iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Why TEDWomen? A Q&A With Host Pat Mitchell

Huffington Post   First Posted: 08/02/10 10:45 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 06:15 PM ET

Tedwomen

As we reported in July, TED (Technology, Entertainment Design), in partnership with The Paley Center for Media, is launching a brand new TED event: TEDWomen, a two-day conference taking place in December that will focus on innovation and ideas by women and girls worldwide.

TEDWomen has been met a range of reactions, from "it's about time" excitement to concern. One blogger worries the event will "encourage further segregation." Salon asked, "Does the world need TEDWomen?" and suggested TED might instead increase the number of female speakers at its existing events.

Pat Mitchell, President and CEO of The Paley Center and the host of TEDWomen, took some time to respond to our questions about the event. Read on for her take on why it's happening, why now, why not TEDMen, and what she hopes the conference will accomplish. What do you think of TEDWomen? Who would you like to see speak there? Share your thoughts in the comments below.

Huffington Post: Why has TED, in conjunction with the Paley Center, decided to launch TEDWomen?

Pat Mitchell: Chris Anderson, TED's curator, and I have been talking for several years about a TED conference that would focus on women and girls and we agreed that the time was right to capture an evolving narrative about women and girls in the unique way that the TED format offers. I really admired how they produced two specialized events -- TEDIndia in 2009 and TEDGlobal in Africa (2007) -- and believed that a similar opportunity had emerged to turn the TED lens on the stories of women and girls as architects of change around the world and across all sectors, to focus on how their ideas and innovations were shaping and reshaping the future. At The Paley Center for Media, through our programs on the role of media, we witnessed the growing interest in the ways that women work, think, learn and lead and the impact of their ideas across the globe and across the media landscape as well as all other sectors of life and work. We agreed that the two institutions together had an opportunity to produce a conference with significance.

HP: Why now?

PM: In my opinion, there's never been a better time. Investing in women and girls may once have been considered a radical notion or even a waste of resources, but in most places in the world today, women and girls are increasingly recognized as a critical link to greater prosperity, political stability, better health and public policy. In the West, of course, generations of educated, empowered women are moving into leadership across all sectors and the impact is measurable. It's an important moment in the evolution of the story of how women and girls in new, and sometimes, old ways are the architects of change across sectors and countries.

HP: Why not TEDMen?

PM: It's an irresistible question, isn't it? But embedded in that question is a dangerous assumption: People tend to assume that the balance between the sexes is a zero-sum game, that when women win, men lose. But it's simply not true. In fact, it's quite the opposite: When women win, we all win. This is one of the key reasons that women are such effective change agents.

HP: One online commenter wondered whether TEDWomen was in danger of blurring the lines between "idea sharing" (TED defines its mission as "ideas worth spreading") and cause advocacy. What do you think?

PM: It sounds like this online commentator reacted to the name without reading about the event! TEDWomen isn't championing a cause; it's surfacing and sharing some of the most important ideas of our time. Our focus is on women as change agents, innovators and idea champions, and I think people will be both inspired and surprised by the program. We're exploring some fascinating territory! For example, there's been a flood of data in recent years showing how investment in women and girls in developing nations leads to economic growth, public health improvement, political stability... Why is that? How does it work? What ideas are these women championing? These are profound questions that matter to all of us.

HP: What is the mission of the conference?

Pat Mitchell: Now, I attend many women's conferences -- in fact, I went to six on four different continents in one month last year. The increasing numbers of these forums all over the world indicates to me a new awareness of the roles women and girls are playing in bringing new ideas and innovations to their communities and countries. These forums are also ways to discuss the challenges that remain for women to achieve their fullest potential.

TEDWomen will focus on the ideas and innovations championed by women and girls. These cover everything from community development to economic growth to biodynamic farming to robotics to medical treatments to the use of technology for personal safety and peace making. Men and women speakers will take the TEDWomen stage with ideas that are reshaping our future, and matter deeply to all of us.

HP: Some have wondered why TED is launching a distinct TEDWomen event, instead of focusing on increasing the number of women speakers at its existing conferences. What's your take on why TEDWomen is necessary? Are there plans to increase the number of female speakers at other TED conferences? If so, how?

PM: Thank you for asking that question! There are a few assumptions there, which we'd like to address head-on. First, the intent behind the conference is to explore in depth a subject we find fascinating and timely. We're seeking out talks about women and girls (not just by them). As with every TED, the speaker program will include men and women. And of course, TED will continue to invite extraordinary women to speak at all of their events.

It's important to understand that TED didn't launch TEDWomen to segregate women attendees or speakers outside the main conference, nor as an alternative to putting forward a balanced speaker program at other events. As my TED colleague June Cohen has pointed out, this was already a priority for TED. The launch of TEDWomen marks an enthusiastic "yes/and," not an "either/or."

Let's also look at the numbers. Over the past two years, TED Conferences have featured 30-40% women speakers. This isn't ideal, but it's actually much more balanced than many other, similar conferences, and obviously a priority for them. TED2009 had 38% women speakers. TEDGlobal, held this month in Oxford, had 30% women speakers, and they were an extraordinary bunch -- "Half the Sky" co-author Sheryl WuDunn, Women for Women International founder Zainab Salbi, Kiva co-founder Jessica Jackley... also powerhouses like novelist Elif Shafak and musician Annie Lennox.

There were similar lineups at TED2010 and TEDIndia, and many more remarkable women booked for TED2011. I know that TED is striving for a balanced program in all their conferences, and will continue to do so.

HP: Will TEDWomen be an annual, ongoing conference, or 2010 only?
PM: At the moment, we're focused on creating the most extraordinary 2-day event we can imagine. Ask me again in December about the encore...


FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

As we reported in July, TED (Technology, Entertainment Design), in partnership with The Paley Center for Media, is launching a brand new TED event: ...
As we reported in July, TED (Technology, Entertainment Design), in partnership with The Paley Center for Media, is launching a brand new TED event: ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 23
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrKrispee
10:49 PM on 08/04/2010
Having a symposium focusing on women isn't inherently wrong. Pat Mitchell is just dishonest about the reasons for it.

"People tend to assume that the balance between the sexes is a zero-sum game, that when women win, men lose. But it's simply not true. In fact, it's quite the opposite: When women win, we all win."

...But when men win, women lose, right? Or when men win, do we all win, too?

"Over the past two years, TED Conferences have featured 30-40% women speakers. This isn't ideal, but it's actually much more balanced than many other, similar conferences, and obviously a priority for them."

...Where's your lack of a "zero-sum" game now? In her zeal to simultaneously show the struggles and success of women at the original symposium, Pat's using the very male-female comparison she says early on shouldn't be used to compare, since it's not "zero-sum".

More women is a good thing. But more women means less men. So less men is by default a good thing too. Which men would probably find a problem with. Not to worry, Pat says, pulling from her back pocket the trump card: "When women win, "we all win." A meaningless sentiment. It's babble-speak. It's not a competition between the genders, stop competing with men by measuring gender through statistics at your own symposium.

I've never been impressed with TED and have found it to be the epitome of overblown pretentious blather.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:37 AM on 08/03/2010
As a man, I am not threatened by an expo encouraging a female symposium based on TED precepts. If you have to ask why there's a Black Entertainment channel and not a "white" one, you're probably too lazy to do the due diligence to find out why a TEDWomen isn't a bad idea but a great one.(I guarantee i'm far too lazy to explain because the reward just isn't there.) Lets do a TEDIrish because I don't think the Irish are represented well enough in science. Statistics show that
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrKrispee
10:51 PM on 08/04/2010
It's a good thing. Just not for the reasons Pat Mitchell puts forth, which is just a bunch of word tricks and circular reasoning.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Infostream
01:12 AM on 08/03/2010
The thing I love about TED is that ideas are valued on their own merit, it's one place where logic and intelligence transcend gender, race, age and mainstream power-position. It just seems insulting to women that they are not being treated equally, like they need a Special Olympics type event as if they can't really compete on the main stage. Many of the best presentations at the real TED have been women, I hope this event doesn't change that.
09:15 PM on 08/02/2010
It would be interesting to know just what the percentage of women is who work in fields that are related to the TED conferences. It would seem, at least many would think, that those fields are vastly more populated by men. So just how you get more women involved in those fields of endeavor is a valid question, as is how to succeed in an overwhelmingly male environment.

It will be interesting to see what comes out of this. Men network, often times, at country clubs that don't allow women. So that women get together under this particular umbrella is hardly a surprise.
photo
mooph
In my haste, I was a dyslexic typist
02:12 PM on 08/04/2010
They wouldn't let me into Curves -- I feel like I'm missing out.
07:51 PM on 08/02/2010
Separate doesn't mean equal. Why can't they just add more female speakers at TED? Seriously how hard would that be? Then again making another conference would bring in more money so go figure.
04:22 PM on 08/02/2010
What does TED stand for ?
photo
mooph
In my haste, I was a dyslexic typist
07:57 PM on 08/02/2010
Technology, Entertainment, Design.
03:40 PM on 08/02/2010
Either TEDWomen is a cause advocacy event, or it is a segregation of TED.

The organizers are responding that it's neither (obviously because cause advocacy is off-brand, and segregation is insulting.)

They say it's not about cause advocacy... but in descriptions and answers it sounds like TEDWomen is promoting investment in women and girls, with the specific citing of "challenges." You can't say in one sentence that it's not cause advocacy, then describe advocating a cause in the next.

They also say it's not segregation... but the mission is supposedly about creating an awareness of women and girls "bringing new ideas and innovations to their communities and countries." That is exactly TED's mission. Just without the gender separation.

It seems the only way to wiggle out of a label (advocacy or segregation) is to broach them both without embracing either.

I think that's what the debate boils down to. TED doesn't want to admit the brand has been diluted with a cause advocacy event, but it also doesn't want to give off the slightest impression of segregation. Unfortunately, that leaves no ground for TEDWomen to stand on.

By logic and definition, TEDWomen is one or the other. Or both.

http://bit.ly/bXAffE
03:39 PM on 08/02/2010
Might have been nice if you had defined TED. Not everyone knows your acronyms.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Bianca Bosker
05:15 PM on 08/02/2010
Thanks that's a great suggestion!
03:31 PM on 08/02/2010
Yanno, I love TED. I've been to 4 TED's, as well as TEDxBerkley.

That being said....W..TF?!?

If there was a TEDMen, Martha Burke would be sto.rming the gates. But this is somehow acceptable?

I have an idea, let's have a TEDAA (African-American), a TEDBP (Br.oke People), and my personal favourite, TEDII (Ille.gal Imm.igrant)
03:30 PM on 08/02/2010
Yanno, I love TED. I've been to 4 TED's, as well as TEDxBerkley.

That being said....WTF?!?

If there was a TEDMen, Martha Burke would be storming the gates. But this is somehow acceptable?

I have an idea, let's have a TEDAA (African-American), a TEDBP (Broke People), and my personal favourite, TEDII (Illegal Immigrant)
janereally
My micro bio is empty.
03:23 PM on 08/02/2010
As long as it costs $6,000 to attend, who cares.
03:10 PM on 08/02/2010
TEDWomen is like a pink toolbox. It forces the divisive notion that women need to be coddled, and treated like "women" in order to perform mundane tasks.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
amazingsusan
Living out of a box
01:58 PM on 08/02/2010
Do we need more women speakers, more women role models, and more focus on issues that impact women and girls? Yes!

(My website http://www.amazingwomenrock.com/ is designed to move that agenda forward.)

Is TEDWomen the best way for TED to support this agenda? In my opinion, NO.

I've been on the more-women-speakers-at-TED bandwagon for some time. My first blog post is here: http://www.amazingwomenrock.com/myblog/speak-up-speak-out-take-the-stage-the-world-needs-more-ted-women.html

My comments on an interview with Chris Anderson in which he said it's hard to find women speakers are here (http://features.bizmore.com/interview/how-to-present-like-a-ted-presenter).

I attended TED Global 2010 in Oxford - it was mind-blowingly awesome. The TED team does a wonderful job.

However, I question the statistic of 30 - 40% women speakers at TED conferences.

By my count, less than 20% of the speakers at TED 2008 were women; that increased to 36% at TED 2009, then DECLINED to 25% in 2010. There were 20% and 29% women speakers at TEDIndia and TEDGlobal 2010 respectively.

Yes, they were amazing, but still significantly fewer in number than the men.

If enough women speakers can be found for TEDWomen, why can't more be found to speak at TED and TEDGlobal?

Finally, there 170+ TED Talks by amazing TED women on my website: http://www.amazingwomenrock.com/ted-talks/index.html
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:42 AM on 08/03/2010
I think the idea is outreach. Get gobs and gobs of women attracted via the TEDWomen conference, and they'll be part of the Ted Network and expected to be a part of the overall TED body of content providers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
amazingsusan
Living out of a box
11:30 AM on 08/03/2010
TED already has a huge number of women TEDsters. The audience split at TED Global, which I just attended in Oxford, looked to me to be 50/50.
photo
mooph
In my haste, I was a dyslexic typist
01:36 PM on 08/02/2010
A few thoughts:

"TEDWomen isn't championing a cause" ... it's taking advantage of a marketing ploy.

"When women win, we all win." Shouldn't we also be able to say "when men win, we all win"?

"People tend to assume that the balance between the sexes is a zero-sum game...." With regard to conference speaker slots, yes. Just as Mitchell focused on the percentage of women speakers at past events, for a closed system such as this conference it is a zero-sum game.

"Why not TEDMen?" Mitchell answers like a politician, changing the subject. An American trend is that, overall, boys and young men have growing record of failure and disengagement. So why not TEDMen?
01:43 AM on 08/05/2010
Fanned! The valuation of the talents and abilities of young men and boys in the USA is generally in an alarming crisis of neglect and decline and furthermore, it is politically incorrect to take notice.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kurotenshi
10:46 AM on 08/02/2010
What??? I would expect this from a more irrational group, but from TED? I am sorry, this is ridiculous, TED is already a meritocracy.