iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

State Department Contractor Steven Kim Charged With Leaking Secrets To Press

MATT APUZZO   08/27/10 11:57 PM ET   AP

Steven Kim

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration on Friday accused an analyst who worked at the State Department of leaking top secret information about North Korea to a reporter.

Steven Kim, who worked at State as an employee of a contractor, maintains his innocence.

He was named in a federal indictment unsealed Friday and charged with illegally disclosing national defense information, which carries a top penalty of 10 years in prison, and with making false statements to the FBI, which has a maximum five-year sentence.

It was the latest move in an aggressive campaign to crack down on leaks, even as the administration has supported proposed legislation that would shield reporters from having to identify their sources.

Recent disclosures to news media have revealed the potential for using CIA drones in the counterterrorist fight against al-Qaida in Yemen, the close relationship of the CIA station chief in Kabul with Afghan President Hamid Karzai and the CIA's practice of paying some members of the Afghan government for information.

On Friday, the director of national intelligence, James R. Clapper, sent a memo to members of the 16 intelligence agencies expressing his concern about leaks to the press, saying officials should be "seen but not heard." The internal memo didn't stay private, leaked to The Associated Press.

In the Kim case, the Justice Department said the analyst in June 2009 knowingly passed information about U.S. intelligence concerning a foreign country to a national news organization and in September of that year falsely denied to the FBI having had recent contacts with a reporter from that news organization. The material was classified top secret/sensitive because it concerned the military capability of the foreign country and related to U.S. intelligence sources and methods.

A person briefed on the case, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss matters not included in the filing, said the country was North Korea and the news organization was Fox News.

"The willful disclosure of classified information to those not entitled to it is a serious crime," said Assistant Attorney General David Kris in a written statement. "Today's indictment should serve as a warning to anyone who is entrusted with sensitive national security information and would consider compromising it."

Kim arrived at court accompanied by his lawyers. He appeared before Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly in an hourlong closed-door hearing.

Afterward, Abbe D. Lowell, one of Kim's attorneys, said his client pleaded not guilty behind closed doors and was released. He posted a $100,000 secured appearance bond, had to surrender his passport, may engage in no foreign travel and must restrict all travel to within 25 miles unless prior notice is given to the government, the Justice Department said in a statement.

Kim's next court appearance is scheduled for Oct. 13.

State Department spokesman Mark Toner said that Kim was on detail from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory to the State Department "at the time of the alleged disclosure." He said Kim worked in the department's Bureau of Verification, Compliance and Implementation from mid-2008 to September 2009.

"If the allegations prove to be true, the Intelligence Community will conduct a comprehensive damage assessment after all legal proceedings are concluded," said Toner.

In a written statement, Lowell and co-defense counsel Ruth Wedgwood said Kim was pleading not guilty because the news report that led to the charges "contains completely unremarkable observations about what a country would do if it was sanctioned for its poor behavior. These kinds of observations were well known to anyone paying attention to public sources and ought not be the basis for making someone a federal felon."

"In its obsession to clamp down on perfectly appropriate conversations between government employees and the press, the Obama administration has forgotten that wise foreign policy must be founded on a two-way conversation between government and the public," Lowell and Wedgwood wrote. "The Justice Department has chosen to stretch the espionage laws to cover ordinary and normal conversations between government officials and the press and, in doing so, destroy the career of a loyal civil servant and brilliant foreign policy analyst."

The administration recently arrested an Army official for leaking classified documents to the website WikiLeaks, charged a former National Security Agency official with leaking information about NSA mismanagement to The Baltimore Sun, and renewed an investigation into who leaked classified information to New York Times reporter James Risen for one of his books.

___

Associated Press writers Kimberly Dozier and Pete Yost contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — The Obama administration on Friday accused an analyst who worked at the State Department of leaking top secret information about North Korea to a reporter. Steven Kim, who worked a...
WASHINGTON — The Obama administration on Friday accused an analyst who worked at the State Department of leaking top secret information about North Korea to a reporter. Steven Kim, who worked a...
Filed by Jeff Muskus  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 554
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (12 total)
02:52 PM on 08/30/2010
If a government agency is being mismanaged -- WE have a right to know.
If a government agency or its employees/contractors are engaging in illegal behavior -- WE have a right to know.

Using "classification" to hide mismanagement or illegal activities should be felony.
01:24 PM on 08/30/2010
Nothing a good disemboweling wouldn't cure!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:18 PM on 08/30/2010
I'm sorry but there is a difference between a whistle blower and someone who leaks classified information for the sake of just leaking it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
parlimentMike
Terrorists keep you in fear
12:09 PM on 08/30/2010
How can you have the promised "open government" if the People are kept informed? It wouldn't have been very hypocritical for Obama not to have acted.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Trevor Seitz
12:00 PM on 08/30/2010
Thanks for the transparency Bushbama!
11:44 AM on 08/30/2010
It is illegal to leak Secret information. If you get caught doing it, you go to jail. It is part of the deal. I'm ok with not forcing Journalists to disclose sources, that is part of the freedom of the press and an important protection. However, the people who are entrusted with classified information are just that 'trusted' to not disclose it. If you do, you should lose your job and go to jail. The people who disclose information know that going in.
02:54 PM on 08/30/2010
And when the "classification" system is misused to hide mismanagement and illegality -- those engaging in that misuse should go to jail. And those who expose the mismanagement and illegality should be protected by statute.
04:22 AM on 08/30/2010
Whistle blowing is one thing and treason is another! This whistle blowing is going to far. If it gets one military member killed! I think the whistle blower should pay harsh punishment not to excluded firing squad!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
parlimentMike
Terrorists keep you in fear
12:11 PM on 08/30/2010
If everything is hidden, it's tough to bring just the right stuff to light. There is some treason in usurping the right of the People to participate in Our governance, by hiding what is done in Our name.
02:56 PM on 08/30/2010
And when the "classification" system is misused to hide mismanagement and illegal behavior -- those who misused it should go to jail.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
magnoliabird
08:37 PM on 08/29/2010
I said it before...there has been too much loose lips and there needs to be a crackdown on sensitive information being leaked just as there is too many loose lips in the Administration leaking information to the press but wanting their names withheld. If you say it, own it fools!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
chiara12
03:41 PM on 08/29/2010
"In its obsession to clamp down on perfectly appropriate conversations between government employees and the press, the Obama administration has forgotten that wise foreign policy must be founded on a two-way conversation between government and the public," Lowell and Wedgwood wrote. "The Justice Department has chosen to stretch the espionage laws to cover ordinary and normal conversations between government officials and the press and, in doing so, destroy the career of a loyal civil servant and brilliant foreign policy analyst."

"The material was classified top secret/sensitive because it concerned the military capability of the foreign country and related to U.S. intelligence sources and methods".

Since when to mid-level bureaucrats and their lawyers get to make the determination about what is an "appropriate conversation" with the press? The information was classified. Some information needs to be classified and some conversations do not need to be had with the press. If nothing is kept secret we undermine our own capabilities around the world. This doesn't seem to be a case of a "whistleblower" (a highly misused term) exposing some wrongdoing by the government, this is just a guy passing along info he shouldn't have. He should be prosecuted.

And before anyone jumps on me, I'm a liberal who doesn't believe that all top secret info should be made public or that there is a gov. conspiracy around every corner.
03:09 PM on 08/30/2010
And if "everything" is considered "classified" by default -- which is how things are done now -- then those who are misusing the classification system should be prosecuted and those who expose it should be protected by law.
03:32 PM on 08/29/2010
The minions of the American Police State march on! Been doing it since Tricky Dicky tried to "suppress leaks" and keep his illegal activities secret. The AAG said it well: it's an attempt to frighten/intimidate any government employee into cowed silence.

IMHO, these tactics are more representative of the Bush/Cheney holdover "embeds" remaining in policy-making and law enforcement positions than they are of the Obama administration itself...take note of the extremely high numbers of positions the President is empowered to fill by appointment that have been blocked by the Rethugs.

OTOH, the Obama administration has shown -- and the President has allowed -- that it wants to maintain many, if not all the expanded executive powers asserted by the Bush/Cheney criminal cabal.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Triple Bottomline
02:24 PM on 08/29/2010
"Once a government resorts to terror against its own population to get what it wants, it must keep using terror against its own population to get what it wants. A government that terrorizes its own people can never stop. If such a government ever lets the fear subside and rational thought return to the populace, that government is finished."—Michael Rivero
01:48 PM on 08/29/2010
Wonder why MURDOCH is here!

WONDER NO MORE!
11:37 AM on 08/29/2010
New administration, same as the old administration. Welcome to the future, America.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Skeptical Patriot
09:48 AM on 08/29/2010
This is the way the system is mean to work. Prosecute the leaker to the fullest extent of the law while allowing freedom of the press and the ability to distribute information unencumbered. Messy but the alternatives aren't great
04:23 AM on 08/29/2010
Hey Llyod, what did you do this time?