More

Sebelius To Health Insurers: Stop Lying About Your Rate Increases

RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR   09/10/10 12:07 AM ET   AP

Sebelius Rate Hikes

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama's top health official on Thursday warned the insurance industry that the administration won't tolerate blaming premium hikes on the new health overhaul law.

"There will be zero tolerance for this type of misinformation and unjustified rate increases," Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said in a letter to the insurance lobby.

"Simply stated, we will not stand idly by as insurers blame their premium hikes and increased profits on the requirement that they provide consumers with basic protections," Sebelius said. She warned that bad actors may be excluded from new health insurance markets that will open in 2014 under the law. They'd lose out on a big pool of customers, as many as 30 million people nationwide.

The letter to America's Health Insurance Plans was the latest volley in a war of words over who gets the blame for rising premiums. Polls show that many people expect their costs to go up as a result of the law, but there's also widespread mistrust of the insurance industry.

An HHS official said the letter is a pre-emptive move, after the department learned that several smaller carriers around the country are blaming the new law for rate increases this year.

The industry's top lobbyist responded that the health care law is a factor behind higher rates, but not the only one.

"Health insurance premiums are increasing because of soaring prices for medical services, the impact of younger and healthier people dropping their insurance during the weak economy, and additional benefits required under the new law," said Karen Ignagni, president of the insurers' trade group. "It's a basic law of economics that additional benefits incur additional costs."

Sebelius asked Ignagni to help stop "misinformation and scare tactics."

Although the law's big expansion of coverage under the law won't take place until 2014, several new benefits go into effect starting later this month. Lifetime dollar caps on coverage are abolished, and plans must allow parents to keep their children on the policy up to age 26. Many plans will also have to guarantee coverage for children regardless of a medical condition, and provide preventive care with no cost-sharing for the patient.

The administration estimates that those new benefits will raise premiums by no more than 1 to 2 percent. Major benefit consulting companies say the impact will be in the single digits, although it may vary considerably from plan to plan.

"Health plans will continue to do everything they can to incorporate all of these new benefits while keeping health care coverage as affordable as possible for families and employers," Ignagni said.

Unpredictable premium hikes are a constant worry for small businesses and people who buy coverage directly. Employees of large companies are generally shielded from big rate swings from year to year, although their costs also creep up.

Obama used premium hikes to his advantage earlier this year in the final push to get health care overhaul legislation through Congress.

After Anthem Blue Cross sought an increase of as much as 39 percent for some of its California customers who purchase coverage directly, the president made the company into a poster child for insurance problems. California regulators recently approved an increase averaging 14 percent for Anthem customers.

Analysts say the industry is generally in good financial condition this year, and that may help to keep premiums in check.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama's top health official on Thursday warned the insurance industry that the administration won't tolerate blaming premium hikes on the new health overhaul law. ...
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama's top health official on Thursday warned the insurance industry that the administration won't tolerate blaming premium hikes on the new health overhaul law. ...
Filed by Jeff Muskus  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,284
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (20 total)
  1 of 6  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
Trustandalwaysverify 01:25 AM on 09/10/2010
I ve tried to post my answer and does not let me.... so I will try it here....

Do your own research you will learn a lot, specially if you use 1099's  

"he 1099 changes attached to the health care reform bill are another kettle of fish. These massively expand the requirements for filing the "1099-Misc" form, which companies use for recording payments to freelance workers and other  Read More...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ultrabop
the beat goes on...
08:28 AM on 09/14/2010
Eventually the health care insurance industry is going down and those people are going to have to find real jobs that involve producing something, not just pushing paper around to make people miserable.

So why not now?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ipolitics123
What an excellent day for an exorcism.
09:46 PM on 09/13/2010
I guess if we don't stop "lying" about rate increases, we'll need some "reeducation" from Auntie Sebilius: http://hotair.com/archives/2010/08/31/sebelius-whos-up-for-some-reeducation/

This woman is a nightmare. What's next?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dave Thinkster Paulson
A concerned American moderate
12:00 PM on 09/14/2010
Nightmare or not, what she said is true.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ipolitics123
What an excellent day for an exorcism.
09:37 PM on 09/13/2010
Health care costs are going up for at least three reasons. Please note that none of these reasons involve evil insurance companies:

1) We are all getting older. Older people need more care.
2) There are more of us every year. More people means more health care.
3) Every year new health care is created. New drugs, surgeries, cures, techniques, etc. are constantly being invented. Shockingly, the people and companies that invent this stuff would like to be paid something for their work.

So, if you want to pay the same insurance rates you did fifty years ago, I suggest you drop your children down a well, get fifty years younger, and never ask for Lasik, an artificial hip, or any kind of cancer cure, because none of those things existed fifty years ago.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dave Thinkster Paulson
A concerned American moderate
11:59 AM on 09/14/2010
Congrats on a dangerous oversimplification of the healthcare issue. True, we are getting older, there are more people and there’s new technology, but to claim that these are the only factors driving the escalation in healthcare costs is beyond naïve. You might want to consider a few addition items before advising that people “drop their children down a well.”

One issue you neglected to mention that actually goes along with your others is that we’re also living longer. But even with that factor, you still haven’t explained the rising costs of healthcare. Probably the most significant factor is that our fee-for-service system promotes the consumption of significant levels of unneeded or marginal services. This factor is behind the fact that while we trail most other OECD nations in most healthcare metrics while spending twice as much on healthcare — 17% of GDP.

Other factors include our lack of preventative care, adult obesity — now affecting 34% of Americans and driving up chronic care costs which amount to 75% of all healthcare costs, inadequate medical records and high administration costs, and insurer profits. The profits of the major insurers have risen 250% in the last decade and hit new records earlier this year.

And while you’re at it, you might also want to drop the “pay the same rates as you did 50 years ago” hyperbole. The fact is that average rates have increased by 131% since 1999.
photo
Mover
Father, Husband, Ret 1SG
02:47 PM on 09/13/2010
This is simply more of what we've become used to from the Obama administration, i.e., trying to control the narrative. They know their policies are going to cause problems for one segment of society or another, and they try to intimidate the naysayers into being quiet about it.

In this case, insurance companies are doing what they always do: Pass on the costs of doing business to the customer. HCR has increased their costs, or soon will, so they, like any responsible business person will raise their rates. It's only common sense.

I have no doubt that the Whitehouse doesn't like the idea of the cost increases coming this soon, but they knew the cost would go up. They said as much.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Doug Watt
Not ready for 2012
05:00 PM on 09/13/2010
The problem with your point is that the new law hasn't affected the insurance companies yet, only a few hundred people have been able to take advantage of the new rules.

The insurance companies aren't passing on any new cost of business, they're reporting the highest profits ever. The new increases are a shot across the administration's bow.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blueken
Finger Picking blues man
10:00 AM on 09/13/2010
I read that United Health Care in Calif was fined for cooking the books in order to get around a state law that says a health care insurance company can't charge more than 30% of payouts for administration. Excuse me, but a 30% handling charge isn't enough? What do they want, 50%? For those of you who don't understand what I just said, United Health Care is trying to get more than $.30 for every $1.00 it spends on the health care. Is it just me, or does that seem like a lot of money, when the only real thing United Health Care does, is pay bills? This is part and parcel to why our present system is no more than a cancer on our economy. Even though health care has become 17% of our GDP, it will never be enough, they will always want more.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ipolitics123
What an excellent day for an exorcism.
09:02 PM on 09/13/2010
Link please! Link. Link?

Crickets.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blueken
Finger Picking blues man
08:59 AM on 09/14/2010
Sorry it took so long to get back to you with link, didn't see your post until the AM. Stop with the crickets.

http://www.calphys.org/html/cc602.asp
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheCarCzarsPage
11:09 PM on 09/12/2010
You reap what you sow.
iridium53
Semper Fi
12:18 PM on 09/12/2010
Sebelius is almost as worthless as Schapiro at the SEC.

Democrats, under the "leadership" of Mr. Compromise, Obama, created a law that enforces taking money from taxpayers, and guarantees profits for largely unregulated healthcare insurance companies.

It was a scam.

And, the ineffective Sebelius is now complaining that she cannot actually control those insurance companies.

What will be left of all this will be the guaranteed profits for the companies, and the burden on the average American to pay their grossly high profits.

And, this is the grand play by Mr. Compromise, Obama the Compromiser.

You know, I used to just turn off the TV when Bush came on, because he disgusted me.
I now find myself doing the same thing with Obama. I now KNOW the words coming out of his mouth are just not the truth.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
emeraldcite
tongue planted firmly in cheek...always
07:48 PM on 09/11/2010
Rate increases are only justifiable when their net result maintain current profit levels.

If a rate increase leads to immediate profit boosts, then the increase wasn't necessary to cover new costs.

If they raise the costs, the at least they should be honest that it's only a move to score profit for investors.

I'd rather have a "death panel" in charge rather than have my health in the hands of profiteers. At least the "death panels" in Congress fear my vote.
photo
Mover
Father, Husband, Ret 1SG
02:53 PM on 09/13/2010
Rate increases are only justifiable when they anticipate imminent cost increases. That is what you see happening now.
03:16 PM on 09/11/2010
I bet the timing of this really ticks off the Dems. I kindof predicted that this would happen, but they had to know that requiring health insurance companies to cover more subsets of people THAN PREVIOUSLY REQUIRED would result in rate increases. November is going to be rough.
04:18 AM on 09/11/2010
This is just amazing. The administration is whining about rates going up because they are requiring insurers to cover pre-existing conditions, as well as children up to age 26. How could you NOT expect rates to rise? They come up with these overly optimistic estimates of "rates should only rise 1-2%" when they know darn well that is probably not realistic.
04:26 AM on 09/11/2010
Well if we eliminated obscene overcharging by docs & hospitals and eliminated parasitic insurance companies the costs would go (gasp) DOWN. Shocking I know.
WWJNPHF?
Who Would Jesus Not Provide Healthcare For?:
http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=473841080930
04:45 AM on 09/11/2010
"overcharging by docs and hospitals". Seriously? So, how much do you think it costs to run a hospital? Pay doctors? I think it would be safe to say that most docs aren't going to work for free. Heck, if we start getting too cheap on them, the doctor supply may decline a bit.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Bumpkins
08:21 AM on 09/11/2010
Now...it is overcharging by.....the Doctors?    Let us allow barbers to perform medical procedures.......like in the good old days......now that saves money.........I would like to be treated by someone in the know....with the best equipment available.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
MJinCanada
Safe from zombies until my 2nd cup of coffee
12:44 PM on 09/11/2010
The young people being covered are, what, 5 or 6% of the population? And they will be generally healthy except for the occasional flu bug or accident. The majority of those young people will place very little demand on the system.

Most people with pre-existing conditions won't need expensive treatment either, considering that being raped or having a non-cancerous mole removed or having a congenital heart murmur can get you crossed off the list for coverage. It's like denying you car insurance if you've ever had a flat tire. Are you at greater risk for an accident thereafter? Who knows, but let's say no anyway.
02:17 AM on 09/11/2010
WWJDHCCT?
Who Would Jesus Deny Health Care Coverage To?
http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=473841080930
photo
proudem
does not suffer fools gladly
02:20 PM on 09/11/2010
How many times are you going to post that same stupid drivel and using Jesus and facebook as your source??!! Really?? Dude, try reading a book...
01:49 AM on 09/11/2010
Kathleen Sebelius is the sexiest woman alive! Or is that Carol Browner?
photo
rbchilds
Independent with Open Eyes
11:18 AM on 09/11/2010
Visit an Optometrist quickly.
photo
proudem
does not suffer fools gladly
02:23 PM on 09/11/2010
What?! Who cares. Try posting something with substance, while at the same time not using "facebook," "wikipedia," or the "bible" as your source. Maybe you can eventually (after studying extensively) even give an original thought.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Actongue
12:06 AM on 09/11/2010
mark19992000 2 hours ago (9:45 PM) Said

"The $500 billion cut reduced the amount of the reimbursement rate. It's a decrease of 21% from 2009. The rate medicare pays doesn't even cover the costs of medical care so doctors have to limit the amount of medicare patients they can see and the Mayo Clinic in WI and MN have quit taking medicare patients at all.
You've got to stop thinking that everything the left says is unconditionally true and everything a republican says is an outright lie. Because that's the way a typical brainwashed person would think...one sided. "

The problem with your statement is that you are the one believing that the Republicans tell the truth and you have been brainwashed by them The republicans have lied from the onset((and before when it comes to Single payer systems)

It is because of Republicans (all but one in the house) that Doctors are not getting reimbursed and paid for their services
http://www.texmed.org/Template.aspx?id=8199
House Passes SGR Fix Bill; Burgess Is Lone Republican to Vote “AYE”

Unfortunately, Capitol Hill partisan politics is complicating what already is a terribly complicated problem of health system reform. Rep. Michael Burgess, MD (R-Lewisville), was the only Republican to vote for HR 3961.

The companion bill in the Senate failed because Republicans voted no across the board.

Then we have the Medicare D issue which republicans wrote and made it impossible to negotiate lower prices with drug companies.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Appleblossom
12:18 AM on 09/11/2010
I am still mad about that last bit.
photo
proudem
does not suffer fools gladly
02:24 PM on 09/11/2010
I don't know how that got passed. I mean, I know how but I am still amazed that it was allowed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mlm4420
Liberal progressive
09:47 PM on 09/10/2010
I agree with Kathleen Sebelius, but shouldn't we also have a watch dog for the hospitals? Why is it that hospitals can charge $7 for an aspirin, $1500 for x-rays, $3500 for an MRI, etc? No wonder an illness can bankrupt a family.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
taquinas
11:51 PM on 09/10/2010
That aspect has been left to the might of capitalism, for now. Must breakup chain hospitals next.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Appleblossom
12:11 AM on 09/11/2010
Because not every patient can pay in full the day they show up. Nor does every hospital get their checks from the insurance company on time.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:58 PM on 09/10/2010
the actions of the health care insurance prove that the single payer option should have been implemented, too many of my friends died in pain because pain relief is a "luxury".