iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Christian Counselors Claim Discrimination Over Religious Beliefs On Gays

First Posted: 08/26/10 11:36 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 06:30 PM ET

Counselors Religious Beliefs

By Maggie Hyde
Religion News Service

(RNS) It's a question being raised by counselors and educators across the country: When are religious views on homosexuality an issue of religious and academic freedom, and when are they discrimination?

On Friday (Aug. 20), a federal judge ruled against Jennifer Keeton, a student at Augusta State University who was ordered to either undergo "diversity sensitivity" training after she expressed conservative Christian views on the issue of homosexuality, or leave the school's counseling program.

Her attorneys announced Monday they were appealing the case.

In March, a federal judge supported the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in its dismissal of a Georgia counselor who ended a session with a lesbian client and referred her to another counselor because of her religious views. And in Maine last year, a school counselor received complaints for appearing in a TV ad that opposed the state's gay marriage law.

As homosexuality becomes more acceptable in American society, some Christian counselors say they are being persecuted for their views as the pendulum, in their eyes, swings too far toward political correctness.

Professional groups, meanwhile, say counselors are duty-bound to be able to handle any number of cases, including those that present situations that might conflict with the counselor's personal religious beliefs.

Julea Ward, a conservative Christian student at Eastern Michigan University, was a few credits away from finishing her master's degree in counseling in 2009 when she was assigned a student who had previously been counseled about a homosexual relationship.

"She went to her supervisor and said, 'I may not be the best person for this particular client," said Jeremy Tedesco, Ward's attorney, who has advised his client not to speak publicly about the case.

Ward was later brought up on disciplinary charges, and eventually dismissed from Eastern Michigan for violating the American Counseling Association's Code of Ethics and demonstrating an unwillingness to change her behavior.

On July 26, a federal judge upheld the school's dismissal of Ward. Her case will be appealed, said Tedesco, an attorney with the conservative legal firm Alliance Defense Fund, which has taken up at least four similar cases in the last year alone.

Tedesco thinks the appeal could take the case all the way to the Supreme Court, bringing the issue to further prominence.

"The judge here definitely got it wrong, in our opinion," he said. "In my view we're going to see a trend of more universities doing this."

Ward's and other cases have left some professionals wondering whether Christian views opposing homosexuality are compatible with the counseling profession, and whether such views are protected under the auspices of religious freedom.

The question of how much students and professors should be allowed to express religious views that frown on homosexual behavior remains unresolved, but cases like Ward's and others seem to indicate little tolerance for personal religious views within academia.

Students in psychology and counseling programs are subject to the American Counseling Association Code of Ethics instead of university rules that may allow greater room for academic freedom.

Ward's legal team says the professional codes are unconstitutional and should not be a basis for discipline, especially at public universities.

"It's a big difference between teaching a code of ethics and enforcing them," said Tedesco. "Those kind of policies can't withstand constitutional scrutiny."

University administrators disagree, saying they have to abide by professional standards if they want their students' degrees to be taken seriously in the workforce.

"We have to go through accreditation standards," said Walter Kraft, Eastern Michigan's vice president for communications. "We have to honor whatever guidelines might exist."

Psychology and counseling professionals it is sometimes appropriate for them to deny their services, as Ward did--when there is a conflict of interest, a close relationship, or unchangeable bias. In practice, they say counselors and psychologists need to be as open-minded as possible, given the myriad of personalities they encounter.

"A professional needs to be able to work with a wide range of populations," said Clinton Anderson, director of the office on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Concerns at the American Psychological Association. "That's a necessary thing when you're talking about competence."

Anderson said Ward's actions were inappropriate given her chosen specialty in school counseling. He said school counselors, like those working in rural or poor communities, often don't have another provider to whom they can refer a student.

Anderson and others say Christian counselors shouldn't be surprised by the rules--a sexual orientation anti-discrimination clause has been in the American Psychological Association's ethics code for more than 20 years.

"What may be new about it," he said, "is that there are very active law firms who are prepared to file suits."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST RELIGION

By Maggie Hyde Religion News Service (RNS) It's a question being raised by counselors and educators across the country: When are religious views on homosexuality an issue of religious and academic fr...
By Maggie Hyde Religion News Service (RNS) It's a question being raised by counselors and educators across the country: When are religious views on homosexuality an issue of religious and academic fr...
Filed by Clay Chiles  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 275
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
11:02 AM on 09/30/2010
Ah, yes, the APA Ethics Code as the basis for "professionalism."

What next?

"...the Rind study ... caused a national furor after it appeared in 1998 in the Psychological Bulletin, a publication of the American Psychological Association. The study's conclusion that child sex abuse "does not cause intense harm on a pervasive basis" was the highest-level endorsement yet of the no-harm rationalization for child sexual abuse. Understandably, the Rind study is the new bible of pedophiles and their groups.

The study also called for a sweeping change in language used to discuss child sexual abuse (a term the study rejected as judgmental). This delighted the pedophile movement, which favors terms like "intergenerational intimacy." One critic of Rind mockingly asked whether the word rape should now be changed to "unilaterally consenting adult-adult sex."

The Rind study was a meta-analysis, an academic term for noodling around with other people's old studies instead of conducting your own. Meta-analyses notoriously leave lots of room for omissions and arbitrary decisions to somehow fit together different studies with different standards and definitions.

The major point about the Rind study is not whether it was intellectually shoddy (though I think it was) but that it shifted the national discussion several degrees toward the normalization of pedophilia. "

http://www.usnews.com/usnews/opinion/articles/020422/archive_020643.htm

For detail on the Rind study and the APA:

http://www.leadershipcouncil.org/1/rind/cont.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Donuthole
Gimme some sugar.
05:53 PM on 09/13/2010
Yet another battle in the interminable "culture wars." Yet another strategic position in which conservative "faith-based" entities complain they're being victimized. Yawn.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ioan Lightoller
Proud Gay Pagan Man, Living Happily With Husband
05:25 PM on 09/16/2010
This will never end. These groups have an ingrained entitlement attitude and a persecution complex that simply will not quit.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mike Kilpatrick
08:32 AM on 09/12/2010
That's like going to a surgeon and having him, (her), say "I'm sorry but my religion requires that I remove your appendix without anesthesia". I'm sorry but irrational prejudice has no place if you want to make any of the sciences your career.
02:02 PM on 09/03/2010
My therapist shared a case story (non-specific) about a client who was being haunted by a ghost. The therapist never shared his personal (or religious) feelings regarding the existence of ghosts. He merely counseled the client to talk to the ghost and find out what it wants. The client followed the advice and the problem went away.

A professional therapist is non-judgemental, with an open mind. The client is not looking for the personal views of the therapist; he already got those from all of his friends and his mother without paying for it. The client is looking for the basic tools that will help him to solve this problem, or any problem in his life. A good hammer doesn’t have a religious affiliation; and talking reasonably to people, or ghosts, can help to sort out many differences.
Paulo1
Thanks for reading, (even if you disagree)
11:50 AM on 09/01/2010
Simple solutions are best I think:

Just do a full disclosure, mandate that such people put up a notice in the lobby "Warning, I am a Religiously based bigot and discriminate against homosexuals, my therapy approach is not approved by my profession and may cause actual harm."

With that out of the way let them practice to their bigoted little hearts content. I imagine that any gay person seeking counciling after that warning has a few bigger issues than sexuality. Masochism comes to mind.
04:17 PM on 08/31/2010
"...some Christian counselors say they are being persecuted for their views as the pendulum, in their eyes, swings too far toward political correctness."

... LGBT youth being ostracized and committing suicide isn't "political correctness", it's unfortunately how things are in our society (which has made great progress but there's far yet to go). These youth need counseling that affirms who they are rather than tries to change what cannot be changed.

Is it so hard to just listen to a student and not go into religion-induced conniptions when he/she mentions a *GASP* PAST SAME-SEX RELATIONSHIP?... I'm baffled that these people actually think that their discomfort is worth more than the requirements of their field.
09:37 PM on 08/30/2010
"Ward's and other cases have left some professionals wondering whether Christian views opposing homosexuality are compatible with the counseling profession, and whether such views are protected under the auspices of religious freedom"

Answwer: Such views are NOT protected under the auspices of religious freedom. You have religious freedom in your own life, not the freedom to impose it on others, or to harm them with it.

The first part of this statement is just offensive. It makes it sound like all Christians have the viewpoint that homosexual relationships are wrong. "Christian views"???? There are plenty of christians who don't view these relationships as wrong. Conservative Christians don't have a monopoly on Christianity, despite their assertions otherwise.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DevonTexas
Eternal Optimism
01:38 PM on 08/30/2010
"Ward's legal team says the professional codes are unconstitutional and should not be a basis for discipline, especially at public universities."

So out with that Hippocratic Oath? Or how about professional codes such as "fiduciary responsibility" The neo-con, religious fundies are stepping in deep do-do with this position.
OverseasVet
stuck in a 3rd world country called texas
11:19 AM on 08/30/2010
Same argument used in the slave trade and in segregation afterward. Nothing new here.
11:13 AM on 08/30/2010
This is an issue of professional competency, not religious discrimination.
“Christian” counselors who are claiming
discrimination want to be permitted to counsel on the basis of beliefs that are
simply incorrect. There’s nothing unusual about protecting the public from incompetency. Incorrect professional behavior based on personal or religious beliefs cannot be protected as religious freedom. Yikes.
11:48 AM on 09/30/2010
Citing her religious belief, Ward did not think it appropriate for her to counsel the client, who was according to the pre-counselling evaluation form completed by the client involved in a ss relationship.

Similar to a doctor/nurse who does not want to participate/perform an elective abortion against his/her religious belief.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
elfish
02:19 AM on 08/30/2010
If a doctor claimed that his religion forbade him using antibiotics would it be persecution if the state took away his license?

I would sure hate to end up in the hands of a doctor whose religion got in the way of him doing his job.

If you are in a "people helping" profession you should be able to suspend your religious beliefs long enough to offer your patients the best possible and most scientifically valid treatment techniques. To do anything less is malpractice.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tyrone Luckett
10:56 PM on 08/29/2010
I am a Christian and these Christians are not reading their bible. We suppose to help those who are in need regardless of their life style. One way we can solve this is give people the option to chose what kind of counselors they want to see. a counselor with a religion background or one without.
05:43 PM on 08/30/2010
As the article points out, there may not be two counselors in a small town. So I'm curious: what's your position when there is one and only one counselor available (or only one who takes Medicaid, etc.) within a reasonable driving distance? So do you advocate restricting any "counselor with a religion background" to larger towns and cities?
08:04 PM on 08/29/2010
The WorldVision decision will be changing all of this in the near future. All any organization has to do is:
1) organized for a self-identified religious purpose (as evidenced by Articles of Incorporation or similar foundational documents),
2) is engaged in activity consistent with, and in furtherance of, those religious purposes, and
3) holds itself out to the public as religious.

This means that they can define any secular activity be it counseling, medial practice etc., as a religious activity and science based "competence and professionalism" are tossed out in deference to belief protected activites. Where once before equipment manufacturing was excluded, it is not included.

Can you imagine the Christian abomonations that we will see in the near future? In general, their imaginations has already been freed from any sense of reality.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Political Avatar
I came here to read and then I couldn't shut up!
11:37 PM on 08/29/2010
I'm a little confused what are you talking about?

What is World vision? What is this decision? And how will it affect positively or negitively professional ethics policies such as this one?
01:15 AM on 08/30/2010
It's posted in the relgiious section on Huffpost. It will slowly negative affect professional ethics because hiring and dismissal are no longer performance based but belief based. A non- church agenda driven group can incorporate as a religious corporation and receive the benefits accorded to religion but now for products and services like they traditionally have for preaching and praying etc.

WorldVisoin is a good charity and does good work but won the argument that charity is a religious ceremony and not a secular activity even though WorldVision is not affliated with any church or specific established Christianity. This will provide agenda driven 'professionals' a way to circumvent professional ethics boards and training.
06:07 PM on 08/29/2010
Thank goodness most of us can go see a medical physician without he or she asking our religious affiliation prior to treatment. If we need a lawyer, we can hire one to counsel with us without having to reveal our political thoughts. Surely, there are fools in all professions who want to screen their clients. Christian counselors over the years I have dealt with them are some of the biggest flakes in the counselling professions. Their personal prejudices always come through. If you are a Protestant and you appear before e Catholic counselor in marital counseling, the prejudice will come through quickly.

If these Christian counselors are working in a public forum, they are seriously breaching their ethical duties.

These people do a lot of damage to families seeking help. I have nothing but utter disrespect for them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wm Hunn
Critical Thinking.....The Other National Deficit!
02:42 PM on 08/29/2010
I the American Counseling Association and similar groups are "private" organizations, they have a right to make and enforce their own rules. The SCOTUS has given broad discretion to discriminate to private organizations. See for instance, Boy Scouts of America.
09:39 PM on 08/30/2010
The Boy Scouts are a club more or less. No organization, even private ones have the right to cause mental and emotional harm to others.

The two are not comparable.
11:53 AM on 09/30/2010
What harm did Ward cause by in effect recusing herself based on her religious beliefs and referring him elsewhere?