More

Jared Bernstein, White House Economist, Throws Cold Water On Bush Tax Cuts Compromise

First Posted: 08/17/10 12:24 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 06:25 PM ET

Obama

A key member of the White House economic team is throwing cold water on a leading compromise proposal in the debate over the extension of the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy.

In a sit-down with the Huffington Post on Monday, Jared Bernstein, Vice President Joseph Biden's chief economist, expressed skepticism with a plan to "phase out" the tax cuts for the wealthy as opposed to simply allowing those tax cuts to expire (as scheduled) later this year.

"There are many good reasons not to extend the high-end parts of the Bush tax cuts having to do with the fear that a temporary extension could be made permanent," Bernstein said. "What you are talking about -- a $30 to 40 billion range in terms of adding to the deficit by extending the high end -- could easily become $700 billion over a ten-year budget window."

"I think the phase out suffers from that vulnerability," he went on. "You are exposing yourself to the risk that it could be made permanent. The president, [Treasury Secretary] Tim Geithner have been very articulate on this point. If you wanted to, and we do, provide more help to the economy that is about the worst way you could do it. Those folks tend not to be liquidity constrained and therefore the kinds of multipliers associated with that type of spending are the lowest. So it simply is not good stimulus policy and it is not good budget policy."

The comments from Bernstein were offered, in part, as a response to a proposal suggested by Moody's economist Mark Zandi. A former adviser to Sen. John McCain who has increasingly become a philosophical ally of President Obama, Zandi has suggested that an abrupt increase in the tax rates on those making over $200,000 a year would have a freezing effect on job creation and economic recovery. Simply not raising the rates, however, would blow a massive hole in the federal budget. As a compromise, Zandi argues, the government should gradually reinstate the higher tax rates over the course of several years.

The White House has favored letting the Bush tax cuts on the wealthy expire as they are set to do under the law. But administration officials haven't been pressed about the middle-ground proposal. Bernstein's comments are the closest that White House aides have come to fully rejecting the idea and they portend an even more dramatic and heated political fight once the issue of the Bush tax cuts re-emerges following Congress' August recess.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,816
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (33 total)
  1 of 13  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
Luna C666 12:30 AM on 08/18/2010
"Those folks tend not to be liquidity constrained"

I.e. they are already financially solvent to the point of not being 'constrained' financially, in other words they can already buy whatever they want, giving them MORE money isn't going to provoke further economic activity on their part, e.g. consuming more than they already do.

The rich are already spending as much as they are  Read More...
05:23 PM on 08/19/2010
If I'm not working, am I paying income tax?

Jobs needed first!

No job, no income, no tax.
10:45 AM on 08/19/2010
so let the cuts expire
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Icantbelieveher
What you do for the least of my brethren, you do f
08:38 AM on 08/18/2010
Every dollar in tax cut to the wealthy is another out of the circulation in the economy, as it just gives them more $$$ to put in their bank accounts. A tax cut to the bottom 95% of Americans will be another $$$ spent and added to the economy, meaning more demand for what corporations are selling!

Why are we constantly being told that we need to learn to accept less than what our parents had -- a lower paying job, no health care, lower social security at a higher wage -- but the wealthy can't pay a dollar more!
11:40 AM on 08/19/2010
then more money to loan ...........
08:23 AM on 08/18/2010
Jared has become a joke. All that he does is blow smoke and foment h8 for people who don't goose step with the lies Obiden wants you to believe
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Icantbelieveher
What you do for the least of my brethren, you do f
08:31 AM on 08/18/2010
What?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sharin
liberal and proud of it
08:40 AM on 08/18/2010
you're on the wrong web site to be posting your prevarifications. U spout UR l1es here often enough and we're smart enough to STILL not believe U
01:34 PM on 08/19/2010
at least he can spell his post correctly........ rather than your debauchery you tried, it should be "prevarication"

but thanks again for playing
07:04 AM on 08/18/2010
I think all the Bush era cuts will be allowed to expire - after much bickering and fighting.

Then, a new tax relief bill for the middle class will be part of the Democratic platform in 2012.
06:29 AM on 08/18/2010
I like the term "phase out" which really means extend. Be prepared for obama selling out on this!
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
lodger16x
06:07 AM on 08/18/2010
Why don't we just get it over with and have a reality teevee show pick one king who gets all the wealth in America, and let the Lovely Wealth Trickle Down as a Blessing to Us All, just like Ronnie Reagan said? Seriously, I've had discussions with Newt Gingrich fans barely scraping by, with a wife and kids, who get upset if I suggest 100 million dollars a year, every year, should be enough for anyone to live on! They have taken a ride on the Wingnut Express, and they're OK with 300 million Americans starving to death as long as ONE GUY gets to make 100 million dollars and one cent a year! You know, because they have "convictions," HA!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vegancheesenut
Proud socialist
06:58 AM on 08/18/2010
Faved.......it reminds me of the abused child will always want to go back to the abusive parent. That's all they know
photo
mariusvinchi
Saint Lucia is looking better and better every day
05:04 AM on 08/18/2010
If the White House waffles on this issue, it will be the final indicator that it's business as usual. Regardless of what party is in the leadership role. Both parties seem to be wholly owned subsidiaries of Dewe, Cheat'em and How...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jlab
04:52 AM on 08/18/2010
This IS important information, but I have kind of decided to stop commenting on this issue after this post, because I realized that, by joining this hysterical and ginned up controversy, we are doing Fox's bidding. It's their decision to make this the number one news item in the country, and for the time being, they're succeeding. They gain from it no matter how hard we try to inject reason into the debate. Instead, everybody who can muster the nerve to stay silent, should stand by and watch the BS evaporate.
04:04 AM on 08/18/2010
There is NO NEED to argue. The law is the law. PERIOD. The tax cuts are set to expire. AND SO THEY BETTER. If you compromise on a law that is already passed you are a complete FECKING mor()on and you can go ahead and consider that the equivalent of Gibbs P*ssing directly into the eyes of the LEFT.

BTW - This guy sounds almost sane. Where have they been hiding him?
03:33 AM on 08/18/2010
Sanity?! In the White House?! Oh no, I must have dozed off at the computer again...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:26 AM on 08/18/2010
The wealthy need to pay for the wars they caused and started.
06:59 AM on 08/18/2010
And don't fight in.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:33 AM on 08/18/2010
If the prez even thinks of phasing these tax cuts he can stick his head between his legs and kiss his butt goodbye. We are tired of getting screwed and not even getting a kiss with it
01:56 AM on 08/18/2010
At what point do we demand that the Bush and Obama advisors stop calling themselves economists? Clearly, none of them no anything at all about economics, so they should be deprived of the title!
04:19 AM on 08/18/2010
I'm an Economist. George Mason University, 1980, MA.

This country needs a Progressive Tax Code similar to the model that functioned quite well beginning in the Eisenhower Era and lasting for thirty years. Anything less than is quite frankly piss-poor. "Reagan, Bush , & Bush II Tax Policies" coupled with Clinton/Rubin Wall Street deregulation (& disastrous Nafta Trade Policy Bull-Shit) have dug a deep fecking ditch for this country.

The Rethugs like it like that. They want a permanent working underclass feeding the gluttonous beast that is their sliver of our population (elite, ruling class, whatever). They maintain that position with the tried and true tools of:
1) Race Baiting
2) Religious Intolerance
3) & an abiding faith in the tenacity of the underclass to remain ignorant (granted the elite do all they can to feed propaganda & destroy public schools, so can you really blame them?)

Slap on some massive dollops of FEAR in the form of fake "WARS ON TERROR" and you have a society and a tax policy that lets that "SLIVER" ride high until the whole deck of cards crumbles from within.

Swell. It's amazing that we're even discussing this. Keep this shiite tax policy? Excuse me? Have you know leadership skills and/or functioning brain cells?

Sigh
04:20 AM on 08/18/2010
really?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kenyatta J Yamel
01:31 AM on 08/18/2010
Good, finally a clear principled statement about something. Let's wait and see if any waffling starts. however.