Pakistan Plane Crash: Airblue Jet Crashes Near Islamabad With 152 On Board

ASIF SHAHZAD and MUNIR AHMED   07/28/10 09:24 PM ET   AP

Pakistan Plane Crash
A Pakistani rescue helicopter flies over smoke and wreckage of a crashed passenger plane in The Margalla Hills on the outskirts of Islamabad on July 28, 2010. A Pakistani passenger plane with 150 people on board crashed in a ball of flames in densely wooded hills while trying to land in Islamabad during bad weather, aviation officials said. AFP PHOTO/AAMIR QURESHI

ISLAMABAD — A passenger jet that officials suspect veered off course in monsoon rains and thick clouds crashed into hills overlooking Pakistan's capital Wednesday, killing all 152 people on board and scattering body parts and twisted metal far and wide.

The Airblue jet's crash was the deadliest ever in Pakistan, and just the latest tragedy to jolt a country that has suffered numerous deaths in recent years due to al-Qaida and Taliban attacks. At least two U.S. citizens were on the plane, which carried mostly Pakistanis.

The plane left the southern city of Karachi at 7:45 a.m. for a two-hour flight to Islamabad and was trying to land when it lost contact with the control tower, said Pervez George, a civil aviation official. Airblue is a private airline based in Karachi, Pakistan's largest city.

The aircraft, an Airbus A321, crashed some 15 kilometers from the airport, scorching a wide stretch of the Margalla Hills, including a section behind Faisal Mosque, one of Islamabad's most prominent landmarks. Twisted metal wreckage hung from trees and lay scattered across the ground. Smoke rose from the scene as helicopters hovered.

The exact cause of the crash was not immediately clear, and rescue workers were seeking the "black box" flight data recorder amid the wreckage. But Defense Minister Chaudhry Ahmed Mukhtar said the government did not suspect terrorism.

Rescue workers and citizen volunteers were hampered by the rain, mud and rugged terrain. The crash was so severe it would have been nearly impossible for any of the 146 passengers and six crew members to survive, rescue officials said.

"There is nothing left, just piles and bundles of flesh. There are just some belongings, like two or three traveling bags, some checkbooks, and I saw a picture of a young boy. Otherwise everything is burned," rescue worker Murtaza Khan said.

As the government declared Thursday would be a day of mourning and condolences poured in from the U.S., Britain and other nations, hundreds of people showed up at Islamabad's largest hospital and the airport seeking information on loved ones.

They swarmed ambulances reaching the hospital, but their hopes fell as rescue workers unloaded bags filled with body parts. A large cluster of people also surrounded a passenger list posted near the Airblue counter at the airport.

"We don't know who survived, who died, who is injured," said Zulfikar Ghazi, who lost four relatives. "We are in shock."

Mirza Ahmed Baig rushed to the hills after hearing that the plane carrying his brother had crashed. He wept amid the chilly weather, criticizing the rescue effort as too little and too lax.

"I'm not satisfied at all on the steps the government is taking," Baig said.

As of Wednesday night, when rescue work was suspended till the morning, 115 bodies had been recovered, federal Information Minister Qamar Zaman Kaira said. DNA tests would be needed to identify most of them, he said.

U.S. Embassy spokesman Richard Snelsire confirmed that at least two American citizens were on board, but he declined to provide any further information on their identities or links to Pakistan.

In the U.S., Paulette Kirksey said that her godmother, Rosie Ahmed of Gadsden, Alabama, and her husband, Saleem Ahmed, were among those on the plane. Rose Ahmed was in Pakistan to make arrangements for him to move to the United States, Kirksey said. She said Rosie Ahmed was in her late 50s.

Witnesses said the plane appeared to be flying very low and that it seemed unsteady in the air.

"The plane had lost balance, and then we saw it going down," Saqlain Altaf, who was on a family outing in the hills when the crash occurred, told Pakistan's ARY news channel.

The Pakistan Airline Pilot Association said the plane may have strayed off course, possibly because of the poor weather. Several officials noted the plane seemed to be an unusual distance from the airport, which was some 9 1/2 miles (15 kilometers) away.

"It should not have gone so far," said Air Vice Marshal Riazul Haq, deputy chief of the Civil Aviation Authority. "We want to find out why it did."

Raheel Ahmed, a spokesman for the airline, said the cause of the crash would be investigated. The plane had no known technical issues, and the pilots did not send any emergency signals, Ahmed said. Airblue flies within Pakistan and to the United Arab Emirates, Oman and the United Kingdom.

Airbus said it would provide technical assistance to the crash investigators. The aircraft was initially delivered in 2000, and was leased to Airblue in January 2006. It accumulated about 34,000 flight hours during some 13,500 flights, it said.

The only previous recorded accident for Airblue, a carrier that began flying in 2004, was a tail-strike in May 2008 at Quetta airport by one of the airline's Airbus 321 jets. There were no casualties and damage was minimal, according to the U.S.-based Aviation Safety Network.

Other Pakistani airlines have come under international scrutiny due to safety concerns.

In 2007, the European Union temporarily banned flights in its airspace of most of the aircraft operated by Pakistan's national carrier, Pakistan International Airlines, because of concerns over the age of the aircraft and poor maintenance. The bloc lifted the ban later that year after the airline took action to comply with safety standards.

The last major plane crash in Pakistan was in July 2006 when a Fokker F-27 twin-engine aircraft operated by PIA slammed into a wheat field on the outskirts of the central Pakistani city of Multan, killing all 45 people on board.

In August 1989, another PIA Fokker, with 54 people onboard, went down in northern Pakistan on a domestic flight. The plane's wreckage was never found. In September 1992, a PIA Airbus A300 crashed into a mountain in Nepal, killing all 167 people on board.

The Airbus 320 family of medium-range jets, which includes the A321 model that crashed Wednesday, is one of the most popular in the world, with about 4,300 jets delivered since deliveries began in 1988.

Twenty-one of the aircraft have been lost in accidents since then, according to the Aviation Safety Network's database. The deadliest was a 2007 crash at landing in Sao Paolo by Brazil's TAM airline, in which all 187 people on board perished, along with 12 others on the ground.

___

AP Aviation Writer Slobodan Lekic in Brussels, as well as Associated Press writers Ashraf Khan in Karachi and Zarar Khan, Nahal Toosi and Sebastian Abbot in Islamabad, contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

ISLAMABAD — A passenger jet that officials suspect veered off course in monsoon rains and thick clouds crashed into hills overlooking Pakistan's capital Wednesday, killing all 152 people on boar...
ISLAMABAD — A passenger jet that officials suspect veered off course in monsoon rains and thick clouds crashed into hills overlooking Pakistan's capital Wednesday, killing all 152 people on boar...
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 277
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
07:31 AM on 07/29/2010
Another plane crash? Oh my.. this is so horrible. very tragic.. i feel so sad for the pakistanis..

-Lisa Allojum
http://www.facebook.com/LisaAllojum
09:55 PM on 07/28/2010
There is not a single Pakistani family that has not been hit in some way by suicide bombers and now this. Pakistanis are having a day of mourning today.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Brian Gorrell
Is this the 1950's or what?
08:29 PM on 07/28/2010
It's so sad.
I totally do not want to die in a plane crash.
Must be the worst thing ever.
Apart from loved ones getting the call....
07:46 PM on 07/28/2010
Here is video report on the crash......

http://www.newslook.com/videos/233401-scores-killed-in-pakistan-plane-crash
07:15 PM on 07/28/2010
What a horrible tragedy. I hope the families of the victims have happy memories of those lost to carry them through this devastating time.
06:50 PM on 07/28/2010
Terrible tragedy. And it doesn't matter what country or region or to what people it occurs. It's just horrible, no matter.
06:48 PM on 07/28/2010
Gosh I Hate Flying.
07:29 PM on 07/28/2010
I have been on several flights where there was serious turbulence. What comes to mind at such a time is how absolutely helpless you are to do anything to save your own life or any other life should the plane go down. There is nothing to hold on to, there is no soft landing. There is no button one can push, crank one can turn, or lever one can pull to alter the impending situation. It is all in the pilot’s hands. If happenstance (or whatever) determines the plane is to hit the ground, the water, or the side of a mountain…all one truly possesses in the moments before impact are the moments themselves. It was on a plane that I was reminded of just how precious the moment is and just how powerful and calming loving acceptance is in a moment of potential sheer horror and utter crisis. Once you accept that you are powerless to control outcome, you are left to appreciate the moment and to beat back fear with thoughts of family, friends, and life experiences of import and lasting value beyond flesh.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:42 PM on 07/28/2010
Not me! Not me!

I had two close calls with death today driving to 7-11 to get a Big Gulp and a lotto ticket.

My flying career included about 4 incidents that could have resulted in death. Total.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
johndpieper
I dance the skies on laughter-silvered wings
06:04 PM on 07/28/2010
repost: That terrain is incredibly difficult to fly through. Fly-by-wire concerns I address below.

captric is right about the only plane that will fly itself into the ground is the 737. Boeing also makes "fly-by-wire" aircraft. It's the Boeing 777. Further to your comments on the FBW systems... These systems are always active as they form the only links between the control input of the pilot flying and the control surface. It is the protection system that is activated on take off. If the FBW the system only came on when the aircraft was airborne then the pilot flying would not be able to rotate the aircraft at the required Vr speed and thus would not take off. The "weight switch" is located in the nose wheel strut and is there as a safety feature to backup the onboard computer system.

On most FBW airliners there are 4 computers, of which three are always on with one redundant. Of these systems, if one fails then the others can take over the failed computers system. So as you can see, an FBW REPLACES the hydraulic systems employed. One advantage of the FBW control system is that, if a control surface fails, like the ailerons, then the onboard computers can re-route the control input to other surfaces to produce the desired effect with out the pilot having to change the way he/she flies the aircraft. An expansion on the FBW principle is the FADEC system.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tholin
08:07 PM on 07/28/2010
I hope you'll pardon my semantic quibbling, John, when I point out that those 737s didn't "fly themselves" into the ground in any sense, as the flight crews in every case of severe upset will first disconnect the autoflight controls and grasp the control column to regain control.

In the case(s) of 737 rudder upsets, those aircraft, under pilot (lack of ) command, literally skidded, flipped and nosedived into terrain, despite the strained efforts of two humans trying to counteract the roll in the opposing diection.

In NTSB parlance, that's an 'uncontrolled descent'.

You might be interested to know that fly-by-wire control is not a "protection system" either; the only things FBW saves is pilot workload and weight. It in no way replaces "hydraulic systems employed"- only reducing the number of torque tubes, rods, screw transmissions and other linkages between the pilots hand and the control surface.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
johndpieper
I dance the skies on laughter-silvered wings
09:04 PM on 07/28/2010
Thank you for the clarification. You are in fact correct. Let's just say I have tons of first hand experience with FBW systems. I was just trying to give an explanation for people who might not have the experience or the information about FBW systems. You are either a very dedicated fan or you are also in the industry in one form or another. I was just trying to give a layman's explanation in an attempt to allay people's fears of FBW systems. Thanks again. Fanned
photo
MajorKong
If the pilot's good, see, I mean if he's reeeally
09:23 PM on 07/28/2010
I always wondered why Boeing went to a single rudder on the 737.

The 727 rudder had an upper and lower half, which were on different hydraulic systems.

Even if you got a hard-over rudder, it would have probably been only on one half or the other.
05:53 PM on 07/28/2010
And somehow India will be to blame of course
photo
living lightning
Knowledge comes, but wisdom lingers.
02:06 PM on 07/29/2010
No one seems to be saying that. hmm...
05:26 PM on 07/28/2010
Ah, the old NBC Bob Costas Olympic rule, ergo, it ain't a tragedy unless there are Americans involved.
04:50 PM on 07/28/2010
C'mon we know these photos are faked since it has become a known fact that airplane crashsites contain absolutely no traces of aircraft wreckage. See the Pentagon and the Pennsylvania crash sites if you don't believe me.
photo
MajorKong
If the pilot's good, see, I mean if he's reeeally
06:12 PM on 07/28/2010
I was flying patrols over Washington DC right after 9/11. Sure looked like wreckage to me.

But then I know you really, really want to believe there was a conspiracy.
04:17 PM on 07/28/2010
A great tragedy for an already reeling nation.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
captric
03:06 PM on 07/28/2010
Accidents in the last year:
July 2010; United Airlines; flight 967; over Kansas: Christian
June 2010; United Express; flight 8050; Ottawa, Canada: Christian
May 2010; Air India Express; flight 812; Mangalore, India: Hindu
May 2010; Pamir Airways; Antonov An24B; flight 112; near Salang Pass, Afghanistan: Islamic
May 2010; Blue Wing Airlines; Antonov An28; eastern Suriname: Christian
May 2010; Afriqiyah Airways; A330-200; Flight 771; near Tripoli, Libya: Islamic
April 2010; Southwest Airlines 737-700; flight 649; Burbank, CA: Christian
April 2010; Polish Air Force Tu154, near Smolensk, Russia: Christian
January 2010; Ethiopian Airlines 737-800; Flight 409; near Beirut, Lebanon: Christian and Islamic equally
December 2009; Northwest Airlines A330-300 (N820NW); Flight 253; near Detroit, MI: Christian
December 2009; American Airlines 737-800 (N977AN); Flight 331; Kingston, Jamaica: Christian
November 2009; Avient Aviation MD-11F; Flight 324; Shanghai, China: No Religion
November 2009; RwandAir CRJ-100ER; Flight 205; Kigali, Rwanda: Christian
October 2009;CASA-212, near Fonds-Verrettes, Haiti: Christian
August 2009; Eurocopter and Piper Saratoga, Hudson River, near New York City: Christian
July 2009; Aria Air Ilyushin 62M, Flight 1525; Mashhad, Iran: 15 July 2009; Islamic
Caspian Airlines Tu154M, Flight 7908; near Jannatabad, Iran: 30 June 2009; Islamic
Yemenia Airlines; Flight 626; near Moroni, Comoros Islands:Islamic
June 2009; Continental Airlines 777;from Brussels to Newark: Christian
June 2009; Air France A330-200; Atlantic Ocean: Christian
The Score: 12 Christian nation accidents -- 6 Islamic Nation Accidents – 1 Atheist Nation Accident --- 1 Hindu Nation Accident.
Why does God hate Christians
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
xstevejx
04:26 PM on 07/28/2010
Because they tend to be the hypocritical wealth-hoarders! ;-)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:28 PM on 07/28/2010
You do realize that the "Christian" West has more than twice the number of flights than the Islamic World, right? By the law of averages, the density of accidents would happen there. In fact, the rate of accidents is higher in the Islamic world, which in turn may just be nothing more than the fact that most of the countries in the Islamic world are still in the developing category.
03:06 PM on 07/28/2010
So sad.
06:15 PM on 07/28/2010
2x
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
up420oz
02:50 PM on 07/28/2010
anybody want to guess that a MANPADS (man portible air defence system) was used?

Lot of missing Stingers out there, and still even more SHORTS BROS. (Bombardier Canada) unacounted for.

MANPADS were originally developed in the late 1950s to provide military ground forces protection from enemy aircraft. They have received a great deal of attention as potential terrorist weapons that might be used against commercial airliners. These missiles, affordable and widely available through a variety of sources, have been used successfully over the past three decades both in military conflicts, as well as by terrorist organizations. They can be purchased on the black market anywhere from a few hundred dollars (USD) for older models to upwards of almost a quarter million dollars for newer, more capable models. Twenty-five countries, including the United States, produce man-portable air defense systems. Possession, export, and trafficking in such weapons is officially tightly controlled, due to the threat they pose to civil aviation, although such efforts have not always been successful.

The missiles are about 5 to 6 feet (180 cm) in length and weigh about 35 to 40 pounds (18 kg), depending on the model. Shoulder-fired SAMs generally have a target detection range of about 6 miles (10 km) and an engagement range of about 4 miles (6 km), so aircraft flying at 20,000 feet (6,100 m) (3.8 miles) or higher are relatively safe.
photo
MajorKong
If the pilot's good, see, I mean if he's reeeally
06:17 PM on 07/28/2010
Well, I suppose it's possible.

But when I hear "heavy rain" and "rugged terrain" in the accident report - MANPAD is not exactly the first thing that comes to mind.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:45 PM on 07/28/2010
Do we know what kind of approach was in use?