iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Rand Paul's Opposition To Federal Funding Of Local Drug Enforcement May Cost Him

ROGER ALFORD   08/12/10 04:22 PM ET   AP

Rand Paul Drug Policy
Rand Paul's Opposition To Federal Funding Of Local Drug Enforcement May Cost Him In Key Battleground

FRANKFORT, Ky. — Republican Rand Paul's opposition to federal funding for state and local drug enforcement initiatives could cost him votes in a region likely to be a key battleground in the U.S. Senate race.

Paul wants to cut federal funding for undercover drug investigations and drug treatment programs. Both are badly needed in Appalachia, a hotbed for marijuana growers and drug dealers selling prescription pills and methamphetamines. His Democratic opponent, Jack Conway, favors using federal money.

"I don't think it's a real pressing issue," Paul told The Associated Press, suggesting that eastern Kentucky voters are more concerned about fiscal and social concerns.

"They're socially conservative out there, so am I. Jack's not. They're fiscally conservative. I am. Jack's not. ... I think we'll swamp him," Paul

As a Republican, businesswoman Carrie Cinnamond-Rose leans toward Paul, but she's seen her Pikeville pharmacy burglarized and robbed four times in recent years.

"I'll have to follow my heart, but let my brain enter into it, too," Cinnamond-Rose said.

Desperate addicts in search of a fix have forced some drug stores in Kentucky's mountain region to lock pharmacists behind bulletproof glass and painkillers inside vaults.

Paul's campaign strategy requires winning all of Kentucky's rural vote, including Appalachia, and staying close in Louisville and Lexington, where voters tend to favor Democrats. Conway has been using the drug issue to whittle into Paul's rural base.

"Rand will handcuff local sheriffs trying to combat the drug epidemic, and I will make sure Kentucky's law enforcement has the tools they need to protect our families," Conway said.

Paul, a tea party favorite, shows libertarian leanings on drugs. He said he is opposed to the legalization of marijuana, even for medicinal purposes. But he also has called drug sentences of 10 to 20 years too harsh.

"I think drugs are a scourge but at the same time I also understand that teenagers – people that you may be related to, people that I may be related to – have had drug problems," he said last month.

A GQ magazine piece this week quotes an anonymous woman who described a marijuana-fueled prank by Paul and a friend when they were Baylor University students. Paul's campaign hasn't directly denied the allegation.

Conway said Kentucky, a small state suffering from budget cuts, can't afford to take on drug traffickers without federal help. Paul wants to limit federal involvement to drugs crossing state or national borders and hasn't said how local and state governments would pay for the rest.

Ed Schemelya, point man in the federal government's marijuana eradication program that confiscated roughly $2 billion of the drug in the central Appalachians last year, said cutting off federal funding would embolden drug traffickers.

"It would be impossible to stop them without federal assistance, because of the dire straits that these economies are in," Schemelya said.

Shortly after Conway became state attorney general in 2008, he created a task force to coordinate local, state and federal efforts to curb prescription pill trafficking. Last year, that task force was part of the largest prescription pill bust in Kentucky history, charging more than 500 people in a drug pipeline between Florida and Kentucky.

Conway also supports Operation UNITE, a federal initiative providing undercover narcotics investigations and addiction treatment. The state puts up about $2 million and the federal share of $4.3 million comes mostly from federal earmarks. Paul has pledged not to request earmarks and isn't worried that voters would be upset about losing Operation UNITE.

"I don't think most people in Kentucky have heard of it," he said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
FRANKFORT, Ky. — Republican Rand Paul's opposition to federal funding for state and local drug enforcement initiatives could cost him votes in a region likely to be a key battleground in the U.S. Se...
FRANKFORT, Ky. — Republican Rand Paul's opposition to federal funding for state and local drug enforcement initiatives could cost him votes in a region likely to be a key battleground in the U.S. Se...
Filed by Elyse Siegel  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 843
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (20 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
joeyfoto
“Écraser l'infamie!”
03:53 AM on 08/23/2010
I hate to say this, but I almost agree with Rand Paul... the operative word being 'almost.'

The man is a doctrinaire incompetent, who has so many principles that he like a medieval scholastic physician, who when confronted with a complicated syndrome can't decide whether to consult Galen or the Bible, when the proper approach would be to examine the patient. Rand Paul is a smart guy who can't match socks.

"Drug war" is a disaster; cutting funding for drug treatment is to abandon responsibility for a social problem, much of which was manufactured by America's creation of illegal markets, via the arrogant and imbecilic "drug war." However, that history no longer matters; elevated levels of addiction is the problem that communities face today. Ignoring that painful fact will not make it go away.

Dr. Paul offers neither vision nor common sense. He represents the worst of both extremes. Rand Paul is both a fanatic and a fool.
01:58 PM on 08/16/2010
I agree with the libertarian party on drug prohibition and I don't agree with them on much. The drug war makes about as much sense as outlawing cancer and drug war spending demonstrably buys us nothing but violent crime. I think that it's telling that Paul, who is trying to position himself as an ideologically pure libertarian, won't even take a stand against something as colossally stupid as marijuana prohibition. I don't smoke the stuff myself, but as threats to the public welfare go, marijuana users don't even rate unless you happen to be a Twinkie.

The fact that Paul hedges on drug prohibition shows that, like most TP "libertarians," his commitment to libertarianism is about a molecule deep, if not 100% pure pretense.

His weak position on a core libertarian issue like the drug war is especially telling when looked at in combination with what he will not compromise on-- he is willing to let the government knock down your door because they think you're smoking a joint in your basement, but by golly, he will not budge an inch in his defense of Woolworths' right to have a segregated lunch counter.

Apparently some liberties are a lot more important to Paul than others.
Clevelandinwi
Progressive is good; regressive, not so much.
07:45 AM on 08/16/2010
Does he have any voters? Why would anyone vote for one of the AXIS OF STUPIDITY - dandyrandypaul, sharinangle and kenniebuck?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ramsha
12:51 AM on 08/16/2010
I think the Kentuckians will like Rand Paul more for being more like them in his college days with regard to smoking a joint.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
TeeLolly
10:56 PM on 08/15/2010
A mere 10% tax on the $2 billion in "eradicated" drugs in Appalachia could have gone a long way towards feeding the hungry, paying for teachers and providing health care for the uninsured. When you have a valuable asset, throwing it away is just stupid, no matter how "righteous" you believe your cause to be.

Just say no.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
iMissMollyIvins
Middle-aged, Middle class, Midwestern Populist
10:19 PM on 08/15/2010
"I'll have to follow my heart, but let my brain enter into it, too,"
_______________

If all Kentucky voters start using their brains when choosing which candidate to vote for, the Republican't Party is in big trouble in the bluegrass state.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jf1936
11:08 PM on 08/15/2010
What do you people feel is so out of line about this guy??

Rand Paul:
* I will not vote for an unbalanced budget.

* I will fight for new rules like a Balanced Budget Amendment and Term Limits.

* I will not take ANYTHING off the table in the fight to balance the budget. Anyone who says something like they will "freeze non-defense discretionary spending" is blowing smoke at you and hoping you won't notice. That would balance the budget — MAYBE — in about 80 years.

* We have to keep our promises to seniors and keep our country strong, but every area has things that can be cut. Every agency has things that are duplicative or that could be done better or cheaper.

* I will propose and force a vote on an Enumerated Powers Act, to force Congress to point to the part of the Constitution that justifies their bills.

* I will fight for the Bill of Rights. Democrats often love the 4th amendment. Republicans the 2nd. I will fight for them all, which means fighting for your free speech, gun rights, and civil liberties. Laws that infringe on ANY of these make the federal government more powerful, and we cannot continue to allow that.

* I will not allow our troops to be the world's policeman, and I will force a vote on a Declaration of War if any President seeks to commit our military to battle.

What is wrong with any of that?????
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
joeyfoto
“Écraser l'infamie!”
04:04 AM on 08/23/2010
What's wrong with: "I believe, absolutely, in individual liberty unless you are a pregnant woman who chooses to have an abortion in which case, I choose to join the Christian fascist state in denying citizens that right to choose."

What';s wrong with Rand Paul is that his is full of hot air and weak principles combined with a long history of very poor judgment.

What's wrong with Rand Paul? The man is third-rate. He is unfit to be in the US Senate, where he would join "Mountain Jim" Inhofe, Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III and Jim DeMint at the lowest end of the body. That is not where the Senate needs intellectual reinforcement.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:26 PM on 09/03/2010
why should we protect the seniors? Maybe because we're "better than them", but it's no moral obligation. I didn't build the broken system, I had nothing to do with it. It's the Senior Citizens who are chiefly responsible for building a unsustainable system.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:30 PM on 09/03/2010
yea, because I am sure that a lot of people will really support having US Citizens assassinated without so much as a shred of evidence if they started using their brains and realized that if it's acceptable for that to happen to one person it's acceptable for that to happen to anyone/everyone.

Of coarse, you don't want people to actual think with their brains, you just want the partisan hacks who identify as Republicans to join your group of partisan hacks who identify as Democrats.
08:59 PM on 08/15/2010
"Paul wants to cut federal funding for undercover drug investigations and drug treatment programs. Both are badly needed in Appalachia, a hotbed for marijuana growers and drug dealers selling prescription pills and methamphetamines."

Adult marijuana use is legitimately a matter of informed, personal/consensual decision making and what needs to happen here is the government needs to step out of it completely.

Methamphetamines are unlike marijuana in that they cause immense physical damage to the brain and body of the user, but again - when an adult has made the decision to partake of their own free will, the question of where the government obtains *any* legitimate right to interfere remains unanswered.

When anyone - including drug users - commit crimes or directly endanger others, that is the time to turn to them and press the legitimate interests of the state over whatever choices they are making. Anything else is an attempt to predict "pre-crime", and is odious at best, and usually much worse than that.

The drug war doesn't work. Prohibition doesn't work. These policies have caused more death, misery, harm and loss in the United States than all the drug use, ever, in the country. Put recreational drugs in adult-accessible stores, and the underlying economic support the government created for the black market *and* its accompanying violence will disappear overnight.

As for kids... that's a parental matter.

The fact is, it is not drugs that cause most of this misery. It is the government. Write your congressperson.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
TeeLolly
10:59 PM on 08/15/2010
As long as alcohol is legal for adults, there is no rational basis for keeping drugs illegal. None.

Regulate them. Tax them. And get the eff out of people's informed personal choices.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
joeyfoto
“Écraser l'infamie!”
04:14 AM on 08/23/2010
These are good arguments against the idiocy of "Drug War.". I have been making them for almost 40 years. Sadly, they are not sufficiently persuasive to overcome cowardice on the part of citizens who refuse to face the obvious. Nor are they powerful enough to confront those who profit from the status quo. Drug war is simply another reason why America is in a death spiral.

Citizens have no liberty and what is worse they have no feeling of community with which to fight back. They are divided from one another into their own individual empires which are crumbling. America is suffering the triumph of "Conservatism." or as my mother, who ran a corporation explained to me: "All that the depression meant to rich people was cheap labor." Good luck...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:34 PM on 09/03/2010
if you want government out of peoples personal lives, than it stands to reason that there should be no taxes that apply disproportionately to one class of goods/services.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:28 PM on 08/15/2010
Is there a nickname for Kentucky's pot? How about Kentucky Blue Grass?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
RockyMissouri
'You must be carefully taught to hate'...
09:27 AM on 08/16/2010
Now THAT's beautiful!--brings tears to my eyes..!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Hillbilly49
Don't tell me you are a Christian; let me guess.
07:26 PM on 08/15/2010
It doesn't matter how many hits Old Rand took on the bong or if he shoots up everyday.

The glue that holds republicans together is their extremist right wing ideology.

Even if he were arressted "toe tapping" in a Minneapolis men's room, republicans would vote for him.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jf1936
11:13 PM on 08/15/2010
oh god.

extremist right wing ideology? The republican party does not resemble anything even close to "right wing".

ideology? What ideology does any republican have? limited government? that's laughable, they ran record deficits 6 of w's 8 years in the white house.

conservative foreign policy? conservative monetary policy? There is absolutely nothing right wing or conservative about republicans.

The sad part is that you actually think the democrats have a different ideology. There is not one, NOT ONE, substantive issue the two parties disagree on.

republicans will never vote democrat because democrats openly endorse increasing government's role in our lives. We do not want that. Republicans *claim* to want to limit government, but when given power they follow the democratic platform of increasing government.

so the fight becomes how to retake the republican party, as rand is trying to do, by making it a legitimately conservative, constitution-respecting party.

That's why they stick together.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SimianNation
Progressive NOT Regressive
11:49 AM on 08/16/2010
Look at the FULL BLOWN case of Teabag!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ronald Sloan
07:21 PM on 08/15/2010
I am sure that Rand paul does not know that pot is the number one
cash crop in the state!!
12:45 AM on 08/16/2010
Maybe he does and is counting on receiving the wacky tabacky farmers' votes.
06:48 PM on 08/15/2010
Can we PLEASE stop treating drug addiction as a criminal problem and instead treat it as a public health problem? The "war" on drugs is a miserable and indefensible failure. And the fact that this so-called "libertarian" doesn't support the full legalization of all drugs further proves the sham that he is. People throw around the term "libertarian" without even the slightest comprehension of what such views entail.
photo
Opygollopy
The more I talk to people, the more I love my dogs
06:02 PM on 08/15/2010
Only in America can people this obviously stu_pid be even considered for Senator. Someone this uninformed making laws for the country to follow somehow makes me very afraid.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jf1936
11:15 PM on 08/15/2010
our current congress is laughed at worldwide. They have an approval rate of a whopping 21% with a 72% disapproval.

You think informed people are making the laws now? please...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rahm11219
03:34 PM on 08/15/2010
Well, will ya look at that! Rand Paul and I actually agree on something! Praise Aqua Buddha!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
katylied
It's just a ride
03:12 PM on 08/15/2010
Maybe he should try a wider stance..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ladyvader
Done with 2-party system that has failed us.
02:18 PM on 08/15/2010
Legalize it and tax it and you be surprised on much good it would do.