iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Afghanistan Civilian Deaths: NATO Data Shows Sharp Increase In Attacks After Civilians Killed

ANNE GEARAN   08/ 2/10 06:17 PM ET   AP

Afghanistan Civilian Deaths
During a helicopter rescue mission en route to a military hospital, Staff Sgt. Brenden Patterson, left, and Staff Sgt. Brandon Smith, both Air Force Pararescuemen, or "PJs," of the 58th Rescue Squadron, treat an Afghan boy who stepped on an IED which severed his right foot and most of a hand, in Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan, Wednesday July 28, 2010. The PJs and helicopter aircrews are part of the U.S. Air Force's 451st Air Expeditionary Wing based at Kandahar Air Field, which provides

WASHINGTON — Each time U.S. or NATO forces accidentally kill Afghan civilians, insurgents and their sympathizers typically retaliate with six additional assaults on foreign forces over the next six weeks, researchers using newly declassified NATO data conclude.

A new study published by the National Bureau of Economic Research supports the prevailing view of counterinsurgency strategists who believe civilian casualties help Taliban recruiting drives. The study found that attacks on foreign forces increase slightly even when the insurgents are to blame for the deaths of non-combatants.

"Our results show that if counterinsurgent forces in Afghanistan wish to minimize insurgent recruitment, they must minimize harm to civilians despite the greater risk this entails," says the study, to be released Tuesday through the Washington-based New America Foundation.

The principle that protecting civilians is the key to sidelining and ultimately defeating an insurgency is the heart of the strategy outlined by Gen. David Petraeus in Iraq and adapted for Afghanistan. As applied by the former U.S. commander in Afghanistan, Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the strategy includes strict limits on U.S. air strikes and firepower.

Petraeus, who took over from McChrystal last month, is tweaking those rules but has said he will not lift them outright. Petraeus told Congress last month that he remains convinced that heavy-handed tactics do more long-term harm than good.

Petraeus published a new manifesto on counterinsurgency Sunday that drives home that point.

"The people are the center of gravity," Petraeus wrote in a memo to his troops. "Only by providing them security and earning their trust and confidence can the Afghan government and ISAF prevail."

The new independent study uses freshly declassified data about civilian deaths and injuries and "significant actions" by insurgents in Afghanistan. It analyzes attacks and deaths by district across the country.

The study is titled "The effect of Civilian Casualties in Afghanistan and Iraq" but focuses mainly on Afghanistan, where the Taliban-led insurgency has surged back from near extinction and now controls key territory.

The report examines data from the International Security Assistance Force, or ISAF, from January 2009 through March 2010. These data cover 4,077 civilian casualties from 2,118 incidents.

The study found that the link between civilian casualties and insurgent attacks also works in reverse.

If ISAF forces can avoid two incidents in which they kill or injure civilians, they can expect one fewer violent incident over the next six weeks, the report found.

The report found no such link in Iraq.

___

On the Web:

National Bureau of Economic Research: http://www.nber.org/

New America Foundation: http://www.newamerica.net/

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

WASHINGTON — Each time U.S. or NATO forces accidentally kill Afghan civilians, insurgents and their sympathizers typically retaliate with six additional assaults on foreign forces over the next ...
WASHINGTON — Each time U.S. or NATO forces accidentally kill Afghan civilians, insurgents and their sympathizers typically retaliate with six additional assaults on foreign forces over the next ...
Filed by Adam J. Rose  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 143
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PlayTOE
Morals evolved due to cooperative group living
04:00 AM on 08/05/2010
And after 9 years of war and a big study we now know that ~
~ Killing their neighbors for no particular reason makes them hate you ...

shouldn't that have been obvious from day 1 ?
02:13 PM on 08/03/2010
Every time US kills civilians, they are accidental. We didn't mean to kill your family, but they looked like terrorists - you know, dressing up in all those rag heads and bhurkas, that sure says terrorists to us. What are you so upset about, we said it was regrettable. Why don't you move to someplace where you don't look like terrorists, huh? Say, Arizona...
12:57 PM on 08/03/2010
Eek, a war without any causalities? Just what kind of drugs are you on?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
omega777
Yellow cake is the Bomb
01:14 PM on 08/03/2010
it's not even a war..there is no army to fight or country to surrender...it's more like trying to police the country and defend our territorial stakes.
Natural gas pipeline routes, mineral, strategic bases n maybe opium to
destabilize russia n china
10:04 PM on 08/03/2010
We are taking and controlling a place, then local people help Talibans to to attack us, because we do not talk like them, wear clothes like them, act like them etc but Talibans are exactly like them, sometimes even from same tribes.

It is waist of time to go and take any territory by force, it just increase our casualties, that's all.

In Iraq the Al-Qaida fighters were from other countries and we could convince Iraqis to hand them over to us.

Here Taliban is part of Afghan population in south.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
xdiesp
12:40 PM on 08/03/2010
No wonder talibans keep having new recruits if you keep gunning down random families "by mistake".
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realpolitic
Proud member of the reality-based community!
12:18 PM on 08/03/2010
So strange how the Taliban can be almost extinct and then make a comeback. I am sure the local population is as weary of them as we are. We let go of the ball for too many years and let the Taliban re-group in Pakistan. We should be working with local warlords anyway to keep control of areas, instead of trying to build a central government in Kabul when there has never been an effective central government.
11:48 AM on 08/03/2010
There's no doubt that civilian casualties increase the risk to NATO forces. And its fine that the generals are aware of this and advise the troops to avoid civilian casualties. But its the grunt on the ground that has to implement the generals' orders.

Assume this: You're a U.S. soldier guarding a barracks where other soldiers are sleeping. Several suicide bombings has occurred recently in the area. The area is posted with signs in Pasto, Dari and English stating that trespassers will be shot. A young Afgan man approaches wearing a backpack. You order him to stop using the Pasto and Dari you've been taught, but the man looks directly at you at continues to approach. He reaches back to his backpack and begins to pull at something. Do you wait to see whether or not you're about to be blown up, or do you do nothing in order to make sure the generals' orders not to harm civilains is enforced.

What would you do?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realpolitic
Proud member of the reality-based community!
12:20 PM on 08/03/2010
Such scenarios are very hard to know what we would do. I think I would disappoint my military superiors by giving the man the maximum amount of time to prove intent as possible.
photo
MikeDu
Both salubrious and lugubrious concurrently.
11:41 AM on 08/03/2010
I have the feeling that Greg Mortenson's book "Three Cups of Tea" has done this country incalculable harm. His hearwarming tale of building schools in Afghanistan had been passed among the officers' wives in the Pentagon. The idea filtered down that all you need is 'good intentions' and you could rely on traditional Afghan hospitality to do the heavy lifting for you. So the Pentagon, being the Pentagon, combined 'good intentions' with MRAPs, Predator drones, body armor and 20 year old Marines.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:33 AM on 08/03/2010
Pull the troops now. End the wars.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PadriVeum
11:17 AM on 08/03/2010
"Each time U.S. or NATO forces accidentally kill Afghan civilians, insurgents and their sympathizers typically retaliate with six additional assaults on foreign forces..."

why call them insurgents? are we admitting that we are an imperialist occupying force? of course they are going to retaliate-they have a bunch of westerners bombing them, gunning them down, blowing them up at weddings, kidnapping and torturing them. who in the west would stand for such and invasion?
11:13 AM on 08/03/2010
Can Afghanistan be unmade? It just doesn't appear to resemble a nation at all. Perhaps dividing it up and letting its neighbors take slices of it would be better..Or maybe the threat of doing so might give us some leverage cutting deals.
11:12 AM on 08/03/2010
A community of human beings is a living-breathing organism. It has an immune system that reflexively try to kill off harmful invading foreign bodies. It is how nature works. Totally expected and history tells the same story over and over again, in Afghanistan, Iraq, Vietnam, Korea, Somalia, and other places. The invading power has to literally wipe out the natives to see any peace, such as what happened to natives in North America, Australia, South America and Africa. Humans are the most deadly species on the surface of the blue planet.
10:27 AM on 08/03/2010
If there aren't any enemies, we gotta manufacture them. If that means killing a few civvies o' my brothers, then so be it. The problem is there's a huge conflict of interest here. Some want the war to end, others don't...
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
tacevad
American SS Card Carrying Socialist
10:27 AM on 08/03/2010
let's see, occupying force check,civillian deaths check,corrupt government installed by said occupiers check,civil unrest?no! really? attacks on occupiers?really? no one ever saw THAT coming did they Rummy?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
mrJJ
如果你不投票,你不能抱怨
10:24 AM on 08/03/2010
There are an estimated 60 major Pashtun tribes and more than 400 sub-clans. Numerous intricate tenets of Pashtunwali influence Pashtun social behavior. One of the better known tenets is Melmastia, hospitality and asylum to all guests seeking help. Perceived injustice calls for Badal, swift revenge.

Badal
snip
Mount Stuart Elphinstone, an english researcher and political officer who has travelled in the beginning of 19th century though some Pakhtun tribes writes in his book"the kingdom of Cabul"that according to the Pakhtunwali every one has the duty to take his Badal. Dispite goverment porpeganda against Badal, it has become part of the code of tribal law. 'A person may wait for a long time to take Badal. for a Pashtun it is Peghor not to take Badal, The one who does not take his Badal, is considered as a coward. In some in some tribes the family will take the Badal and in some the whole tribe will help to take the Badal. Badal can be avoided through reconciliation by Nanawati.

http://www.afghanan.net/pashto/pashtunwali/badal.htm