Gulf Oil Spill: BP Says Time For 'Scaleback' Of Cleanup Efforts

HARRY R. WEBER and GREG BLUESTEIN | 07/30/10 11:50 PM | AP

What's Your Reaction?
Gulf Oil Spill Sediment
Gulf Oil Spill Relief Efforts DELAYED Over Sediment

BILOXI, Miss. — BP's new boss says it's time for a "scaleback" in cleaning up the Gulf of Mexico oil spill. Federal officials say there is no way the crude could reach the East Coast. And fishing areas are starting to reopen.

There were several signs Friday that the era of thousands of oil-skimming boats and hazmat-suited beach crews is giving way to long-term efforts to clean up, compensate people for their losses and understand the damage wrought. Local fishermen are doubtful, however, and say oil remains a bigger problem than BP and the federal government are letting on.

Other people contend the impact of the spill has been overblown, given that little oil remains on the Gulf surface, but Bob Dudley, who heads BP's oil spill recovery and will take over as CEO in October, rejected those claims.

"Anyone who thinks this wasn't a catastrophe must be far away from it," he said in Biloxi, where he announced that former Federal Emergency Management Agency chief James Lee Witt will be supporting BP's Gulf restoration work.

After an April 20 rig explosion that killed 11 workers, BP's blown-out well gushed an estimated 94 million to 184 million gallons of oil before a temporary cap stopped it July 15. Efforts to permanently plug the gusher had been expected to begin as early as Sunday, but the government's point man for the spill said Friday that those plans hit a snag.

Crews found debris in the bottom of the relief well that ultimately will be used to plug the leak for good, retired Coast Guard Adm. Thad Allen said. The debris must be fished out before crews can begin a procedure known as a static kill that hopefully will make the rest of the job easier.

"It's not a huge problem, but it has to be removed before we can put the pipe casing down," Allen said.

The sediment settled in the relief well last week when crews popped in a plug to keep it safe ahead of Tropical Storm Bonnie. Removing it will take 24 to 36 hours and likely push the kill back to Tuesday, Allen said.

Once the relief well is ready, crews can begin the static kill, in which mud, and possibly cement, are pumped in through the temporary cap. The better that procedure seals the blown-out well, the easier it will be to plug it forever by pumping in cement from below using the relief well. The blown-out well could be killed for good by late August, though a tropical storm could set the timetable back.

Story continues below
Advertisement

As the work of plugging the well appears to reach the homestretch, so does much of the cleanup work. Relatively little oil remains on the surface of the Gulf, leaving less for thousands of oil skimmers to do.

Dudley said it's "not too soon for a scaleback" in the cleanup, and in areas where there is no oil, "you probably don't need to see people in hazmat suits on the beach."

He added, however, that there is "no pullback" in BP's commitment to clean up the spill.

St. Bernard Parish President Craig Taffaro responded with an order forbidding removal of any cleanup equipment from staging areas in his parish. "The response is not over in St. Bernard Parish, and it would be premature to demobilize any assets at this time," a brief announcement said.

There had been fears that the massive spill could reach South Florida and the East Coast through a powerful loop current, but federal officials said Friday that earlier reports that some oil had reached the current were wrong.

A new analysis by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration showed most surface oil in the Gulf had degraded to a thin sheen. What remained on the surface and below was hundreds of miles from the loop current.

NOAA Administrator Jane Lubchenco said a strong eddy is preventing oil from reaching the current.

"So there's no mechanism for oil to get from where it is now at the surface to the Keys, Miami-Dade, to any place along the East Coast," Lubchenco said.

Mississippi, Alabama and the Florida Panhandle will likely be spared any additional major beach oiling, although tar balls could wash ashore, NOAA said. Louisiana's coast was the most likely place where oil could still make landfall.

Lubchenco cautioned that scientists will continue studying the potential effects of the subsurface crude.

"Diluted and out of sight does not mean benign," she said. "But in those concentrations there will be minimal impact to the big things that are out in the ocean, big fish, big marine mammals, birds."

She said scientists still don't know the oil's environmental effect underwater.

For help with the long-term recovery, BP has hired Witt and his public safety and crisis management consulting firm. Witt, who was FEMA director under President Bill Clinton, said he wants to set up teams along the Gulf to work with BP to address long-term restoration and people's needs.

"Our hope is that we can do it as fast as we can," Witt said. "I've seen the anguish and the pain that people have suffered after disaster events. I have seen communities come back better than before."

BP and Witt's firm refused to say how much Witt will be paid for his work.

Commercial fishermen, meanwhile, were allowed back on a section of Louisiana waters east of the Mississippi River on Friday after federal authorities said samples of finfish and shrimp taken from the areas were safe to eat.

About 70 percent of Louisiana waters are now open to some kind of commercial fishing, but state waters in Mississippi and Alabama remain closed and so do nearly a quarter of federal waters in the Gulf.

Reinforcing the state's declaration that Louisiana seafood is safe to eat was U.S. Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Margaret Hamburg. At a news conference in New Orleans, she said fish showed levels of contaminants that were "extremely low, significantly below the threshhold of concern."

Hamburg stressed that testing will continue because of the large volumes of oil spilled and the large amounts of dispersants used to break it up.

Seafood industry representatives hailed the reopening, but Rusty Graybill, a boat captain from Yscloskey, La., who fishes for crab, oysters and shrimp, said "it's a joke."

"I'm pretty sure I'll go out and I'll get oil-covered shrimp. They capped this well and now they're trying to say it's OK," he said.

Graybill, a wiry 28-year-old with a leathery tan, made a 2-inch circle with his thumb and finger. "I'm still finding tar balls this big out there, and the boom is still covered in oil," he said.

Louisiana fisherman Pete Gerica couldn't work up much enthusiasm, either. He noted that it doesn't include crabs or oysters and that shrimp season in most of the area has yet to open.

"If you can't crab in these areas, it's a flop," Gerica said.

Oil rig workers are struggling along with fishermen because a federal moratorium on new deepwater drilling in the Gulf of Mexico. Those workers will be getting $100 million in aid that BP said Friday it will distribute through a Louisiana charity.

There is no official estimate of how many people have been out of work since the Interior Department imposed the moratorium in June. Drilling has since been suspended on 33 exploratory wells.

The fund is focused on people who worked on the rigs drilling those wells, not people who provided support services, such as ferrying supplies to them, said Mukul Verma, a foundation spokesman. Those people might get money if there is any left over after grants are provided to rig workers, BP spokesman Tom Mueller said.

___

Bluestein reported from New Orleans. Associated Press Writers Jason Dearen in Yscloskey and Kevin McGill and Brian Skoloff in New Orleans contributed to this report.

Get HuffPost Green On Twitter, Facebook, and Google Buzz!
BILOXI, Miss. — BP's new boss says it's time for a "scaleback" in cleaning up the Gulf of Mexico oil spill. Federal officials say there is no way the crude could reach the East Coast. And fishin...
BILOXI, Miss. — BP's new boss says it's time for a "scaleback" in cleaning up the Gulf of Mexico oil spill. Federal officials say there is no way the crude could reach the East Coast. And fishin...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
2,072
Pending Comments
0
View FAQ
Login or connect with: 
More Login Options
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »   (50 total)
RightsGuy   04:13 PM on 8/03/2010
Here’s what’s really happening with the oil spill:

Rarely Seen Pictures Of The Devastating Consequences Of The BP Disaster: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article25926.htm

And here’s what kind of company BP is:
BP's admits role in Lockerbie bomber's release http://articles.sfgate.com/2010-07-16/news/21985586_1_bp-megrahi-transfer-pact

Please disseminate these links widely! Put them on your Facebook page and Twitter. Send the link to your friends and colleagues.

We must be vigilant and do everything we can to keep this disaster in the public eye for years to come!!!
Virgil Kane   08:49 AM on 8/02/2010
I hear that once BP gets the well permanently sealed off, they are going to cut and run from the gulf.
maxfax   12:04 AM on 8/02/2010
British Petroleum has been scaling back long before now, as soon as the relief wells are complete, BP is out of Louisiana and the other coastal states.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SilentSolidarity   10:32 PM on 8/01/2010
Here’s bright spot in the news of the day: energy from new solar installations has, for the first time, become cheaper than energy from new nuclear plants, according to a new Duke University study. Thanks to cost-saving technologies and economies of scale, price can no longer be an excuse to invest in nuclear power rather than solar.
http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/01/inhabitats-week-in-green-solar-surpasses-nuclear-sewage-fuele/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jsmith1105   05:48 PM on 8/01/2010
This is the only environmental problem anyone seems to care about anymore. This is bad, horrible even, but it's not the biggest environmental problem we have. Global warming isn't even the biggest problem right now. Habitat destruction is the biggest problem we have right now, and no one seems to care about that one at all. I support the clean up, and if BP tries to get out it I say we tar and feather them for what they have done. However, I wish people would open their eyes. It could take many years for the ocean to fix this on it's, but at least the ocean is naturally pretty good at this.

Honestly, this isn't even the biggest problem in the ocean right now. The great pacific garbage patch is, and don't get me started on the pH level of the ocean which is changing due to global warming. This story is big yes, but there are other environmental disasters we need to talk about too.

I'm not saying we all need to drop this and move on. Far from it in fact, but we need to realize that there are other problems out there. I'm not saying just focus on climate change or habitat destruction. What I'm saying is we need to look at our environment over all, and we need to reexamine our priorities. This dispersant is crap, but do you know how much plastic ends up in the food chain?
photo
HLL   06:52 PM on 8/01/2010
Excellent post. Fan #4

I wish I could stop the current civilization and get everyone to focus on the Earth, like that musical play, "Stop The World, I Want to Get Off." The problems you outline barely scratch the surface of what the Earth is having to deal with. Population being one of the major issues, lack of water.... climate change, global warming, and the melting polar ice caps, are huge problems that we in the USA are ignoring. Whatever Natural disasters may occur because the Earth needs to de-tox from us, we thoroughly deserve.

The Gulf of Mexico is going to need decades, if not a century at least, to recover from the gas and oil she's had to swallow. And the ecosystems, Keys, Everglades, rivers and wetlands are decimated. Who knows if they will EVER recover? The wildlife and marine life is also decimated, many species will become extinct because of BP.

I highly recommend this documentary, HOME: http://www.youtube.com/homeproject

It's about the Earth right now, where it's at, what is being done, and what more can be done. It's free, narrated by Glenn Close, visually stunning and inspiring. Bookmark it for whenever you have the time ☮
photo
pmagellan   02:55 PM on 8/01/2010
Profit its all these people think and care. They haven't even finished the plugging the hole!

But if you also note the fact that BP used Oil Dispersants Regularly Even After White House Order, then you can better understand why they did it. Now they can declare mission accomplished, which would be difficult with oil still visible above surface.

Goodbye oil, hello cancer!! BP is obviously quite aware that no one will never have enough information to prove the harmful effects on humans and the rest of the ecology.
flashblitzen   01:52 PM on 8/01/2010
If they cut and run now, oil wins. We should not mention a timeline for the pull out.
photo
pmagellan   02:58 PM on 8/01/2010
Indeed
maxfax   12:08 AM on 8/02/2010
That would be up to the White House to make that demand, thus far, the White House, through their pointman, basically follows the lead of British Petroleum, as though they're joined at the hip.
Prairiewinds   09:11 AM on 8/01/2010
In keeping with a clever motto brought forth a few years ago, one need only say that "the solution to pollution is dilution." Once the petroleum, dispersants and other chemicals dumped into the Gulf spread into the larger oceanic ecosystem they won't be so noticeable and everything will be 'okay.' That is unless you're part of the overall food chain or a consumer of the byproducts which will haunt us for many, many years to come. A microdose of oil every day is barely noticeable and therefore not really a problem, right?

As this myth is proffered and reinforced we will tend to forget that we've created a problem of horrendous magnitude, will become inurred to the transient obvious damages and with our short attention spans gradually accept BP and their allies' version of this incident. In a sort of 'out of sight, out of mind' theatric we will be fed a sufficient dosage of lies to offset any corporate liability or culpability, learn to enjoy a petroleum-tainted environment and allow this farce to continue.

Or we could finally wake up, demand change in our approach to energy extraction and consumption, deny the corporate rapists their victims and put an end to this disastrous culture of poisoning our world a little at a time once and for all. But then that won't happen as long as we believe the magician's lies, will it?
photo
pmagellan   02:57 PM on 8/01/2010
Well said. Ignorance and plays on perception are bliss for polluting industries.
JPETERB   02:24 AM on 8/01/2010
If BP is not listening to reason, and this "scaleback" of limited cleanup operations shows they are in contempt of any reason or regard for our coast and waters, we average Americans and other world citizens must boycott BP now and for a long time to come. Corporations respond only to a loss of profits and end market limits on the price they can set and future growth they cannot plan on. They practically own the US Congress and have firm control of the US Supreme Court, so we are the only actors we can trust to protect the land and lives we have to lose.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
M Miles   12:50 AM on 8/01/2010
Why doesn't and why didn't they employ the following company?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9G5kt1p-LEw&feature=player_embedded

And why are they scaling back, That is the question the following are asking?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pYuj3c9MsTY

Go to Google Earth type in, Brenton Sound, LA. see what the State Officials are talking about.
Scale back?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
M Miles   01:34 AM on 8/01/2010
patman77   08:20 PM on 7/31/2010
is chenyburtons promo team still working press for bp ? btcha. as the snide one loligags in dubai counting his hard earned bloody doubloons and rolls around in them with his lizard daughter
patman77   08:18 PM on 7/31/2010
cut and run. at least pres O got a 20 bil. stake and pay for the folks that are out of work during the exploration that it is safe to proceed. anyone voting against alternative energy is an enemy of mankind and animals of gods earth in my book.
photo
ABQ-Mike   04:50 PM on 7/31/2010
BP won.
Obama lost.

It seems a miracle that President Obama was able to convince BP to establish a $20 billion escrow fund to compensate those hurt by the ongoing oil plume in the Gulf of Mexico . After all, he had no constitutional power to force them to do so

Let us take a closer look at the effect on BP's finances:
1. BP will establish a $20 billion fund, but will pay only $7 billion into it during 2010.
2. BP is a British corporation, but has a very large operating entity in the U.S.
3. By generally accepted accounting principles, BP must book the entire $20 billion expense in the year accrued. Therefore, they will book a $20 billion expense in 2010, reducing their U.S. tax liability by $7 billion.
4. Obama also convinced this massive corporation to show their concern for the "small people" by withholding dividends to their shareholders for the last three quarters of 2010. This reduces their outward cash flow by about $7.5 billion. Assuming the Bush tax cuts will survive through 2010, the U.S. Treasury will lose another $450 million in taxes on that amount.

Let us review the results:
BP Cash Flow:
Escrow funding -$7.00 billion
Dividend saving +$7.5 billion
Tax savings +$7 billion
Net favorable cash flow : +$7.5 billion

US Treasury Tax Receipts:
BP Corporate income tax -$7.5 billion
BP Shareholders -$0.45 billion
Net unfavorable tax receipts -$7.95 billion
photo
pmagellan   03:08 PM on 8/01/2010
Your accounting ignores a full 13 Billion still to be paid by BP after 2010.

Also, it accounts only for government income, and not for the more vulnerable economic victims of the spill who would have been in more dire straits.
RightsGuy   02:02 PM on 7/31/2010
BP is restricting photography of the spill. See: http://www.newsweek.com/2010/05/26/the-missing-oil-spill-photos.html
and: http://bpoilnews.com/oil-spill-pictures/oil-spill-pictures-bp-coverup-first-amendment/

Not willing to give into the notion of doing nothing, the Center for a Better South has launched a new project to shine a different light on what’s happening in the Gulf. The center, a pragmatic nonpartisan policy think tank, has started a collaborative photo blog — www.BetterGulf.org — to pair vivid images of what the spill means to people with their stories and perspectives.

Please encourage everyone to send photos of the spill to: http://www.bettergulf.org

Take a look at this website, Gulf Spill Clips, for daily news spotlights on what's happening in the Gulf States: http://www.gulfspillclips.com/

Send photos to: http://www.bettergulf.org Together we can show and document the truth.

Thanks
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BannedNBoston   02:02 PM on 7/31/2010

Twitter Edition