libs just don't get simple business concepts do you?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dnalpahs
01:38 PM on 07/28/2010
Why does the Left hate corporations? Because they are "powerful?" But the Left grows government to epic size and power when history is filled with tyrannical government but rarely a tyrannical corporation?

The Left is just gibbering about corporations out of habit and a failed 100 year old ideology of socialism.

In the early 20th century, the Left demanded that we reject capitalism in the name of progress. Embrace "scientific" socialism, it said, and prosperity will ensue. This delusion could not be maintained.

Faced with the ever-rising living standards in the more capitalist countries, from the United States to West Germany to Asia, and with the ever-increasing misery and even death in the more socialist countries, from Soviet Russia to East Germany to North Korea, the Left had a choice. Either reevaluate the path to progress and become a champion of capitalism, or continue attacking capitalism knowing full well that it is the only means to prosperity.

The Left chose the latter.
01:47 PM on 07/28/2010
The "Left" doesn't hate Corporations. They are IN on it. This isn't a 'party' thing anymore: party is non-extant. Lemme guess: Ayn Rand fan, right?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dnalpahs
01:49 PM on 07/28/2010
Murray Rothbard, Thomas Jefferson and James Madison fan.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:04 PM on 07/28/2010
The left does NOT hate Corporations, they can be a very positive force. The left hates the fact that the Corporations control our government more than "We The People" do.
And there have been plenty of tyrannical Corporations, it's just that their influence was limited by our government to a certain degree, much less since Deregulation.
And in all reality, life has gotten much better for many since our government took some responsibility in the Mid part of last century. Do you want to go back to Slavery, or the suppression of Women's Rights, or the company store, or maybe even the witch hunts of New England. The left does not believe in a tyrannical government, but believes in an effective government that works for Justice and Truth, for The People.
And you talk of a "failed 100 year old ideology of socialism". But I can point to many successes in social policy in the last century. What about the totally failed policies of the Neo-Conservative Right in the last several decades? And do not point to Clinton, as he did not change the course, in fact he promoted it.
We do not attack Capitalism because we often see the upsides. But we do attack Capitalism when it is taken to an extreme and it is the only governing thing that matters in this Country. We attack it because it is your only Lord.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
amaycatbaker
04:12 PM on 07/28/2010
Clinton did pretty good until "the incident", then what choice did he have, the witch hunt impeached him... which dictated the end of most of the good he did, and blighted the rest of his presidency.

He did the deed but the witch hunt cost him when he lied. Don't blame the man for lying, any person would. He signed the repeal of the banking laws after that, because the right did claim power over his pen. That is my opinion as I read about his presidency... as I read my opinion is changing about him.
photo
hypnotoad72
Real democracy = living wages.
04:38 PM on 07/28/2010
Well said!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ohioan4truth
I'm just an average, ordinary guy.
01:34 PM on 07/28/2010
Corporations won't be happy until they get the working stiff to pick and carry two tons of peaches (hypothetically speaking) for a dollar. They don't care about paying a living wage. It's a slow wasting away when the energy you expell can't be replenished by the wages you earn.

Grapes of Wrath......all over again!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dnalpahs
01:35 PM on 07/28/2010
What year is it again? Oh yeah, it is the 21st century.

In the Liberal worldview, the oppressed are the poor, and the oppressors are the corporate interests who exploit them.

That made sense 75 years ago, when a relatively small number of corporations -- oil and coal companies, steel producers, car makers -- controlled a vast segment of the work force and when government was a comparatively anemic enterprise. In recent decades, however, as technology has reshaped the economy, more and more Americans have gone to work for smaller or more decentralized employers, or even for themselves, while government has exploded in size and influence.
01:39 PM on 07/28/2010
Rubbish, it's very relevant. It just doesn't have a tidy fit with your view. Corporations control policy of the federal government by financial confluence..

And before you render some cheap, dismissive response; you'd better do some research. And take your rose-coloured goggles off.
05:35 PM on 07/28/2010
The 21st century isn't a year, it's a ... century.

And that world view you describe ... is just your VIEW of that word view.

As to the rest of your post ... it's just preposterous, alternate reality BS. You can't just make stuff up and expect HP readers to swallow it—this isn't Fox.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ohioan4truth
I'm just an average, ordinary guy.
01:49 PM on 07/28/2010
History is replete with lessons not learned. Cycles do occur simply because a greddy man will try over and over again until he dominates the world.

Why have there been Ceasars, Pharaohs, Kings and Dictators?

Power and wealth drives them all!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ohioan4truth
I'm just an average, ordinary guy.
01:59 PM on 07/28/2010
greedy
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:21 PM on 07/28/2010
Do not confuse Corporate Business and business of the SMALL Entrepreneur. Difference is, since (Corporate America) is already holding all the money and all the Lawyers and all the Lobbyists... laws are ALWAYS stacked in their favor or at the very least with major consideration to doing no harm. Can you say that is true for small family owned or the the random individual?... No, they usually must take their licks and accept new policy as handed to them.
Another big difference is that the small guy usually cares about more than money/ Profit, that is where his personal desires (local living, family), morals, and care for his community come in. (“DuPont, which has announced thousands of job cuts over the past year...”)
Corporations are protected by our (leaders) because that easy money supports Wall Street’s (TM) Monopoly Game. Small business employs more people in this country than large Corporations, especially when you start to look at the profit vs (domestic) employment thing. Real value and the real work is done with mostly local workforce. And although those People have the least say in what is inflicted upon them, they are the ones really paying the way.
This is Corporate Cancer... telling us all how to live, and controlling the direction our Country goes in... through financial manipulation. That direction does not appear to be “We The People” in my eyes. And who supports this Corporate Rule 110%? The hard pushing Republican Right.
01:38 PM on 07/28/2010
ok so you acknowledge that small business are the ones that employ the most can we enact a business friendly environment for these people? you know like if you make more money you should be rewarded for it? not if you make more then the state should come in a take more.

I am not disagreeing with you on anything so lets put clear defined barriers and limits on the govt, reduce its power so that Corporations can't use it for their benefits (or start useless wars but that is a different matter) to give the little guy a chance
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
the Lensman
Facts Have a Liberal Bias
09:45 PM on 07/28/2010
Sadly reducing government power is to hand that power over to the large corporations "Our" government is the only power strong enough to stand between the corporations and their complete dominance of the world and making all of us "little people" no better than serfs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ohioan4truth
I'm just an average, ordinary guy.
01:11 PM on 07/28/2010
They day may come when we see the minimum wage of today become the maximum wage of tomorrow, if those "Capitalists/Corporatists" get their way!

Vote Republican!

If you enjoy working for next to nothing! If you can find a job that pays that much!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ohioan4truth
I'm just an average, ordinary guy.
01:12 PM on 07/28/2010
There may.......
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ohioan4truth
I'm just an average, ordinary guy.
01:12 PM on 07/28/2010
a day......
01:41 PM on 07/28/2010
How about I not vote at all, blindman?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Leigh49
Close your eyes, you won't feel a thing
01:08 PM on 07/28/2010
And republicans still think these corporations need tax breaks?
02:57 AM on 07/30/2010
Only if you want them to hire you.. otherwise it's much easier to take their business to some place that doesn't take all the money they make.. you know, some of those smart places that actually realize the value of business? America is one of the highest taxed countries in the world. How much do you suggest is enough? or is there ever?