More

Under Fire From Chemical Industry, Scientific Panel Is 'Gutted'

First Posted: 08/30/10 01:53 PM ET Updated: 05/25/11 06:30 PM ET

Methyl Iodide

This post comes courtesy of California Watch

By Amy Standen

Five out of nine members of a scientific panel that advises the state on toxic chemicals have been fired in recent weeks, following disputes with the chemical industry and a conservative group that targets environmental laws.

"It's been gutted," said Paul Blanc, a professor of occupational medicine at UC San Francisco and one of the panel's four remaining members.

While the Scientific Review Panel on Toxic Air Contaminants is not well known outside of regulatory circles, its work carries clout in state environmental policy. Since its inception in 1983, the panel has evaluated more than 300 chemicals - everything from pesticides to secondhand smoke - and advised the state on how these chemicals should be regulated.

Among the dismissed members is panel chairman John Froines, who also heads the Department of Environmental Health Sciences at UCLA's School of Public Health. Froines has served on the panel since it was founded and has been its chairman since 1998. Froines says he learned of his dismissal July 22 in a two-sentence letter from Assembly Speaker John A. Perez, D-Los Angeles.

Panel members, including Froines, have come under fire over the years when their designation of certain substances as toxic came at a cost to industry.

Most recently, Froines and other members of the panel made enemies in the chemical industry when they publicly criticized the California Department of Pesticide Regulation for its plans to approve a strawberry fumigant called methyl iodide, which the scientists said would endanger farm workers.

Froines, who said he'd received no explanation for his dismissal, praised the work of his colleagues, many of whom had served on the panel for more than a decade. "The integrity of this panel has been nothing short of impressive," he said. "Why would you destroy it?"

Craig Byus, dean of UCLA's Thomas Haider Program in Biomedical Sciences, learned of his dismissal the same day as Froines. Then, on August 20, three other panel members received similar notices, this time from the California Environmental Protection Agency. The three members were Joseph Landolph of USC, Gary Friedman of Stanford University School of Medicine, and Charles Plopper of UC Davis.

Asked about the dismissals, staffers for both Perez and California EPA said the time had come for panel members to be reappointed. Candidates for these positions, they explained, come from a list supplied by the UC Office of the President.

When the list arrived, they said, the names of Froines and others weren't on it. UC Provost Lawrence Pitt said that he couldn't speak directly to the names on the list, but that he wasn't aware of any specific instructions to remove specific panel members.

"I'm confident we have no part of it," Pitts said.

Froines and others on the panel said that while single panel members may step down and be replaced every few years or so, such widespread, simultaneous dismissals are unprecedented. "Normally what happens is we get reappointed, or the state just continues us."

"It's curious, you've got this obscure panel that's been doing a good job," said Sierra Club California director Bill Magavern, "so why suddenly the wholesale changes?"

One group taking credit for the shakeup is the Pacific Legal Foundation, a Sacramento-based conservative group with a history of fighting environmental legislation. The foundation has charged, in an ongoing lawsuit, that panel members shouldn't be able to serve such long terms.

Foundation attorney Damien Schiff said he believes the lawsuit served as a catalyst for the dismissals, which he called a "needed infusion of fresh blood for the panel."

The lawsuit stems, in part, from longstanding complaints from the building and transportation industries over the panel's 1998 conclusion that diesel particulate is toxic to human health. That determination formed the basis for a series of regulations of the trucking industry, which has vigorously fought the new rules.

State officials have announced the appointment of five new UC scientists to replace the departing members. Michael Kleinman, whom Froines says he admires, is an adjunct professor at the UC Irvine School of Medicine. Kleinman will be chairman of the revamped panel.

UCSF's Paul Blanc said he believes the quick turnover will get in the way of the panel's ability to do its work. "I think this will cripple the committee," he said "certainly in the short term."
.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST LOS ANGELES

Filed by Billy Silverman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 12
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
organicconnect
12:04 PM on 08/31/2010
The chemical industry continues to operate in the terror that they will be called to account for the persistent poisoning of our society. A video from Ken Cook of the Environmental Working Group really drives this home on a personal level: http://organicconnectmag.com/wp/2010/08/body-toxins-and-our-children/
mothergrace
If they knock you down, bite 'em on the ankle.
11:47 AM on 08/31/2010
This story should be above the fold.
07:19 PM on 08/30/2010
America is owned and run by Corporations. Everyone is bought. No one person or political candidate who is really on the side of "people" will ever get elected. Corporations don't care if they poison food, air, water, or (fill in the blank). Think about all the toxic waste dumping that went on (and probably still does) in this country. The Central Valley of California has the worst air pollution in the country; oil refinery production, farm pesticides, large commercial traffic, etc...to the degree 1 out of every 5 child, has asthma and schools will not allow children to play outside at recess during "bad air" days (per air quality index readings). The regulators have ignored state air pollution regulations for years; via getting deadline dates for air improvements, pushed back, over and over again. We just had a HUGE egg recall, now, there's another BEEF recall back East, due to contamination with E-coli. This will most likely be the "norm" as we know it in America. If you, or your loved one gets ill, develops a chronic illness, or perhaps dies due to lack of oversight by regulatory agencies, so what? Just like Cheney, in his response to how 2/3 of Americans feel about the wars (they don't like it)...So?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Just walkin the dog here
So, just where is this micro-bio? This it?
06:23 PM on 08/30/2010
Wow, vote for Meg Whitman, she will certainly be concerned with the quality of your fruit and vegetables. That would be part of her plan. ~sarcasm~~ added
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Christopher Hull
Democratic Socialist
04:38 PM on 08/30/2010
Wow! This John Perez claims to be a "labor organizer"? I think that is LA speak for not ever having had a real job. Basically he's a latino gangster. No different than the Tammany Hall guys and just as bad. Of course when HIS kid gets cancer from being exposed to this stuff HIS state paid insurance will take care of it. Your kid? Well there is that whole overpopulation thing and these things happen and no one could have foreseen...etc, etc, etc. All the usual excuses why you have to suffer and they get richer and pay no consequences.
09:58 PM on 09/01/2010
I'ld submit this move saves the SRP for at least 3 years. We have about a 60% chance meg whitman is our next governor based on how CA's tend to vote for governor and disatisfaction.

By statute members are appointed for 3 years to the SRP(Fixed term not pleasure of the governor. This means queen meg can't replace these 5 reappointments until late 2013. Actually she could only get 3 of them.

And industry was coming. A majority is now safe for 3 years appointed by a green administration. And industry may drop it's priority to further change the Board making it safe. Secretary of EPA having 5 appointments makes it vulnerable to a pure political move absent this move.

Likewise the new chair specializes in ultra fine it looks like which is a big developing area CARB is starting to focus on, as well as multi substance interaction.

Meg can at most change 2 in the first year as the EPA secretary did 3 already. Those 3 have until 2013. 2 by assembly speaker), 2 by senate rules (AKA senate president pro tem Steinberg). Dems likely maintain control of those 4.

Politically a very wise move if temporarily inconvenient. And it will hinder future efforts to discredit their results. The appearance of impropriety by long service and no obvious appointment process harms it's credibility if attacked. This move helps fix that. I have faith the UC scientists coming in will do good. Science is science.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scott Zwartz
03:51 PM on 08/30/2010
Better living through chemistry. Originally that slogan meant better lives for the consumer, not it only means more profits for the mega-wealthy.

I was an a tea party session this weekend (it had not been billed as such) and they call for the elimination of all government oversight agencies like the EPA and FDA.. According to these loons, it is not the governments' job to interfere with private business. If Farm workers do not to be poisoned, then they are free not to work. These idiots who do not care about the people who put food on the tables are so out of touch with reality that they don't care if they feed poison to their children.

Oh yeah Mama bear knows best!

Ignorance coupled with hyper-emotionalism is lethal.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:39 PM on 08/30/2010
Isn't sad that ppl can be told to kill themselves and they say ok. Then they'll be the first ones on Dateline or 20/20 whining and crying about how unfair it is and filing lawsuits.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dolmance
02:39 PM on 08/30/2010
It must be so great to live in a country where you're so free... Free to give your fellow citizens cancer and get paid for it. Free to feed your politicians peanuts and have them be yours forever and ever.

So keep swilling that corn syrup and some 6500 chemical insecticides and assorted plastic byproducts that you have no idea at all what their effects will be.

Oh, hey... I hear American men are losing their testosterone and growing boobs from some chemical called BPH that's in every single thing you eat. Mmmm.... Numby numbs... It's all such a tasty world you've made for yourselves.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Christopher Hull
Democratic Socialist
04:41 PM on 08/30/2010
That's true actually. The rate of teenage and young male gynomastia has gone through the roof. It is now the NUMBER ONE performed plastic surgery operation on men. But of course nobody talks about it because it's embarrassing. And many men have had it done more than once.
And let's not even talk about why seven year old girls are getting breasts...
We are killing ourselves.
mothergrace
If they knock you down, bite 'em on the ankle.
01:51 PM on 08/30/2010
“This is disgraceful. This panel should be able to hand down its findings without fear of reprisal from industry. Of course industry wants to continue doing whatever it is doing without regard for the cost to workers or the environment. That's a given. That is why we need people like this, to evaluate the effects of industry practices on the environment and the health of workers and consumers.

To bow to this type of pressure is reprehensible and a betrayal of every citizen of this state.

Methyl iodide is extremely dangerous in many ways. The only thing it has to recommend it over methyl bromide is that it does not deplete the ozone layer.

Methyl iodide is extremely carcinogenic, a thyroid disruptor, neurotoxin, can cause permanent brain damage, and miscarriages and should not be used at all, let alone on strawberry fields throughout the state that are often near residences and schools.

I have never understood why it is necessary to completely sterilize the soil to grow strawberries but I do know one thing. I will never buy strawberries or other products that use this toxin.â€
mothergrace
If they knock you down, bite 'em on the ankle.
01:12 PM on 08/30/2010
This is disgraceful. This panel should be able to hand down its findings without fear of reprisal from industry. Of course industry wants to continue doing whatever it is doing without regard for the cost to workers or the environment. That's a given. That is why we need people like this, to evaluate the effects of industry practices on the environment and the health of workers and consumers.

To bow to this type of pressure is reprehensible and a betrayal of every citizen of this state.

Methyl iodide is extremely dangerous in many ways. The only thing it has to recommend it over methyl bromide is that it does not deplete the ozone layer.

Methyl iodide is extremely carcinogenic, a thyroid disruptor, neurotoxin, can cause permanent brain damage, and miscarriages and should not be used at all, let alone on strawberry fields throughout the state that are often near residences and schools.

I have never understood why it is necessary to completely sterilize the soil to grow strawberries but I do know one thing. I will never buy strawberries or other products that use this toxin.