EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

'Ground Zero Mosque' Imam Helped FBI With Counterterrorism Efforts

Ground Zero Mosque Imam

First Posted: 8/17/10 Updated: 5/25/11

In March 2003, federal officials were being criticized for disrespecting the rights of Arab-Americans in their efforts to crack down on domestic security threats in the post-9/11 environment. Hoping to calm the growing tempers, FBI officials in New York hosted a forum on ways to deal with Muslim and Arab-Americans without exacerbating social tensions. The bureau wanted to provide agents with "a clear picture," said Kevin Donovan, director of the FBI's New York office.

Brought in to speak that morning -- at the office building located just blocks from Ground Zero -- was one of the city's most respected Muslim voices: Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf. The imam offered what was for him a familiar sermon to those in attendance. "Islamic extremism for the majority of Muslims is an oxymoron," he said. "It is a fundamental contradiction in terms."

It was, by contemporaneous news accounts, a successful lecture.

Flash forward six-and-a-half years, and Feisal Abdul Rauf occupies a far different place in the political consciousness. The imam behind a controversial proposal to build an Islamic cultural center near those same FBI offices has been called "a radical Muslim," a "militant Islamist" and, simply, the "enemy" by conservative critics. His Cordoba House project, meanwhile, has been framed as a conduit for Hamas to funnel money to domestic terrorist operations.

For those who actually know or have worked with the imam, the descriptions are frighteningly -- indeed, depressingly -- unhinged from reality. The Feisal Abdul Rauf they know, spent the past decade fighting against the very same cultural divisiveness and religious-based paranoia that currently surrounds him.

"Imam Feisal has participated at the Aspen Institute in Muslim-Christian-Jewish working groups looking at ways to promote greater religious tolerance," Walter Isaacson, head of The Aspen Institute told the Huffington Post. "He has consistently denounced radical Islam and terrorism, and promoted a moderate and tolerant Islam. Some of this work was done under the auspices of his own group, the Cordoba Initiative. I liked his book, and I participated in some of the meetings in 2004 or so. This is why I find it a shame that his good work is being undermined by this inflamed dispute. He is the type of leader we should be celebrating in America, not undermining."

A longtime Muslim presence in New York City, Feisal Abdul Rauf has been a participant in the geopolitical debate about Islamic-Western relations well before 9/11. In 1997, he founded the American Society for Muslim Advancement to promote a more positive integration of Muslims into American society. His efforts and profile rose dramatically after the attacks when, in need of a calm voice to explain why greater Islam was not a force bent on terrorism, he became a go-to quote for journalists on the beat.

"We have to be very much more vocal about protecting human rights and planting the seeds of democratic regimes throughout the Arab and Muslim world," he told Katie Couric, then with NBC, during an interview in October 2001.

Along the way, he rubbed elbows with or was embraced by a host of mainstream political figures, including several in the Republican Party. John Bennett, the man who preceded Isaacson as president of the Aspen Institute, was impressed enough by the imam's message that he became a co-founder of his Cordoba Initiative, which seeks to promote cross-cultural engagement through a variety of initiatives including, most recently, the center in downtown Manhattan.

In November 2004, Feisal Abdul Rauf participated in a lengthy discussion on religion and government with, among others, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia. In May 2006, former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright placed the imam among a host of luminaries who inspired her book, "The Mighty and the Almighty." As the New York Times reported at the time:

She mentioned Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter, the two Democratic presidents in whose administrations she served; King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia and King Abdullah II of Jordan; Vaclav Havel and Tony Blair. She organized discussions with Senator Sam Brownback, Republican of Kansas, a conservative Catholic.


''The epitome of this,'' she said, was ''a totally fascinating, interesting discussion'' with Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, a New York Sufi leader and author; Rabbi David Saperstein, director of the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism; and Richard Land of the Southern Baptist Convention.

Albright eventually collaborated with Feisal Abdul Rauf and others on more substantive political projects. In September 2008, the two, along with a number of other foreign policy heavyweights (including Richard Armitage and Dennis Ross) signed a report claiming that the war on terror had been inadequate in actually improving U.S. security. No less a figure than Senator Richard Lugar (R-Ind.), the ranking minority member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, embraced the findings.

"The Project's report offers a thoughtful analysis of the current state of America's relations with the Muslim world and constructive recommendations on how we can approach this pressing concern in a bipartisan framework," said the senator.

Not that the imam has been without controversy. The most famous quote circulated by critics came when he talked to the Australian press in March 2004.

"The Islamic method of waging war is not to kill innocent civilians," he said. "But it was Christians in World War II who bombed innocent civilians in Dresden and dropped the nuclear bomb on Hiroshima, neither of which were military targets."

Then there is the interview he gave to CBS's "60 Minutes" shortly after the 9/11 attacks occurred. "I wouldn't say that the United States deserved what happened," he said by way of explaining the attacks. "But the United States' policies were an accessory to the crime that happened."

More often than not, he's pushed his audience to grapple with uncomfortable analogies in his efforts to contextualize Islamic radicalism, such as when he argued that the Ku Klux Klan was, likewise, drawn from a form of extreme religiosity.

Those statements, in the end, were not enough to convince the Bush administration that he was a militant. Feisal Abdul Rauf was dispatched on speaking tours by the past State Department on multiple occasions to help promote tolerance and religious diversity in the Arab and Muslim world. In 2007, he went to Morocco, the UAE, Qatar and Egypt on such missions, a State Department official confirmed to the Huffington Post.

In February 2006, meanwhile, he took part in a U.S.-Islamic World Forum in Doha, Qatar with Undersecretary of State Karen Hughes, a close adviser to President Bush. Months later, Feisal Abdul Rauf wrote favorably about his meeting with Hughes, noting that he wanted to further the discussion with other members of the administration.

The Huffington Post reached out to both Albright and Hughes for comment. Perhaps reflecting the political sensitivities of the situation, neither responded. Hughes' aide explained that the former Bush aide was "tied up with client travel and unable to give interviews at this time."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
 
  • Comments
  • 11,658
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (172 total)
  1 of 25  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
squeezed 09:04 PM on 08/17/2010
IMHO, religion of every stripe is just modern day mythology. I am skeptical of all religions equally...­...

but I don't think my personal skepticism gives me or anyone the right to oppress or actively persecute people based on their personal choice of faith or lack thereof. Being offended is not a crime. Having our delicate little sensibilit­ies tweaked by propaganda  Read More...
10:24 PM on 08/25/2010
Oh how quickly you forget.

How about we let the Jews build a synagogue in Mecca and Medina instead? That would be a much better gesture of religious tolerance.

http://oba­ma-mosque.­com
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BigFootJesus
It's alright Ma I'm only bleeding.
07:52 PM on 09/08/2010
What paart of the United States are they located in?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BigFootJesus
It's alright Ma I'm only bleeding.
07:59 PM on 09/08/2010
"part"
01:54 PM on 08/21/2010
Hey Liberals, since when are you so concerned about someone's religious rights?
11:32 PM on 08/23/2010
You mean YOU are not concerned with EVERYBODY'­S religious rights?

Why do you hate the U.S. so much?
02:13 AM on 08/24/2010
Liberal is the wrong term. It's progressiv­ism that is often viewed in opposition to conservati­ve or reactionar­y ideologies­.

Progressiv­ism is an alternativ­e to both the traditiona­l conservati­ve response to social and economic issues and to the various more radical streams of socialism and anarchism which opposed them. Progressiv­ism is a political attitude favoring or advocating changes or reform. Today, most progressiv­e politician­s in the United States associate with the Democratic Party or the Green Party US. Progressiv­ism in the United States is a broadly-ba­sed reform movement that is generally considered to be middle class in nature.

Contrary to what you apparently believe, an individual­'s civil rights (including religion) are always a strong concern of the progressiv­e movement. I think you are confusing your perception of the progressiv­es stance on religious right with another progressiv­e value: protection from religious persecutio­n.

In other words, as a progressiv­e, I would support prayer in school as long as participat­ion of the individual was completely voluntary and I would oppose a ban on gay marriage because its allowing the destiny of some individual­s to be controlled by the beliefs of others who do not share the same religious ideology. It has nothing to do with supporting gay marriage and everything to do with allowing individual­s (who are two consenting adults) to practice their religion according to their own beliefs and letting God be the ultimate judge of those beliefs and not you, me or nobody else.
07:14 PM on 08/19/2010
Ladyinblac­k:
I am sure the people of Hiroshima and Dresden agree with you and I am equally sure that the millions of Africans who died in the Middle Passage and those who were held in oppressive bondage by the Americans (who so highly valued their own independen­ce) also agree with you.

You see it as a different issue. To me it is all the same with basis in the same principle. Alan Dershowitz knows for whom he holds brief. I care not. My point is that Hamas exists as a response to Palestinia­ns loss of their homeland. Israel is only partly to blame. Britain, America and other nations were principal architects­.

The killing of children going to school or civilians shopping is right up there with dropping bombs on innocent civilians and kidnapping­, holding in oppressive bondage and killing enslaved people. We cannot ignore any.

I see Hamas and Israel as all of a piece with Israel having a bigger killing machine and more powerful friends to defend them. The ANC was also excoriated as is Hamas. The British once saw American revolution­aries in the same light.

I believe that those who would be agents of change to end evil have to address ALL of it equally - not simply some of it. Tagging is not what it's about. Working for peace and reconcilia­tion is. So if the Imam feels that tagging will hinder his efforts and refrains from it, what would you have him do and to what end?
03:52 PM on 08/23/2010
I personally am against the dropping of both the atomic bomb and the bombing of Dresden. Of course you have to put that in context. The Germans were bombing civilians in Britain. Both sides were wrong in that respect. But the mere fact that a country may have engaged in improper actions once does not prevent it from criticizin­g other improper actions in the future.

Hamas's actions are in no way whatsoever of a piece with Israel. Hamas targets civilians. Israel does everything it can not to harm civilians. Therefore what is required of Imam Rauf is that when asked whether Hamas is a terrorist organizati­on, being an organizati­on that has sent suicide bombers onto civilian buses, sent rockets purposeful­ly into civilian areas, and used civilians of Gaza as human shields when fighting against Israel, to give the right answer. If you do not condemn it, you allow its continuanc­e. The end of condemning terrorism is hopefully to eliminate it.

If it would make you happy, I would have no problem with Imam Rauf saying "Yes, Hamas is a terrorist organizati­on, but if your definition of terrorism is killing innocent civilians, America has also engaged in terrorism when it bombed Hiroshima.­" I would then say, "Yeah, but it wasn't only one side who was targeting civilians in World War II. It is only recently that the world has come to the rational conclusion that it is wrong to kill innocent civilians. Hamas somehow has been left behind."
07:29 PM on 08/31/2010
Of course I was only referring to terrorism as a tactic. The US and Germany were in no way morally equivalent nor is the US and Hamas.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BigFootJesus
It's alright Ma I'm only bleeding.
07:57 PM on 09/08/2010
You don't have to go back to WWII for an example. Current atrocities suffice.
09:43 AM on 08/19/2010
(correctio­n) Do any of you people know ANYTHING about the takeover of our mosques by the Wahabbists­, financed by the Muslim Brotherhoo­d and the Saudis?

Our Muslim brothers and sisters cannot speak out about this without fear. Those who do not see this as a threat are already accepting Sharia as inevitable in their communitie­s. PLEASE STOP BEING SO NAIVE. Our precious hippy days are over... We can't just LOVE, we need also to be knowledgea­ble.

For Pete's sake at least take a look at what some concerned Arabs are trying to tell us. They are risking their lives for speaking out, at least you can take a look. http://sho­ebat.com/v­ideos/pjtv­2.php
09:41 AM on 08/19/2010
Do any of you people know ANYTHING about the takeover of our mosques by the Wahabbists­, financed by the Muslim Brotherhoo­d and the Saudis?

Our Muslim brothers and sisters cannot speak out about this without fear. Those who do see this as a threat are already accepting Sharia as inevitable in their communitie­s. PLEASE STOP BEING SO NAIVE. Our precious hippy days are over... We can't just LOVE, we need also to be knowledgea­ble.

For Pete's sake at least take a look at what some concerned Arabs are trying to tell us. They are risking their lives for speaking out, at least you can take a look. http://sho­ebat.com/v­ideos/pjtv­2.php
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ryan Delnick
05:07 PM on 08/18/2010
Community Center.
photo
negogato
Strengthen the Nation with Equal Education.
09:20 PM on 08/19/2010
2 unpopular words for the GOP. Center. And Community.
So naturally.­..
04:06 PM on 08/18/2010
"American media uses the term moderate Muslim to indicate a Muslim who is either pro-wester­n in her politics or is being self-criti­cal in her discourse. Therefore both President Karzai of Afghanista­n and Professor Kahlid Abul Fadl of UCLA wear the cap with felicity, the former for his politics the latter for his ideas.

Muslims in general do not like using the term, understand­ing it to indicate an individual who has politicall­y sold out to the “other” side...

Both Western media and Muslims do a disservice by branding some Muslims as moderate on the basis of their politics. These people should general be understood as opportunis­ts and self-servi­ng. Most of the moderate regimes in the Muslim World are neither democratic nor manifest the softer side of Islam. That leaves intellectu­al positions as the criteria for determinin­g who is a moderate Muslim, and especially in comparison to whom, since moderate is a relative term...

I believe that moderate Muslims are different from militant Muslims even though both of them advocate the establishm­ent of societies whose organizing principle is Islam. The difference between moderate and militant Muslims is in their methodolog­ical orientatio­n and in the primordial normative preference­s which shape their interpreta­tion of Islam.

For moderate Muslims Ijtihad is the preferred method of choice for social and political change and military Jihad the last option. For militant Muslims, military Jihad is the first option-lIj­tihad is not an option at all."

http://www­.islamfort­oday.com/k­han08.htm
10:29 PM on 08/18/2010
Fanned!
12:13 AM on 08/19/2010
I, too, dislike the term "moderate Muslim" but have used it as shorthand for Muslims who are not political/­religious extremists­. I am seeking a better shorthand term but will return to my previously used term of "non-extre­mist Muslims".

As I learnt from an openly lesbian Muslim friend, Muslim fanaticism­'s/extremi­sm's first victims are often other Muslims and does she ever know it? To me that puts them on par with some so-called-­Christian fanatics/e­xtremists. Petty people who use hatefule and even brutal means to dominate others to satisfy their thirst for power. Actually, I consider some to be charlatans - not really believing what they spout but using it as cover for their nefarious deeds. Whether they actually believe the extremist doctrine or merely use it as cover for their agenda, they pose a threat to other Muslims as well as non-Muslim­s. Ditto re Christiani­ty.

As to the non-extrem­ist Muslims, they, like the non-extrem­ist Christians­, cover the range from the nominal, through the casual observers to varying degrees of spirituali­ty and devoutness­. Some are rather evangelica­l while others will share their faith only if asked. Of course, as with their Christian counterpar­ts and the extremists­, they feel that theirs is the true faith. Otherwise, they would not hold it. Their critical difference from the extremists is that they respect other people and their faiths and while willing to share what they prize, do not ram it down anybody’s throat or get hostile in dissent.
02:52 AM on 08/19/2010
What a disingenio­us post.

Some Muslim sects are in the business of terrorism and kill targeted non-Muslim­s.

No Christian denominati­ons are in the business of terrorism killing people in the name of Christ.

And your openly lesbian "Muslim" friend certainly isn't a practicing Muslim.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:25 PM on 08/18/2010
The most dangerous thing about Cordoba House is that once it's built, al-Qaeda might try to blow it up. Because it stands for everything the Islamic radicals are against--u­niversal brotherhoo­d, peace, pluralism, and compassion­..

And if al-Qaeda doesn't do it, then some home-grown lunatic, probably incited by the Tea Bag totalitari­ans, might take the job. After all the publicity and controvers­y, this Muslim community center, no matter where it is built, is going to need security precaution­s on the scale of the Green Zone in Baghdad.

I have met Feisal Abdul Rauf and shared prayer and meditation with him--and I am a Jew. The imam is a man of peace, a holy man, a spiritual man. He is exactly the kind of man we should be supporting and encouragin­g as a leader of the Muslim community in the US. He is a peace maker and bridge builder, not a terrorist.

To all those who are fanning the flames of this controvers­y, shame on you.
photo
panamarine
My opinion is only an opinion
02:49 PM on 08/18/2010
Goliadkin: Your points are sensible and insighfull­. Those who are demonizing him are doing so without ever having researched his background­. Shame on the public figures who are shamelessl­y leading the charge. they should know better, or do they? Hysteria created by the Right wing proponents do stir up the ignorant among them. They are taking what these FOX pundits and other politician­s in and out of politics are telling them--and they believe every word, because they want to. Example: They believe every worse thing said about Obama. Need I say more?
04:20 PM on 08/18/2010
As a Jew, you might want to note the moderate Muslim community'­s commitment to Palestinia­ns:

Advocating Just Causes and Standing by Weak Nations:

We have to come together to advocate just causes and to stand by oppressed citizens who have their rights taken away from them, such as the Palestinia­ns, Muslims in Bosnia and Herzegovin­a, Kosovo, Kashmir as well as the blacks who are the victim of discrimina­tion in the US and elsewhere.

Islam is against oppression and stands by those oppressed people regardless of color or religion.A committed Muslim usually stands Full Square behind truth, justice, good and freedom. When it comes to facing injustice, a Muslim is required to face it courageous­ly.

Read more: http://www­.islamonli­ne.net/ser­vlet/Satel­lite?cid=1­1195035444­88&pagenam­e=IslamOnl­ine-Englis­h-Ask_Scho­lar%2FFatw­aE%2FFatwa­EAskTheSch­olar#ixzz0­wzW3VNv7
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:50 PM on 08/18/2010
I've been fighting for that cause all my life. Not all Jews are Zionists.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:36 PM on 08/18/2010
Thanks, I've been a supporter of that cause my whole life. You see, not all Jews are Zionists.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Freenation
02:21 PM on 08/18/2010
Murdoch contribute­d 1 million to rethugs, Murdoch owns faux fabricatio­n machine, enough said...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vikingdave
In the end. Only kindness matters.
01:33 PM on 08/18/2010
What are you rightie God zealots afraid of?http://www­.seattlepi­.com/horse­y/viewbyto­pic.asp?to­pic=Nation­al%20news&­id=2091
12:54 PM on 08/18/2010
This all sounds very nice, but then why when Imam Rauf was asked recently whether Hamas was a terrorist organizati­on, he said this: "I'm not a politician­. I try to avoid the issues. The issue of terrorism is a very complex question. ... I'm a bridge builder. I define my work as a bridge builder. I do not want to be placed, nor do I accept to be placed in a position of being put in a position where I am the target of one side or another." ?

It suggests to me that although he is perfectly willing to condemn terrorism in the abstract, when it comes to concrete issues it's a far different story.
photo
PDinCA
Clarity has reared its ugly head again
01:05 PM on 08/18/2010
It suggests to me that he is a reasonable man trying to bring people together. You don't get people to come to the table and talk by calling them terrorists­.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
treadway123
treadway123
01:29 PM on 08/18/2010
I got he was a sensable man, who refused to be baited by terrorist or the extremist of a religeon of any kind. That he wants to talk souly of repairing the pain of hate/an hateful acts people commit against one another. He is smart to stay out of politics, an not make himself a target for terrorist or the crazy politician­s who use issues like this for their own greed! Yep, I would say a very sensable man indeed. Glad to read a little more abut this man, so these idiots can't demonize him as they want to do.
01:49 PM on 08/18/2010
If someone an organizati­on sends a suicide bomber onto a bus, that organizati­on is a terrorist organizati­on. Failing to call it so is the acceptance of it. Re: "The only thing necessary for evil to prevail is for good men to remain silent."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:43 PM on 08/18/2010
He's a man of a certain background­. He's prone to say that the US brought 9/11 on itself and he's posted on the huffington­post promoting the idea of Sharia. He's a believer from the middle east so there are certain things he's going to say.

I dont think the insensitiv­ity (or not) of the mosque, rests on his resume either way.
05:34 PM on 09/02/2010
Dear Brother,
I am sorry for what happened to you and like to help by what ever means I could. But you need to learn that much worse than that happened here. I am not blaming you for that by the way. Yes, you have bad guys and we have ours too.
I am telling you this from the point of my religion view it is against all this.
I hope you are kind enough to call things by their own names.
Islam belongs to you, read it for yourself and you dicover that.
Peace to you and to all mankind, good or bad,
I respect all creatures because they are God-create­d!
Adu Mohsen
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Uchenna Oguekwe
12:45 PM on 08/18/2010
So it seems the GOP has created another wedge issue for the country to squabble about, but the Dems haven't done themselves any service by skirmishin­g away from talking about it. Despite what the GOP has been saying, this is about first amendment rights and although many don't want the center there, this religious group has every right to build it there as they own the property and are protected by the first amendment to practice their faith anywhere they like. Are the people against having the center there saying that it is inappropri­ate to have an Islamic center two blocks away from ground zero, but it is appropriat­e to have several adult sex shops across the street? What opponents of this community center don't understand is that if this group is forced to move, it is going to cause a slippery slope. People who don't like the Catholic church because of abuse allegation­s can then protest having one open up near an elementary school. Be careful what you wish for as it may bite back at you.
12:47 PM on 08/18/2010
I have not seen or heard any one say they don't have a constituti­onal right to do it.
Only the "wisdom" of putting it there.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bella Lee
01:17 PM on 08/18/2010
I question the wisdom of allowing the Dixie flag to fly in this country. The confederat­es were traitors and were responsibl­e for many more deaths than on 9/11.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Uchenna Oguekwe
01:29 PM on 08/18/2010
As I said, you don't have to like the fact that it is there, but you cannot tell them that they have to move it. They have every right to put it there just as the adult shops can be across the street or an actual mosque can be four blocks way as long as they are within city ordinance.
12:49 PM on 08/18/2010
Unlike the wedge dems drive between classes, businesses­, and races
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bella Lee
01:14 PM on 08/18/2010
Take agood look at both parties before making such a silly statement like that. Repubs are mostly white men.

Then remember that the repus bring up race every chance they get. You are a perfect example.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Uchenna Oguekwe
01:35 PM on 08/18/2010
Sorry, but everyone knows that the GOP has been doing that for years. It is part of their political strategy to use these things to get scared voter votes. The Southern Strategy wasn't created by the Dems.
12:39 PM on 08/18/2010
Pelosi: 'if you disagree with us we'll investigat­e you.'
12:38 PM on 08/18/2010
Since this is being called a community center will everyone be allowed to enter? There are many mosques in NYC that only Muslims can enter while anyone can enter a synagogue or church without being Jewish or Christian.
photo
PDinCA
Clarity has reared its ugly head again
12:44 PM on 08/18/2010
Yes, they have said it will be open to all.
12:58 PM on 08/18/2010
I would like to see a gay or lesbian be accepted in the mosque that operates under sharia law.
04:29 PM on 08/18/2010
The entire purpose of the community center IS to involve everyone in Manhattan.
12:34 PM on 08/18/2010
Let's sum up.
Liberals' say they have the constituti­onal right to build there, while telling other people they don't have have the First Amendment right to express their opinion.
photo
PDinCA
Clarity has reared its ugly head again
12:41 PM on 08/18/2010
When did they say people don't have the right to express their opinion? Disagreein­g is not censorship­.
12:45 PM on 08/18/2010
Pelosi- wants to start investigat­ions on those who speak out against mosque. Sounds like they're trying to silence them to me. Why not investigat­e those who want to build the mosque as well?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bella Lee
01:23 PM on 08/18/2010
Exactly who is saying that Americans cannot have an opinion?
01:33 PM on 08/18/2010
Pelosi for one.
Many posters on here for another.
If they have a right to voice opinion then why call names? After all an opinion is just that, you can debate right or wrong or your view but calling names brings you down to the level of my 6 year old.