Harry Reid: New Energy And Oil Bill Draft Unveiled, Less Sweeping Than Failed Climate Legislation

FREDERIC J. FROMMER   07/27/10 08:29 PM ET   AP

Democrats Liberals

WASHINGTON — Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid unveiled a draft of energy and oil spill legislation Tuesday, having to settle for a far less sweeping bill than the cap on carbon emissions he had hoped for.

Reid, D-Nev., was forced last week to give up the cap on carbon, which is blamed for global warming, when it became clear he didn't have the votes to pass it.

The new bill would require oil companies to pay higher fees into the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund and would eliminate the $75 million cap on economic liability from an oil spill. It calls for spending $5 billion for the Home Star program, which would provide rebates to consumers to encourage energy efficiency upgrades. It also would fully fund the Land and Water Conservation Fund.

The American Petroleum Institute assailed the elimination of the cap on economic liability. The group's president and CEO, Jack Gerard, said that requiring "an unattainable level of insurance coverage" would force American companies out of U.S. waters. Even those companies that self-insure, he said, "would see costs skyrocket, driving investments out of the United States."

On vehicles, the measure has portions of an electric vehicle bill introduced by Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D., including $400 million to encourage the deployment of electric cars in certain cities and a competition run by the federal government to develop a battery that will power a car for 500 miles on a single charge. The bill also encourages federal agencies to buy electric drive vehicles for their fleets and offers incentives to retrofit heavy-duty vehicles for natural gas.

The bill does not include a renewable electricity standard, despite a last-minute push by some senators, businesses and clean energy advocates. Such a standard would require utilities to produce a certain percentage of their energy from renewable sources.

At a news conference earlier Tuesday, reporters asked Reid about supporters' contention that there were the necessary 60 votes for the renewable electricity standard.

"The numbers that we have indicate that those votes are not there," Reid responded. "I know there are some people saying that, but I'd like them to give me the names, and I'll be happy to check them off."

On oil, the bill would speed up claims processes for people harmed by spills and would overhaul government regulation of offshore drilling to prevent conflicts of interest.

Reid plans to introduce the bill on Wednesday and bring it to the floor later this week, with an eye on a vote next week.

Meanwhile, House leaders hope to bring their oil spill package to a vote this week. The Consolidated Land, Energy and Aquatic Resources Act, or Clear Act, includes new safety standards for offshore drilling; full liability for responsible parties to cover 100 percent of the cleanup costs and damages of oil spills; a Gulf of Mexico restoration program; ethics standards aimed stopping the revolving door between government regulators and the oil and gas industry; and a new trust fund for oceans.

The Congressional Budget Office estimated that the legislation would reduce the federal budget deficit by $5.3 billion from 2011-2015 and $1.7 billion from 2011-2020.

___

Associated Press writer Ken Thomas contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

WASHINGTON — Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid unveiled a draft of energy and oil spill legislation Tuesday, having to settle for a far less sweeping bill than the cap on carbon emissions he had...
WASHINGTON — Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid unveiled a draft of energy and oil spill legislation Tuesday, having to settle for a far less sweeping bill than the cap on carbon emissions he had...
Filed by Travis Donovan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 410
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
  1 of 3  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
lightningbolt 12:10 PM on 07/28/2010
"The American Petroleum Institute assailed the elimination of the cap on economic liability. The group's president and CEO, Jack Gerard, said that requiring "an unattainable level of insurance coverage" would force American companies out of U.S. waters."

This is exactly what we need. We need to force oil companies out of our waters. Even if this bill doesn't accomplish everything we need to  Read More...
06:47 PM on 09/21/2010
"Watered down"

Ha. Ha. No cap and trade fraud included means "watered down." More corporate agitprop playing "green." Goldman Sachs is crying...no, wait, Hope! Ram through cap and trade scam through regulations! Utopia is coming! Carbon derivative instruments will make our economy stronger!
06:54 PM on 09/21/2010
I apologise for my comments. Why is this old article pop up on HP front page? I liked the idea Senator Reid was pushing this, but this is old news. I feel misused. I had Hope!

Still believe even though envoronment bill was pulled to be a cover for cap and trade for a later day, regulatory bodies will be used to ram through cap and trade.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dangerous Dan
Because I can!
09:05 AM on 07/29/2010
Just pass the bill, we will fix it later!
Got to check off the "Achieved" block for Barrack's legacy.
How many of these legacy bills been watered down,
written or hijacked by the industries being regulated,
just to claim a VICTORY!
TIVObama has an agenda, too bad it does not include the desires of ANY constituancy.
10:13 AM on 07/29/2010
Hey, the Reid strategy is a lot better than his other choice. If he had followed RECONCILIATION strategy used by Republicans for 8 years, we would have Single Payer, robust energy, and the imperialistic wars ended by now. We also would have nationalized BP and sealed the oil spill on Day 2 with concrete slabs. But then, Reid knows what's best for his personal wealth program.
07:04 PM on 07/30/2010
Reid is the problem.

Reid created the 60 vote requirement.

Reid can remove it,

tomorrow.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joe Friday
11:40 PM on 07/28/2010
Liberals just move the pile of dung from one side to the other. Why would any sane person accept the cluttered thinking of these dung pilers?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mountainweb
Conservative Commonsense
09:37 PM on 07/28/2010
"having to settle for a far less sweeping bill than the cap on carbon emissions he had hoped for.", in other words, there is a title page and a end page with NOTHING in between! And they will struggle to get that passed....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tribilin219
AND NO ONE IN JAIL YET, Why?
09:26 PM on 07/28/2010
They can take this bill and the health care bill and the financial reform bill and stick up their ( you know what! ) When I see a real bill come out of this good for nothing congress? I'll belive their there to do the people's work, Not like now that their working for Special Interest! not us.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Overtone
See bio on the Aesop Institute website
09:03 PM on 07/28/2010
The new Bill is at least a start.

We are apparently dealing with an unrecognized emergency.

400 parts per million of carbon has recently been found to be the Arctic Tipping Point, which could conceivably endanger us all. We are approaching 390 ppm and adding 2 ppm each year. The safe limit is 350 ppm.

According to one scientist, a very thin oil film on the surface of the Atlantic and Arctic oceans that could spread from the Gulf, threatens to raise temperatures toward the catastrophic Tipping Point.

A monumental effort on a wartime scale now seems necessary. With enough public support Congress might pass truly effective legislation as a series of smaller Bills.

If the threat is real, renewable energy systems that can be deployed in time should rapidly be produced on a 24/7 basis. The White House, Congress and anyone concerned should check the facts without delay - and if confirmed, do whatever is necessary to make that possible.

See A 5 Point Emergency Program at http://www.aesopinstitute.org

Little known and hard to fathom breakthroughs involving radically new energy technologies can help to supersede petroleum much more rapidly than might be readily understood or easily believed.

See Moving Beyond Oil on the same Aesop Institute website.

If the threat is genuine, Congress and the White House must immediately initiate the string of emergency actions needed to avoid a catastrophic loss of life on earth.

Strong public demand can produce that result - let your voice be heard!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dangerous Dan
Because I can!
09:14 AM on 07/29/2010
"According to one scientist, a very thin oil film on the surface of the Atlantic and Arctic oceans that could spread from the Gulf, threatens to raise temperatures toward the catastrophic Tipping Point."

What were the recorded temperatures during WWII?
I am sure a thin film of oil was dispersed in the Arctic, Atlantic, and Pacific Oil, chemicals, munitions, all dumped over a 10 year period of time!
07:44 PM on 07/28/2010
"Reid, D-Nev., was forced last week to give up the cap on carbon, which is blamed for global warming, when it became clear he didn't have the votes to pass it..." what weak person would come before the nation and say so what if your city cannot breath ...if that person does come with any statement that can be associated with so what...broadcast LOUDLY WHO THIS FOOISH VOICE IS and then hopefully a nation is listening
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joe Friday
11:43 PM on 07/28/2010
It's a HOAX!! Did you miss the memo?
03:48 PM on 07/28/2010
Dorgan's push for electric vehicles makes no distinction as to where they are made. This is just another way to pump up Korea's and Japans economies
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dangerous Dan
Because I can!
09:16 AM on 07/29/2010
The GM Volt, an American volks-wagon, at $41k a pop.
A true people's car.
02:43 PM on 07/28/2010
I am grateful for a President that tries to honor the pledges he made to the American people during his campaign. I really don't understand all the people that cheer against meaningful reform while their very world around them is destroyed.

Would you people insulate your homes with asbestos to stay warm? You never $h1T where you $leep
03:48 PM on 07/28/2010
Clinton did
02:40 PM on 07/28/2010
I'm for "Cap 'n Tax"!

Cap the leak permanently and make BP pay their damn taxes, instead of trying to stick us with the bill.

But re: fossil fuels in general, I'm all for something like Sarah Palin's "cap 'n dividend" plan.
.
You know - like the oil dividend she, as Gov. of Alaska, ran until she up and quit public service to sell books and get better pay at Fox News. You know, the one her and her family made $42K a year off.

And don't forget that Sarah warned us about BP and foreign oil companies (but only after the spill). Sarah should know, as hubby Todd worked for BP for 18 years (only part of that time was he an avowed secessionist (but just mostly during George W. Bush's term of office)).
03:49 PM on 07/28/2010
how about Kerry buyng a boat made in the far east and refusing to pay taxes
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dangerous Dan
Because I can!
09:19 AM on 07/29/2010
Tax!

They are going to claim a $34B, lose against their 2010 tax burden.
02:39 PM on 07/28/2010
even Bush couldn't get his side of the aisle to stand on this issue. Unfortunately, President Obama has a tough road ahead when it comes to climate change and energy!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNC8I3Vw-JM
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:52 PM on 07/28/2010
Bush is not the only Republican willing to give energy reform lip-service. The trouble is that when it comes time to do something about it, they vote with Big Oil.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
UpFromLiberalism
Liberalism is totalitarianism with a human face.
02:00 PM on 07/28/2010
Carbon-Control Bill Faces Tough Fight In Senate

"After a closed-door meeting of Democratic senators, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., urged her colleagues to postpone action until the fall, when a better economic climate might help."

riiiight; "until the fall, when a better economic climate"

read: "we fear our scam on the American citizens may be exposed and we can't get re-elected"

a better economic climate?

dear leader 'snake-oil salesman in chief' said this is a job creator, you know like the stimulus was supposed to be.

"Obama said "This is a jobs bill" and would increase employment in clean energy industries.

There may well be new jobs created but they will be more than offset by the numbers of jobs lost. As manufacturing costs increase businesses will have no choice but to reduce employment as will businesses that depend on those manufactured products. Increased unemployment will also reduce consumer income thereby accelerating the downward spiral of our economy.
02:23 PM on 07/28/2010
Another tinfoil tricorn conspiracy theorist. I'm so sick of you clowns.

Consider the dramatic decline of America's steel industry, the huge reduction of our manufacturing workforce, and the designers, engineers and technicians that have been furloughed in the automotive and aeronautic segments. These people can be put back to work. A typical wind turbine has 8,000 parts and is made of 250 tons of steel. Somebody has to make that steel, fabricate those parts, assemble them, deliver the assembled turbine to a wind farm, erect the turbine and manage the wind farm. Those are American jobs! And they are jobs in sectors hardest hit by the global economy - the sectors that need jobs the most.
02:40 PM on 07/28/2010
save me a hit
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stopthemadness69
Real Americans care more about people than profits
05:32 PM on 07/28/2010
He must be smoking something white or yellow because green will not do that to a person.
01:54 PM on 07/28/2010
So jack Gerard admitted offshore oil production isn't profitable without taxpayers underwritting the liability risk?

based on the laws of the free market it should then not be a business or the cost of their product is far to low. But wait if they raise the cost then green energy is cheaper.

This is the equivalent of a retailer saying we can't sell products if we have liability for slips trips and falls in our stores.

The free market is the free market oil is apparently now to dangerous to extract as a capitalist venture without state support. Striking admission for a lobbyist.

The free market must rule, oil must therefore cease if Mr. gerard is being truthful in his analysis.
photo
SolarPowerGuy
Ph.D., Immunology; Solar power @ home; Green Party
09:20 PM on 07/28/2010
"So Jack Gerard admitted offshore oil production isn't profitable without taxpayers underwritting the liability risk?"

Profit is relative, right? So maybe drilling for oil offshore of a country which makes the driller pay for proper insurance is LESS profitable than drilling offshore of a country which cuts industry a deal. Maybe it won't be unprofitable to drill on the American continental shelf -- but it might be MORE profitable to drill off Nigeria.

On the other hand -- maybe it really isn't profitable to do deep-water drilling without government as the insurer of last resort. I'm fine with that reality.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rougebaisers
01:53 PM on 07/28/2010
You gutless wonders can wipe you soiled buttocks' with that useless paper.
01:43 PM on 07/28/2010
Doesn't matter how you water it down - it's a tax and spend bill that doesn't do a darn thing for the climate.

Want to fix the climate - tell the Democrats to quit whining - their hot air is killing us.