iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Egg Recall: U.S. Chose Not To Require Vaccine For Salmonella Egg Threat

MICHAEL J. CRUMB   08/24/10 08:32 PM ET  AP

DES MOINES, Iowa — Low-cost vaccines that may help prevent the kind of salmonella outbreak that has led to the recall of more than a half-billion eggs haven't been given to nearly half the nation's egg-laying hens.

The vaccines aren't required in the U.S., although in Great Britain, officials say vaccinations have given them the safest egg supply in Europe. A survey conducted by the European food safety agency in 2009 found about 1 percent of British flocks had salmonella compared to about 60 to 70 percent of flocks elsewhere in Europe, said Amanda Cryer, spokeswoman for the British Egg Information Service.

Since Britain's vaccinations began, the only salmonella outbreaks in eggs have been linked to those imported from elsewhere in the European Union, Cryer said. Overall salmonella cases in the country dropped by half within three years.

There's been no push to require vaccination in the U.S., in part because it would cost farmers and in part because advocates have been more focused on more comprehensive food safety reforms, those watching the poultry industry said. And the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has not yet determined how the hens in Iowa became infected.

But Darrell Trampel, a poultry veterinarian at Iowa State University, predicted vaccination will become more common after the recent outbreak.

"I think (vaccination) will move from hit and miss to being a standard," Trampel said.

About 125 million of the 218 million egg-laying hens in the U.S. have been vaccinated, said Gary Baxter, a spokesman for French pharmaceutical company CEVA, which makes some of the vaccines available in the U.S. The salmonella vaccine prevents chickens from becoming infected and then passing the bacteria on to their eggs. It has been available in the U.S. since 1992.

There are two forms. One is a spray that uses a live bacteria, and chickens inhale it. The other contains dead bacteria that's injected. Jewanna Porter, a spokeswoman for the Egg Safety Center, an industry group, said both forms provide good protection. The injected vaccine lasts longer, but veterinarians recommend both be updated.

In most cases, laying hens are vaccinated at between 10 and 16 weeks old, which is before they are put into production.

The FDA said last month it doesn't believe mandatory vaccination is necessary, but it supports farmers doing it voluntarily.

Data on the vaccine's effectiveness in field trials conducted in real world conditions "was insufficient to support a mandatory vaccination requirement," the agency said in the text of new rules requiring increased inspections and testing of eggs.

"If individual producers have identified vaccines that are effective for particular farms, FDA encourages the use of vaccine as an additional preventative measure," the agency said.

Telephone and e-mail messages left for FDA spokeswoman Patricia El-Hinnawy for further explanation were not immediately returned Tuesday.

Doug Grian-Sherman, senior scientist at the Union of Concerned Scientists, said the vaccine deserves additional study, but it would likely have only have limited effectiveness against a bacteria like salmonella, which has many different strains.

"It's only going to be a Band-Aid on a much bigger problem," he said.

It would be more effective to give the FDA additional authority to stop repeat offenders and pull contaminated products off shelves and to move away from big production facilities that ship across the nation and can quickly spread disease, Grian-Sherman said.

"The way we produce a lot of our food and meat and eggs in particular, has gotten to a scale where it's very difficult to prevent these problems," he said. "That needs to change and we need to think about producing food on a scale that is better for the communities and safer for consumers."

Trample, the Iowa State University veterinarian, said no vaccine for any disease is required for chickens.

"They are all left up to the decision of the producer," he said. "Almost all other vaccines are strictly for chicken diseases that have no public health significance."

Both farms involved in the recall vaccinated some of their chickens.

Julie DeYoung, a spokeswoman for Hillandale Farms, said the company began purchasing vaccinated laying hens in September 2009. The company didn't vaccinate older hens but replaced them with vaccinated ones as they went out of production, she said.

"So about 80 percent of the hens have been vaccinated," DeYoung said.

Wright County Egg has vaccinated some hens since 2009, investing more than $570,000 in the effort, spokeswoman Hinda Mitchell said. She declined to offer details due to an FDA investigation but said young hens were vaccinated "when they are in our care."

The FDA's El-Hinnawy said Monday it appeared the company vaccinated some but not all of its hens.

In Great Britain, farmers use a vaccine that goes into the water hens drink. The British government began encouraging, but not requiring, vaccination after a salmonella scare in the late 1980s crippled its egg industry. There was a 60 percent drop in egg sales overnight, Cryer said.

"Looking back, that scare was probably the best thing for the industry because we sorted out the problem, and we now have very high standards and there are no consumer concerns about safety," she said.

At least 90 percent of eggs in Great Britain come from vaccinated hens. The other 10 percent come from very small farmers who may have vaccinated chickens but don't sell to major retailers.

Dr. George Boggan, a veterinarian with CEVA, said they aren't always effective. If egg farms are dirty, and there's a lot of contamination, the bacteria can "overwhelm" the protection from the vaccine, he said.

"It's in the best interest to keep the environment as clean as possible," Boggan said.

S&R Farms near Whitewater, Wis., began inoculating its 2.5 million hens seven years ago.

"We kept our birds on that program and we've never had a positive (salmonella) result in the thousands of tests we've done," manager Dave Hill said.

He didn't know exactly how much the company paid for the vaccines, but others estimated vaccination costs between 40 and 60 cents per bird. That includes the cost of the vaccine and the expense involved in administering it.

"It's a relatively inexpensive thing to do for the safety you get from it," Hill said.

___

AP Medical Writer Maria Cheng in London contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST FOOD

Filed by Nick Graham  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 560
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (13 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sqeptiq
06:43 PM on 08/30/2010
Well, aren't vaccines supposed to be bad? This is HuffPo, isn't it?
10:39 AM on 08/26/2010
We are killing ourselves, when we eat these foods.
10:39 AM on 08/26/2010
They are killing us.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thepoliticalcat
Eradicate your microbioflora
12:32 AM on 08/26/2010
Our factory farming is going to be the de@ .th of us all. And the offender in this case was a known offender with multiple repeat violations.
12:03 AM on 08/26/2010
I've learned to not trust government figures when it comes to vaccines.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:56 PM on 08/25/2010
Corporate Agriculture is just plain GROSS.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
neutralground
11:37 PM on 08/25/2010
All my life I've heard, "Don't eat raw eggs; they might have salmonella in them." Suddenly it's an issue requiring vaccination of the hens? If you can get eggs from free range hens, do so. They'll have omega 3's in them and taste so much better than eggs from sick chickens in factory farms. Sure, let's clean up the factory farms, but let's not make rules on vaccinating hens that will drive the little family farmers out of business.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Texas Aggie
07:26 PM on 08/25/2010
"The salmonella vaccine prevents chickens from becoming infected and then passing the bacteria on to their eggs."

Then it will be the first salmonella vaccine that prevents infection. The others just keep the bacteria under control in the gut rather than entering the body. And which particular serotype of Salmonella do you want to vaccinate for? There are hundreds, many of which do not cross react.

Decades ago, Salmonella pullorum was a scourge in the poultry industry, but instead of vaccinating, they just blood tested each laying hen and eliminated any that were positive. Now that particular serotype has been eliminated from poultry industry. And vaccination would have short circuited the whole program because you wouldn't have been able to tell if the bird was vaccinated or infected.
03:25 PM on 08/25/2010
NOW THE PRICE IS GONE UP 38% IN 2WKS & CLIMBING,LAW SUITS ARE COMING,THE JUDGES WILL RULE FOR THE COMPANIES INVOLVED AFTER A 15YEAR FIGHT,LET THE FREE MARKET WORK & KILL.
photo
PharmaCan
Trying to make sense of it all
03:00 PM on 08/25/2010
Does it surprise anyone that corporate factory farms have been allowed to poison our food supply? Asking a corporation to voluntarily police themselves is about as effective as asking them to voluntarily pay higher taxes. When the only important factor is the bottom line, human health doesn't play much of a role in corporate decisions.

When you have a monopoly on the food supply, you can put out whatever low-quality toxic garbage you want and call it food. Most people are still going to consume it because they either don't know any better or have limited alternatives.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Zutroy
02:45 PM on 08/25/2010
How ironic that they do this to avoid impeding business.

When food is so poorly regulated that disease outbreaks happen, people AVOID the food industry. I worked at a restaurant during the tomato scare and the spinach scare. If conservatives think those things encouraged entrepreneurialism and growth, they ought to be in Attica.
photo
BannedInBoston
Everyone is entitled to my opinion.
02:35 PM on 08/25/2010
Reagan and Bush to blame? (Hey, we'll take what we can get....)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fnordlord
02:15 PM on 08/25/2010
Obviously LESS REGULATION works!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
booki
01:45 PM on 08/25/2010
i still don't understand how .........people can be so stupid to believe that 1000k people who got sick in April and May, June. (supposedly)
can be traced to an egg, let alone ............knowing what farm the egg came from?

c'mon!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:45 PM on 08/25/2010
England is a small country in geographical terms.

That means it can get away with a corporate monolopy over their food supply.

However the United States one of the largest countries in the world and has a population of over 300 million people and cannot possibly afford its safety to corporate monopolies.

It really should bother people when articles like this try to make comparison of the United States to England or Europe.

These articles constantly do this from 'America should ride bicycles to work like the Dutch' to 'British eggs are safer then America's'.

It's better if articles focus on the problems that come with globalization and a consolidated food supply instead of local organic means.
02:13 PM on 08/25/2010
Good points you have.

My, what short memories we have. The U.K. is hardly a model of food safety. Remember the mad cow outbreak caused by the practice of turning cows into cannibals in the name of profit? Millions of cattle had to be slaughtered. Vaccinating hens would not address the underlying problem of the unhealthy and inhumane practices that cause the infections. All that does is hide the real culprit.
04:16 PM on 08/25/2010
Except I disagree w/ you about not focusing on organic local means. The whole problem with globalization and consolidated food supply goes hand in hand with the decrease in local food supplies and safe practices.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Texas Aggie
07:40 PM on 08/25/2010
So which do you want? Local food supplies or safe practices? Twenty small farmers are a lot more likely to produce some contaminated food than one modernized farm twenty times their size that can afford to properly process what they grow. All it takes is regulation and inspection, and it's a lot easier to inspect one big place than twenty small places.

And if you want to hear complaints about government regulation, then try to regulate how a small farmer processes the food he sells. As an example, look at what happened when the USDA tried to put in a system so that they could easier track back animals that turned up infected with something at the slaughterhouse. The little farmers had a hissy fit and the program had to be dropped leaving us vulnerable when the next BSE or TB cow shows up at a major slaughterhouse. We won't be able to determine where it came from.