iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama Blasts Bush Tax Cuts, Calls Out John Boehner In Ohio Economic Speech

JULIE PACE and TOM RAUM   09/ 9/10 12:36 AM ET   AP

Obama
President Barack Obama has leveled an unusually direct attack against House Minority Leader John Boehner in the Republican's home state of Ohio.

CLEVELAND — Politically weakened but refusing to bend, President Barack Obama insisted Wednesday that Bush-era tax cuts be cut off for the wealthiest Americans, joining battle with Republicans – and some fellow Democrats – just two months before bruising midterm elections.

Singling out House GOP leader John Boehner in his home state, Obama delivered a searing attack on Republicans for advocating "the same philosophy that led to this mess in the first place: cut more taxes for millionaires and cut more rules for corporations."

Obama rolled out a trio of new plans to help spur job growth and invigorate the sluggish national economic recovery. They would expand and permanently extend a research and development tax credit that lapsed in 2009, allow businesses to write off 100 percent of their investments in equipment and plants through 2011 and pump $50 billion into highway, rail, airport and other infrastructure projects.

The package was assembled by the president's economic team after it became clear that the recovery was running out of steam. There was a political component, too: With Democrats in danger of losing control of the House in November, Obama is under heavy pressure to show voters that he and his party are ready to do more to get the economy moving and get millions of jobless Americans back to work.

However, none of Wednesday's proposals, nor Obama's call for allowing tax rates to rise for the wealthiest Americans, seems likely to be acted on by Congress before the elections, reflecting the battering Obama and congressional Democrats have taken in public opinion polls.

Obama made one of his strongest appeals yet to allow the tax cuts passed under President George W. Bush – in 2001 and 2003 – to expire at the end of the year on schedule, but just for individuals earning more than $200,000 annually or joint filers earning over $250,000. The changes would affect dividend and capital gains rates and various other tax benefits as well as income from wages and salaries.

The president's strategy – pushing for legislation to save some tax cuts but not all – carries its own risks. Since all the tax breaks would expire automatically at the end of the year if Congress failed to act, that could result in sweeping increases for taxpayers at every income level – a major blow to recovery hopes and a colossal dose of blame for voters to parcel out to lawmakers and the White House.

Some influential Democrats, and Obama's own former budget director, Peter Orszag, have suggested a compromise might be necessary – one to temporarily extend all the tax cuts, perhaps for a year or two – given the current election-year animosity between the two parties.

But in his remarks in Cleveland, Obama strongly signaled he wasn't about to sign off on any such deal.

"Let me be clear to Mr. Boehner and everyone else. We should not hold middle class tax cuts hostage any longer," the president said. The administration "is ready this week to give tax cuts to every American making $250,000 or less," he said. It was a slight misstatement of his own position, since the $250,000 would apply to household income. The threshold for individuals would be $200,000

White House officials said Cleveland was picked as the speech site expressly because Boehner, who probably would become House speaker if Republicans take back control of the chamber in November, laid out his party's economic agenda here in a fiery Aug. 24 speech.

At that time, the Ohio Republican called for Obama to fire key economic advisers and to support an extension of all the Bush tax cuts.

Boehner kept up the attack on Wednesday. "If the president is really serious about focusing on jobs, a good start would be taking the advice of his recently departed budget director and freezing all tax rates, coupled with cutting of federal spending to where it was before all the bailouts, government takeovers and `stimulus' spending sprees," he said after Obama spoke.

Earlier, Boehner was even more specific on ABC's "Good Morning America," saying Congress should freeze all tax rates for two years and pare back federal spending to 2008 levels. The deep recession began in December 2007.

White House press secretary Robert Gibbs noted that keeping the Bush tax cuts in effect just for two more years would represent a change from past calls by Boehner to keep them in place permanently.

"My question for him is: Are they abandoning the permanent or are they going with the two-year plan? I've seen him saying permanent so many times that I tend to believe that," Gibbs told reporters aboard Air Force One. "That's his plan and I think that continues to be his plan."

Republicans, and some Democrats, argue that the fragile state of the economy makes this a poor time to raise taxes on anyone – and that increases could stifle wealthier people's appetite for spending.

Obama argued that the rich are more likely to save additional money than spend it. And he said the struggling U.S. economy can't afford to spend $700 billion to keep lower tax rates in place for the nation's highest earners.

That $700 billion is what the nonpartisan congressional Joint Committee on Taxation estimates it would cost the Treasury to continue tax cuts for top earners over 10 years. What Obama wants to do would cost just over $3 trillion over the same period, the panel estimates.

The debate over the Bush tax cuts is an unwelcome one for dozens of vulnerable Democratic incumbents just weeks before Election Day. Already, a handful of Democrats in conservative or swing districts, such as Reps. Gerry Connolly in the northern Virginia suburbs of Washington, D.C., and Bobby Bright in southeastern Alabama, have come out publicly for extending all the cuts – at least temporarily.

Sen. Michael Bennet, D-Colo., engaged in a tight re-election battle, said he "would not support additional spending in a second stimulus package" and that any new initiatives such as Obama's infrastructure package should be paid for with leftover funds in the $814 billion stimulus package passed last year.

Still other embattled Democrats, wary of alienating middle-class voters, are siding with Obama. In central Ohio, for example, Rep. Mary Jo Kilroy has said the tax cuts for higher earners should be repealed but middle-income people should see no tax increases.

Obama acknowledged recovery had slowed noticeably, with unemployment hovering just under 10 percent.

"The middle class is still treading water, while those aspiring to reach the middle class are doing everything they can to keep from drowning," he said.

Polls have shown a steady slippage in Obama's approval ratings and an accompanying rise in Republican prospects for winning House and Senate seats in November. That has chipped away at Obama's leverage to get things done in Congress.

Obama has sought to frame the election as a choice between continuing his policies or reinstating those pursued by Bush. He acknowledged in an interview with ABC after his speech that "if the election is a referendum on are people satisfied about the economy as it currently is, then we're not going to do well, because I think everybody feels like this economy needs to better than it's been doing."

The excerpt was aired Wednesday on ABC's evening news. Fuller portions of the interview were airing Thursday morning on "Good Morning America."

___

Tom Raum reported from Washington. Associated Press writers Stephen Ohlemacher and Erica Werner in Washington contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
CLEVELAND — Politically weakened but refusing to bend, President Barack Obama insisted Wednesday that Bush-era tax cuts be cut off for the wealthiest Americans, joining battle with Republicans &...
CLEVELAND — Politically weakened but refusing to bend, President Barack Obama insisted Wednesday that Bush-era tax cuts be cut off for the wealthiest Americans, joining battle with Republicans &...
Filed by Nick Wing  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 16,834
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (219 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spinns17
TEAMSTER
01:56 PM on 09/12/2010
the tax cuts were nothing but a paycheck for the crooks that put bush in office.wall street thanks them .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Salty 2
08:43 AM on 09/12/2010
It's not about how many jobs were created under the Bush tax cuts, As Obama put it , " it's about lives touched".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spinns17
TEAMSTER
01:58 PM on 09/12/2010
we lost a million jobs under bush two terms .just like planned by wall street
02:45 PM on 09/11/2010
Married people get screwed under current tax law. 250 for households vs 200 for individuals ?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cornel
wuf wuf
12:06 PM on 09/11/2010
Let the rich have their tax cuts, they contribute so much to the US economy : they buy Mercedes, BMW, Rolls, Riva Yachts, and vacation residency in the Caribbeans. I forgot, they also hire a lot of illegal maids and landscapers to maintain their residences here in the US.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spinns17
TEAMSTER
01:58 PM on 09/12/2010
f&f
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FACTISFACT
A war veteran. Finally retired
11:28 AM on 09/11/2010
Well, I cannot agree more that all that the President had said only that I saw some Republicans and the Republicans staunch activists were waiting anxiously for the President to call them and Kiss them, But they were disheartened and the rich billionaires abused them for giving false hope of tax cut extension.

On the contrary, he asked Terry Jones to listen to the good angles instead of the devils who are advising to put the lives of all Americans living at home and abroad in harms way. the Americans living aboard must be told who all sponsored this anti American movement through this mad pastor.
11:13 PM on 09/10/2010
Do you get a tax break for modernizing your factories in China?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:35 PM on 09/10/2010
Here's a thought. Collect all the back taxes from government workers and THEN talk to me about ending the Bush tax cuts for the "wealthy".
02:48 PM on 09/11/2010
But they keep this country going and you should bow down to them. What is it, 41 in Obo's admin owe a total in the millions in back taxes ? Even the dept of labor is headed by someone that benefitted from not paying their fair share.
06:07 AM on 09/12/2010
"back taxes". Huh....? Are you not familiar with Swiss bank accounts? The Cayman
Islands? Bermuda (a rising country that corps. have decided to use for 'corporate head-
quarters)? There is no possible way that the "back taxes from government workers" adds
up to the amount of money that the wealthy and tens of thousands of corporations owe.
So, once again, we have an advocate for the wealthy and major corporations against the
middle class of America.
I love these posts that just regurgitate the typical ignorant rant that some Tea Party
activist wrote for the minions to repeat. No. Do not think for yourself. It is too hard.
Listen to me. The wealthy need more money. The corporations are being taxed out of
business and cannot compete. These posts are so ridiculous that the poster must take
them as something factual or truthful. The truth is that we are currently under the Bush
tax cut strategy. How well is it working for us? Will someone with the ability to articulate
the benefits of the Bush tax cut strategy in clear English please answer this question?

Hear are some sites you may like to visit should you want to know the real numbers or
where the tax cuts and corporate taxes dollars are going; http://www.hrworld.com/features/10-overseas-companies-060408/ or http://www.mlive.com/business/index.ssf/2008/08/most_companies_in_us_avoid_fed.html

Everyone knows how much the wealthy are getting.
02:32 PM on 09/10/2010
The Bush tax cuts were put forth as a stimulus. (In case some have forgotten)

The Bush tax cuts are in place NOW.

What are the Bush tax cuts doing to stimulate the economy NOW?

Any signs of Trickle Down yet???
04:07 PM on 09/10/2010
Oh, I asure you tha the filthy rich 2% has pissed upon US all. BTW, it seems that Bush Jr's stimulus, tax cuts for his rich buddies, was for Asia, not for US.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:45 PM on 09/10/2010
$250K is "filthy rich" now? Wonder if you'll feel that way when YOUR salary suddenly is the new definition of rich?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
charles116
05:53 PM on 09/10/2010
Do John McCain's pants count?
01:49 PM on 09/10/2010
TODAY’S REPUBLICANISM.....IS THE VICTORY OF THE "ID" OVER THE "SUPER EGO"

Today's Republicans don't believe that intelligence, logic, compassion or an appreciation or acknowledgment of historical facts or legal precedents are relevant or worthy of consideration.

Driving jobs out of America and Americans out of their homes is "just business" to them; nothing "personal".

Corporations should be given the same first amendment free speech rights as individual citizens so they can "buy" political candidates and elections, despite the fact that works against the best interests of working class Americans and further diminishes their political relevance/influence.

Pollution, global warming and deforestation are all improvable "myths" of egg-head/tree-hugger scientists who are “socialist” enemies of “over-regulated” capitalism. The earth, which right wing evangelical extremists claim is only 6,000 years old, will miraculously heal itself! All we have to do is “pray”.

For today's mercenary self-focused deviant breed of dysfunctional near-sighted Republicans, it's not about right or wrong, good or bad, fair or unfair, rational or irrational.....it's about power and control, even if that means intellectual, moral, psychological and functional delusion, denial and dishonesty. They want what they want for no other reason than they WANT it……regardless of the consequences to themselves and everyone else! Somehow, that makes "them" feel good about themselves…..makes them feel safe?
04:01 PM on 09/10/2010
Good points. Faved and fanned.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bluegrass10126
04:40 PM on 09/10/2010
Good one. Fanned
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gustavo Rejivik
01:46 PM on 09/10/2010
Obama's being immature calling out Boehner by name. While Bush had his faults you'd be hard pressed to find any quote where he criticized any other individual congressperson by name. This tone is not what Obama promised and disrespects the Oval Office.

I agree with this overly-tan-guy .. let's go back to 2008 spending levels ...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
charles116
05:54 PM on 09/10/2010
I think it's WAAAAAAAAAAAY past time to be naming names.
06:28 AM on 09/12/2010
...and then what?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:16 PM on 09/10/2010
Tax the rich, tax the he$$ out of them, how much does it take to live a happy life!!!!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:47 PM on 09/10/2010
Since the Constitution calls for laws to be equally applied, the rich should not have to pay a higher percentage than anyone else.
06:33 AM on 09/12/2010
So then I suppose %52 of the tax cuts did not go to two percent or 1.4 million
Americans. Would you be upset and using the Constitution about that? Nah.
Thatn nere is a good plan.
03:07 PM on 09/11/2010
Let them determine what makes them happy and you can determine what makes you happy. I would like to know why liberals need a tax increase if they think gov should get more of their money, they are free to donate. It's funny to hear Bill Clinton say they he did not ask or need a tax cut after making 50 million on speechs yet when he came into office he had to revise his taxes because he wrote off everything but the kitchen sink to reduce his tax bill. He even took a credit for $7 for each pair of used underwear he donated to goodwill. The Clintons also dumped millions into a foundation which they did not have to pay taxes on.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:38 AM on 09/10/2010
I thought that Bush's tax cuts were only for the rich? You mean people making UNDER $250K were getting a tax cut too?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:48 PM on 09/10/2010
Funny how the libs overlook that point; ...on purpose.
03:08 PM on 09/11/2010
We were told that for years, now it turns out the rest got them also.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:15 PM on 09/09/2010
There are 1.7 million USA households making over $250,000. They earn 17.5% of the gross household income of $7.9 trillion (total GDP is $14.52 trillion). Households making over $250,000 earn a total of $1.4 trillion income. Increasing their taxes by 5% gives you and increase of $70 billion/year. How does this cover any of the increased spending? (sources CIA world fact book, IRS, Dept of Commerce, and Census Dept)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Janetshusb
12:01 AM on 09/10/2010
So you're saying because the $70B doesn't cover all of the increased spending people that earn over $250,000 should continue to enjoy their limited time gift from Bush even though the rest of the country is hurting. Very public spirited of you and your friends that earn such a satisfying amount.

Interesting, when Democrats talk about spending $70B the rich scream like stuck pigs about going into debt. But the reply when asking them to help out during hard times is that $70B is such a piddly amount it wouldn't do any good so the rich should just keep it for themselves.

I've got news for you; those that worship the twin gods of Cupidity and Misanthropy are the same people that came up with the sophistry that ending a time limited tax break is the same as a tax increase. What's really happening is that 8 years of free money is coming to an end. And,oh the whining!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:12 PM on 09/10/2010
"What's really happening is that 8 years of free money is coming to an end."

Hi, Janetshusb; it has been awhile.

(1) If someone earns the money, it isn't free money.
(2) If the government cuts taxes, and lets people keep more of their earned money, it is a tax cut.
(3) If the government lets taxes go up and takes more of peoples earned money, it is a tax increase.
08:50 AM on 09/10/2010
Why would it still not be a good idea to let them expire?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:39 AM on 09/10/2010
Because government steals then wastes enough of my money.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:55 PM on 09/10/2010
We will need to let them expire, but they do not provide enough money. Bush and Obama increased spending by almost $2 trillion. The tax on those over $200K is only $0.07 trillion. The money will need to come from someone. If you repeal all the Bush cuts it provides $0.3 trillion. So, how will we close the gap? It will require more taxes and cuts.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
HST
Conservatism = selfishness
11:05 PM on 09/09/2010
CHART OF THE DAY: It's Official: Obama Is Creaming Bush When It Comes To Jobs
http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-jobs-lost-in-the-bush-and-obama-administration-2010-2#ixzz0z5ffAqFN

"The 2001 and 2003 tax cuts added about $1.7 trillion to deficits between 2001 and 2008. Because they (were) financed by borrowing — which increases the national debt — this figure includes the extra interest costs resulting from that additional debt."
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2009/jun/24/paul-krugman/bush-tax-cuts-health-care-probably/
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
firefly echo
sister outsider
09:06 PM on 09/09/2010
The notion that rich, pampered elite will denounce their collective citizenships to pack it all up and move to some tax-easy country that doesn't have the power grid to support a household laptop is ridiculous.

The idea that the world's greediest capitalists will give up the opportunity to do business in the biggest and most ravenous consumer based economy in the world is insipid.

The remaining threat is that they will abandon this country for an industrialized, educated country that will charge them much more in taxes than we ever would dare. This also makes absolutely no sense.

Roll back the cuts. They only benefit the needless recipients, and even then, only until this country becomes the third world nation the recipients are presently avoiding. The only thing standing in the way is the politicians. Everyone should be phone treeing right now.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:16 PM on 09/09/2010
There are 1.7 million households making over $250,000. They earn 17.5% of the gross household income of $7.9 trillion (total GDP is $14.52 trillion). Households making over $250,000 earn a total of $1.4 trillion income. Increasing their taxes by 5% gives you and increase of $70 billion/year.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:18 PM on 09/09/2010
Better yet, repeal all the tax cuts on household income, it adds $300 billion in increased revenues. Those in the lowest bracket would increase 50% from 10% to 15%. But, still it does not come close to the increased spending?