Gulf Cleanup Will Change Once Oil Stops For Good

First Posted: 07/29/10 08:44 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 06:10 PM ET

Gulf Oil Spill Cleanup
Oil from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill is seen near an unprotected island in the Gulf of Mexico near Timbalier Bay, off the coast of Louisiana, Wednesday, July 28, 2010. (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert)

NEW ORLEANS (Associated Press) - The government's point man for the Gulf spill plans to meet with coastal parish officials Thursday to talk about what's next now that the oil has stopped flowing.

Retired Coast Guard Adm. Thad Allen said crews are having trouble finding patches of the crude that had been washing up on beaches and coating delicate coastal wetlands since the Deepwater Horizon offshore drilling rig exploded April 20, killing 11 people.

Though no one knows for sure how much oil might be lurking below the surface, most of what was coming ashore has broken up or been sucked up by skimming boats or burned.

"The oil that we do see is weathered, it is sheen," Allen said.

Barring a calamity, the oil won't start flowing again before BP PLC can permanently kill the well, which could happen as soon as mid-August. Allen said the Coast Guard expects oil to keep showing up on beaches four to six weeks after that happens.

Then, he said, the Coast Guard may start redeploying some of the 11 million feet of boom, 811 oil skimmers and 40,000 people that have been part of the oil spill response. Many of the workers are fishermen who have lost their livelihoods because of the spill.

Crews have taken a crucial step toward readying the relief well they need to permanently stop the oil, removing a plug they had popped in to keep the well safe ahead of Tropical Storm Bonnie.

Allen also said Wednesday that a temporary cap put on the busted well two weeks ago is holding firm. Before that, it spewed 94 million to 184 million gallons of oil.

Crews are taking every precaution as they work toward a permanent fix.

"We have always asked for a backup plan for the backup plan," he said. "This relief well, while it is deep, it is something that has been done before. Obviously the depth is an issue here. But we are confident we are going to get this thing done."

Drilling the relief well has been a monthslong task, and BP had used several other techniques to stop the leak that had never been attempted before in mile-deep waters. Some were utter failures and none was totally successful until a carefully fitted cap was placed over the well and the leak stopped in mid-July.

The cap has stopped the flow but is only a temporary measure while crews finish the relief well that will plug up the gusher from below.

The work had to stop last week because of Bonnie, which passed through in weakened form without doing any major damage.

Now that the plug is out, the relief well must be flushed out with drilling mud before casing can be dropped in and cemented. All that should be done around Monday, Allen said, though he cautioned that was just an estimate.

Once everything is in place, crews will begin a procedure known as a static kill, pumping heavy mud straight down the well though the temporary cap and failed blowout preventer. If the well casing is intact, the mud will force the oil back down into the natural petroleum reservoir. Then workers will pump in cement to seal the casing.

The static kill is on track for completion some time next week. Then comes the "bottom kill," where the relief well will be used to pump in mud and cement; that process will take days or weeks, depending on the success of the static kill.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

NEW ORLEANS (Associated Press) - The government's point man for the Gulf spill plans to meet with coastal parish officials Thursday to talk about what's next now that the oil has stopped flowing. Ret...
NEW ORLEANS (Associated Press) - The government's point man for the Gulf spill plans to meet with coastal parish officials Thursday to talk about what's next now that the oil has stopped flowing. Ret...
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 64
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
12:42 AM on 07/30/2010
A picture is worth a thousand words.

BP is restricting photography of the spill. See: http://www.newsweek.com/2010/05/26/the-missing-oil-spill-photos.html
and: http://bpoilnews.com/oil-spill-pictures/oil-spill-pictures-bp-coverup-first-amendment/

Not willing to give into the notion of doing nothing, the Center for a Better South has launched a new project to shine a different light on what’s happening in the Gulf. The center, a pragmatic nonpartisan policy think tank, has started a collaborative photo blog — www.BetterGulf.org — to pair vivid images of what the spill means to people with their stories and perspectives.

Please encourage everyone to send photos of the spill to: http://www.bettergulf.org

Take a look at this website, Gulf Spill Clips, for daily news spotlights on what's happening in the Gulf States: http://www.gulfspillclips.com/

Send photos to: http://www.bettergulf.org Together we can show and document the truth.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dhhh
01:20 PM on 07/29/2010
Time Magazine....http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,2007202-1,00.html..The BP Spill...Has The Damage Been Exagerrated?
01:38 PM on 07/29/2010
a 100 days and a news organization has, at last, found the real story.

Yes folks, you have an Administration lead by a person who Joe Wilson called out over a year ago.

Apparently correctly.
02:13 PM on 07/29/2010
No offense but perhaps you should consider changing your blog name.
sheesch.
11:52 AM on 07/29/2010
Can one also surmise that the usage of Kevin Costner's oil/water centrifugal force separation devices have been used to great advantage and benefit in regard to the underwater plumes? The devices can suck up to 210,000 gallons per day and return I believe 97 to 99% clean water. These machines have been in use for some weeks.
01:41 PM on 07/29/2010
Ah but the EPA does not let you return that water. Unclean

Much like this Administration approach to immigration. If I cannot do it, you certainly cannot.
02:17 PM on 07/29/2010
The fact that the machines are and have been in use for some time returning 97 to 99% clean water to the Gulf seems to have slipped by you. ???
11:49 AM on 07/29/2010
The natural sunlight degradation of the oil has deplenished the surface oil. The underwater plumes seem to be degrading rapidly due to the microbial action. This is also resulting in oxygen depletion. Is it possible to oxygenate the waters through external means. Are there apparati available that could instill oxygen into the waters to combat the oxygen depletion. The dispersants are becoming more and more minimized with each passing day. The dispersants are dispersing the oil into minimal parts per million and perhaps billion. Is it possible that the situation may not be as bad as feared. I truly believe BP was criminally negligent and should be held accountab;le to the fullest extent of the law. However, taking into account glowing media accounts and bought off scientists, etc. Is it possible that the dispersant action has dispersed the oil to such a great extent, and the dispersants are being diluted to such a great extent, that the harmful effects will be extremely minimized?
01:46 PM on 07/29/2010
Doubtful, but no one is really sure yet. There are studies that indicate that while dispersants themselves are less toxic than the compounds in crude, when added to crude, it amplifies the toxicity of both. And while the dispersants have broken the crude down to make it easier for microbes to degrade the oil, the dispersants have also made the toxic compounds in crude more available to organisms throughout the water column, including phytoplankton, which makes up the base of the food web in the Gulf. These toxins will then be carried up the food chain and get in the tissues of basically every marine animal. The effects are pretty much unknown though, especially the long-term effects. There's simply not enough data yet to draw long-term conclusions on the impact on the Gulf ecosystem.
02:15 PM on 07/29/2010
FF! pm.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:29 AM on 07/30/2010
Good report by Samantha Joy of the Marine Science center at University of Georgia. No hysteria, no pulled punches. The limits of microbial action are clear if you watch the whole five part press briefing. Not without hope, but not with false hope. Also, sunlight only does so much. It does degrade oil, but also warms the water and brings up more of the plumes. It ain't over yet and probably won't be for years.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLuUXEsxsIc&feature=related
11:41 AM on 07/29/2010
Wait...94 million to 184 million gallons of oil? Does any one else see a problem here? Maybe I'm reading it wrong but how is there that big of a gap when estimating how much spewed out!?!?!? Really?? "Hmm, it could be this number or...it could be double that." So are we saying that we have no DAM IDEA!!??
11:54 AM on 07/29/2010
One can't simply cast aside the oil collection measures that have strongly remediated the total spillage.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:34 AM on 07/30/2010
one cannot cast aside the fact the size BP reports has gone up several times and some scientists feel it is still up to only a quarter of what's really been expelled. Try a quarter billion gallons. That's around the to end of the estimates but still doesn't reflect the worst case estimates. Also methane has been spilled or gushed at about 40% the volume of the actual oil and that's measured at a level (depth and cold temperatures) that probably only reflects a quarter to one/four hundredth of what it might represent when i evaporates at the surface. This may not be 2012 level disaster, but it's a good dry run.
01:48 PM on 07/29/2010
What we have here is one group interested in minimizing the oil and one interested in maximizing (even exaggerating) it. it is not surprising then that the quotes are far apart.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:35 AM on 07/30/2010
No it's not, but will you bet your life on the low end being right? And is the low end even enough to sustain it?
11:07 AM on 07/29/2010
Jeebuz!! Who writes these headlines? GWB? SP? Etc.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:36 AM on 07/30/2010
BP?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
The Cause Endures
10:36 AM on 07/29/2010
Don't worry everyone! The Free Market will fix it! Just follow the invisible hand!
10:52 AM on 07/29/2010
Not the free market, but all those little microbes that fine raw crude excellent dining. A population explosion of these critters that now has them worried about oxygen depletion. I wonder if the depletion is going to be bigger than the annual dead zones that take place every year in the Gulf courtesy of all the good folks along the Mississippi who dump all of those fertilizers. Oh well, it's always something.
10:05 AM on 07/29/2010
Is this not criminal:

After the rig explosion and sinking, the mile long collections riser pipe crashed to the seabed floor crimping above the BOP and leaking oil. All that was necessary was to remove a flange held by 6 hex bolts removing the broken riser and attaching a new flange and riser pipe to surface collection. This act could/would of stopped the so called "oil leak" and this environmental disaster .

Any replacement of broken riser and flange and subsequent riser to collection at surface would have indicated the real spill rate and total oil spilled – BP after 2 days or 92 days – for the sake of avoiding fines they caused this monumental disaster ..

I have been proposing stop leak solution and others relating to oil collection and sealing the well for months to BP and multiple print/broadcast media…

Here is difinitive proof that BP , gov and print/broadcasting media was informed(at least by me) of fix to replacing flange and broken pipe months ago..

www.infrastructuresolutionsmag.com/node/891#comment-22

Please broadcast that this disaster was avoidable - there is no media print / broadcast telling this incredible story - help
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
M Miles
10:03 AM on 07/29/2010
Retired Coast Guard Adm. Thad Allen said crews are having trouble finding patches of the crude that had been washing up on beaches and coating delicate coastal wetlands. From above article.

Thad needs to have his crews view the following link, then they won't have that problem anymore.

http://www.oilspill.labucketbrigade.org/reports
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:39 AM on 07/30/2010
I saw Allen on a news conference trying to read a map without his glasses. He couldn't. Maybe that's whats wrong with the coast guard in general.
09:55 AM on 07/29/2010
"Though no one knows for sure how much oil might be lurking below the surface, most of what was coming ashore has broken up or been sucked up by skimming boats or burned."

Now explain to me one more time how a liquid with a specific gravity 0.8 to 0.9 sinks into a liquid with a SG of 1.035? Oh yes it emulsifies into a liquid of SG 0.95 which still FLOATS!!!!!!!

And sorry, same problem with dispersant SG of mix < 1.0

So the unholy grail of the underwater plumes is scientifically ridiculous.

The rapidity of the breakup of the continuous oil bring into question the higher numbers quoted for the release of oil. That is why we need the invisible oil to pad the overestimates.

The Spill is a disaster. The Media handling od it rises to the same level.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:40 AM on 07/30/2010
Your math is just plain wrong., Corexit bonds with oil and makes i much heavier than water. That's why it sinks. BP isn't even denying that anymore.
06:59 AM on 07/30/2010
If its SG is less than 1 as is the SG of oil, please tell me what law of chemistry or physics do you invoke to magically increase its density?

The effect of a dispersant is to rapidly reduce the particle size of the spilled oil so that natural biological degradation processes can quickly begin. There are a greater number of those agents near the ocean bottom as these deep layers of the ocean may not be well oxygenated. That was the reasoning for the submerged usage of the agent.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:52 AM on 07/29/2010
Maybe people really are stupid. And will believe whatever some bozo in the media tells them.

It's clean! Million barrels of crude oil has been absorbed by Mother Nature!! Eat, drink, and be merry!
07:00 AM on 07/30/2010
Join the club ;-)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Overtone
See bio on the Aesop Institute website
09:44 AM on 07/29/2010
We may be facing an unrecognized emergency. Confronting it may be required for survival. The necessary actions could produce many jobs and stimulate the economy.

400 parts per million of carbon has recently been found to be the Arctic Tipping Point, which could conceivably endanger us all. We are approaching 390 ppm and adding 2 ppm each year. The safe limit is 350 ppm.

According to one scientist, a very thin oil film on the surface of the Atlantic and Arctic oceans that could spread from the Gulf, threatens to raise temperatures toward the catastrophic Tipping Point.

A monumental effort on a wartime scale now seems necessary. With enough public support Congress might pass truly effective legislation as a series of smaller Bills.

If the threat is real, renewable energy systems that can be deployed in time should rapidly be produced on a 24/7 basis. The White House, Congress and anyone concerned should check the facts without delay - and if confirmed, do whatever is necessary to make that possible.

See A 5 Point Emergency Program at http://www.aesopinstitute.org

Little known and hard to fathom breakthroughs involving radically new energy technologies can help to supersede fossil fuels much more rapidly than might be readily understood or easily believed.

See Moving Beyond Oil on the same Aesop Institute website.

If the threat proves genuine, the White House should quickly initiate a group of emergency actions needed to avoid a catastrophic loss of life. That could mean many changes.
09:58 AM on 07/29/2010
"We may be facing an unrecognized emergency."

Not may, we are. Reading the above post will be hazardous to your sanity.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:43 AM on 07/30/2010
So, THAT's how you stay sane? Don't read the news and don't believe it when you read it. Now there's a solution to this disaster!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
M Miles
10:18 AM on 07/29/2010
Is that the same White House that put BP in charge of the oil clean up after the Exec stated he would not meet with Tony Hayward as he did not trust him or BP?

Is that the same White House that the Exec stated he would not rest with respect to the oil spill and then went golfing, and on vacation(s).

This is an emergency as you state. It is hard to understand how big the gulf spill is. The spill
is approximately the size of 20,000 oil tankers or put another way nearly 20,000 times the size of the Exxon Valdez spill. The consequences of this spill are yet to be comprehended.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:44 AM on 07/30/2010
Yup, same white house, different color president, not that it has made much of a difference over the last one on this issue - or Afghanistan, or that matter.
09:32 AM on 07/29/2010
Gulf Cleanup Will Change Once Oil Stops For Good

Translation: They ain't ever cleaning up the gulf.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jim Shaffer
50 yo US citizen, 25 year resident in Bilbao Spain
09:28 AM on 07/29/2010
They did such a good job at hiding the spill with dispersant that now there's nothing on the surface to clean. It's not gone though, just suspended in the water column and following the currents. This is going to have many more long term consequences.
10:00 AM on 07/29/2010
Go to your kitchen and pour a teaspoon of olive oil into a glass of water. Please report back to all at HP what you see.
10:12 AM on 07/29/2010
Then go back and do the same experiment, but mix (stir) a solution of dishwasher soap, water, and a drop of antifreeze into the glass, and then report what you see.