Mexico's TV Channel Cancels Show After Drug Gand Kidnaps 4 Reporters

OLGA R. RODRIGUEZ   07/30/10 11:42 PM ET   AP

Televisa
Jose Baston, president of television and content of Grupo Televisa, speaks during a news conference at Televisa studios in Mexico City, Thursday, July 30, 2009. Televisa announced it wil cancel its programming.

MEXICO CITY — Mexico's biggest television network canceled a popular news show to protest the kidnapping of four reporters, abductions that media advocates called an escalation of a campaign by drug gangs to control information.

One of the journalists – a reporter for Televisa – was released Thursday, hours before journalist Denise Maerker, the anchor of Televisa's news magazine show "Starting Point," announced the network's decision shortly before midnight, when the show was scheduled to go on the air.

"We're not willing to go on the air tonight pretending nothing is happening," Maerker said. "There is something happening. All the reporters of this show and all reporters run huge risks in order to do their jobs and society runs the risk of sinking into silence and disinformation."

Four journalists – two of them from Televisa, one from Milenio Multimedia television and one from a local newspaper – were kidnapped Monday after they left a prison in the northern city of Gomez Palacio where they had covered a protest against the arrest of the penitentiary's director.

Local media reported Hector Gordoa, a reporter in Maerker's news show, had been released Thursday but Miguel Zapata, a spokesman for Televisa, said Friday he couldn't provide any information on the case.

On Friday, the Televisa news network reported that a grenade exploded outside its offices in the border city of Nuevo Laredo. Some widnows were damaged, but no injuries were reported.

In an opinion article published Friday, Milenio newspaper Deputy Managing Editor, Ciro Gomez Leyva said one of the journalists had been released but doesn't identify him.

In his column, Gomez Leyva also demanded the government take responsibility for the safe release of the other three reporters.

Gomez Leyva wrote that he and Carlos Marin, the newspaper's Managing Editor, "agreed that it is the Mexican state that has to assume 100 percent of the management of this crisis, which is not a television crisis but a national one."

Interior Secretary Francisco Blake condemned the kidnappings in a news conference Friday saying the government "reiterates its commitment to act with all of its legal attributions to guarantee the safety and (physical) integrity of the those kidnapped and to take those responsible to justice."

For years, local journalists in several Mexican states have been under siege from drug traffickers and many have resorted to self-censorship to avoid being targeted. Some drug gangs have even recruited reporters to pass the message to their colleagues on what can be covered and what needs to be ignored.

But the kidnappings of the reporters by a drug gang that demanded videos implicating alleged corrupt local officials with a rival gang be aired on national television is a new escalation in their attempts to intimidate reporters and control information, said Carlos Lauria of the New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists.

"This is unprecedented," Lauria said. "But the truth is that for a long time there has been a battle by organized crime groups to control the flow of information."

The Inter American Press Association President Alejandro Aguirre said his press group earlier this year visited northern Durango state, where the reporters were kidnapped, and heard from local journalists about their fear that violence against them would increase if the government didn't act.

"For a long time local reporters have been under this pressure but the long arm of organized crime hadn't reached the national media," Aguirre said. "The fact that they did go after these people from very large and well known media and the fact that the media responded, like Televisa deciding not to air the news show, definitely raises the gravity of the situation."

Press groups say Mexico is one of the most dangerous countries in the world for journalists. More than 60 reporters have been killed in Mexico since 2000, according to the National Human Rights Commission. Many more Mexican reporters have received threats from drug gangs.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

MEXICO CITY — Mexico's biggest television network canceled a popular news show to protest the kidnapping of four reporters, abductions that media advocates called an escalation of a campaign by ...
MEXICO CITY — Mexico's biggest television network canceled a popular news show to protest the kidnapping of four reporters, abductions that media advocates called an escalation of a campaign by ...
Filed by Hunter Stuart  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 253
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
flagringo
05:07 AM on 08/03/2010
gee, and we want MORE of these criminals to come over our border???? Keep this riff raff SOUTH of our border...Obama, DO YOUR JOB,

SECURE OUR BORDER !
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
memito
08:16 PM on 08/02/2010
Gand? come on! this is not Yahoo Answers!, we have high standards here.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
danusgram
supporter of Mitt robbed me for President
06:49 PM on 08/02/2010
This is so sad what is wrong with these people ....the President of their country is a failure they will next be trying to kidnap reporters from here....legalize drugs ...end their reign of terror does not anyone remember gangster land Chicago during prohibition....prohibition ended and so did the their reign.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
millicent101
01:14 PM on 08/03/2010
I tend to agree that very little harm would come from legalizing marijuana. It is such a problem because people want it. we have seen very little trouble arising from the nearly 40% of the population that smokes outside of the legality of buying it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:14 PM on 08/04/2010
Where does that stat come from?
06:13 PM on 08/03/2010
WHy is the president a failure? He is doing all he can to stop the violence
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TaxpayingVoter
Wait....whut?
03:19 PM on 08/02/2010
Gee, the grenade damaged the 'widnows' so badly they're misspelled now.....lol
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Estevan Benson
03:01 PM on 08/02/2010
What the he1l is wrong with Mexico? I'm devastated that this looks like a losing battle for them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Friction57
full grown and still a microbio
02:28 PM on 08/02/2010
and we think our partisan issues are bad.

Mexico has a real mess, with so much of their police and military so corrupt they need Elliot Ness and a lot of bullets before the see the light of day
12:15 PM on 08/02/2010
TYPO TYPO..

Is it GAND or is it GANG?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
millicent101
02:30 PM on 08/04/2010
It rhymes with band and that means rock and roll.
12:11 PM on 08/02/2010
I wonder if these cartels are getting tactical or operational guidance from a blackwater/xe style consulting firm. The mythology of the Zetas says that they started as 31(?) members of a Mexican Special Forces group who were recruited as private security guards (and hit men) for another cartel.

They soon split off and formed their own cartel, but also sought to corner murder for hire and weapons smuggling. Quite a few of the founding members have been killed or captured, but the Zetas and splinter or copycat groups live on.

Do they really have the capacity to cause this much havok? I wonder if they're taking some of that drug money and hiring consultants in image control, logistics, business development, management, finance etc.
Obviously they already have these, some of whom are working from the U.S. side of the border, but I'm shocked and awed by the level of competence displayed.
photo
Toddynho
Slartibartfast made me do it.
10:41 AM on 08/02/2010
The Latin American drug trade is a complicate morass to sort through. For those chiming in with their "legalize it and all problems will go away" comments, I'd take off your rose colored glasses and see the ugly truth if I were you. These are career criminals with nothing to lose, they're not married to selling drugs, they are married to earning easy MONEY. When major drug shipments are confiscated, these criminals don't sit back and let their profits disappear, they do other things to recuperate the lost revenue. Those other things are usually MUCH worse for the public - kidnappings sky rocket, personal assaults, home invasions, forced prostitution etc.etc I'm not against legalizing "certain" drugs, but this shouldn't be the reason because it would inevitably backfire. You legalize pot, and watch how fast they crank up production on crack and hit the schools for new clients looking to offset their losses.

It's really complicate, it's not an easy fix, or it would have been fixed already. But you can do something, as Columbia has shown. If anyone is really interested in this subject read "Killing Pablo" The Pablo Escobar story. Apart from it being a brilliant read, you see just how sophisticated and brazen these criminals are (they've brought down passenger planes before to make a point). You also see just how complicated the problem is and one way of tackling it that seem to work, more or less, with Columbia and the great drug trafficker of all times.
photo
MyFatCat
Slacktivist no longer
02:48 PM on 08/03/2010
Agree about the complicated mess, and the motivation for easy money. I'd disagree with your premise that there's something more acceptable about selling drugs than other forms of criminal activity. I don't believe that a "we leave you alone, you leave us alone" perspective on drug use works: even easy money seeks to expand its market. The idea that crime would expand to affect people not currently affected by the drug trade assumes that many law-abiding citizens are not already affected by drug users in the form of traffic fatalities, robbery, burglary, and domestic violence.

I do appreciate the reference to Killing Pablo. It's always a pleasure to find a source to look more deeply into an issue.
photo
Toddynho
Slartibartfast made me do it.
03:40 PM on 08/03/2010
I see your point, but that wasn't what I was getting at - I'm not saying that it's a victim-less crime, what I'm sayingis that the victim count tends to go up dramatically and quickly when you suddenly remove their source of income, and this has been studied quite a lot in hot zones like Brazil.

Maybe I could have made my point a tad clearer, but I won't disagree with your concern.

I just raised the Merton's principle for some, because too many see the quick fix as simply legalizing the drug and somehow all the nasty people will simply go away, when in fact the unintended consequence of legally drugs to combat the drug wars could in fact be much worse. SO, whatever campaign / strategy is adopted, it must be multifaceted.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lmab
09:16 AM on 08/02/2010
I thought kidnapping was a game show.....The Price is Right.....Let's Make a Deal....Jeopardy.....Wheel of Fortune.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gayandmarried
08:29 AM on 08/02/2010
i like this idea the more i think about it,, annex mexico as the 51st state,, rename new mexico to OLD mexico, then we can FINALLY have all the oil we would EVER need and stop importing from the middle east forever!!
and let bush and cheney be the governors of the state of mexico so they can have their own personal war to fight for life!! gives em both something to do with all their idle time
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gayandmarried
08:27 AM on 08/02/2010
pull ALL of our troops back from the middle east, send them to mexico, and wipe these drug cartels off the maps once and for all!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gayandmarried
08:26 AM on 08/02/2010
we should annex mexico as the 51st state,, THEN the neocons would REALLY have a war worth fighting on the table!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:41 AM on 08/02/2010
A safer proposal is stop consuming drugs, or legalize it... more cheaper
12:12 PM on 08/02/2010
I don't think Mexico would want that, we would destroy a large segment of their shadow economy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kelley kissinger
08:24 AM on 08/02/2010
test
10:10 AM on 08/02/2010
pass
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
memito
08:17 PM on 08/02/2010
B+
photo
knightoftheroundtable
Old Knight without porfolio or armor
01:45 AM on 08/01/2010
Just one big cesspool smelling worse all the time. I truly feel for the poor decent folk of Mexico. Unfortunately these same drug cartels are operating in the USA and will as long as drugs remain illegal.
Which is the worse crime, drug cartels or legalizing drugs?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:45 PM on 08/01/2010
It's people like you who could even suggest that legalizing drugs would be a "crime" who are keeping in this terrible position.
12:13 PM on 08/02/2010
Do you understand what he's saying?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
millicent101
01:01 PM on 08/03/2010
There is a difference between legalizing 'drugs' and legalizing marijuana. Peeps will say that all recreational use of 'drugs' including mj is harmless and should be considered the right of the individual. However the harder drugs have the potential of changing the brain chemistry forever and it will take unprecendented strides for the FDA to consider legalizing anything that has the potential of changing human character. I am for the legalization of mj bc while not for everyone the benefits far outway the risks for the general population. And it would end this insane criminal behavior, ya know just like the gansters of the first prohibition.
10:13 AM on 08/02/2010
You'd think that we would've learned our lesson from prohibition. Legalize it, produce it, tax it, regulate it. I'm talking marijuana only, if it was legal and available, I don't believe that the market for the other "hard" drugs would be sustainable. You could bankrupt the cartels in less than a year of you legalize it.
12:14 PM on 08/02/2010
We had a massive drug problem in this country when everything was legal. A lot of it was due to ignorance (many people simply didn't know about addiction to narcotics) but I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of the problems are repeated.