iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Informant: Accused Wikileaks Soldier Bradley Manning Had Civilian Help

Wikileaks

DAVID DISHNEAU   07/31/10 06:11 PM ET   AP

HAGERSTOWN, Md. — An Army private charged with leaking classified material to the whistleblower website WikiLeaks had civilian help, a key figure in the case said Saturday.

The development, first reported in the New York Times, suggests an expansion of the government's investigation into leaks including more than 76,900 secret Afghanistan war records posted on WikiLeaks in the past week.

Army officials didn't immediately return calls and e-mails from The Associated Press asking if they are looking at possible civilian accomplices of Army Pfc. Bradley E. Manning, who's charged under military law with leaking classified material. FBI officials declined to comment and referred inquiries to the Pentagon.

Adrian Lamo, the Sacramento, Calif.-based computer hacker who turned in Bradley to military authorities in May, claimed in a telephone interview Saturday he had firsthand knowledge that someone helped Manning set up encryption software to send classified information to WikiLeaks.

Lamo, who's cooperating with investigators, wouldn't name the person but said the man was among a group of people in the Boston area who work with WikiLeaks. He said the man told him "he actually helped Private Manning set up the encryption software he used."

Lamo said the software enabled Manning to send classified data in small bits so that it would seem innocuous.

"It wouldn't look too much different from your average guy doing his banking on line," Lamo said.

He said Manning sent the data to get the attention of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange.

Assange didn't immediately respond to an e-mailed query from AP about Lamo's claim.

Also on Saturday, a New York Times reporter who has been the newspaper's liaison with Assange, dismissed Assange's claim that WikiLeaks had offered to let U.S. government officials go through leaked documents to ensure that no innocent people were identified. Assange told the Australian Broadcasting Corp. in an interview that aired Thursday that the New York Times had acted as an intermediary and that the White House hadn't responded to the offer.

Times reporter Eric Schmitt told the AP that on the night of July 23, at White House spokesman's Robert Gibbs' request, he relayed to Assange a White House request that WikiLeaks not publish information that could lead to people being physically harmed.

The next evening, Schmitt said, Assange replied in an e-mail that WikiLeaks was withholding 15,000 documents for review. Schmitt said Assange wrote that WikiLeaks would consider recommendations made by the International Security Assistance Force "on the identification of innocents for this material if it is willing to provide reviewers."

Schmitt said he forwarded the e-mail to White House officials and Times editors.

"I certainly didn't consider this a serious and realistic offer to the White House to vet any of the documents before they were to be posted, and I think it's ridiculous that Assange is portraying it that way now," Schmitt wrote to the AP.

On Friday, White House spokesman Tommy Vietor said it was "absolutely, unequivocally not true" that WikiLeaks had offered to let U.S. government officials go through the documents to make sure no innocent people were identified.

Manning is being held at the Quantico Marine Corps Base in northern Virginia, awaiting possible trial on 12 offenses.

He is accused of leaking a helicopter cockpit video from Iraq that WikiLeaks posted in April, and a classified cable from the U.S. embassy in Reykjavik, Iceland, dated Jan. 13, 2010, that also has appeared on WikiLeaks.

Manning is also charged with illegally obtaining more than 150,000 classified State Department cables and leaking more than 50 of them. It's not clear from the charges, though, whether the allegedly diverted documents were those published on the WikiLeaks site.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

HAGERSTOWN, Md. — An Army private charged with leaking classified material to the whistleblower website WikiLeaks had civilian help, a key figure in the case said Saturday. The development, fir...
HAGERSTOWN, Md. — An Army private charged with leaking classified material to the whistleblower website WikiLeaks had civilian help, a key figure in the case said Saturday. The development, fir...
Filed by T.J. Ortenzi  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 41
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
10:51 PM on 08/01/2010
Who better to look to for corporate media propaganda than the NYT. Where's there coverage on the war crimes investigation of the documents?
09:21 PM on 08/01/2010
Anybody on this site care about Pvt. Manning's background?

From the Powerline blog:

"Manning's mother is British. She married an American and lived in the U.S. for some years; Bradley was born here. His parents divorced and she brought him back to Wales in 2001. The Telegraph took the trouble of interviewing some of Manning's friends and family members in the U.K., and checking out his Facebook page. The results are interesting.

First, Private Manning is openly homosexual. Did you know that? I didn't; if the fact has been reported in the American press, I've missed it. Moreover, Manning was an activist who demonstrated against Congress's "don't ask, don't tell" policy. His Facebook includes a photo of him at a gay rights rally, holding a sign demanding equality on "the battlefield." Further, he has posted anti-military comments on his Facebook page. An uncle describes him as "an introverted kid who loved computers and was fired up politically." That tantalizing reference is left hanging. Whether he was fired up about something other than gay rights remains unknown, for the moment. "

Couldn't be because anybody passing a "progressive" litmus test gets a pass, could it?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
voxpop88
09:44 PM on 08/01/2010
Anyone on this site care to see what's on the blog "Powerline," that Philclock has recommended, and its background?

"OBAMACARE'S UNPOPULARITY IS BROAD AND DEEP," August 1, 2010.

From: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_Line:

"Power Line is an American political blog, providing news and commentary from a conservative point-of-view.

It is written by three lawyers who attended Dartmouth College together: John H. Hinderaker, Scott W. Johnson, and Paul Mirengoff. Joe Malchow, another Dartmouth College graduate, publishes the site.

The site gained wide recognition for its role in covering the Killian documents scandal that led to the departure of Dan Rather from the CBS Evening News."
07:05 PM on 08/01/2010
what a lame argument the leaks about situations all ready gone are going to put soldiers lives at risk... I will tell you what will put our young boys lives at risk BEING IN A WAR ZONE that will do it folks..

If are main stream media were doing there job there would be no need for a internet take over by these guys from wiki leaks and co, but they created the Internet and its a big bad world and there telling.....

THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE what you going to do with it..............

quite surprising there are less that 30 comments on this post.........
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
voxpop88
08:26 PM on 08/01/2010
"I will tell you what will put our young boys lives at risk BEING IN A WAR ZONE."

Keep "telling it," natasha007, no matter how many posters there are :)

Good going; FANNED.
09:55 AM on 08/01/2010
OK why is the fed so focused on WHO blew the whistle instead of the documents themselves. They are running all over the world trying to find out who helped this kid when its obvious there are much bigger issues. Who believes these fools anymore? Thousands of documents showing their inempt corrupt handling of a decade of war and they decay of the entire US mission in Afganistan and we have 15 government agencies trying to track down who he complained to on facebook. Fire them all!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
scholasticus
I don't have to believe your "-ism".
09:38 AM on 08/01/2010
Has he been tortured yet? Sorry, subject to "enhanced interrogation techniques"? What is the betting line on how soon he will confess and recant?
09:33 AM on 08/01/2010
mute = moot, but mute kinda work too
09:30 AM on 08/01/2010
Spin wars begin. Forget the fact that some children got shot up in a van and some innocent journalists died...all that's mute...because these sins were labelled classified by the perp. I see this word "might" every time WikiLeaks is accused of endangering lives. Who's endangering lives? Who's taking innocent life? Not Wiki Leaks. Mainstream media hates Assange & crew. They're competition. Competition that embarrassingly exposes mainstream media as weak sycophants and cowering to established authority. I'd be embarassed too.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JWoodz
My micro bio is way too long.
08:16 AM on 08/01/2010
He stole classified information. He gave it to people with no security clearance. He must be punished. Is that hard to understand?

It would be different if he refused to serve because of his conscience. But he used his service in a way that was illegal and lethal to those who are serving the country. That is not being a whistle blower. He is a bitter, disturbed private with an axe to grind.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
scholasticus
I don't have to believe your "-ism".
09:32 AM on 08/01/2010
Yes, the truth must be kept away from the people. Taxpayers have no right to know what their government is up to. No need for reporters either. They just find things out.
09:58 AM on 08/01/2010
it needs to be determined that what he leaked didn't cause harm to our soldiers or put them at risk of losing their lives.
That is the line to be determined - if he did then he is in trouble.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
voxpop88
09:04 PM on 08/01/2010
JWoodz, you display a common attitude that has contributed to tragic circumstances throughout (and before) history:

1. "Blind Obedience."

Countries, organizations, and individuals the world over make and enforce unethical laws to control their populaces- and often because a minority elite is enriching themselves at the cost of others' lives.

This is precisely what has happened in Iraq and Afghanistan:

These military actions are enriching commercial industries and services that
make bilions off killing human beings, in wars that make our world less safe and create MORE terrorists, not fewer.

2. “Laws are protean; ethics are not.”

Authorities that mandate and proscribe behavior that entail killing are subject to legitimate questioning, even and especilly disobedience, if those rationales are not legitiamately justifiable- such as the Bradley Manning case.

This is a clear “case of conscience.”

3. EXAMPLES (U.S.):

*1. Slavery was “legal.”
*2. 'Jim Crow Laws' & Segregation were “legal.”
*3. 'Child Labor' was “legal.”
*4' 'Disenfranchisement of Women' was “legal.”
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JWoodz
My micro bio is way too long.
11:33 PM on 08/03/2010
There is a line to be drawn. He leaked information. It is likely that people were killed because of it.

There is a way to expose truth. True whistleblowers do it. This guy's methods and motive, who knows?

Your argument is non sequitur. Unjust laws should not be changed. Based on your logic, then 'by any means necessary' is an acceptable means to justice. History has proven that approach to be unproductive and fatal.

If he really wanted to expose truth, he could have done it a dozen different ways. Get a lawyer, get counsel. Find journalists who can help investigate. Go public. Violating terms of his military service and placing others lives at risk for his 15 minutes doesn't count IMHO.
07:00 AM on 08/01/2010
Truth must be hidden so the people can be manipuated
03:16 AM on 08/01/2010
Government by consent of the governed doesn't mean much if the governed can't know what they consent to. Prosecution of the people who tell you what's happening is anti-democracy.
02:06 AM on 08/01/2010
The headline is based on hearsay from Lamo, the guy who ratted on Manning. Why should we believe him and why are his assumptions posted as a headline?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
code blue
I support the right to Keep and Bear Children
12:31 AM on 08/01/2010
Where are the protests over this war? Where are the marchers and the civil disobedience?

I'm sorry, but espionage and treason (that could certainly lead to the deaths of allies and informants) are not acceptable substitutes because of our lethargy as a population.

This guy is looking at 35 years in military prison, and I'm not sorry.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
scholasticus
I don't have to believe your "-ism".
09:34 AM on 08/01/2010
Unlawful wars are a crime. The people of a free country need to know what their elected government is up to. Enough with secret government.
10:00 AM on 08/01/2010
sorry buddy but if your elected officials approved this war it isn't unlawful
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
voxpop88
08:34 PM on 08/01/2010
Every Friday afternoon, in many (most?) major cities in the U.S.,
protesters display signs and placards at the corners of major intersections for the commuters.

Let's have more people participate, and educate ourselves even more,
so that we may engage people we know and meet in our everyday lives,
concomitant to our online activism.

btw, fanned.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:05 AM on 08/01/2010
There is some discussion that Wikileaks is a honey pot.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jesse P. Steinberg
est un habitant.
12:02 AM on 08/01/2010
The new war on terrorism. The war on soldiers who take on their employers and government for hiding stuff.

God Bless America.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
code blue
I support the right to Keep and Bear Children
11:24 PM on 07/31/2010
So, was it worth it for 35 years in a military prison?