iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

DISCLOSE Act Faces GOP Filibuster In Senate

Mcconnell

07/26/10 03:43 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama is imploring Republican senators to allow a vote on new campaign finance disclosure requirements, warning them not to resort to political delaying tactics that would block the legislation.

Speaking in the Rose Garden on Monday, Obama said that by standing in the way of the bill, Republicans would be giving special interest groups increased sway in Washington.

"Corporate lobbyists will be able to tell members of Congress, if they don't vote the right way, they will face an onslaught of negative ads in their next campaign," Obama said. "And all too often, no one will actually know who's behind those ads."

The bill would impose new donor and contribution disclosure requirements on nearly all organizations that air political ads independently of candidates or the political parties. The legislation would require the sponsor of the ad to appear in it and take responsibility for it. Obama argued that the bill would also reduce foreign influence over American elections.

"You'd think that making these reforms would be a matter of common sense, particularly since they primarily involve just making sure that folks who are financing these ads are disclosed, so that the American people can make up their own minds," Obama said. "Nobody is saying you can't run the ads; just make sure the people know who in fact is behind financing the ads."

The House narrowly passed a similar bill last month. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., wants to begin debate on the bill Tuesday, but he faces Republican delaying tactics.

The Senate bill, proposed by Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., removes from the House bill an exemption for transfers between a national organization and its state affiliates and between separate organizations, provisions aimed at helping unions.

However, the bill preserves a contentious House exemption for large organizations such as the National Rifle Association and the AARP. It also adds a requirement that campaign money disclosures by Senate candidates be filed electronically, as they are by House and presidential candidates

Companies with federal contracts worth more than $10 million would also be banned from independent political advertising.

Democrats need at least one Republican to support the measure in order to get the 60 votes needed to overcome GOP procedural delays, but their chances of doing so are slim.

So far, not one Senate Republican has swung behind the measure, which is strongly opposed by the party's leadership. Nor is it clear that all 59 Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents will support the bill.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said in a statement Monday that the bill is designed to "protect unpopular Democrat politicians by silencing their critics and exempting their campaign supporters from an all out attack on the First Amendment."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Filed by Elyse Siegel  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 5,305
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (117 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dixdarlin
07:56 PM on 08/07/2010
Why is the GOP so evil?
Our planet is in peril and the only thing they care about protecting is their money!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
acacia72
12:02 PM on 07/28/2010
The republican mantra for U.S. citizens ought to be called "The Mushroom"; "Keep 'em in the dark and feed 'em $ hit."
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
missouriwatcher
military veteran, veteran teacher, father, grandpa
03:20 PM on 07/28/2010
Good one (except that the comparison insults mushrooms).
09:30 AM on 07/28/2010
Does anyone honestly believe that the passage of this bill will mean anything? Clandestine meetings and under-the-table politics have and will always be the norm. Corruption is rampant and will not be hindered. This empire is collapsing and there isn't anything anyone can do about it, short of an all out revolution to throw ALL of the bums out.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Schalaine
We are women. We vote.
12:33 AM on 07/29/2010
I don't think so. Voting will do just fine!
photo
justsayno
All politicians lie
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
hollace
I told you I was sick
07:24 AM on 07/28/2010
why are all the young, talented and capable standing in the jobs lines . These guys don't need to care..they won't be here long.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Schalaine
We are women. We vote.
12:35 AM on 07/29/2010
Because your party destroyed our economy and refuses to help fix the problem. Gotta love the pugs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Martha T
We ARE the people!!
07:18 AM on 07/28/2010
When I wake up and go onto HuffPost to check out the news, and then click on to Politics to get depressed I might add, and have to see a picture like the one attached to this article , I cannot continue and eat my breakfast..Mitch McConnell physically and philosophically turns my stomach! Yuck
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
yougg
just a citizen
06:34 AM on 07/28/2010
SOMETHING has to be done. Let everybody disclose. Let the chips fall where they may, I'm certainly not in favor of the status quo. In 2000, John McCain came to speak at the school that I was attending at the time. His subject? Campaign finance reform. I'm a former union member and don't have a proplem with a level playing field.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kenstrolle
05:46 AM on 07/28/2010
The republicans only care about big business, not the people ask them what they will do for the
middle class? They only care about the rich!! Worse then big gov. is a big gov. run by big greedy
businesses!!!!!!!!!! That's what the republicans want!!!!! It will help them run down the middle
class, so the ceo's can get bigger Pay Checks Wake Up People, Wake Up!!!
04:10 AM on 07/28/2010
REPUBLICANS IN THE SENATE:
Filabuster the Disclose Act!! No more POWER-GRABS for Obama. I don't care what you have to do to stop this Act and any other attempt for more power. Stamp your feet if you have to. Give me names, and I'll check into their recent pasts and I will DISCLOSE it.
Delores Smith
Delores109@cox.net
02:17 PM on 07/28/2010
"...attempt for more power."??? on whose part??

The Disclose Act would allow we the people to know who pays for which Political ads (why don't the Republicans want us to know that?) It would help ensure that democracy is not for sale to the highest bidder!

Corporations are now allowed to bully candidates into "doing it their way...or else!"--because they can spend anything they want and say anything they want--with no accountability. Freedom of speech requires responsibility.

This Act is for the people, so we can know who's behind the attack ads on any candidate--Democrat or Republican. For some reason, the Republicans don't want us to know that....I wonder why?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:53 AM on 07/28/2010
It may face a GOP filibuster but the AFL-CIO is also opposed to it.

Strange bed fellows.
01:01 AM on 07/28/2010
This would have passed if the Democrats had not exempted all Unions and other Special Interest Organizations like the NRA , World Wildlife Federation and the Sierra Club.

The AFL/CIO , SEIU, UAW, Teamsters, Steelworkers,were particularly vocal over there objection to the Bill and strongly opposed it. Once they were exempted from the Bill's provisions, the Bill had no chance of passage.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CJHAN
Live for today Fight for tomorrow.
12:16 AM on 07/28/2010
so does everything else.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TAMPA M
Sicilians of Ybor City
11:48 PM on 07/27/2010
We gave the Democrats the majority and still they cannot get anything done so I will be voting for the replacement of these backstabbing liars.
Vote out corrupt corporate career criminal politicians this November.
11:54 PM on 07/27/2010
Which ones?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:13 AM on 07/28/2010
And replace them with who.............................................
11:46 PM on 07/27/2010
why isn't every Democratic politician and operative out waiting in line at every television station to slam the Republicans about this.

THIS is what the Tea Party claims to oppose. I can't think of anything off hand that is more directly at odds with the the overall political mood in this country than supporting the rights of the uber-powerful to pull the strings of our government from behind a drawn curtain.

There is no way that the Democrats will ever win over the TeaParty. It is, fundamentally, a conservative (and yes often racist) hate movement more than a political movement. It's driven by frustration about perceived liberal-oppression and out-right hate. It's 'us' versus 'them'. The Republicans have been able to, mostly, play nice by pulling the 'conservative' card and through the race-bating but the Tea Partiers are quick to go independent when they feel Republicans aren't devoted [crazy] enough.

If Democrats could demonstrate just how at odds the Republican party is to the generally agreed upon positions of the Tea Party.. the party won't go D but it won't go R either.
11:55 PM on 07/27/2010
I keep waiting for the Tea Party to say something about Big Banks and Wall Street?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Traynor
Oh....nooo! Empty Biooo!
12:52 AM on 07/28/2010
And bite the hand that feeds (and bankrolls) them? Nah!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
missouriwatcher
military veteran, veteran teacher, father, grandpa
10:34 PM on 07/27/2010
Of COURSE, the GOP will oppose this bill--it would sour their sugar too much. These so-called representatives of the people REALLY represent more big-money donors than anyone/anything else. Reprehensible, they are, and I wish the ones who keep voting them into office would see them for what they really are.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
missouriwatcher
military veteran, veteran teacher, father, grandpa
11:17 PM on 07/27/2010
kenhamlett: I don't know why they didn't post your comment; however, here is my reply. I voted for Barak Obama in 2008, and would do so again today. While I am not 100% happy with what he's done/not done, I also recognize that I would not be completely happy with anyone but myself--and maybe not even then. Do you think McCain/Palin would have done better? I seriously doubt it. In case you've not noticed (maybe this was the first election you've voted in, I don't know), what is promised in campaigns are the ideal. Much of that changes once a candidate is in office; sometimes it is truly disingenuousness, sometimes it is being faced with facts of reality not known beforehand. When complaining, please try to bear in mind what the alternatives would have been; also remember that this presidency is only half way through (and he does have to deal with Congress, neither you nor I would want a dictator).
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
missouriwatcher
military veteran, veteran teacher, father, grandpa
03:10 PM on 07/28/2010
traynor: I think that you perhaps misread my post; I do NOT support the GOP agenda which I consider anti-American and anti-Christian . . . and just plain poopy. Therefore, I cannot, and will not, vote for those that espouse it . . . ever.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
acacia72
12:10 PM on 07/28/2010
Yes, it's very frustrating, they are firm believers in the big lie...
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
missouriwatcher
military veteran, veteran teacher, father, grandpa
03:05 PM on 07/28/2010
I don't know as they believe it so much as that they benefit personally from it--at America's (and the World's) expense.