iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama's Ground Zero Mosque Comments: President Recalibrates (VIDEO)

AP / Huffington Post   First Posted: 08/14/10 09:22 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 06:20 PM ET

Weighing his words carefully on a fiery political issue, President Barack Obama said Saturday that Muslims have the right to build a mosque near New York's ground zero, but he did not say whether he believes it is a good idea to do so.

Obama commented during a trip to Florida, where he expanded on a Friday night White House speech asserting that Muslims have the same right to freedom of religion as everyone else in America.

The president's statements thrust him squarely into a debate that he had skirted for weeks and could put Democrats on the spot three months before midterm elections where they already were nervous about holding control of the House and maybe even the Senate. Until Friday, the White House had asserted that it did not want to get involved in local decision-making.

Obama told CNN's Ed Henry Saturday that he supported the developers' right to build:

My intention was to simply let people know what I thought. Which was that in this country, we treat everybody equally in accordance with the law. Regardless of race. Regardless of religion. I was not commenting on and will not comment on the wisdom of making a decision to put a mosque there. I was commenting very specifically on the right that people have that dates back to our founding. That's what our country's about and I think it's very important that as difficult as some of these issues are, we stay focused on who we are as a people and what our values are all about.

WATCH: Obama talks about "the right" to build mosque

The White House quickly followed up on Obama's latest comments on the matter, with Obama spokesman Bill Burton saying that the president wasn't backing off in any way from the remarks he made Friday.

"What he said last night, and reaffirmed today, is that if a church, a synagogue or a Hindu temple can be built on a site, you simply cannot deny that right to those who want to build a mosque," Burton said.

New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, an independent who has been a strong supporter of the mosque, welcomed Obama's White House speech as a "clarion defense of the freedom of religion."

Florida Gov. Charlie Crist, who was among those who met with Obama on Saturday, lauded the president's position. Crist is running for the U.S. Senate as an independent.
"I think he's right -- I mean you know we're a country that in my view stands for freedom of religion and respect for others," Crist said after the Florida meeting with Obama and other officials. "I know there are sensitivities and I understand them. This is a place where you're supposed to be able to practice your religion without the government telling you you can't."

Others were quick to pounce on Obama's statements.

In a statement Saturday, House Minority Leader John Boehner said the decision to build the mosque wasn't an issue of religious freedom, but a matter of respect.
"The fact that someone has the right to do something doesn't necessarily make it the right thing to do," Boehner said. "That is the essence of tolerance, peace and understanding."

Added Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y.: "President Obama is wrong. It is insensitive and uncaring for the Muslim community to build a mosque in the shadow of ground zero."
Democratic Senate candidate Jeff Greene of Florida took Obama's Friday speech to mean the president supports the construction.

"President Obama has this all wrong and I strongly oppose his support for building a mosque near ground zero especially since Islamic terrorists have bragged and celebrated destroying the Twin Towers and killing nearly 3,000 Americans," said Greene. "Freedom of religion might provide the right to build the mosque in the shadow of ground zero, but common sense and respect for those who lost their lives and loved ones gives sensible reason to build the mosque someplace else."

The mosque would be part of a $100 million Islamic community center two blocks from where nearly 3,000 people perished when hijacked jetliners slammed into the World Trade Center towers on Sept. 11, 2001.

The proposed construction has sparked debate around the country that has included opposition from top Republicans including Sarah Palin and Newt Gingrich as well as the Jewish civil rights group the Anti-Defamation League.

Obama's Friday comment was taken by some to mean that he strongly supports the building of an Islamic center near the site of the Sept. 11 terrorist attack, something he never said.

Speaking to a gathering at the White House Friday evening to observe the Islamic holy month of Ramadan, Obama said that he believes "Muslims have the same right to practice their religion as everyone else in this country."

"That includes the right to build a place of worship and a community center on private property in lower Manhattan, in accordance with local laws and ordinances," he said. "This is America, and our commitment to religious freedom must be unshakable."

Some relatives of people killed in the Sept. 11 attacks supported Obama's comments.

The mosque is "in many ways ... a fitting tribute," said Colleen Kelly of the Bronx, who lost her brother Bill Kelly Jr. in the attacks.

"This is the voice of Islam that I believe needs a wider audience," said Kelly, who is Catholic. "This is what moderate Islam is all about."

Opinions are mixed among family members.

Sally Regenhard, whose firefighter son was killed at the World Trade Center, has said the president's comments show "a gross lack of sensitivity to the 9/11 families and to the people who were lost."

"Barack Obama has abandoned America at the place where America's heart was broken nine years ago, and where her true values were on display for all to see," said Debra Burlingame, a spokeswoman for some Sept. 11 victims' families and the sister of one of the pilots killed in the attacks.

Building the mosque at ground zero, she said, "is a deliberately provocative act that will precipitate more bloodshed in the name of Allah."

Obama surely knew that his words Friday night at a White House dinner marking the holy month of Ramadan not only would make headlines, but be heard by Muslims worldwide. The president has made it a point to reach out to the global Muslim community, and the more than 100 guests at Friday's dinner included ambassadors and officials from numerous nations where Islam is observed, including Saudi Arabia and Indonesia.

When Obama first took office, Muslim leaders had high hopes from his presidency, even as he kept his distance from them during the campaign and rebutted false rumors that he was Muslim.

Their expectations were raised further after a June 2009 speech in Cairo, where Obama said he wanted to forge a relationship between the U.S. and Muslims based on respect and parterships with the private sector and civil society.

But many leaders have since become disappointed in the president, believing he has mostly kept his outreach to their community behind the scenes. Many Muslims had also hoped he would reverse several Bush administration policies they felt unfairly targeted them after the Sept. 11 attacks, such as no-fly lists and the Patriot Act.
___
Jelinek reported from Washington. Associated Press writer Bill Kaczor in Panama City Beach and AP Religion Writer Rachel Zoll in New York contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Weighing his words carefully on a fiery political issue, President Barack Obama said Saturday that Muslims have the right to build a mosque near New York's ground zero, but he did not say whether he b...
Weighing his words carefully on a fiery political issue, President Barack Obama said Saturday that Muslims have the right to build a mosque near New York's ground zero, but he did not say whether he b...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 18,581
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (286 total)
09:36 AM on 08/27/2010
What kind of President would he be if he did not support the rights of American Citizens? I dont believe the mosque is being built by non citizens of our country. Are there not Churches in the south where the KKK once killed in the south?
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Christophe
11:33 AM on 08/18/2010
For the Nth time.
The building of a Muslim Community/Cultural Center in lower Manhattan is NOT the issue we should all discuss. It is not only LEGAL but could be an great ASSET to the cultural life of New York.
The Arab World Institute in Paris is a fabulous place. Please check here: http://www.imarabe.org/en
What REALLY MATTERS is:
What kinds of Islam will be shown and promoted?
What kind of explicit message will/could be sent to the Muslims around the world by the people running this facility?

Instead of debating how close or how far the building stands from the WTC site, we should hear from the promoters of the projects what their contribution to interfaith relationship and potential (should I say hopefully) reform of Islam reform would be.

We cannot change what happened on 9/11. Let's all focus on the future.
photo
TYRANNASAURUS
UGH!....people taste like crap!
07:05 PM on 08/17/2010
OBAMA SUPPORTS EQUALITY AND THE CONSTITUTION........ IT DOES NOT SURPRISE ME THAT MOST PEOPLE WON'T SUPPORT THE CONSTITUTION WHEN IT'S DOESN'T SUPPORT THEIR POSITION.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
JimR
11:08 PM on 08/17/2010
ME LIKE USE BIG LETTER TOO!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sydneymoon
Dismiss what insults your own soul - WW
06:33 AM on 08/18/2010
Well, you know you make me wanna'(Shout)
Kick my heels up and(Shout)
Throw my hands up and(Shout).........
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dcjdjay
05:50 PM on 08/17/2010
Debra Burlingame, like her BFF Lynn Cheney, is one nasty piece of work.

The woman is a concentrated pustule of intolerance, ignorance, and bigotry.
03:49 AM on 08/18/2010
To speak in such a crude fashion, in a personal attack, about someone who lost a loved one on 9/11, is to demonstrate an opinion without any redeeming qualities whatsoever. You not only need to walk in this woman's shoes for a while and feel her loss, you need to develop some basic human virtues, such as common decency. Even if you do not agree with her, your choice of words says more about you and your own character than it does Ms. Burlingame. In the end, Ms. B, is just standing up for her lost brother in the best way she knows. She is an accomplished woman, an attorney, and former flight attendant, who has had a major role in leading 9/11 families and shaping public opinion subsequent to that infamous day.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
billw8017
History looks like this
05:08 PM on 08/18/2010
Didn't Ann Coulter have something to say about Ms B?

Not that I have a lot of regard for Ms Coulter's opinions, but I thought you did.
02:23 PM on 08/20/2010
Losing a loved one on 9/11 does NOT immunize someone from criticism.
Especially if that criticism is aimed at public statements they have made.
Your dismissal of the parent's comments on this grounds is pandering in the extreme.
You prove your hypocrisy by standing for B's rights to speak while attacking the parent.
Shame on you.
03:51 AM on 08/18/2010
One final point, DC,
There is nothing super about your comment regarding Debra Burlingame.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GENE DEVAUX
Political activist, degrees in Accounting and Econ
04:58 PM on 08/17/2010
The following is the sound of grief and misunderstanding:

Sally Regenhard, whose firefighter son was killed at the World Trade Center, has said the president's comments show "a gross lack of sensitivity to the 9/11 families and to the people who were lost."

"Barack Obama has abandoned America at the place where America's heart was broken nine years ago, and where her true values were on display for all to see," said Debra Burlingame, a spokeswoman for some Sept. 11 victims' families and the sister of one of the pilots killed in the attacks.

Those comments were said in grief not understanding. Keeping the Muslim community center out of downtown New York is illogical. There is a mosque that has existed since before the trade center was erected. The building in question would be community center in a part of New York that desperately needs renovation. Do they really believe that keeping that center from opening in a blighted area that needs new life will do the things that they said in her interview? Do they really believe that President Obama has abandoned America? What he said was not offensive to anyone; it was a reaffirmation of the First Amendment right to religious freedoms. Don't they realize that unbounded and irrational fear is more likely to lead to hatred and war than building the community center?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gingersp
proud to be a liberal
06:03 PM on 08/17/2010
Unfortunately, some people believe that the First Amendment guarantees them the right to not ever be offended. Not the case.
I feel for Sally Regenhard, but stopping the building of the center will not bring back her son. she seems to forget that many of his firefighter comrades were also Muslim. Their families are grieving also. How do we think they feel to hear all the negativity about the Muslim religion.
04:26 AM on 08/18/2010
Ginger,
Your opening comment misstates the debate surrounding the ground zero mega mosque. I think you owe your fans and readers at least one clearcut example of someone stating the 1st Amendment supports the right not to be offended. However, in the end, this is not a 1st Amendment issue, except to those who willfully misunderstand the argument opposing the mosque. No one, repeat, no one argues the proponents of the mosque have no legal right to build it. Regarding your second point, about Sally Regenhard, Sally has forgotten nothing. Regardless of how many Muslims were slaughtered on 9/11, all the victims, Muslim, Christian, Jew, etc., were murdered by Muslim terrorists acting according to their understanding of Islamic jihad. It is you who have forgotten. It is you who have forgotten the connection between Islam and the 9/11 attack. The proposed site for the mosque became available because the landing gear of one of the hijacked jets plummeted through the coat factory's roof, clear to the basement, destroying the building and rendering it unrepairable. That is why the mosque's proponents were able to buy the property so cheaply, compared to other lower Manhattan real estate. The argument against the mosque on the site of the coat factory is simple: common decency and respect for the dead, and their families, dicate there shoud be no Muslim community center or mosque on a site destroyed by Muslim terrorists.
04:50 PM on 08/17/2010
------- http://www.xoxob.com -----Discount Activities
photo
Pole
retired professor of History, Comparative Religion
04:33 PM on 08/17/2010
German mosque used by Sept. 11 attackers shut down
(AP) – 6 days ago

BERLIN — German authorities say they have closed a Hamburg mosque used by the Sept. 11 attackers as a meeting place before they moved to the United States.

A statement by Hamburg officials says the Taiba mosque was shut down and its cultural association was banned on Monday.

The prayer house, formerly known as al-Quds mosque, used to be a meeting and recruiting point for some of the Sept. 11 attackers.

Weekly news magazine Focus cites a report by a local intelligence agency branch in saying the mosque has again become the city's "main center of attraction for the jihad scene." It says some members who belonged to the Taiba group and prayed at the mosque have moved on to a radical training camp in Uzbekistan.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gingersp
proud to be a liberal
04:42 PM on 08/17/2010
Do you have a point?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Eldienne
Moderate Dem
04:54 PM on 08/17/2010
Yes - that all mosques in the U.S. should be shut down; which would be a clear and flagrant violation of the First Amendment.
04:07 PM on 08/17/2010
I think Americans should be more concerned about Catholic Churches being too close to schools, playgrounds...children, in general. Catholic priests are a more tangible, real threat to our children than peaceful Islams who simply want a place to congregate.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Super Fly Fly
03:45 PM on 08/17/2010
I don`t see how he is recalibrating or back tracking on what he said. I think the news media understands language much differently to how others understand it. It is like what was actually said vs what the media wants you to think was said. I grow tired of all these news people and their lies.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dcjdjay
05:55 PM on 08/17/2010
The press today is largely a giant entertainment complex staffed by people who are told to whip up a frenzy for ratings. Most of the press is trying to compete with Fox News, or if they're not, they're too terrified of appearing "left wing," even as their opponents continue to dish out garbage. The serious written press may be different, but how many Americans actually read the newspaper? Or a serious magazine on issues?
03:24 PM on 08/17/2010
If a Muslim community center can't be built near the site of an atrocity committed by people who were Muslim, then no Catholic community centers can be built near any site where European colonists landed and killed or enslaved the native peoples. No Southern Baptist churches can be built near any site where African-Americans were lynched or otherwise abused (Selma, Jacksonville, etc.). Hell, no religion of any kind can build anything, anywhere if some person or group who adhered to that religion committed any atrocity in that location at all whatsoever. Because we all know that it was not the people who follow a particular faith that committed those acts; it was the religious community as a whole. Makes total sense. And by total, I mean none at all.
03:32 PM on 08/17/2010
> If a Muslim community center can't be built near the site of an atrocity committed by people who were Muslim, then no Catholic community centers can be built near any site where European colonists landed and killed or enslaved the native peoples.

Not the same thing. The ministers of those churches do not refuse to condemn what was done to the Native Americans. They don't make the ridiculous claim that the Native Americans were somehow complicit in their own suffering.

This isn't about constitutionality. Nobody is claiming that these people don't have a constitutional right to build this facility. It's just disrespectful given that this Imam refuses to condemn terrorism. Why does it have to be that location? Would the NAACP be ok if the KKK wanted to build a headquarters building next to the Lorraine Hotel in Memphis? or if Fred Phelps wanted to build a branch of his Wesboro Baptist "Church" next to an LGBT community center? I doubt it.

-Paradigm
www.belatedtruth.com
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gingersp
proud to be a liberal
04:44 PM on 08/17/2010
Both very bad analogies
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
JimR
11:02 PM on 08/17/2010
He has condemned terrorism, liar.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Chernynkaya
02:55 PM on 08/17/2010
Today, Chuck Todd and Savannah Guthrie interviewed the deputy Mayor of NY City. These were their statements and "questions":

“And now the President has added his voice and created a NATIONAL controversy.”

“Was it appropriate for the President to say something?”

“Was it HELPFUL? All things being equal, do you think the President has done more harm than good?”

“The next day, the President said that the Muslems have a right to build a mosque near Ground Zero. Do you think the President should have been clearer?”

“Do you see the WH being overreactive to the 24/7 news cycle?”

Do you see how the so-called “liberal” media frames this? THEY are not owning these statements—oh no! They ask these questions, not as impartial news reporters, but the very questions have a POV. They keep asking the questions that perpetuate the tired media memes that criticize Obama about everything.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3096434/#38737714
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GENE DEVAUX
Political activist, degrees in Accounting and Econ
03:27 PM on 08/17/2010
The "so-called liberal media should stop giving this non-issue air time. The Republican propagandists are making a mountain out of a molehill. The building at issue is not a mosque, it is not "at ground zero," it is not near "ground zero," it is about four blocks away in a rundown part of downtown New York where buildings have been abandoned and from which businesses have moved. That building has not been used for 8 years. It is an eye sore now but would get a face lift if the COMMUNITY CENTER is put into that building. As reported on Keith Olbermann’s Countdown last night, The COMMUNITY CENTER would have a basketball court and a culinary school. It would not be a mosque, but would have two floors set aside for daily prayers by local Muslims. Republicans are painting this building as a potential terrorist training center. This is going to backfire on the propagandists when more information is made available to the public. This is the same type of scare tactic that Rudolph Giuliani used by repeating, "9/11" time and again in every one of his speeches. This is a false attack that is being made less than three months before the November elections. It is just another reason to throw out the lying, conniving con men of the Republican Party.
06:33 PM on 08/17/2010
So then please expalin why Obama made this false attack. Until he opened his big mouth this was mostly a NYC issue. Obama is the mountain maker.
06:21 AM on 08/18/2010
This issue has become a firestorm because the President angered both sides of the issue, Democrats and Republicans alike. So to say that this is a non-issue, is to ignore what everyone is talking about. The Cordoba Project is more than a mosque, it is a mega mosque that includes a 15-story community center. According to Matt Sledge, it is a lot closer to the WTC than you suggest. Here is a link to the definitive answer to how far the proposed mosque is to the WTC. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/matt-sledge/just-how-far-is-the-groun_b_660585.html Further, the proposed mega mosque site was destroyed by the hijackers in the course of the 9/11 attack, when landing gear from one of the jets fell clear to the building's basement, so the site is an integral part of ground zero. It has not been used for "8" years because the Muslim terrorists destroyed it on 9/11. It is not just Republicans who are warning about the threat this project represents. See what three influential Muslims have written about it --
http://www.ottawacitizen.com/news/Mischief+Manhattan/3370303/story.html#ixzz0wvnEOxpb”
and
http://www.aawsat.com/english/news.asp?section=2&id=21980

CNN/Opinion Research poll and a Fox poll, reveal a large majority of Americans, including a majority of Democrats, want the mosque built elsewhere.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Super Fly Fly
03:47 PM on 08/17/2010
You are so right and they mislead and twist everything too.
02:51 PM on 08/17/2010
Tick-tock, tick-tock, tick-tock ...

• In a Quinnipiac University poll 65% of registered voters think that “President Obama’s policies” have either “hurt the economy or haven’t made a difference.” An overwhelming 84% say they think “President Obama’s policies have either “hurt or haven’t made a difference” in their “personal financial situation.”

• In a Pew Research/National Journal poll of adults nationwide, 57% said they think “the economic stimulus” has failed to keep “unemployment from getting even worse” and 66% think “the economic stimulus” has “increased the federal budget deficit.”

• Rasmussen national telephone survey found that, “57% of likely U.S. voters say the recently passed health care law will be bad for the country.

• Associated Press-GfK Poll determined that “64 percent of those surveyed aren't confident that a financial regulation overhaul…will avert another meltdown.”

• In a USA TODAY/Gallup poll, “Support for Obama's management of the [Afghanistan] war fell to 36%, down from 48% in a February poll. Now, a record 43% also say it was a mistake to go to war there after the terrorist attacks in 2001.”

• The same poll also found that, “Even Obama's handling of the war in Iraq received record-low approval, despite a drawdown of 90,000 troops and the planned, on-schedule end of U.S. combat operations there this month.” And, “Only 41% of those surveyed…approved of the way Obama is handling his job.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Eldienne
Moderate Dem
04:29 PM on 08/17/2010
I wouldn't touch a troll with a ten foot poll.
04:58 PM on 08/17/2010
And I wouldn't even come near you with my 9" poll ...
06:58 AM on 08/18/2010
You're living in dreamsville on borrowed time, Eldienne. The trolls are taking over soon. Read the polls and weep. Our Dear Leader blew it from the gitgo with his blandishments about "transparency;" and no more lobbyists in government; and he would not sign a bill containing earmarks. And then we had his leadership default to Pelosi and Reid on the no-stimulus bill and healthcare "reform." How do you like borrowing 867 billion dollars from the Chinese so some pencil-necked geek can study the effects of cocaine in monkeys? How do you like borrowing 26 billion more for teachers in CA and NY where the legislatures never saw a spending bill they didn't like? Remember how we didn't have time to read the stimulus bill; we had "shovel-ready projects all set to go? Did you know two-thirds of the shovel-ready money hasn't even been allocated? Feeling that recovery yet? And aren't we all just dying for Obamacare?! I hope you like standing in line. How do you like paying taxes for 10 years so you can get 6 years of health benefits? Do you work, Eldienne? If you work, you will pay. And pay. Not me. I'm done working. I am on your dime.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gingersp
proud to be a liberal
04:31 PM on 08/17/2010
which goes to show that you can make a poll say anything that you want it to. It depends on who you ask. For example, I assume, by your user name that you are a Texan. If you poll only West Texas, you are going to get by far answers toward the ultra conservative. If you poll Dallas or Austin, answers will be more liberal. Rasmussen is notorious for skewing their polls in this way.
04:55 PM on 08/17/2010
Ginger ...

AP, USA Today, Rasmussen, Pew Research, Quinnipac University ... all seem to be "skewing" the same way. Not often you seen that happen ... might be a trend, don't ya think?
07:12 AM on 08/18/2010
Ginger,

Where have you been all your life? Your comment about polls is worse than absurd -- it is willfully disingenuous. Tex has cited national polls from all across the political spectrum. Don't you ever watch Chris Mattews when he has Democratic pollster, Charlie Cook, as a guest? It's bad news, Ginger, all the way to November, unless we have an October surprise akin to the Second Coming. You're full of sheepdip on Rasmussen. He polls likely voters, not registered voters, and not people over 18. In times like these, when the voters are not having any of it, they poll more anti-incumbent. His polling bias is open and above board -- voters who say they are likely to vote.
01:59 PM on 08/17/2010
Yes, I believe in freedom of religion and the freedom to practice your own religion but this is hallowed ground. This is wrong if you ask me not because I am against Islam or hate any religion really but what happened needs to be remembered not by turning to religion or our differences but what we have in common, our humanity. If this was truly a project to bring peace, then why are these groups of very powerful people fighting so hard to get this built? The bond of common humanity and decency was lost to us. By the terrorists and perhaps by the way we treated them or past wars I don’t really know but it continues with the pursuit of this mosque. Insult to injury.
02:15 PM on 08/17/2010
"Hallowed ground"? The WHOLE neighborhood? All ready with adult video stores and strip joints. Not MY idea of keeping the neighborhood "hallowed."

Use some common sense, folks.
07:24 AM on 08/18/2010
"Hallowed ground? The WHOLE neighborhood?"

No, frank, just the proposed site for the mega mosque. It was destroyed when the landing gear from one of the hijacked jets went through the roof to the basement. That is why the group pushing the mosque got the property so cheap. The building cannot be used and it cost more to repair than its woth. Nice deal, huh? Muslim jihadists knock down the building and a Muslim prayer group picks up the place for a song. What's the problem? Thousands died in the course of the attack? Just several blocks away? I don't see no stinking problem.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GENE DEVAUX
Political activist, degrees in Accounting and Econ
03:48 PM on 08/17/2010
Hallowed ground? A run down old business district with boarded up buildings four blocks from ground zero in a building that is currently abandoned and in need of repair is not hallowed ground. Republicans are just using this for a talking point without telling the truth. If they do not want a mosque near the "hallowed ground" then they should insist that the mosque that has been located in the area since before the trade center was built should be closed down. Republicans are just a bunch of out of work trouble makers looking for an issue to regain power. Hazmatgirl, boooo! Did I scare you? That is what the Republicans are trying to do.
07:35 AM on 08/18/2010
Look, Gene, your animosity for the GOP is affecting your thinking. First thing, know that the majority of both GOP and Dems, as well as Independents and New Yorkers, are against the proposed site for the mosque. Second, know that the proposed site was destroyed by the 9/11 hijackers. No Muslim group with a sense of decency and respect for those who died on that day would want to put up a 15-story mega mosque on a site that they bought at a fire sale price because the place was destroyed by Muslim terrorists. Even Muslims not involved in this deal can see that. This business about the building is "abandoned and in need of repair" is true because Muslims jihadis from Saudi Arabia destroyed it on their way into the World Trade Center. The Cordoba/Park 51 folks need to go elsewhere.
01:30 PM on 08/17/2010
I don't think that Obama was walking back his comments, and I think he was entirely correct in not walking back his comments. I think that he was very appropriately declining to comment on something that very first words of the very first amendment of the Bill of Rights unequivocally stipulate is not the call of the government (a limitation on government powers that, although it is the very first that the framers they pretend to revere amended the Constitution to add, apparently does not interest the putative advocates of limited government in the TP and the GO[back]P).

I think that the President's comments show that he is taking his oath of office seriously, I think they are good foreign policy (thus needed exactly from him), I think that they demonstrate humility about what the government should and should not do, and I think they demonstrate remarkable courage in the face of mass hysteria.

I also think that these realities have been ignored because they are inconveniently inconsistent with mass media narratives. I think that the media would rather continue to paint him as naĂŻve, arrogant, and lacking in moral courage than acknowledge the existence of something that belies these characterizations. What upsets me is that people are buying it rather than thinking for themselves. The reaction by the racist right is not surprising, but I wish that so many of Obama's and liberal supporters (a group that includes me) had not been so quick to judge him.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Eldienne
Moderate Dem
05:14 PM on 08/17/2010
My thoughts exactly!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rj1340
Better to light a match than curse the darkness
01:13 PM on 08/17/2010
It is the president's job (they make him swear on a Bible) to defend the Constitution and it was entirely correct for Obama to point out the RIGHT of American citizens to practice their religion. It would also have been politically correct for him to point out that in this particular case, it might not be in the best interests of the community to do so. We need, however to abandon the doctrine of PC and admit out loud that imams must repudiate violence and those who perpetrate it and recruit others for that purpose. Mosques must not be used as recruitment centers and hostels for young terrorists, and ALL Muslims must step forward and condemn those who would destroy us or they render themselves as irrelevant as those Germans who watched as the Nazis purged Europe. When it becomes apparent that your religion eschews the destruction of all others, its time to earn the right to practice it as you want, where you want. Any religious leader dedicated to the service of his fellow man would consider the sensibilities of a community subjected to the unprecedented trauma of 9/11.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GENE DEVAUX
Political activist, degrees in Accounting and Econ
04:04 PM on 08/17/2010
First of all, no one makes anyone take their oath on the Bible. The United States Constitution spells out that there shall be no religious test to hold office in the United States and that officials may swear or aver, that is tell the truth, when they take their oaths. Furthermore Muslims are not taught violence as part of their religious beliefs. How about this? George W. Bush is a born again Christian. Christ did not teach violence, but Bush invaded Iraq, an Arab country that tolerated all religions. So, should we assume that Bush was taught to be evil in the church that he attended? Of course not. It is his personality that led him to his way of thinking, no minister would have taught him to invade and kill hundreds of thousands of people with no real justification or provocation. People tend to fear what they do not understand. Ignorance and intolerance leads to wars and mayhem. Republicans forget that what they do and say is not heard just here in the U.S. but all around the world. When others hear what Republicans are saying, they have reason to be concerned and have fears about the future of this country and the world.