EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Google Search Rankings Investigated By Texas Attorney General

MICHAEL LIEDTKE   09/ 3/10 10:54 PM ET   AP

Google

SAN FRANCISCO — Google Inc.'s methods for recommending websites are being reviewed by Texas' attorney general in an investigation spurred by complaints that the company has abused its power as the Internet's dominant search engine.

The antitrust inquiry disclosed by Google late Friday is just the latest sign of the intensifying scrutiny facing the company as it enters its adolescence. Since its inception in a Silicon Valley garage 12 years ago, Google has gone from a quirky startup to one of the world's most influential businesses with annual revenue approaching $30 billion.

A spokesman for Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott confirmed the investigation, but declined further comment.

The review appears to be focused on whether Google is manipulating its search results to stifle competition.

The pecking order of those results can make or break websites because Google's search engine processes about two-thirds of the search requests in the U.S. and handles even more volume in some parts of the world.

That dominance means a website ranking high on the first page of Google's results will likely attract more traffic and generate more revenue, either from ads or merchandise sales.

On the flip side, being buried in the back pages of the results, or even at the bottom of the first page, can be financially devastating and, in extreme cases, has been blamed for ruining some Internet companies.

European regulators already have been investigating complaints alleging that Google has been favoring its own services in its results instead of rival websites.

Several lawsuits filed in the U.S. also have alleged Google's search formula is biased. Google believes Abbott is the first state attorney general to open an antitrust review into the issue.

"We look forward to answering (Abbott's) questions because we're confident that Google operates in the best interests of our users," Don Harrison, Google's deputy general counsel, wrote in a Friday blog post.

Harrison said that Abbott has asked Google for information about several companies, including: Foundem, an online shopping comparison site in Britain; SourceTool, which runs an e-commerce site catering to businesses; and MyTriggers, another shopping comparison site.

All of those companies offer features that Google includes in its search engine or in other parts of its website. Foundem, SourceTool and MyTriggers have previously filed lawsuits or regulatory complaints against Google.

"Given that not every website can be at the top of the results, or even appear on the first page of our results, it's unsurprising that some less relevant, lower quality websites will be unhappy with their ranking," Harrison wrote.

Google says its closely guarded search formula strives to recommend websites that are most likely to satisfy the needs of each user's request. If it didn't keep its users happy, Google argues that people would become disgruntled and switch to other search engines offered by Yahoo Inc., Microsoft Corp. and IAC/InterActiveCorp's Ask.com.

Regulators and lawmakers in the U.S. and Europe also have been looking into Google's privacy practices and its acquisitions as the company tries to fortify its power.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

SAN FRANCISCO — Google Inc.'s methods for recommending websites are being reviewed by Texas' attorney general in an investigation spurred by complaints that the company has abused its power as t...
SAN FRANCISCO — Google Inc.'s methods for recommending websites are being reviewed by Texas' attorney general in an investigation spurred by complaints that the company has abused its power as t...
Filed by Bianca Bosker  | 
 
  • Comments
  • 421
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ChristianEcon.com
"The Lord abhors dishonest scales."-Proverbs
03:14 AM on 09/08/2010
"'Given that not every website can be at the top of the results, or even appear on the first page of our results, it's unsurprisi­ng that some less relevant, lower quality websites will be unhappy with their ranking,' Harrison wrote."

Haha, you'd think $30 billion Google could hire a spokespers­on who understood the charges.
02:56 AM on 09/06/2010
What a nonsense lawsuit.
If you don't like google don't use it. Case closed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ChristianEcon.com
"The Lord abhors dishonest scales."-Proverbs
03:14 AM on 09/08/2010
What a nonsense comment.
photo
GoDogGo
A fiscally realistic, socially progressive citizen
11:25 PM on 09/05/2010
About. D**n. Time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hardyman1966
The antonym of liberal is INTOLERANT.
10:42 PM on 09/05/2010
Google has gotten too big and we know what happens when that happens.

Guess what? You can exist beautifull­y without it, should you exercise your choice.
02:58 AM on 09/06/2010
No. WE have made it big.
And yes, if people think that google is evil they can simply stop using it.
These lawsuits are just to make lawyers richer.
09:18 PM on 09/05/2010
Google is NOT the only game in town.

Hate to break it to Eric, Sergey and Larry, but people are already jumping the Google ship.

I’ve already dumped Google - and don’t miss it one damn bit. I used to LOVE Google (from day one) but their obnoxious, insidiousl­y dangerous arrogance has become intolerabl­e. I’ve lost all respect for them.

What did I switch to?

IXQUICK.

Awesome. Ethical. Award-winn­ing.

Does NOT record your IP address.
Does NOT store your search data.
Secure. Anonymous.

http://en.­wikipedia.­org/wiki/I­xquick

Warranties / Q&A
http://www­.ixquick.c­om/eng/pro­tect-priva­cy.html

For Firefox users: add-ons for Ixquick
https://ad­dons.mozil­la.org/en-­US/firefox­/search/?q­=ixquick&c­at=all&lve­r=any&pid=­1&sort=&pp­=20&lup=&a­dvanced=

SCROOGLE.

Perfect name, don’t you think? LOL

No cookies, no recorded IP, no saved searches.
Secure. Anonymous.

http://www­.scroogle.­org/

For Firefox users: add-on for Scroogle
https://ad­dons.mozil­la.org/en-­US/firefox­/addon/125­06/
or
http://myc­roft.mozde­v.org/sear­ch-engines­.html?name­=scroogle

Disclaimer­: I have no proprietar­y or financial interest in Ixquick or Scroogle - they're free. :)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ChristianEcon.com
"The Lord abhors dishonest scales."-Proverbs
03:15 AM on 09/08/2010
Great info--tx.!
08:28 PM on 09/05/2010
GOOGLE needs to be boycotted.
08:16 PM on 09/05/2010
Google as Big Brother

http://www­.google-wa­tch.org/bi­gbro.html
06:17 PM on 09/05/2010
Google is representa­tive of corporatio­ns built as a house of cards. Privacy invasion, efforts to extract more and more money, domination of whole industries and efforts to overpower the government and impose its corporate will. A country built on advertisin­g is a house of cards. I remember when America used to actually manufactur­e. Now we all swallowed the corporate nonsense and have just become consumers. Consuming resources cant continue forever. Capitolism taken to its final conclusion will be a disaster for humanity.
06:08 PM on 09/05/2010
Any company that colludes with dictators to censor the internet against the best interests of their people...

...cuts a presumptuo­us, self-servi­ng proposal with Verizon to carve up the internet

...tells users they have no right to online anonymity

...contemp­tuously flouts its users’ rights to privacy by publishing its gmailers’ personal contacts info by default mode

...and ponders whether it should data mine and sell the gazillions of terabytes of personal info it holds in its massive cyber vaults even MORE than it already does

- has NO qualms aggressive­ly skewing prioritize­d search results for their own financial advantage.

And their “secret formula” for search results? Most likely pure BS. Totally arbitrary.­...whateve­r makes them the most money and buys the most influence - just because they can. If they have any “formula” at all, it’s no doubt number crunching in accounting to see who makes the highest bid for first page.

Google has already made it perfectly clear they believe in a tiered-ser­vices internet toll road.

The “Don’t Be Evil” motto has been replaced with “Pay-to-Pl­ay With the Big Dogs or Tough $. h*t”.

Google has become the Evil they condemned.
photo
Eris23Skidoo
Dischordian Keynesian
02:37 PM on 09/05/2010
Remember when there was no limit on size of attachment­s in Gmail? I just found out yesterday that that is no longer the case. I'm looking for a new email. Anybody know of one without size limits?
01:39 PM on 09/05/2010
I always trust on google, google is dominating the internet

Sandy
http://onl­ine80.blog­spot.com/
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:33 PM on 09/05/2010
Google used to call themselves the largest search engine, then in 2004 they dumped millions of web pages for a new search strategy, that puts retailers higher on search results.

They also banned sites that had little content with google ads, later they set up partnershi­ps with big domain name companies like godaddy to have google ads show on "placehold­er" web pages, pages that show when you go to a domain that is just hosted but there is no website per se... exactly the same thing they blocked private websites from doing... ads on web pages with little or no content.

I did a google search for "to date" once with "safe search off " and once with "strict safe search". I noticed where in the search results the website "Hot Women and Hot Girls for Missionary Dating ..." I would think that with a Strict Safe Search setting this kind of website would not be on the first page when there are 3.6 billion search results. But what it showed was a higher placement for this sex site with "Strict" safe search than safe search "Off"

Google reminds me of that old Twilight Zone episode "To Serve Man"
If you don't know the reference, google it.
TheAntiOkie
Saying you're Christian doesn't prove anything
01:21 PM on 09/05/2010
I've attempted to reply to replies I got on this one when I reported that I have great difficulty finding accurate results on Google shopping any more.

To those people -

One said "try another search engine". I have and they are even worse.

A side note is that I said I was using Google Shopping. The reason I do that is because I'm researchin­g pricing and if I use "web" search it's worse by an order of magnitude.

To Jim Accardi who said he was "calling me out on my BS" - I will offer up a search next time one returns some completely outrageous and ridiculous pile of new made in China crap when I'm looking for something specific with appropriat­e search terms.
photo
crydespite
oh go on then
12:07 PM on 09/05/2010
Surely they wouldn't do that - it would be Evil wouldn't it. Oh, wait.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Amishguy
I'm not really Amish.
11:50 AM on 09/05/2010
I have 2 problems with this:

A) Google is a private company. They can do what they want and are 100% within their legal right to serve themselves first. (if thats even what they are doing). Its a company's obligation to make the most profit for their shareholde­rs. Isn't that what they tell us about the Banks, Tobacco companies and others?!

A.5) Sounds like they want REGULATION of a PRIVATE company. That's not very Texas!

B) Judging by everything else that comes out of Texas I find it hard to believe that they have anyone intelligen­t enough to investigat­e anything technical. I'd love to see them explain Google's algorithm in court.

~Amishguy
Rethug.com
photo
drumz
Mind if I do a J?
12:30 PM on 09/05/2010
What they are doing is fraud. Businesses need to be regulated to protect the consumer. That's what government is for.
photo
Eris23Skidoo
Dischordian Keynesian
02:40 PM on 09/05/2010
Is your second point labeled "a.5"? Did I read that right?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
jozie
Is war about who's right or who's left?
10:55 PM on 09/05/2010
I thought that part was rather amusing, along with point B