iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

For The Bible Tells Me So: Remembering Rev. Lawrence Boadt

First Posted: 08/04/10 10:27 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 06:15 PM ET

Lawrence Boadt

By Phyllis Zagano
Religion News Service

(RNS) Mid-summer Manhattan is a sticky sultry town--lazy in a way unlike, say, October, when cool breezes chase visiting diplomats up and down the avenues. New York in July is, well, beastly, and no one wants to be there.

But we were all there on a recent morning, at the Church of St. Paul the Apostle, to celebrate the life of the Rev. Larry Boadt, president and publisher of Paulist Press, a teacher and scholar, publisher and priest.

On that hot July morning, about 400 people--including a large chunk of the people who comprise American religious publishing--gathered in the huge stone church in the shadow of Lincoln Center that's run by Boadt's order, the Paulists.

The Paulist Fathers were founded by Isaac Thomas Hecker in 1858. Hecker championed an "American" spirit in preaching and teaching, and the order is best known for its work in communications. New York's archbishop handed over St. Paul the Apostle to Hecker and his cohort.

The Paulists started with four men, and there have never been very many of them. As their band of traveling preachers grew, they carried with them a dedication to spreading the word of God. Hecker--now officially a "servant of God" and on the road to sainthood--was an indefatigable traveler and speaker until leukemia slowed him down.

Boadt's life was much the same. He was a champion of interreligious dialogue, and only stopped after a 15-month battle with an intractable cancer slowed and then stopped his teaching and writing, his publishing and preaching.

Like Hecker, Boadt was in his late 60s when he died. Like Hecker, illness slowed down his travels toward the end. Like Hecker, he thought everybody had the right to know about Christianity.

Boadt thought the best way to understand Christianity was to understand Judaism, beginning with the Hebrew Scriptures right through to contemporary Jewish prayer and practice. He was an acknowledged expert in what Christians call the Old Testament--the law, the prophets, and the writings--and he wrote an introductory text book 25 years ago that's sold nearly 300,000 copies to date.

Boadt knew what he was doing. He said he wrote for 'Christians, who are often woefully ignorant of the Jewish roots of their own Christian faith," and who would profit by exploring Judaism. His goal was not dry academic interreligious dialogue; he recommended Christians get themselves invited to Jewish worship to really understand the faith.

He wrote books and taught scripture for 21 years at Washington Theological Union, all the while serving as scripture editor for Paulist Press, which The New York Times calls "one of the country's most distinguished religious publishing houses, producing books by writers of all faiths." For the past 12 years, he was its president and publisher.

That was the point of Larry Boadt's life. Scripture was not for the intelligentsia; it was for everyone.

As he began his career, the Second Vatican Council recommended the ancient Christian practice of "lectio divina"--sacred reading. His final project, "The Catholic Prayer Bible," teaches the process step by step: read, think, pray, act. It's a lesson that can be applied to the sacred writings of any religion.

And it's not a bad idea. Too much divides us in this sullied world. Would that we, all of us, search out each others' scriptures and traditions, and better understand each other--and perhaps ourselves.

(Phyllis Zagano is senior research associate-in-residence at Hofstra University and author of several books in Catholic Studies.)

FOLLOW HUFFPOST RELIGION

By Phyllis Zagano Religion News Service (RNS) Mid-summer Manhattan is a sticky sultry town--lazy in a way unlike, say, October, when cool breezes chase visiting diplomats up and down the avenues. New...
By Phyllis Zagano Religion News Service (RNS) Mid-summer Manhattan is a sticky sultry town--lazy in a way unlike, say, October, when cool breezes chase visiting diplomats up and down the avenues. New...
Filed by Clay Chiles  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 42
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:24 PM on 08/06/2010
When Jesus was crucified the curtain in the temple was rent by unseen hands. That signified the end of the old system of law and the new system of salvation
There were two sets of law in the old testament, and they were authored by two different hands, but by the same Spirit. They were also kept in two different areas within the temple, though not different. The first set of law(s) were written by the finger of God on Mt. Siani and carried down to the people by Moses. In a rage over the peoples idolatry, he broke the first set, returned up the mountain and received a second set. These laws are our ten commandments and were kept inside the arc of covenant. The second set of law(s) which have perished due to Jesus and his sacrifice are all the Mosesic laws penned by Moses by Gods spirit, these laws covered just about every aspect of life. These laws were kept next to the arc of the covenant inside the " holy of holys".
Jesus said when asked when the law ( ten Gods law) would end, he replyed " not one jot or tittle would pass away" from these law(s), in other words all 10 are still in effect today.
When asked which commands were the most important he replied all of them, the first four commands teach us to "love the Lord God" the last six teach us to " love our neighbor...",
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bsmithslo
12:04 AM on 08/07/2010
Nice post.

Actually, Commandment 5 covers honoring our "parents". Our parents are in fact an extension of God in this case (or a type of God for us). This makes the parallel much more clear. The first 5 are speaking of our relationship to our superiors (God and parents). The second 5 relates to our peers (or neighbors). Commandment 1 parallels with 6, 2 with 7, 3 with 8, 4 with 9, and 5 with 10.

If you want an excellent review of this check out Rabbi David Fohrman's Structure of the 10 Commandments. You can google it or download it at davidfohrman.com.

I would also suggest that while the 10 are always in effect they are unique not because they are timeless or "special" but rather because they form this structure which sets us in the correct relationship with our superiors, our peers, and eventually with ourselves.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:19 PM on 08/08/2010
Translation of your previous posts:

"I pick the bits of "god's word" that I like and ignore the bits I don't like. I've broken the law of god so not only am I not going to heaven I don't need to worry about anyone else breaking the law of god. We only need to take bits of the bible literally - like that bit about not killing (better go out and boycott an abortion clinic) or that bit against homosexuality (can't let them marry!). The stoning will come back when god comes back and sets up the theocracy - and what a glorious day that will be - better memorize the route to the quarry".
05:47 PM on 08/07/2010
"The curtain in the temple was rent by unseen hands (how do you know it wasn't an unseen pair of giant scissors?), and there was a great earthquake and darkness over the face of the earth (which no one reported at the time), and the dead came out of their graves, etc, etc. Gimme a break.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:54 PM on 08/07/2010
TFA:
Lucifer? Is that you?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:02 PM on 08/05/2010
I took your advice and had a search through the scriptures.

The following require punishment by stoning:

1. For touching Mount Sinai Exodus 19:13
2. For taking "accursed things" Joshua 7:1-26
3. For cursing or blaspheming Leviticus 24:16
4. For adultery (including urban rape victims who fail to scream loud enough) Deuteronomy 22:23-24
5. For animals (like an ox that gores a human) Exodus 21:28
6. For a woman who is not a virgin on her wedding night Deuteronomy 22:13-21
7. For worshipping other gods Deuteronomy 17:2-5
8. For preaching the wrong religion Deuteronomy 13:5-10
9. For disobeying parents Deuteronomy 21:18-21
10. For witches and wizards Leviticus 20:27
11. For giving your children to Molech Leviticus 20:2
12. For breaking the Sabbath Numbers 15:32-56
13. For cursing the king 1 Kings 21:10


I'm planning on buying stock in my local quarry. What do you think?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bsmithslo
02:07 AM on 08/06/2010
Please find some evidence that the laws demanding stoning were either practiced widely in the past or are selectively practiced today. The fact is no one seems to interpret the text as you are interpreting it. The laws were written as they were to indicate the serious nature of the infractions, the relative weight of certain types of disobedience, and to highlight the need for each of us to give and receive mercy. The most Fundementalists among us don't go around suggesting we start stoning people. It seldom if ever happened. It is a style of communication outsiders seldom understand.

From the Christian perspective, the harshest laws given were given for the purpose that there be no excuse that we had not been given instruction and were not informed of the consequences of our actions. As God was unable to wipe out Adam and Eve for their actions we too are unable to wipe out our loved one when they fail, even when the law clearly demands that we should do it. The laws that you reference clearly highlight this. Orthodox Jews love their children too and are inclined to grant mercy to loved ones as God has granted mercy to us.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:42 PM on 08/06/2010
If it's the word of god then it's ALL the word of god. Not just the bits you like.

The fact that you don't advocate stoning means you don't believe it is the word of god.
09:40 PM on 08/06/2010
Come'on bsmithslo. You're always a stickler for every jot and tittle of of every word of scripture being honored in its purest form. You demand exact meanings in all your other blogs. So, by golly, if here your book says stone'em, you should not split hairs, rather you should stone'em.
09:38 AM on 08/05/2010
According to the teachings of Jesus the Nazarene, he left you with two commandments: FIRST, love your god, and, SECOND, do nothing to harm your fellow man.

It seems that after those two powerful and sensible commandments, the priesthoods have gone bat manure crazy with excessive religiosity and churchianity they claim they find in the scriptures.

BUT, no one listens to Jesus.

It is strange that we see the priesthoods concentrate on everything BUT the two commandments left to them by Jesus. They use their scriptures to paint every human folkway, more, custom, etc. with broad swashes of Jesus, always citing their dogma. Jesus did not ask them to do that, he said simply love your god and do not hurt your fellow man.

Maybe author Phyllis Zagano can tell us why the modern religious scholars and priests totally ignore the teachings of Jesus, i.e., love your god and do nothing to harm your fellow man. Why do they dig deep into the scriptures to find ways to paint Jesus into chemical pollution, economics, social work, political policies, legal issues, etc.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bsmithslo
12:12 PM on 08/05/2010
I am curious as to why you have changed the phrase "love your neighbor as yourself" to "do nothing to harm your fellow man". It's not that it is important but the phrase you include is from the rabbis and not from Christian scripture.

The commands of Christ are actually to love God with all of your heart, soul, and mind and love your neighbor as yourself. The law given to Moses (the one you seem to reject but Christ embraced fully) is a method of teaching us how to love ourselves in such a way that is good for us. From there (and only from there) it makes sense to treat others likewise. If we do not know how to love what difference does it make if we try to love or not? If we don't know how to love then we do indeed harm our fellow men with our lovin'.

P.S. Even the most violent abuser will claim that he loves his wife and wishes that no harm come to her.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:58 PM on 08/05/2010
The argument for love your neighbor seems overshadowed by the Christian support of Prop 8 in California. Love seems to come under conditions.

The same was true for Loving v. Virginia. Christians were against miscegenation laws. Stating that God created races and placed them on different continents for the reason not to mix. Christian intolerance at it's best.

You cannot help but see the hypocritical stand behind saying love is the most important command. It seems that scripture is now interpreted as love your fellow Christian.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ZenGardner
Cogito ergo atheus. 6.875
01:26 PM on 08/05/2010
Pick pick pick pick pick.

I'm curious as to how you can't see the parallel between "do no harm to others" and "love your neighbor as yourself." Is it really that difficult? Really?