More

Wolf Killing Set To Expand Despite Endangered Status, Proposal Would Gas Pups In Their Dens

MATTHEW BROWN   09/ 5/10 01:05 PM ET   AP

Wolf Killings Expand

BILLINGS, Mont. — Government agencies are seeking broad new authority to ramp up killings and removals of gray wolves in the Northern Rockies and Great Lakes, despite two recent court actions that restored the animal's endangered status in every state except Alaska and Minnesota.

Various proposals would gas pups in their dens, surgically sterilize adult wolves and allow "conservation" or "research" hunts to drive down the predators' numbers.

Once poisoned to near-extermination in the lower 48 states, wolves made a remarkable comeback over the last two decades under protection of the Endangered Species Act. But as packs continue to multiply their taste for livestock and big game herds coveted by hunters has stoked a rising backlash.

Wildlife officials say that without public wolf hunting, they need greater latitude to eliminate problem packs. Montana and Idaho held inaugural hunts last year but an August court ruling scuttled their plans for 2010.

"As the wolf populations increase, the depredations increase and the number of wolf removals will increase. It's very logical," said Mark Collinge, Idaho director for Wildlife Services, the U.S. Department of Agriculture branch that removes problem wolves, typically by shooting them from aircraft.

"You just have to accept that part of having wolves is having to kill wolves," he said.

But wildlife advocates and animal rights groups contend the response to depredating wolves has become too heavy-handed. They say a string of court decisions in their favor underscores that the species remains at risk.

"The draconian lengths they are poised to take really are a throwback, to when the same agency was gassing wolf pups in their dens almost a century ago and setting poisoned baits and trapping them," said Michael Robinson with the Center for Biological Diversity.

At least 1,700 wolves now roam Idaho, Montana and Wyoming. There are more than 4,000 in Michigan, Wisconsin and Minnesota. New populations are taking hold in Oregon and Washington, and wolves have been sighted in Colorado, Utah and New England.

Some of the most remote wilderness habitats are becoming saturated with the animals. As a result, packs are pushing into agricultural and residential areas where domestic animals offer an easy meal.

One of the more extreme proposals – burying wolf pups in their dens and then poisoning them with carbon monoxide gas – would be used only infrequently, in cases where the rest of the pack had been killed for preying on livestock, officials said.

More established practices, including shooting wolves from the air and ground, would be expanded.

In Montana and Idaho, officials hope to revive hunting seasons by rebranding them as "conservation hunts" or "research hunts." Also, Montana Democrat U.S. Senator Max Baucus wants ranchers to have more freedom to shoot wolves harassing livestock.

A novel, non-lethal approach to wolf control is being considered in Idaho, according to a Department of Agriculture proposal. After being surgically sterilized, pairs of wolves would be radio-collared and released – "to maintain and defend their territory against other wolf packs that might be more likely to prey on livestock."

Killing marauding wolves is nothing new in some parts of their range: In the Northern Rockies, more than 1,400 have been killed by wildlife agents and ranchers since the first 66 wolves were reintroduced to Yellowstone National Park and central Idaho in the mid-1990s.

But Wisconsin and Michigan in the past avoided wolf killings, instead relocating plundering animals or taking defensive measures such as fencing in livestock. Under applications pending with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the states want new authority to remove up to 10 percent of their wolves annually, equal to about 110 wolves a year.

Government statistics back up critics' claims that wolves account for a small proportion of livestock losses caused by predators. They kill fewer sheep and cattle than coyotes, bears, mountain lions or even dogs.

Yet where packs get onto ranchlands, the results can be brutal for both wolves and livestock. That was illustrated in a string of recent cattle killings and reprisals outside the small town of Ennis, Mont.

Since late July, at least six ranches near Ennis have suffered cattle killings by a wolf group known as the Horse Creek pack, which lives at the base of the Gravelly mountains.

Within two weeks of the first calf being killed, wolf specialists with Wildlife Services killed two adult members of the Horse Creek pack in hopes of deterring the others.

One was shot on July 29 and the second on Aug. 6 – just a day after U.S. District Judge Donald Molloy in Missoula, Mont. ordered the region's wolves back onto the endangered species list.

After the attacks continued and several more calves died, state officials on Aug. 12 ordered the entire pack removed. Another calf was found dead on Aug. 13, and two on Aug. 17.

Two more Horse Creek wolves were shot.

On Aug. 18, three more calves turned up dead, bringing the total dead livestock to at least a dozen.

The remaining four members of the pack remained at large late last week. But there was little doubt they would be killed, said Carolyn Sime, Montana's lead wolf biologist

"When we authorize it, we're confident they're going to get it done," she said.

Rancher Jerry Dickinson said the Horse Creek pack killed at least three calves worth a combined $2,400 on the Granger ranch, which he manages.

Their carcasses were found on the Beaverhead National Forest, where the calves had been grazing. Others have disappeared without a trace.

"If they take that pack out, we've bought ourselves maybe two or three years until another pack establishes itself," Dickinson said. "Eventually another bunch of wolves will move in there and we'll get the same problem all over."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

BILLINGS, Mont. — Government agencies are seeking broad new authority to ramp up killings and removals of gray wolves in the Northern Rockies and Great Lakes, despite two recent court actions th...
BILLINGS, Mont. — Government agencies are seeking broad new authority to ramp up killings and removals of gray wolves in the Northern Rockies and Great Lakes, despite two recent court actions th...
Filed by Travis Donovan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 484
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
02:55 AM on 09/14/2010
"Ultimately, this problem lies squarely at the feet of the pro-wolf crowd.' WRONG!!! The problem lies squarely in the fact that private cattle owners use and abuse public lands for profit. All the while destroying OUR public lands and public wildlife. We are witnessing the desertification of the entire west due primarily to public lands grazing. Cattle owners can graze private livestock on public lands (dumping thousands of pounds of feces in our clean water sources) for as little as $1.30 per cow/calf pair per month. Yet humans have to pay as much as $20 per night and have to stay 200 ft away from water sources, all the while dodging cow-pies as we hike. Those lands and the wildlife on them belong to the entire nation and are our great heritage. Why should we allow the beef oligarchy (who made the public lands grazing laws without input from the rest of us) to profit while they destroy our wildlife heritage. Wolves were extirpated for no other purpose than to provide safe grazing on public lands so that a small portion of the population could profit. Does anyone else get to use public lands for private profit??? NO!!! The most important thing anyone can do to stop the slaughter of our wildlife and the destruction of our public lands is to STOP EATING BEEF!!!!! PUBLIC LANDS GRAZING MUST END!!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RockyMissouri
'You must be carefully taught to hate'...
01:42 AM on 09/09/2010
Wolves are essential to herd health..!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RockyMissouri
'You must be carefully taught to hate'...
01:41 AM on 09/09/2010
No need to kill...
05:07 PM on 09/08/2010
We routinely collar wolves to find out where they are. Domestic cattle and sheep might be collared also, to produce a shock to any nearby wolf via his collar. Just a thought. Or maybe the government could reimburse cattle owners for any cattle wolves may kill. They do that in other countries for other predators and I think we pay for that. Why not pay for them here? In the end, unless we control human populations humanely through contraception instead of war, there won't be any room left for wildlife.

“What is man without the beasts? If all the beasts were gone, man would die from a great loneliness of spirit. For whatever happens to the beasts, soon happens to man. All things are connected.”

Chief Seattle
02:40 PM on 09/08/2010
Makes me wonder if the Rancher, Ken Salazar, is behind this?
01:27 PM on 09/08/2010
This is ridiculous. I understand the need to control the population but to just gas the pups is not the right thing to do.
06:40 AM on 09/08/2010
Kill all of the animals, right?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gypsysailor
Things that might have been never were.
10:50 PM on 09/07/2010
Oh boy! Are mama grizzlys from Alaska going to be next? Can we hunt them from an airplane or helicopter?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
omobob
left coast, usa
10:17 PM on 09/07/2010
One thing is certain. If the wolf population is out of control, its because of something done by man.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
judibluiz
Life I love you...all is groovy
07:40 PM on 09/07/2010
We need wolves in Colorado. The elk population in Rocky Mtn. National Park is out of control. They want to pay hunters to come in and thin the population. I think it would make a lot more sense to bring in wolves to thin the herds, and the wolves will keep the elk population strong by culling the weak and sick from the herds. From what I've read the people here are very positive about reintroducing the wolf.
05:10 PM on 09/08/2010
Agree. Fanned. Sport hunters also kill the strong and best breeders, thereby weakening the gene pool
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
judibluiz
Life I love you...all is groovy
04:05 PM on 09/10/2010
Thanks and back at you dd. :)
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
HLL
Women, their rights & nothing less ~ SusanBAnthony
09:31 AM on 09/09/2010
A wonderful idea, per your usual, jude. If we would only permit animals to live their wild areas, protected from us, they would be in perfect balance. It is us, the humans, that are out of balance, so we wreak havoc and cruelty on the Natural world. I wish we would all "wake-up" to the wonder of this Earth and her animals and become caretakers and protectors instead of destroyers ♥ x☮x☮
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:42 PM on 09/09/2010
Amen, friend! Caretakers vs. dominion over the animals -- love vs. fear. When will we ever learn?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
llstudent
Tax churches now!
06:34 PM on 09/07/2010
Ok now that I have read the article about wolves killing the lady in Alaska, Well this has happened before with grizzly bears and others, it is a very rare occasion as the article says and the animal carcasses have not been tested yet, also there are more dog killings of people than from wolves do we eliminate all dogs no, this is just another example of these wolf haters using this story to justify slaughering all of the wolves, and the problem itself stems from people having garbage and feeding these wild animals who come habituated to humans, once again it is human error. .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
llstudent
Tax churches now!
08:59 PM on 09/07/2010
Praetoria, again if you don't care about my so-called opinion why do you keep responding. You can assume anything you want about me. But you still have not responded to any of the facts. Yes the two Bush administrations and especially the Reagan eras, have been the worst on record for wildlife although GHW Bush was not as bad as his son. But yes most of this can be put on the republican side yes you sure like to side with the Bush dynasties, but they are mostly responsible for the loss of wildlife and wild lands being the lovely oil men at any cost that they are. James Watt was one of the worst but in regards to dems vs. repubs it is the lesser of two evils. But no we should not get rid of all people but but hey man cant there be more of a balance, well I guess not if you are a greedy American and macho man from Idaho.
photo
Praetoria Cohors
Pragmatic Libertarian
09:35 PM on 09/07/2010
Are you hiding your comments now? If you address me by name, I feel obligated to respond. Sorry to burst your bubble, but I am not a Republican. I am a Libertarian. But neither has anything to do with the wolf issue, now does it? But for some reason you feel you need to get in a cheap political shot. Why, I don't know, but usually when someone attempts deflection, it is because they are not confident in their own position.

I have been arguing for a proper balance the whole time, I'm glad you finally agree. You have a lot in common with a beta wolf. Why be threatened by "a macho man from Idaho"? You really should stop, it's embarrassing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lark817
expat in Mexico
04:21 PM on 09/07/2010
How very Nazi of them.
photo
fran
painter
02:00 PM on 09/07/2010
This is so sickening I am ashamed of my species
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
HLL
Women, their rights & nothing less ~ SusanBAnthony
11:05 AM on 09/09/2010
F & F ~ Me too sometimes, especially regards how we treat animals ☮
01:18 PM on 09/07/2010
How can they do this, either legally or morally? How about relocation if it actually is a necessity?
photo
Praetoria Cohors
Pragmatic Libertarian
05:18 PM on 09/07/2010
The federal government already relocated them from Canada. Do you want to send them back now? This was the reason so many of us said we didn't want them brought here in the first place. Now Pandora's Box has been opened, and the only ones who are going to suffer, are the wolves. When man tries to second guess mother nature, animals are always the losers in the end.

Ultimately, this problem lies squarely at the feet of the pro-wolf crowd. If they would have left nature to her own devices, this would not even be a possibility.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
dengal
06:13 PM on 09/07/2010
not true - if left to their own devices they would have remained here not have been hunted to almost extinction.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
llstudent
Tax churches now!
06:16 PM on 09/07/2010
OH and you didn't want them there in the first place, because you want to control all of the land, Oh how generous of you. The problem lies squarely at the feet of the people who slaughtered the species to begin with.
01:10 PM on 09/07/2010
To kill these beautiful creatures would be wrong. The wolves were here long before us & when we have arrived and move west we killed them to the point of extinction & know farmers are making an issue about this and they want to hunt them to verge of extinction is wrong.The farmers should find a way to live with the wolves instead.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
HLL
Women, their rights & nothing less ~ SusanBAnthony
11:06 AM on 09/09/2010
Fan #5. Agree ☮