iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Online 'Sextortion' Of Teens On The Rise: Feds

CHARLES WILSON   08/14/10 01:07 PM ET   AP

Sexstortion

INDIANAPOLIS — The nightmare began with a party: three teenage girls with a webcam, visiting an Internet chatroom and yielding to requests to flash their breasts. A week later, one of the girls, a 17-year-old from Indiana, started getting threatening e-mails.

A stranger said he had captured her image on the webcam and would post the pictures to her MySpace friends unless she posed for more explicit pictures and videos for him. On at least two occasions, the teen did what her blackmailer demanded. Finally, police and federal authorities became involved and indicted a 19-year-old Maryland man in June on charges of sexual exploitation.

Federal prosecutors and child safety advocates say they're seeing an upswing in such cases of online sexual extortion. They say teens who text nude cell phone photos of themselves or show off their bodies on the Internet are being contacted by pornographers who threaten to expose their behavior to friends and family unless they pose for more explicit porn, creating a vicious cycle of exploitation.

One federal affidavit includes a special term for the crime: "sextortion."

No one currently tracks the numbers of cases involving online sexual extortion in state and federal courts, but prosecutors and others point toward several recent high-profile examples victimizing teens in a dozen states:

_ In Alabama, Jonathan Vance, 24, of Auburn was sentenced to 18 years in prison in April after he admitted sending threatening e-mails on Facebook and MySpace extorting nude photos from more than 50 young women in Alabama, Pennsylvania and Missouri.

_ In Wisconsin, Anthony Stancl, 18, received 15 years in prison in February after prosecutors said he posed as a girl on Facebook to trick male high school classmates into sending him nude cell phone photos, which he then used to extort them for sex.

_ A 31-year-old California man was arrested in June on extortion charges after authorities said he hacked into more than 200 computers and threatened to expose nude photos he found unless their owners posed for more sexually explicit videos. Forty-four of the victims were juveniles, authorities said. Federal prosecutors said he was even able to remotely activate some victims' webcams without their knowledge and record them undressing or having sex.

The cases have prompted law enforcement officials and advocates to caution teens about their activities. Privacy is nonexistent on the Internet, and once indiscretions appear online, they are virtually impossible to take back. A nude photo sent to a boyfriend's cell phone can easily be circulated through cell phone contacts and wind up on websites that post sexting photos. Once there, it's available for anyone who wants to trace it back to the person who made it.

"Kids are putting their head in the lion's mouth every time they do this," said Parry Aftab, an attorney and online child safety advocate.

Teens can be more vulnerable to blackmail because they're easy to intimidate and embarrassed to seek help. And the extortionists are often willing to make good on their threats, said Steve DeBrota, an assistant U.S. attorney in Indianapolis who has been involved in sextortion investigations.

"You are blackmailable," said Aftab, " ... and you will do anything to keep those pictures from getting out."

In the Indiana case, the teenage girl's mother called police when she found out about the threats. Authorities subpoenaed Internet service providers to track the chats and e-mails to their source, a computer in Mechanicsville, Md., according to court documents.

According to court documents, the computer's owner, Trevor Shea, told agents he had engaged in similar schemes with about 10 girls, most of them 17 or 18 years old.

His trial is set for Aug. 30. He has pleaded not guilty and his attorney, Michael Donahoe, said he is working on a possible settlement.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

INDIANAPOLIS — The nightmare began with a party: three teenage girls with a webcam, visiting an Internet chatroom and yielding to requests to flash their breasts. A week later, one of the girls, a 1...
INDIANAPOLIS — The nightmare began with a party: three teenage girls with a webcam, visiting an Internet chatroom and yielding to requests to flash their breasts. A week later, one of the girls, a 1...
Filed by Nick Graham  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 202
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
05:54 PM on 08/28/2010
I don't think teen should be excused from the stupid things they do. That being said extortion is a crime, so for everyone who wants to tar and feather kids for doing something stupid (because that's new to this generation I guess) get over it.

I keep reading about girls flashing/taking nude pictures. It seems that we missed the part of the article where boys took pictures as well. They were tricked so that example was slightly different but no one made them do it the first time.I have trouble believing thats the only case, and all of them are tricked in to it. Life is full of lessons and most of us are fortunate to have grown up in a non internet era. So yes they have to learn, but unlike all the other "perfect" people here Iam not ready to lock them up just yet. The Girls or the boys....
photo
scorpioman
The Naked Truth
07:19 PM on 08/17/2010
the interweb's series of tubes needs to be divided up between the adults tubes and the under 18's series of tubes........
photo
scorpioman
The Naked Truth
07:14 PM on 08/17/2010
where there's a will, there's a way........
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Johnism96
06:37 PM on 08/17/2010
If someone steals from you and then blackmails you that is a crime. If you do something dumb and someone holds it over your head that should not be a crime.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stephen Anderson
07:01 PM on 08/17/2010
If you yourself posed nude on the internet and invited a 12 year old to view you in the raw, that would be dumb and a crime. I don't think as a whole criminals are known to be very smart.
If a 17 year old male did the same thing, he would be subjected to criminal charges. He could go to prison and face life time registration as a sex offender. Child porn is a crime or its not a crime. You can't have it both ways. The other people in the story should be charged too.
Now watch people will refuse to accept what these girls did was a crime, but they are crimes just the same.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Todd Sullivan
09:39 PM on 08/16/2010
i agree with whoever said the girls should be charged with a crime for exposing themselves. it is a double standard which women think gives them a free pass, but all it really does is continue to cast them as the weaker sex that's too innocent to really know what they're doing. females who really want women to be empowered should force these girls to take responsibility for their actions, just as the men should have to take responsibility for their actions.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stephen Anderson
05:32 PM on 08/17/2010
Thank you.
12:23 PM on 08/16/2010
If you have kids, do random checks of their computers and monitor all of their communications until they are 18. Make sure that they understand that you are always going to find out what they're sending from their phone/computer.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:31 AM on 08/16/2010
Welcome to the Internet! You must be new around here.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oxygen
love is like oxygen
09:19 AM on 08/16/2010
the poor kids are being forced into seeing things with the internet they should never have to be exposed to at such young ages forcing them into adulthood and causing them emotional stress

technology should be making childrens lives better not worse ... of course the public teachers are happy with this abuse as it makes the kids easier to manipulate - a side show to hide the teachers own abusiveness with poor education
08:46 AM on 08/16/2010
Anything you do on the internet can be recorded by someone. The answer? Don't do anything on line that you don't want everyone in the universe to be aware of. Parents and teachers should stress that message. Some adults need to learn it, too.
photo
kapalabhati
Lokah Samasta Sukhino Bhavantu
08:35 AM on 08/16/2010
Well, perhaps flashing online was their first mistake.
08:48 AM on 08/16/2010
Exactly - don't do anything on the internet that you don't want the world at large to know about.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ian Gonsalves
12:06 PM on 08/15/2010
I love how people get angry at the 19 year old who was extorting the girl and nobody seems to realize that the extortion would not even have been possible had the girl not shared the photos in the first place.

If you walk down the street and get mugged in broad daylight people would feel sorry for you, if it's 3am, in a bad part of town, and you are alone in a secluded ally and you get mugged, I still have sympathy for you, but much less than if it had been the first scenario. Same goes for this girl, I have sympathy for her but it's quite a bit less than if she had been in her room on a second story and someone had climbed up and taken nude photos of her.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JasonWS
Lovely day for a good plan
08:41 AM on 08/16/2010
Is blackmail a crime or not? If you're drunk, and investigate a strange sound, leading you to a public side-walk, isn't your murderer still guilty of murder, even though you were drunk in public?

I've been flashed by teenagers while I drove past them on my way to work, I didn't take pictures and I didn't try to force them to have sex with me. They committed a crime, but it does not give me the right to exploit them. The more severe crime does deserve the more severe public outrage. Someone who speeds, that is then killed by a wrong way drunk driver deserves less acrimony than the Drunk Driver. This is simple stuff.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ian Gonsalves
09:53 PM on 08/16/2010
You've miss my point completely, I'm not saying the guy did not commit a crime, I'm just saying he could not have even done it had she not been irresponsible.

Also your scenario about investigating a strange sound has nothing to do with the topic, that would be considered an unfortunate accident. I'm not talking about accidents or unfortunate series of events, I'm talking about being aware of your surroundings and avoiding risk when possible. If young girls don't share pictures of themselves nude, they help avoid the risk of creeps taking advantage of them. This is simple stuff.
photo
Walter H
Thou shalt not coerce. One and done.
08:30 AM on 08/15/2010
It would simplify much of life if we didn't teach kids that sex was dirty and shameful in the first place. The blackmail aspect only works in a context of guilt and shame.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kenan Cross
02:06 PM on 08/15/2010
And that's going to work for perverts? So if they aren't ashamed then they will be more free to share it? Is that the road you want to go down? I have a 12 year old daughter who is starting to elicit stares from grown men. Believe me, it makes no difference whether they are shamed or not, perverts will still do anything they can to exploit you. It's more than shame they face, its the ruin of their reputation!
photo
Walter H
Thou shalt not coerce. One and done.
08:03 AM on 08/16/2010
I think you completely missed my point.
11:53 AM on 08/16/2010
ruin of their reputation = shame...same thing, you missed the point of Walter's post.

If someone flashes their boobs on a webcam and someone saves it then says "I'll post this on the internet if you don't take more pictures for me." Then the kid says...who cares, post it. End of the blackmail/sexploitation. The blackmailer only has power if you have shame over what they are blackmailing you for.

Oh and get used to guys looking at your daughter, it isn't "perverted" it is called normal human behavior.
photo
kapalabhati
Lokah Samasta Sukhino Bhavantu
08:36 AM on 08/16/2010
Oh good lord.
photo
Walter H
Thou shalt not coerce. One and done.
09:01 AM on 08/16/2010
Insightful retort.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stephen Anderson
05:04 AM on 08/15/2010
I was just wondering if it was a connection with giving teen girls a pass when they commit sex crimes like this and girls who cry rape because the guy dissed them or something. After all, they know that everyone is going to automatically treat them like victims. It’s a shame the guy has to show video off his cell phone to clear himself. After he do that, they still won't charge her with anything.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gesundheit 451
I am merely a genius, not a god.
03:07 AM on 08/15/2010
I can't believe how foolish these girls were, what are their parents teaching them? And why were these girls so afraid to tell their parents about this creep? I did dumb things too when I was a kid, but I always felt comfortable going to my parents for help, no matter how bad it was. We adults need to understand that it's no longer strangers outside the home we need to fear. The strangers now have direct access to our homes and our children. We also have a responsibility to make sure children are aware of net dangers at the same time we warn them about stranger danger and good touch/ bad touch. It's never too early to teach our children some common sense safety tips in a way that will empower them rather than frighten them. That having been said, there are states that are now prosecuting teens who engage in sexting as distributors of child pornography. I really can't believe the double standard I'm seeing here. Would you forgive boys as easily? Why are you assuming the girls are innocents? If they did that on a street corner we'd be talking about a whole different ball game. I'm not saying they weren't victimized after the fact, so check yourself on that. However, what they did before they were victimized they should be held accountable for. Actions have consequences, and they've learned that the hard way. What sort of person of either sex does that sort of thing anyway?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realitytrumpsbull
Two 'alves of coconut!
03:35 AM on 08/15/2010
I think it's like the people that xerox their butts on the copier at work. It's kind of sleazy, kind of risque, but, once you've done that, your behind is immortalized on the bulletin board...well, at least for the duration of the time it takes em to figure out who did it, which is why more and more jobsites have security cameras...to prevent people from doing stupid stuff, or at least make it so they can fire the responsible parties. If you show off your 'bod on the web, chances are, someone's going to see the picture someday, eventually, other than the person you might have intended to show it to. But, how is it really different from some chick on the freeway who 'puts em on the glass'? If you've got it, flaunt it, as they say, but, given the probably terabytes of smut and nudity already on the web, hasn't this whole thing gotten kind of passe, novelty gone etc.? I guess some things never really get boring, though.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stephen Anderson
03:42 AM on 08/15/2010
Thank you for the intelligent response to the question. I am amazed at how people floated away from a crime that if committed by a 17 year old boys, they would scream for him to be in prison.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stephen Anderson
02:33 AM on 08/15/2010
Now this is what I call an intelligent debate.